Excuse me, lauda
As I have said before, I have improved the quality of my post, so today I am here and want you to rethink the quality of my post. I believe it's really good, and I hope you too. Most importantly, I expect you to remove my name in the blacklist.
Thank you!
Regards
Pau
Topic: [SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version) - page 10. (Read 100672 times)
Why am i on the list? I never even enrolled in any of you guys's campaigns.
Of course you didn't. The Earth also never revolves around the Sun either. You were added by yahoo to his list, and therefore also to SMAS. I highly doubt that yahoo could remember every individual case of any member. A brief review of your post history pretty much confirms your placement on it.
Why am i on the list? I never even enrolled in any of you guys's campaigns.
Of course you didn't. The Earth also never revolves around the Sun either. You were added by yahoo to his list, and therefore also to SMAS. I highly doubt that yahoo could remember every individual case of any member. A brief review of your post history pretty much confirms your placement on it.
Why am i on the list? I never even enrolled in any of you guys's campaigns.
Updated SMAS using the latest lists from Lauda and Yahoo.
Thanks for evaluating my posts. Most posts you quoted seem to be subjectively in-understandable to you rather than being an objectively spammy post.
Not sure why you had to comment this despite not having given a negative feedback to the user; it's also not as necessary since Vod did give him a negative previously.
My negative doesn't matter and I believe accounts should be tagged for each instance of misuse as some argue "That was over a year ago and some dumb people gave me negative even though I didn't know about it" or the "no-collateral loan" negative is removed after a certain period of time by most DT members.
Should be in a private message.
Sure but nearly everyone does post "updates" on the sales thread.
Yes, you're quoting bad English. However, this post does not accomplish anything and barely contributes anything to the thread (that already had 100 replies, mind you). It's pointless to berate someone for misusing a term and saying that they don't know the meaning behind it and then not explain it yourself. How difficult would it be to insert a little snippet: "provably fair means that ______________" in case anybody did want to know? (which they do not since the thread would just be jam-packed with spam)
The post he quotes does have the probably fair term explained, I didn't find it worth to include it again and just pointed out his mistake. And as far as I know, replying to the last few posts as long as it is related to the topic at hand is fine. As for "100 replies before you", last I checked(unanimous unspoken opinions) posting in those type of threads is considered spam only if you do it multiple times, you re-frame the same opinion/argument everytime, the thread has gone past 20-30 pages and you are posting an opinion similar to what most users have posted.
Hey there, you, yes you. Nobody gives a shit about you too
? What's with this purely berating post?
You can have a look at the thread to see why one would answer in that manner.
Google "999dice scam" or view the linked scam accusation thread in this topic , it has been known as a scam site for ages now
I'm not sure what your reply is supposed to do, exactly. JackpotRacer asks a question and then you respond with a scam casino. It's unclear.
Yeah I guess that was either a wrong post I quoted or a bad way of putting it, what I meant to say was how dice sites could claim to be probably fair and scam(ex: 999dice). The thread was about someone recently discovering 999dice is a scam though.
This is fine but I would usually prefer more explanation (again, it would be useful to provide more detail; seen as OP was confused)
Perhaps a bad way of putting it but I felt it was adequate at the time.
? Is this really useful?
Opinion on a speculation thread, I think its alright.
Someone from DT should tag him for this even if this was a joke/troll post, seeing that his only other negative comes from a no-collateral loan. I'm pretty sure there is no need for anyone else to explain why this is something that warrants a neg.
Not sure why you had to comment this despite not having given a negative feedback to the user; it's also not as necessary since Vod did give him a negative previously.
Hey again. Sorry but I was inactive for a few days and when I got back to your PM I found the file link was expired, could you resend it after reuploading it?
Should be in a private message.
That depends on how we think on it .,Yes it probably fair random but it is in their system even they say propably fair it doesn't mean its fair its just like sweet words to attract to catch up our mind .Then if its probably fair 50-50% chance on my own understanding . If i am a the owner o a gambling house even i say that its probably fair it doesnt mean how it is as i said. I don't need to elaborate but the point there is you must be a responsible gambler.
