[SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version) - page 28.

rizzlarolla

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1001

Quote from: actmyname on July 10, 2016, 01:10:34 PM

Quote from: rizzlarolla on July 10, 2016, 01:02:39 PM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on July 10, 2016, 11:13:52 AM

Honestly this forum shouldnt be viewed as a paycheck. Posting for sig campaigns is a privilege. And obviously its not just 1 post that would earn them that tag. People need to realize the facts around here. Too much trash has been posted on a daily basis

Can I report here, is the Coinroll manager on board?

"Too much trash has been posted on a daily basis" Like..

hermanhs09
Over 350 posts in (under) two days.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hermanhs09-378917

Is this campaign pay per post?

Looked over his posts. Definitely bad.

The campaign is 0.25 usd per post, and 0.0005 usd * total posts daily.
So that would be... approximately 0.1344 BTC from the posts and about 0.0033 BTC from the daily counts. The coinroll payments are manually paid every week, so notifying the campaign manager might be good. I'll do that right now.

There's replies every single minute! Even sometimes there's two replies in the same minute! It's all oneliners spaced out to look like they've posted more.

Total tally for the past 2 days as of this edit: 1:15 PM, EST - 337 posts from July 9th to July 10th

Thanks guys,

(doesn't really matter but,) I see 402 posts in the last 24 hours from now. (6pm bst)
Your 337 is correct in calendar days, EST.
Either reference shows the point being made here!

You guys have a tough task here, but when such obvious spamming is happening, something clearly needs to change.

hermanhs09 is probably very poor, compared to western standards.
Is he earning over $40 per day at those rates? (if he is I'll be sig spamming myself soon!)
At least his English language is ok. Better than many others.

I think he started 4 threads yesterday in discussion alone. (don't know if he did the same to other boards)
Along with similar posters, BCT is overrun.
Sold out to advertising.
(i've started 2 threads in my whole time here i think)

I personally will try to never use any of these advertised sites BECAUSE of their sponsorship of these lowbrow advocates,
people who know nothing/very little of bitcoin, and/or people who can barely string a sentence together.
Most of these posts should at least be in the beginners section.
It is not really about bitcoin to these people, they only understand how to (try to) profit here.

This is not aimed at all sig wearers, but probably many.
I guess i'm not really the target market of these advertisers.
Especially the scammy ones.

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: rizzlarolla on July 10, 2016, 01:02:39 PM

Can I report here, is the Coinroll manager on board?

Coinroll doesn't have a designated signature campaign manager in place.
I've contacted their forum representative (the OP of their signature thread; Namworld, as guitarplinker pointed out above) on behalf of SMAS
and asked whether they want to contribute to the effort or at least adapt the upcoming SMAS lists.

guitarplinker

legendary

Activity: 1694

Merit: 1024

Quote from: rizzlarolla on July 10, 2016, 01:02:39 PM

Can I report here, is the Coinroll manager on board?

"Too much trash has been posted on a daily basis" Like..

hermanhs09
Over 350 posts in (under) two days.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hermanhs09-378917

Is this campaign pay per post?

The CoinRoll manager is Namworld. It doesn't look like he's monitoring the signature campaign at all, here's what he said about it a few weeks back:

Quote from: Namworld on June 20, 2016, 09:23:07 PM

I'm sorry, I don't check bitcointalk that often anymore. I did while there was issues, but I though tracker was running smoothly.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: rizzlarolla on July 10, 2016, 01:02:39 PM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on July 10, 2016, 11:13:52 AM

Honestly this forum shouldnt be viewed as a paycheck. Posting for sig campaigns is a privilege. And obviously its not just 1 post that would earn them that tag. People need to realize the facts around here. Too much trash has been posted on a daily basis

Can I report here, is the Coinroll manager on board?

"Too much trash has been posted on a daily basis" Like..

hermanhs09
Over 350 posts in (under) two days.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hermanhs09-378917

Is this campaign pay per post?

Looked over his posts. Definitely bad.

The campaign is 0.25 usd per post, and 0.0005 usd * total posts daily.
So that would be... approximately 0.1344 BTC from the posts and about 0.0033 BTC from the daily counts. The coinroll payments are manually paid every week, so notifying the campaign manager might be good. I'll do that right now.

