Topic: [SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version) - page 9. (Read 100714 times)

Hello SMAS,
Is this posts spammy like Post Bursting way.

Like what information ?

The list of users posted here are already analysed and judged thoroughly on the basis of their post quality by the SMAS campaign managers so other managers won't have to re-do it.They can simply use this list as a reference while recruiting new members to their campaign.

If you have too much time on your hands,you can automate stuff anyway.Wait,automate what ? 

Yep, I find that website slow however. If any of the core members are interested, please shoot me a PM, or send me your details for skype/slack/gitter/whatever other chat app.

That might be handy for looking for alternate accounts too. Currently I use Achow101's https://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info.

So if I understand this correctly, you guys are making a list of spammers and hoping that other signature managers will exclude them from their own programs?

If so, I am a programmer and I could potentially help you automate some of the process. I.E add a website where signature managers can search easily and get information about users.

Look for the person who added you to the list and follow the instructions related to their own list.

Thanks. Kittens are doing fine and the kitty is busy.

Use an alt if you're scared from backlash.

"They're  Normal" --> It's subjective.I honestly,didn't find them interesting and it doesn't have to be.Only the people who have put you up there on the list should matter,try impressing them.

Mother ? I'm quite certain you're getting off the wrong foot.

i realize what everyone is saying, and in retrospect i feel that some kind of list should be made! you three original managers actually have my respect for the over the top bullshit you have to deal with every day!
i dont feel i am the right person to be making this list... i am a bit hot headed and very biased on certain subjects"that makes me the very wrong person to do this .... i know!
but while you guys are cleaning up the forum "for what you can" of the user base .
this place really needs to restrict in some way the higher levels also.."higher levels as in the people how make scamming possible!"
"Signature Campaign Manager blacklist"
 just think how much flack i would get if i did something like that?
and i am too much of a asshole to hold my tongue at times.
but i do know a few that would like this to happen.  so what i will do is help them organize this.
thank you all for offering a hand , and who knows i might just ask for some! lol
you THREE are known for the great reputations you all have worked so hard for!
THANKS

I've been on the naughty list for a while but I'm sure if someone reviewed my posts you'd see they're normal. Can somebody have a look? Thx

And happy mother's day Lauda! How are the kittens?

Looks like this will be a good idea since the last time I search a list of signature campaign manager overview, all I've found was an outdated thread which is this. Since we have a list of Signature Campaign and Escrow list, so why not start a topic like that.
By the way, I don't think making a campaign manager blacklist would be good too since some may say that it will be bias depending on who they mostly want.

As you've mentioned it, the problem stems from several things. I could objectively asses and *destroy* a lot of "managers" (destroy as describe how and why they are bad). Even this would cause a lot of whining as they are reluctant to learn and actually do proper work.

You are free to start your own thread regarding this, and I think it would be most suitable in the Reputation section (depending on the exact contents). You could do a "Signature Campaign Manager Overview" with ranking or a "Signature Campaign Manager blacklist". Whilst I won't start something like this myself (as per reasons mentioned in the last few posts), I would probably help you or anyone who creates such a thread in any way I can.

~Lauda

I'm not sure this is a road i want to travel down. Look at the multiple threads the normal users create on those of us pressing SMAS. I'm not scared by any means but the drama is just stupid.

If users joining campaigns would just follow rules we wouldn't have these problems. Of course alot of the problems stem from users trying to make a living from making posts. Users who own 50 accounts(and we cannot really know who owns what account until someone outs the accounts) trying to make 10btc a week from posting.

We know we cannot stop all the bullshit but we are at least trying to stop some.

Like Lauda stated, if we make a list about managers we will see a load of users claiming we placed them on the list to try and take all the campaigns. We cannot stop someone else from making a list, but it is not in our best interest to make such a list.