Christ.... please don't use such terminology, i.e "provably fair" actually, if you don't know the meaning behind it or how it actually works.Yes, you're quoting bad English. However, this post does not accomplish anything and barely contributes anything to the thread (that already had 100 replies, mind you). It's pointless to berate someone for misusing a term and saying that they don't know the meaning behind it and then not explain it yourself. How difficult would it be to insert a little snippet: "provably fair means that ______________" in case anybody did want to know? (which they do not since the thread would just be jam-packed with spam)
I dont give f'''$$ k about mining blocks or any techinical Bs. I payed real money. Money does not come from the air. Its their problem to solve that.
at least there should be option to take back transfer.
you shut up with your story...i dont have time to listen this nice storiez. I trusted blockchain as tgey are big company. Someone nedd to give answers i put alot money into this my fcking money is stuckked. They are thiefes.
This guy thinks others will listen to his nonsense and offer some way to help. Oh the hilarity.at least there should be option to take back transfer.
you shut up with your story...i dont have time to listen this nice storiez. I trusted blockchain as tgey are big company. Someone nedd to give answers i put alot money into this my fcking money is stuckked. They are thiefes.
Hey there, you, yes you. Nobody gives a shit about you too
? What's with this purely berating post?
Code:
Quote from: JackpotRacer on February 22, 2017, 11:24:22 AM
are you an expert of provably fair option? would be able to tell if a site/game is provably fair?
I'm not sure what your reply is supposed to do, exactly. JackpotRacer asks a question and then you respond with a scam casino. It's unclear.
The price of Bitcoin changes from time to time you know.
This is fine but I would usually prefer more explanation (again, it would be useful to provide more detail; seen as OP was confused)
Finally people can buy it again, the price should just go back to under 900 IMO.
? Is this really useful?
Did I say you were wrong? No, I said you were critical, nothing is wrong with being critical, I'm just expressing my right to say whatever I want on the forum
quite critical from a guy who has most of his posts in the off topic section...
Quite the ad-hominem you've got there. Except, it's interesting to note that despite being the board that I have the most posts in, it encompasses 11.65% of my total posts, seconded by Gambling and Meta (which are less than ten posts off from overtaking first place).
You'll find that I haven't posted in Off-topic once in my latest 778 posts (including this one) and the most recent reply from that board was back on June 27th of last year. Here, I'll link it for you: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15388169
It's a pretty shitty post, I can admit that. And you'll find - if you decide to peruse my post history - that I stop from replying to such spam megathreads.
Ignoring the fact that it doesn't matter how many posts I have in off-topic, can you seriously tell me where I went wrong in my analysis here and why it's wrong for me to be critical of others? Sure, in the past I have posted a large number of replies in Off-topic (and I still occasionally post in Games & Rounds when the odd promotion or giveaway arises) but that doesn't make my points any less true. Having lots of posts in off-topic doesn't make for being a spammer. Likewise, having a lot of posts in Technical Support does not make you a Bitcoin expert. What if you were posting on "my confirmation is unconfirmed!!!" threads the whole time?
I think that your point is invalid.
Did I say you were wrong? No, I said you were critical, nothing is wrong with being critical, I'm just expressing my right to say whatever I want on the forum
The tone implies cynicism.
I'm happy if someone takes the time to evaluate my post quality.
You said over a year ago, yes? I'll go back 6 months.
this is a discussion about my post quality since more than an year or so, not my potential activity(a result of my infrequent post timing)
(the occasional posts are also not too constructive, but I will not go into those deeply) {i would think that the further back you go, the worse the quality is [and i did not wish to waste too much of my time] so i halved the timeframe}
Someone from DT should tag him for this even if this was a joke/troll post, seeing that his only other negative comes from a no-collateral loan. I'm pretty sure there is no need for anyone else to explain why this is something that warrants a neg.