There's replies every single minute! Even sometimes there's two replies in the same minute! It's all oneliners spaced out to look like they've posted more.

Total tally for the past 2 days as of this edit: 1:15 PM, EST - 337 posts from July 9th to July 10th

rizzlarolla

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1001

Quote from: yahoo62278 on July 10, 2016, 11:13:52 AM

Honestly this forum shouldnt be viewed as a paycheck. Posting for sig campaigns is a privilege. And obviously its not just 1 post that would earn them that tag. People need to realize the facts around here. Too much trash has been posted on a daily basis

Can I report here, is the Coinroll manager on board?

"Too much trash has been posted on a daily basis" Like..

hermanhs09
Over 350 posts in (under) two days.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/hermanhs09-378917

Is this campaign pay per post?

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: yahoo62278 on July 10, 2016, 12:22:45 PM

Right now we have guitarplinker notaek sfr10 Lutpin gianluca95 and myself on board. I think we have a solid starting core

That's roughly the participation I've expected.
Plus/Minus a few candidates I didn't expect to join the effort/I'm still waiting to get into the camp.

I agree, we're a solid core that includes the majority of signature campaigns currently running and we should be abled to give it a try and make an impact with this roster.

I'll be contacting the managers and runners of those campaigns that haven't signed up for SMAS yet shortly and inform them about this effort, aswell as ask for their participation.

At this pace, I think we can kick off the SMAS protocoll early next week. After some discussion and only once we've closely elaborated the process, of course.

notaek

legendary

Activity: 1268

Merit: 1009

According to this thread http://archive.is/Ca3YO, members that I have currently blacklisted are:

Code:

stiffbud
Darwin02
sumit513
helloeverybody
chineseprancing
bitdoger
cambda
trafficolaa
X-ray
tiffyroman
Dewi Aries
yhansky
7788bitcoin
relq
chineseprancing
peta4e
Hide_ip112
phreaky
Rubberduckie
ASHLIUSZ
Cybertron00
coin_gambler
CryptoBjorn
BillyBobZorton
Shibashi Dogemoto
StoreBit
upsidedown75
bitcoinisfurture
vero
Vikingr
Cozynunu
Akupuniard
traderbit
Seast
2legit2
newcoins1978
iqlimasyadiqa
Stedsm
socks435
romero121
Superbitzz
greatr
fravia

They are just blatant spammers, increasing their post counts without even analyzing the OP.
(I regret enrolling 2 members from this list in one of my campaigns)

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3682

Merit: 4469

Right now we have guitarplinker notaek sfr10 Lutpin gianluca95 and myself on board. I think we have a solid starting core

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: actmyname on July 10, 2016, 11:56:32 AM

If you create a blacklist, you would need to constantly add people to it but one of the pros to this is that you won't overlook anyone who posts good content.

We're all signature campaign managers (so far). This means reading posts, checking post histories and managing lists is already part of our daily work.
I've been managing a blacklist in one of my campaigns in the past and it was some extra effort, but it was worth it (imo).
Creating a more global SMAS blacklist is going to take it's time and requires an extra effort from each participating manager, but I'm ready to bring in that extra effort.

Quote from: actmyname on July 10, 2016, 11:56:32 AM

If you create a whitelist instead, you can more easily create the list (it would be far smaller), however, it would also take some time to scour all the campaigns for high-quality posters.

Ideally, each manager would do that for their own campaign and the others just run checks on that.
I like the idea of decentralizing the SMAS protocoll and allowing each of the participants to work their area, creating SMAS as a community effort, being made up of each and everyones participation.

Quote from: actmyname on July 10, 2016, 11:56:32 AM

I would say that an appeal thread might be a good idea for users that wish to either leave the blacklist or get on the whitelist

That's a valid suggestion, and we'll think about some way to contact us and appeal SMAS listings.
However, the way I'm looking to run SMAS we're already constantly rechecking, updating and keeping up with recent changes.

Quote from: notaek on July 10, 2016, 12:01:32 PM

I'm definitely into this campaign.

Glad to have you on board.

notaek

legendary

Activity: 1268

Merit: 1009

Great idea. Spamming is highly increased in this forum, especially in economics, gambling, and digital goods section.
I'm definitely into this campaign.