You see most of these "bad managers" getting jobs due to the fact they will work for pennies. Companies can run their scam for cheap and keep more of the money. No not all companies are scams, but alot of altcoin projects are less than honest. It is a companies choice whom they hire but you can tell alot about a company when they're trying to save every penny they can IMO.

i agree in the fact that many would cry like babies  but  that could not bother me in the least! simply for the fact that while the very few people in this thread are doing their very best to make this entire forum a better place; there are so many more  so called campaign scamagers"not miss spelled"  that will do anything for pennies! no matter who it is and what the reason, in my mind THAT IS SICKENING!
while your group has implemented the SMAS , im sure making the managers shit list would be much harder. but until now as far as i know, no one is willing to stand up to these guys because everyone is only about the cash!
i agree that if you and yahoo would start this you would be accused of self propagation because you are both managers also .
so who in their right mind would do this and how?
or should i doo like all the sheep do and look the other way and pretend this is not happening?

There is none as far as I'm aware. If we were to make it ourselves, then I'm sure that a fair number of people would whine about "monopolies" and whatnot. You are free to make such a list and publish it. There are a lot of bad managers.

hi all, sorry to pull this off topic for a moment but i would like to ask a question.?
is there  some kind of list for really bad signature campaign managers? as in people like    jamalaezaz
who acts like he would like to be a campaign manager of some sort.
but has no decency even to send personal msgs instigating controversy. there should be some kind of control over people like him!
if anyone is in doubt or would like to have the msg he sent ,please just ask and i will forward it to you asap!
thank you guys and keep up the hard work ! you all are doing an AWESOME job!

I know what type of posters are reluctant to read a short FAQ.

Hi Lauda, I am sorry I am posting this here as I don't know whether you read my PM or not. I hope this is the right place to ask for an unban. I saw that you banned me last month when I was in your Bitmixer campaign, I guess it's over a month now. I want to know if I can ask for an unban now or not? I am sorry if it's still early. Hope I have improved a bit.

No, that is not going to happen. You're just wasting our time with your inadequate posting quality and going through the improper channels for requesting an unban.

I hope I get out of here next week


Here, I want to say that I only use cash, so, I sell bitcoin when I own it. And the risk here might be the bitcoin value drop, I believe you understand it.



No one has forbidden me to raise my opinion despite many similar things before. We have freedom of speech, and I think this article is not a problem.

Similarly, this is not a problem.



Maybe my language is a bit complicated. I want to say that only the altcoins actually developed with their own algorithms can compete with bitcoin. The remaining altcoins that copy from bitcoin do not do that.



Same thing, maybe you do not understand what I'm saying. "Only banks that the government manages can accept bitcoin"

I know that, I just want to explain more about my opinion, but it seems I did not do it. I will try harder.


*** It seems my only problem that can not be improved is repetition. I'm sure I'll change it. Again, I hope you can exclude me from lauda's list in the last week.

---

First and foremost, it's only been a week.

"Rules specific to Laudas list:
If you wish to not be on this list, your post quality can be reviewed after 30 days. If the review confirms your ban, or you ask for a review before 30 days have passed, you will be blacklisted for 6 months. This excludes permanently blacklisted members that can be found in their own thread."

---

Are you saying that this is a quality post? You're just repeating what you quoted.


And this one too? What are the possible risks, exactly? And what do you mean by, "Myself, I do not buy bitcoin, otherwise I always sell it for cash"? This is a bit contradictory, is it not?


How about this one? You really believe that this is useful after 500+ replies to the thread?


This is post #394.


It's unclear what you're trying to say here. "most altcoins are copied from bitcoin, but are used with a different name" is not absolutely true. "they have absolutely a chance to compete fairly with bitcoin. But bitcoin is really too powerful, it has taken over all other altcoins from the moment it is formed." contradicts itself.


This is more of an accuracy issue that I have (though is still the 38th post of the thread): it is true that Bitcoin has no intrinsic value but it does not at all fully depend on other currencies. The same can be said of FIAT currencies. I'm not sure what the last sentence is for, though. "That is true, and most banks accept bitcoin as government-led banks." is a strange statement.

---

I could go on and on and talk about the posts in more depth but that would be a waste. Again, length does not mean substance.

---

If I have a long essay that repeats the exact same points over and over again, being redundant - or better yet, paraphrasing previously-published essays, then it's completely pointless and adds nothing.