Not sure why you had to comment this despite not having given a negative feedback to the user; it's also not as necessary since Vod did give him a negative previously.
Hey again. Sorry but I was inactive for a few days and when I got back to your PM I found the file link was expired, could you resend it after reuploading it?
Should be in a private message.
That depends on how we think on it .,Yes it probably fair random but it is in their system even they say propably fair it doesn't mean its fair its just like sweet words to attract to catch up our mind .Then if its probably fair 50-50% chance on my own understanding . If i am a the owner o a gambling house even i say that its probably fair it doesnt mean how it is as i said. I don't need to elaborate but the point there is you must be a responsible gambler.
Christ.... please don't use such terminology, i.e "provably fair" actually, if you don't know the meaning behind it or how it actually works.Yes, you're quoting bad English. However, this post does not accomplish anything and barely contributes anything to the thread (that already had 100 replies, mind you). It's pointless to berate someone for misusing a term and saying that they don't know the meaning behind it and then not explain it yourself. How difficult would it be to insert a little snippet: "provably fair means that ______________" in case anybody did want to know? (which they do not since the thread would just be jam-packed with spam)
I dont give f'''$$ k about mining blocks or any techinical Bs. I payed real money. Money does not come from the air. Its their problem to solve that.
at least there should be option to take back transfer.
you shut up with your story...i dont have time to listen this nice storiez. I trusted blockchain as tgey are big company. Someone nedd to give answers i put alot money into this my fcking money is stuckked. They are thiefes.
This guy thinks others will listen to his nonsense and offer some way to help. Oh the hilarity.at least there should be option to take back transfer.
you shut up with your story...i dont have time to listen this nice storiez. I trusted blockchain as tgey are big company. Someone nedd to give answers i put alot money into this my fcking money is stuckked. They are thiefes.
Hey there, you, yes you. Nobody gives a shit about you too
? What's with this purely berating post?
Code:
Quote from: JackpotRacer on February 22, 2017, 11:24:22 AM
are you an expert of provably fair option? would be able to tell if a site/game is provably fair?
I'm not sure what your reply is supposed to do, exactly. JackpotRacer asks a question and then you respond with a scam casino. It's unclear.
Interested for the job. Might be a good idea to have a look at the participants' post history first, instead of selecting a random guy.
This could be in a private message.
The price of Bitcoin changes from time to time you know.
This is fine but I would usually prefer more explanation (again, it would be useful to provide more detail; seen as OP was confused)
Finally people can buy it again, the price should just go back to under 900 IMO.
? Is this really useful?
Overall, your quality isn't that bad. It may comprise of one-liners, but I found them to be sufficient enough to be somewhat constructive. Given the fact that I had to actively seek out unconstructive posts, I would not consider you a spammer.
And in the context of burst posting, plenty of people may do that with consecutive posts though I've found that you have had gaps between sequences, unlike other offenders.
I'm happy if someone takes the time to evaluate my post quality.
You said over a year ago, yes? I'll go back 6 months.
this is a discussion about my post quality since more than an year or so, not my potential activity(a result of my infrequent post timing)
(the occasional posts are also not too constructive, but I will not go into those deeply) {i would think that the further back you go, the worse the quality is [and i did not wish to waste too much of my time] so i halved the timeframe}
Someone from DT should tag him for this even if this was a joke/troll post, seeing that his only other negative comes from a no-collateral loan. I'm pretty sure there is no need for anyone else to explain why this is something that warrants a neg.
Not sure why you had to comment this despite not having given a negative feedback to the user; it's also not as necessary since Vod did give him a negative previously.
Hey again. Sorry but I was inactive for a few days and when I got back to your PM I found the file link was expired, could you resend it after reuploading it?
Should be in a private message.
That depends on how we think on it .,Yes it probably fair random but it is in their system even they say propably fair it doesn't mean its fair its just like sweet words to attract to catch up our mind .Then if its probably fair 50-50% chance on my own understanding . If i am a the owner o a gambling house even i say that its probably fair it doesnt mean how it is as i said. I don't need to elaborate but the point there is you must be a responsible gambler.