Quote from: actmyname on July 10, 2016, 11:56:32 AM

Although I would agree with this concept in its foundation, I do think that there are two ways to do this:

If you create a blacklist, you would need to constantly add people to it but one of the pros to this is that you won't overlook anyone who posts good content.

If you create a whitelist instead, you can more easily create the list (it would be far smaller), however, it would also take some time to scour all the campaigns for high-quality posters.

Both of these take time, but you need to decide on one. Honestly, they're quite equal.

I would say that an appeal thread might be a good idea for users that wish to either leave the blacklist or get on the whitelist

If anybody improves and thinks that they shouldn't be in the blacklist anymore, they can make an appeal here for a review, resulting in striking off their names. So no need to create a whitelist.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Although I would agree with this concept in its foundation, I do think that there are two ways to do this:

If you create a blacklist, you would need to constantly add people to it but one of the pros to this is that you won't overlook anyone who posts good content.

If you create a whitelist instead, you can more easily create the list (it would be far smaller), however, it would also take some time to scour all the campaigns for high-quality posters.

Both of these take time, but you need to decide on one. Honestly, they're quite equal.

I would say that an appeal thread might be a good idea for users that wish to either leave the blacklist or get on the whitelist

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3682

Merit: 4469

Im not looking to destroy dreams myself but it appears that multiple warnings arent working. Banning accounts isnt working since not enough ppl are getting banned(as you see 2-3 accounts a week in mets from ppl crying why am i banned). So i think we need to take a more aggressive route. Hit users in the pocket.

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Quote from: guitarplinker on July 10, 2016, 11:16:13 AM

If a sort of "campaign blacklist" was created and maintained to prevent spammers from entering the signature campaigns, I'm hoping that would cut down on some of the forum spam around here. However, for a blacklist like this to be effective, every signature campaign would have to participate in the blacklist, or else these spammers would just join a campaign that isn't using the blacklist.

I agree, that's why we've started this thread and why we're looking for as much support as we can get.
The more campaigns we can get to support SMAS, the better it is, ultimatively, we'd be looking to add the SMAS protocoll as a part of all campaigns ruleset.

Quote from: guitarplinker on July 10, 2016, 11:16:13 AM

I'd be on-board for something like this.

I'll add you to OP and will include you in the next group PMs discussing further details.

Quote from: geopolisch on July 10, 2016, 11:08:29 AM

and what will you do? I mean how will you tag them? with giving negative feedback or tag them with another way?

Details are not yet public and also still up to discussion between us.
I've got a concept I'm going to push, but I'm also open to suggestions from all other participants.
Fact is, something needs to be done and smas is supposed to be made up by users who agree and want to help.

Quote from: geopolisch on July 10, 2016, 11:08:29 AM

If someone is a good and legit trader, exchange and dealer here and you or Luptin give him negative feedback for one spam post..
can you imagine what will happen?? his all bitcoin life/journey will finish after that, after getting red tagged he can't even survive here anymore.

I (myself) wont be giving negative feedbacks over the post quality of a user. I understand that with being on DT I have to be a lot more considerate about my feedbacks.
That much I can already say. We'll be going another way than that.
I'm not looking to "destroy bitcoin dreams" here. This is about making the forum more worthwhile for everyone and targetting spam.

guitarplinker

legendary

Activity: 1694

Merit: 1024

Quote from: yahoo62278 on July 10, 2016, 10:55:53 AM

My ideas go as far as tagging all accounts that i see spamming forums so that theyre no longer able to be campaign participants. Ill wait n see what the rest of these guys think and we will come up with something for sure though

I'd be on-board for something like this. If a sort of "campaign blacklist" was created and maintained to prevent spammers from entering the signature campaigns, I'm hoping that would cut down on some of the forum spam around here. However, for a blacklist like this to be effective, every signature campaign would have to participate in the blacklist, or else these spammers would just join a campaign that isn't using the blacklist.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3682

Merit: 4469

Quote from: geopolisch on July 10, 2016, 11:08:29 AM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on July 10, 2016, 10:55:53 AM

Im glad to be a part of this. Hopefully we can take care of some business and clean this place up.

Quote from: geopolisch on July 10, 2016, 10:43:05 AM

Great Start...
I am already in a campaign which is in Under Yahoo. so no need to bring my manager here. lolzz
one question. do you guys smas users for his past/previous posts?? or give peoples one more chance?

