You don't follow your rules that you seted yourself!
I do; however, I do not have to if I do not want to. I don't have to review anyone if I do not want to, and could permanently blacklist everyone right away. By giving spammers 2 chances for reviews I am being lenient towards them.
What the hell you wrote then "If you wish to not be on this list, your post quality can be reviewed after 60 days. If the review confirms your ban, or you ask for a review before 30 days have passed, you will be blacklisted for 6 months. This excludes permanently blacklisted members that can be found in their own thread" if you don't follow that?
1 review denied -> 2nd review denied -> permanently blacklisted.
I was trying to talk with you and see what was the problem in my comments, but you have said you don't give such advices for free.
Do you realize how many people PM me per day? Let me rephrase, do you realize how many people
waste my time with bullshit per day? (more specifically, a lot of the requests are bullshit, complaining, et. al.) If I were to analyze everyone's shitposting and give suggestions in my free time, a backlog (for all on-forum *obligations*) would be created that would take weeks if not months to go through. Therefore, I rarely do such a thing (e.g. maybe I have extra time, or a good day).
Do you take money for your advices, really?
I do paid consulting, but that's not relevant to SMAS. If you are complaining that someone doesn't want to do something
for free for
you, you being a
stranger to them, then you're a self-entitled brat.
You are not fair. And if SMAS support you in that they are not fair as well.
Everyone is being treated equally, more or less, thus it is naturally fair. Whether I am too strict or not, has nothing to do with fairness.