Christ.... please don't use such terminology, i.e "provably fair" actually, if you don't know the meaning behind it or how it actually works.Yes, you're quoting bad English. However, this post does not accomplish anything and barely contributes anything to the thread (that already had 100 replies, mind you). It's pointless to berate someone for misusing a term and saying that they don't know the meaning behind it and then not explain it yourself. How difficult would it be to insert a little snippet: "provably fair means that ______________" in case anybody did want to know? (which they do not since the thread would just be jam-packed with spam)
I dont give f'''$$ k about mining blocks or any techinical Bs. I payed real money. Money does not come from the air. Its their problem to solve that.
at least there should be option to take back transfer.
you shut up with your story...i dont have time to listen this nice storiez. I trusted blockchain as tgey are big company. Someone nedd to give answers i put alot money into this my fcking money is stuckked. They are thiefes.
This guy thinks others will listen to his nonsense and offer some way to help. Oh the hilarity.at least there should be option to take back transfer.
you shut up with your story...i dont have time to listen this nice storiez. I trusted blockchain as tgey are big company. Someone nedd to give answers i put alot money into this my fcking money is stuckked. They are thiefes.
Hey there, you, yes you. Nobody gives a shit about you too
? What's with this purely berating post?
Code:
Quote from: JackpotRacer on February 22, 2017, 11:24:22 AM
are you an expert of provably fair option? would be able to tell if a site/game is provably fair?
I'm not sure what your reply is supposed to do, exactly. JackpotRacer asks a question and then you respond with a scam casino. It's unclear.
Interested for the job. Might be a good idea to have a look at the participants' post history first, instead of selecting a random guy.
This could be in a private message.
The price of Bitcoin changes from time to time you know.
This is fine but I would usually prefer more explanation (again, it would be useful to provide more detail; seen as OP was confused)
Finally people can buy it again, the price should just go back to under 900 IMO.
? Is this really useful?
Overall, your quality isn't that bad. It may comprise of one-liners, but I found them to be sufficient enough to be somewhat constructive. Given the fact that I had to actively seek out unconstructive posts, I would not consider you a spammer.
And in the context of burst posting, plenty of people may do that with consecutive posts though I've found that you have had gaps between sequences, unlike other offenders.
Wouldn't be surprised if I was added in the ban list having a look at my burst posts, but I do hope I don't get banned.
What's with the 180 degree turn from 'wouldn't be surprised' to 'surprised'? Posting in this thread is really pointless and won't get your case handled more quickly. If anything, you are likely going to get pushed back to the end of the queue. Wouldn't be surprised if I was added in the ban list having a look at my burst posts, but I do hope I don't get banned.
Posting in this thread is really pointless and won't get your case handled more quickly. If anything, you are likely going to get pushed back to the end of the queue. I'm sure someone can analyze it if they have time to waste. You won't like the results though.
I'm happy if someone takes the time to evaluate my post quality.tl;dr Last post was a mistake, please go through what you usually do when reevaluating participants in the ban list and if possible clarify if I was indeed added to the list because of my inactivity as being called a spammer when I was simply MIA bugs me a bit.
Im a bitcoin early investor
And I am Bill Gates.and posting here while getting some coins helps the bitcoin economy
It may well help the Bitcoin economy. However, it doesn't help this (already spammer infested) forum.Regardless, if you believe these users deserve the coins so much, why not pay them yourself? You are a millionaire, surely you can spare a few bitcents to help improve the Bitcoin economy.
killing the only use case that bitcoin has for the average joe: making money posting on this forum.
If an average joe's only use for Bitcoin is to be earned from posting on this forum, what do they do after it? They've already posted on the forum and received it, there is absolutely no other use for Bitcoin now. It can sit in their wallets like the useless numbers it is.Think before you post.