As far as im concerned i wanna treat this like a courtroom. Your past will always be there for us to explore and look into. If users are gonna change they had better do it NOW cause if we getour sights set on you we will be checking the past n making our decisions on how to proceed.

My ideas go as far as tagging all accounts that i see spamming forums so that theyre no longer able to be campaign participants. Ill wait n see what the rest of these guys think and we will come up with something for sure though

and what will you do? I mean how will you tag them? with giving negative feedback or tag them with another way?
I saw your post in a thread in service section about that too. (you are giving negative feedback everyone who post there)
If someone is a good and legit trader, exchange and dealer here and you or Luptin give him negative feedback for one spam post..
can you imagine what will happen?? his all bitcoin life/journey will finish after that.
after getting red tagged he can't even survive here anymore.

Honestly this forum shouldnt be viewed as a paycheck. Posting for sig campaigns is a privilege. And obviously its not just 1 post that would earn them that tag. People need to realize the facts around here. Too much trash has been posted on a daily basis

Gianluca95

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1196

Reputation first.

As I've managed several signature campaign, and right now I'm managing two signature campaign, I guess that I can help you to find spammers

geopolisch

hero member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 511

Quote from: yahoo62278 on July 10, 2016, 10:55:53 AM

Im glad to be a part of this. Hopefully we can take care of some business and clean this place up.

Quote from: geopolisch on July 10, 2016, 10:43:05 AM

Great Start...
I am already in a campaign which is in Under Yahoo. so no need to bring my manager here. lolzz
one question. do you guys smas users for his past/previous posts?? or give peoples one more chance?

As far as im concerned i wanna treat this like a courtroom. Your past will always be there for us to explore and look into. If users are gonna change they had better do it NOW cause if we getour sights set on you we will be checking the past n making our decisions on how to proceed.

My ideas go as far as tagging all accounts that i see spamming forums so that theyre no longer able to be campaign participants. Ill wait n see what the rest of these guys think and we will come up with something for sure though

and what will you do? I mean how will you tag them? with giving negative feedback or tag them with another way?
I saw your post in a thread in service section about that too. (you are giving negative feedback everyone who post there)
If someone is a good and legit trader, exchange and dealer here and you or Luptin give him negative feedback for one spam post..
can you imagine what will happen?? his all bitcoin life/journey will finish after that.
after getting red tagged he can't even survive here anymore.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3682

Merit: 4469

Im glad to be a part of this. Hopefully we can take care of some business and clean this place up.

Quote from: geopolisch on July 10, 2016, 10:43:05 AM

Great Start...
I am already in a campaign which is in Under Yahoo. so no need to bring my manager here. lolzz
one question. do you guys smas users for his past/previous posts?? or give peoples one more chance?

As far as im concerned i wanna treat this like a courtroom. Your past will always be there for us to explore and look into. If users are gonna change they had better do it NOW cause if we getour sights set on you we will be checking the past n making our decisions on how to proceed.

My ideas go as far as tagging all accounts that i see spamming forums so that theyre no longer able to be campaign participants. Ill wait n see what the rest of these guys think and we will come up with something for sure though

geopolisch

hero member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 511

Great Start...
I am already in a campaign which is in Under Yahoo. so no need to bring my manager here. lolzz
one question. do you guys smas users for his past/previous posts?? or give peoples one more chance?

Lutpin

copper member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1874

Goodbye, Z.

Code:

--YUki--
-aleco-
0xfff
1982dre
1Fexq1fjVxn8
20kevin20
21coin
2legit2
3JOH22A
5ato5hi8itcoin
ALToids
ASIC-K
AceCobra1
AicecreaME
Aleister Crowley
Altaraiser
Altynbekova
AmXProX
Amitabh S
An0nym0us
AncilVTwo
AngelSky
Ankara
Anwar22
Araudan
AtheistAKASaneBrain
B4RF
BAGOBO
BR4F
BTCforJoe
Babylon
Bananana
Bardman
Barnabe
BawsyBoss
Bayyn
Beerwizzard
BellaBitBit
BenCodie
BestWebCreator
Bestwishes745
Beta-coiner1
BingoDog
BitAurum
BitMaxz
BitcoinExpart
BitcoinMarshal
BitcoinPanther
Bitcoin_Legend
Bitcoinbro
Bitcoinsummoner
Bitsaurus
Bitus
BlackBaron
BlackMarket
Blawpaw
Blind Legs Parker
Blisk
BlueStackz
Bluestreet
Bonakid
BossMacko
Buchi-88
CasioK
Cazkys
Celsiuss
Charisse1229
Chemistry1988
Choyor
Chris314
ChronoLite
CoinBreader
CoinThinker
Coinmin3r
Corenin
CosbyCoin
CrackedLogic
CrimBit
Cripto DeD
CryptoCurrencyInc.com
CryptosapienZA
Csmiami
Cyberczar
D05GTO
DIA7
DIMKAZDS
DOGE12321
DaddyMonsi
Daimon88
Dammitt
Danydee
David19
Dayan1
Deres
Dhaaaw
Digital_Lord
Dimelord
Djanggo
Doamader
DoctorG
DodoB
Doell
Doms
DomsLuanX3
Doncaster
DrBeer
DrG
DrGuns4Hands
Dragonkiller
Drnice
Ducky1
ERossin
Edraket31
Emerge
EthanB
EvilClown
FaucetRank.com
FiiNALiZE
Fireblade
Format.C^
Fraxinus
Fredomago
Freshmen
Frosxh
Gaaara
Gabz999
Galer
GideonGono
Gillette
Glucose
Golftech
Googlulinks
Gozie51
Greentree
Gromozeka
Gufeng
HI-TEC99
HabBear
HatakeKakashi
Hatuferu
Havelivi
HaydenBruin
HeRetiK
Hellacopter
Hirose UK
HongKong
Idrisu
InVarianT
Indijanos
Integ
Invulner
Itsmylife
Ivanech
J9901
Jacce
Jaceefrost
Jako0203
Jalum
Jambolb2
Jannn
Jayhawk1
JeWay
Jerowacik
JessicaSe
Jrock
JumperX
K128kevin2
KBH
Kaller
KennyR
Keyboard PC
Khristian
Kollor
Kotone
Krabby
LGD2Business
Leonard2016
Lieldoryn
LittleDigger
Loganota
LordCoder
LoupGaroux
LuanX3
Lucas*
Luno
MFahad
MISHA165
MONKEYJUNK
MadGhost
Maddinson100
MaritiJames3
MasoVa
Maveth13
Maxdeielle
Mikellev
Mikez
MinMan
MingLee
MintCondition
Monetizer
MoneyIsDebt
MonsterV
MrCrank
Multipulty
Mumbeeptind1963
Mvaporis1961
MyBTT
NEWGOODOUBLE
Naficopa
Naoko
Nathland
Navi_027
Navigo
Nawaytes
Nerman
NetNeo
Newcoins2020
Nimbulan
Nomad88
PHPSELLER
Pacepay
Palmerson
Pamoldar
Pangia
Parat8t9
PatronRH
Pattart
Pelegrini
Perfect999
Pitchblackroom
PlanetOfBets
PrintCoins
Pro User
Pumared
Qunenin
RGBKey
RJX
Radjie
Rahar02
Rajamuda
RealMalatesta
RedX
Redones
Revelation Machine
Revolutioner
RhodaGila
Rhum142
Ris88
Ron-Popeil
Ron~Popeil
Ru_Ezaz
Ryananda
SAMKUSH
SONG GEET
Sale_man
Sanglotslongs
Saoha
Sarthak
Seanzqt
Sengoko
Sharma
Shendelzare_Silkwood-
Shibashi Dogemoto
Shinpako09
ShowOff
ShrykeZ
SilverPunk
Sincere_
Singbatak
Sir Cross
SirLancelot
Sir_lagsalot
Sk_Ezaz
Skarner21
Sniper44
Snub
SoulBargain
Soutogu
SquallLeonhart
Starscream
Stedsm
Straux
Streamlink
Sumaiya55
Superhitech
SushiMonster
SvintuS
Taki
Termin4tor
Text
Thanasis
TheCarm
TheGreatPython
TriggerX
Trongersoll
Turan100
TurboMen
Twipple
Tyrantt
UCHCHILD
Uberzugzug
Ultegra134
Universat
Unread
VINSIN
Vaccinus
Vasilije69
VinceSamios