I don't care about my credibility. Im rich, I have thousands of BTC, you are nothing.
Roger Ver, is that you? Im a bitcoin early investor, I couldn't care less about making money with signature campaigns, but I do care about the unfortunate, and posting here while getting some coins helps the bitcoin economy. A lot of people are getting banned due unrealistic posting standards when they get paid next to trash.
Whether or not you're a Bitcoin early investor or not is entirely irrelevant. If anything, the posting standards are not high enough.The actual problem is you have a superiority complex. You think you are a big shoot, when you are a dumb fuck owns less than 1000 BTC, can't code anything meaningful, and spends his entire day ruining people's accounts, killing the only use case that bitcoin has for the average joe: making money posting on this forum.
Said the person who thinks that capital == intelligence or knowledge. 
It also seems that someone is insecure about their own knowledge, or lack thereof. Maybe you should go back to school.I don't care about my credibility. Im rich, I have thousands of BTC, you are nothing.
This is the prime example of the inferiority complex which I was talking about. You are just a pest, with or without capital. It's so stupid that people aren't allowed to take breaks, otherwise their accounts become useless when trying to be illegible for a signature campaign.
If you can sign a message from a very old address I generally let you back in (assuming post quality is adequate). Otherwise, no.Maybe you nerds can't understand that.
You have an inferiority complex. I suggest you visit your local psychiatrist. Im well off, but I think about those who benefit from that extra income that signature campaigns can provide (specially for Hero-Legendary members).
That's not my concern. If you need money to survive, then go get a real job.Posting from alt accounts is bad for credibility.
Surprised to see my name added here about a month after I stopped posting on bitcointalk, does inactivity count as "spam" too now?
Wouldn't be surprised if I was added in the ban list having a look at my burst posts, but I do hope I don't get banned.
What's with the 180 degree turn from 'wouldn't be surprised' to 'surprised'? Posting in this thread is really pointless and won't get your case handled more quickly. If anything, you are likely going to get pushed back to the end of the queue. To any users replying or quoting this post, this is a discussion about my post quality since more than an year or so, not my potential activity(a result of my infrequent post timing) or loan requests(which have been fulfilled everytime).
I'm sure someone can analyze it if they have time to waste. You won't like the results though.
Surprised to see my name added here about a month after I stopped posting on bitcointalk, does inactivity count as "spam" too now? I have PMed Lauda about this but I've been added to the list by yahoo too apparently, just wanted to know why as I've so far not participated in Yahoo's campaigns(having a look at my post history last I tried participating in one of them, it was Dec last year) nor has the quality of my posts degraded to the point where any random person can have a look at my post history and say "This guy is regurgitating opinions that dozens of others have already posted".
To any users replying or quoting this post, this is a discussion about my post quality since more than an year or so, not my potential activity(a result of my infrequent post timing) or loan requests(which have been fulfilled everytime).
To any users replying or quoting this post, this is a discussion about my post quality since more than an year or so, not my potential activity(a result of my infrequent post timing) or loan requests(which have been fulfilled everytime).
Hi,
I did not realize my mistakes until you talked about it, sincerely sorry for all, I understood all that you said, and I promise to try to improve the quality of my article. . I hope I will soon be removed from this list. Thanks for your attention.
Regards
Paul
It is ironic that you managed at least one campaign (specifically an avatar campaign) whilst you are a decent spammer yourself. Depending on who placed you on the ban list, you can easily find all the required information for requesting a review. Yet you still fail to read/realize this considering your statement "I hope I will soon..".I did not realize my mistakes until you talked about it, sincerely sorry for all, I understood all that you said, and I promise to try to improve the quality of my article. . I hope I will soon be removed from this list. Thanks for your attention.
Regards
Paul
Due to the ever growing number of spammers/account farmers that are just wasting this opportunity I'm thinking of switching towards a stricter model. Specifically, 1 denied review will result in a permanent blacklist.