Viyamore
VolanicEruptor
Wandering Soul~
WarrEagle
White sugar
WhiteManWhite
WhoCaresCoins
Wicked17
Willeampere
Windpower
Winner
Wipeout2097
Wolf_Pack
Woshib
Xanidas
Xenoph0bia
XinXan
YUki
Yellowriver
Your Point Is Invalid
Yuhee
Yutikas_11920
Zalfrin
Zazzu
Zeek_W
Ziskinberg
Ziskinberg
Zooplus
Zyborg
a4techer
a7mos
aadje93
abstractednerve
adel hmdt
adloule13
aesma
ainv42
airdata
airsounds
ajeef
ajmapalo22
ajqjjj
ajrah
ajun96
akija
akosipepot
alamin99
alpsea
alpsea
amacar1
amaral1977
amencon
andycarrol
angaper
angrynerd88
angryswamp
ankylotic
antyivan
apoorvlathey
appleffi
arancra
ardentvolcanoes
ariesjia
armadora
arransiv
arthurbonora
artows21
artur11110000
arwin100
asdalani
ashapasa
ashour
atas
atronite
ausbit
avatar_kiyoshi
avikz
axorb
azguard
baby222
bal3wolf
bandung01
bapparabi
barbara44
bartolo
bearex
bearexin
bellamae
bep42
bestluck
betlord90
bharal07
bitcad4U
bitcampaign
bitcoinisbest
bitcoinissatan
bitcoinst
bitcoinvest
bitgolden
bitlancr
bitsmichel
bittraffic
blackmachinegun
blajde
blatchcorn
bloom08
blueangel01
blueteam09
bob123
bokr57
bontyw1276
bri912678
brian_23452
brituspol
brokenfate
btc-facebook
btc_angela
btccashacc
btcforall777
btcforchild
btcforks
btcjoin14
btcton
bumbarash
burner2014
butcherboss
buyinbtc
c4n10
cabsav
cadexn
cafucafucafu
cakravothy
calkob
cancerbola
casinobitcoin
casinobonusgiveaway
chaosknight
chesegrinder
chineseprancing
cluit
co5hike
coin_gambler
coinzat
colt22
corroze
countryfree
craZyLovE0916
creativex
criz2fer
croato
crossabdd
cryptworld
cungursia
czvezda
dE_logics
dadaas
dadaas]
daddybios
dali_masmoudi
danherbias07
daniahya
dark08
darkfriend77
darklus123
darthmaul
daserpent1
davids
dawnasor
daxiake
deadlyunknown
dearbesz1219
deathcode
deblue
deepocean
deethe2
designerusa
dezoel
dfox101
dhimasnk
diagla
diazepam666
digitalgame4life
dinda22
dingmei1
diodio5
disclaimer201
dlorah111
dobol
dodgecharger
dodgrad
dopamine
dotajhay
dr1980m
drakker
droideggs
duckydonald
dunfida
dustboy
duuuuude
dynospytan
eaLiTy
easynote
eddyubachs
edge777
edulord
edynolan
ekiduwuka
ekoice
elyas772
emezh10
emitdama
enhu
erk
erre
etoialist05
exstasie
fabrizoc
familiaverde
fanbeila
fancy_pants
farewellbit
farhansadik
fearlesscat10
felicita
feterim
fiomcorka
fioncorka
fireball4
firefop
fitty
fkvidar
flipstyle
franco123
fravia
freedoge.co
frendsento
friend666
fritzdark
frogcorporation
funbarrel
fusioncoins
futureofbitcoin
g83
gabbie2010
gandame
genos
gerXhonza
geyayy
giveen
goinmerry
googlebtc
gordoh
gouyu78
greBit
greatr
greenclub09
gsrcrxsi
gtraah
hakanbalta577
hardcoreminers.com
hardtime
hasiramasenju
healtheworld
hendra147
hologram
hulla
iTradeChips
iamtom123
ibrahim267
ice18
igorokkk
imamusma
imbest
indocafe
ingiltere
iotacampaign
itod
iyan33
izlevinv
jaberwock
jacee
jackhdt
jafri101
jakelyson
jamieb81
jerelimZ
jertsy
johanmarieaton101
joinal
joinal
jonatuzc
joseafonso123az
josephdd1
josh07
joshv06
jostorres
jtipt
just_Alice
justspare
kafeelniazi
kafiddrhman