Hi,
I'm contacting you here, this means I'm really interested in the quality of my post, and I want to improve it, "I hope I will soon", it's just a way for me to say I'm going to good quality of my article. I know you have a reason to charge me, so I do not give any resistance. I just want you to give me a chance to leave this list. That's why I use the word "hope". So I "hope" you guys give me a chance, I will improve the quality of my posts and leave the blacklist. Please do not forbid me forever.
Regards
Paul
By the way, I'd like to ask why I'm still on the list of yahoo6228 yet I putted here and removed by Lauda. My name doesn't even show on the thread of yahoo. Hope this will be fixed.
Hi,
I did not realize my mistakes until you talked about it, sincerely sorry for all, I understood all that you said, and I promise to try to improve the quality of my article. . I hope I will soon be removed from this list. Thanks for your attention.
Regards
Paul
It is ironic that you managed at least one campaign (specifically an avatar campaign) whilst you are a decent spammer yourself. Depending on who placed you on the ban list, you can easily find all the required information for requesting a review. Yet you still fail to read/realize this considering your statement "I hope I will soon..".I did not realize my mistakes until you talked about it, sincerely sorry for all, I understood all that you said, and I promise to try to improve the quality of my article. . I hope I will soon be removed from this list. Thanks for your attention.
Regards
Paul
Due to the ever growing number of spammers/account farmers that are just wasting this opportunity I'm thinking of switching towards a stricter model. Specifically, 1 denied review will result in a permanent blacklist.
Hi,
I'm contacting you here, this means I'm really interested in the quality of my post, and I want to improve it, "I hope I will soon", it's just a way for me to say I'm going to good quality of my article. I know you have a reason to charge me, so I do not give any resistance. I just want you to give me a chance to leave this list. That's why I use the word "hope". So I "hope" you guys give me a chance, I will improve the quality of my posts and leave the blacklist. Please do not forbid me forever.
Regards
Paul
Hi,
I did not realize my mistakes until you talked about it, sincerely sorry for all, I understood all that you said, and I promise to try to improve the quality of my article. . I hope I will soon be removed from this list. Thanks for your attention.
Regards
Paul
It is ironic that you managed at least one campaign (specifically an avatar campaign) whilst you are a decent spammer yourself. Depending on who placed you on the ban list, you can easily find all the required information for requesting a review. Yet you still fail to read/realize this considering your statement "I hope I will soon..".I did not realize my mistakes until you talked about it, sincerely sorry for all, I understood all that you said, and I promise to try to improve the quality of my article. . I hope I will soon be removed from this list. Thanks for your attention.
Regards
Paul
Due to the ever growing number of spammers/account farmers that are just wasting this opportunity I'm thinking of switching towards a stricter model. Specifically, 1 denied review will result in a permanent blacklist.
😂😂
Just because a reply is lengthy (comparatively, though yours are still two-liners) does not mean it is constructive. Substance comes from usefulness and seeing how you reply to spam megathreads, few of your posts are actually useful. Let us not only stop there, but review the duration of time between posts.
Five minutes apart. It took five minutes for you to search for another thread quickly, to look over at its content and create a reply. You may use a broad vocabulary but it serves no need when it is vague and refers to general (relative to bitcoin users) knowledge.
The casinos that you have outlined have different advantages, so you can easily see that through the process of using them. Bitsler advantages in speed, you can make bet quickly with double the speed of other casinos. For yolodice and primedice, we will see the stability and rhythm between the bets. And they all guarantee fairness, so we should choose them.
Also five minutes apart. And actually, the latter post has no real use seeing as you only promote Bitsler for its 'speed' yet go no further about other casinos using descriptive factors. The above quoted linked their site; there needn't be any more to add, lest it be a wholehearted suggestion.
Pointless post.
And the list goes on.
Bonus quote:
These are words that I expect an eight year-old to say about something they consider bad.
Hi,Excuse me!