karmakeddon
kateryana81
katiecbell
kenshi222
keyscore44
kidoseagle0312
kikeda
kiloiko
kingntking
kiweikoo
klenin
klepa
kodes88
kompeni
kpcian
kpitti
krupenin
kryptqnick
kucritt
kvazimodo
kyori
l8nit3
leex1528
lepricoin
leps
leshutov
letyouearn2
lexuz
liomojo1
lissandra
lister storm
lixer
loges
luckylucky
maarx
malekbaba
malikusama
man1996
maniakbtc
manselr
maokoto
marcovaldo
marioantonini
marjod
mark coins
marketone
martinacar
maxamus
mega
mel0924
mel1978
mentalpanda
merlyn22
mexi.db.
mhanbostanci
mikehersh2
mileymatmun
mimini0147
mjpo
mnporter2001
mobilestrike
mondobitcoin
monica60
monica69
mornabo
mostkey
mrhelpful
msarro
mtwelve
muhcoins
mundang
mynameisdon
nara1892
nasituygun
needmoney
neonshium
nethead
newcoins1978
newcryptoman
nextblast
nikona
noone000
nor9845
numismatist
nxtZen
oblivi
offlinedragon
olcaytu2005
oli123123
olubams
omegaflare
ontrackk
opossum
optigon
oyeTorry
ozzke
pacifista
panju1
pashh
passwordnow
patrickmh
paul gatt
paycum
pbleak
pearnapple
peretss
peta4e
petahashminer
phaddie
philiveyjr
phr0stbyt3
phreaky
pieppiep
pinoycash
pissedoff
pocarime32
poetra2501
polovec
polynesia
poncho32
poncom
posternat
potatopower
pozmu
praprata
pungopete468
purebitco
qavhity
qiwoman
quentincole32
quintiilieo
qwerty_2134
r32godzilla
r34tr783tr78
rally
randal9
randy8777
raymond541
readysalted89
rebel92
redfin31
redsun114
rekinthis
revans
reyhiesa
rfcdejong
richmcrich
richminded
rikko72
rikudou
rinhunter
rivoke
romecheo
ronaldo40
roomfirst
rozee
sHeRiLyN1618
sabbirshm
safari88
salinizm
salmanahmedone
salsa321
samuel999
samuraijin
sana54210
sandor111
saqwe
savioroshan
savushkinTA
savushkinTA
secone
setupbounds
seven2smoke
shamzblueworld
shane
shapeshiftscam
shapetwist
sheldonnnn
sherbyspark
shesheboy
shiryu
shiunsai
shyich03
sikke
silvercell
silverduck
sir.humus
sirohige
sishendaoye
siti25
sj2199
skyline247
smigel
sniveling
sobsitesearch
socal
solracx
sorehammer
southerngentuk
spiker777
sportis
spud21
ste0024
steampunkz
step_mike
stepwilli
stripykitteh
stromma44
strunberg
supandi wiharja
swogerino
swscowods
syahril
syberwolfen
syndria
t2yax
tair85
takingthis4
tampazeus
tazmania
tbterryboy
techgeek
tee-rex
terman45x
thefaucetrunner
thisappointed
tiggytomb
to1ga
tomsmith26
tonto
topman21
topminingcontracts
torrentheaven
toy4lov3rs
treather
trickshot22
trinaldao
trplzr
tsaroz
tukinen
tungaqhd
tvskit
tygeade
tyson187
u9y42
ubitcoin
udet4food
ultimatesky
umaOuma
uname
unent
unholycactus
universe_
unneros
uou5296
usekevin
useless4
user27
valvalis
var53
vennali
vero
vh
vindicare
vingaard
virtualkeybuyer
virusasog
vit05
voephilisI
vrm86
vs2014
wahyoezz25
wdnj
web.master
wellsontheja
whale123
wiesen
wignyopalermo
www.www
x4
xFiber
xRaVeNx
xavier77
xenxen
xht
xijieboy-8
xingming
xslugx
xtalfoster
yishak
ymer
yolanda222
youdamushi
yueno
yugo23
zeaderza
zedicus
zenitzz
zergenyt09
zuyfg888
|Bitkoin|

Topic: [SMAS] Signature Managers against Spam (light version) - page 28. (Read 100704 times)