I see my name in your list. This made me really nervous, I do not know why this happened. That is really a bad thing for me, please let me know the reason why I'm here, and how I can end it. I do not want to be part of your blacklist. Please show me how to get out of it. Thanks!
Regards
Paul
I see my name in your list. This made me really nervous, I do not know why this happened. That is really a bad thing for me, please let me know the reason why I'm here, and how I can end it. I do not want to be part of your blacklist. Please show me how to get out of it. Thanks!
Regards
Paul
Just because a reply is lengthy (comparatively, though yours are still two-liners) does not mean it is constructive. Substance comes from usefulness and seeing how you reply to spam megathreads, few of your posts are actually useful. Let us not only stop there, but review the duration of time between posts.
Good news for bitcoin in general and bitcoin users in particular. It seems bitcoin has shown the world the potential and power of it, so more and more countries are adopting bitcoin and legalizing it. They want to make use of bitcoin to make a profit for their country, a meaningful job for every country. We can see that many countries have banned bitcoins, but now that these countries have accepted bitcoin. Bitcoin really proved its power.
Yes as long you use a thing to pay it is called money, so Bitcoin and other cryptocurrecy is a money that thing that it is different with the fiat is it's appearance because bitcoin is a digital currency. So bitcoin is a money and the other alt coin too.
I do not agree with what you say, bitcoin is not an altcoin, it is a core coin, it is the foundation of all the other altcoins. It's like a common currency of technology, it has the same power and power as cash. Bitcoin is a digital coin that represents the evolution of technology, it is even stronger than many of the current cash in the world.Five minutes apart. It took five minutes for you to search for another thread quickly, to look over at its content and create a reply. You may use a broad vocabulary but it serves no need when it is vague and refers to general (relative to bitcoin users) knowledge.
And the next thing we will know, is the banks all over the world will accepts bitcoin, and also the all the people in this whole wide world. 
Although Japan has accepted bitcoin, we can not be sure that the whole world will accept bitcoin. It is possible that bitcoin is becoming popular and well known, but, in essence, it is still a virtual currency, its value depends entirely on real money. It never changes. Virtual money is a constant change, even though it has existed for a long time, but it always has big and irreparable problems. It could be the reason that banks around the world accept bitcoin. The future is something that we can not be sure of.Actually you can go to this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/monthly-best-gambling-site-april-2017-1859063 for the Monthly Best Gambling Site. But from my experience, i recommend you nitrogensports and directbet for sportsbook. Primedice, bitsler and yolodice for dice sites. For casino and live casino, i don't know much about them, because i rarely gambling on casino.
The casinos that you have outlined have different advantages, so you can easily see that through the process of using them. Bitsler advantages in speed, you can make bet quickly with double the speed of other casinos. For yolodice and primedice, we will see the stability and rhythm between the bets. And they all guarantee fairness, so we should choose them.
Also five minutes apart. And actually, the latter post has no real use seeing as you only promote Bitsler for its 'speed' yet go no further about other casinos using descriptive factors. The above quoted linked their site; there needn't be any more to add, lest it be a wholehearted suggestion.
Thank you for your friendliness, you are a good manager of this site, I see the enthusiasm in your way of doing things. Yolodice is actually competing with much larger casinos, Bitsler and prime dice are one of the typical casinos, they have attractive incentives to compete with them is very difficult, But I hope you can offer stable promotions to attract players. Good luck!
Pointless post.
And the list goes on.
Bonus quote:
Hyper inflation, I would love to use your words, the economic crisis will surely happen, and it will destroy the economy of the whole world. Let's try to think, if the whole world uses bitcoin, and when it reaches that value, then suddenly it disappears or collapses. I think it will be a disaster for everyone. It was horrible. And I see that it will never happen even after two centuries.
These are words that I expect an eight year-old to say about something they consider bad.
I did not realize my mistakes until you talked about it, sincerely sorry for all, I understood all that you said, and I promise to try to improve the quality of my article. . I hope I will soon be removed from this list. Thanks for your attention.
Regards
Paul
Jump to: