This is like the old platform that is bountyhive which now seems like they no longer operate as bounty managers through their platform, before stopping they also impose restrictions on participants for bounty campaigns and that's good but the problem is the project is not good.
I agree with the participant restrictions, that would be good for bounty hunter income.
Topic: Solution to too many promoters - page 12. (Read 3286 times)
It is very easy to fix the issue of too many promoters if the Bounty managers decide to do what is right.
Launch a new Bounty and place participants restrictions.
Top 50/100 registration for hunters, then accept and reject participants because bots will surely join
Launch a new Bounty and place participants restrictions.
Top 50/100 registration for hunters, then accept and reject participants because bots will surely join
I think @masulum has adopted this great method, I believe that if every bounty manager does the same then there can be profit in Bounties, but I do not think it will ever happen.
ShengWorld| by masulum
@OP, you make a good point. However, that's not the fault of bounty managers or the project advertised but the responsibility of you yourself not taking into consideration the worth in USD the total allocated tokens.
I usually said this to bounty hunters check the genuine level of project and there payment before working for them or else will work for penny.
always checking the allocation to be distributed is indeed an important point. but, in the world of bounties, the allocations given are uncertain. even if they say the allocation is millions of dollars. however, the most important thing is to limit the participants. the advantage is, the project will also look higher quality, it's just that the drawback is the promotion of the project in question is not as maximal if participants are not restricted. I usually said this to bounty hunters check the genuine level of project and there payment before working for them or else will work for penny.
It is very easy to fix the issue of too many promoters if the Bounty managers decide to do what is right.
Launch a new Bounty and place participants restrictions.
Top 50/100 registration for hunters, then accept and reject participants because bots will surely join
Did you mean about limiting the registrations for the new participants? I didn't even think that will work because the existence of the managers to clean the bots from the campaign that has been running. Launch a new Bounty and place participants restrictions.
Top 50/100 registration for hunters, then accept and reject participants because bots will surely join
Some projects may did it but it's not all of the projects.
It is very easy to fix the issue of too many promoters if the Bounty managers decide to do what is right.
Launch a new Bounty and place participants restrictions.
Top 50/100 registration for hunters, then accept and reject participants because bots will surely join
Launch a new Bounty and place participants restrictions.
Top 50/100 registration for hunters, then accept and reject participants because bots will surely join
@OP, you make a good point. However, that's not the fault of bounty managers or the project advertised but the responsibility of you yourself not taking into consideration the worth in USD the total allocated tokens.
I usually said this to bounty hunters check the genuine level of project and there payment before working for them or else will work for penny.
I usually said this to bounty hunters check the genuine level of project and there payment before working for them or else will work for penny.
Presently, it's hard to curtail the cluster of bounty hunters on projects that seem good,reason being that you hardly find good bounty project and once hunters find such,they would all cluster it making the reward to be small, I think bounty campaigns should be limited,so that reward can make those that participated smile.
even those projects that were limited by the number of participants - they paid very little money. They limit the number of participants and make the reward pool too small so it meant that it does not matter will we have some limits or not 
Presently, it's hard to curtail the cluster of bounty hunters on projects that seem good,reason being that you hardly find good bounty project and once hunters find such,they would all cluster it making the reward to be small, I think bounty campaigns should be limited,so that reward can make those that participated smile.
You can't predict how many bounty participants will join a bounty campaign, you can join when there are very small participants on bounty spreadsheet and after few weeks the spread sheet will consists of over hundreds of participants, bounty managers needs to think and make a move on this one.
that's why it is important to constantly check the spreadsheet and if it is full of bots or other participants, you can simply stop being a participant of this company and not work for a penny
Limited participants are good for bounty hunters only but doesn't help the project much, the team plan to spread words about their project through bounty hunters help, it's sure that they will want unlimited promoters even if they have to fight on 3000$ bounty pool, they don't care
You can't predict how many bounty participants will join a bounty campaign, you can join when there are very small participants on bounty spreadsheet and after few weeks the spread sheet will consists of over hundreds of participants, bounty managers needs to think and make a move on this one.
The great communication with persuasion, energy, passion, and vision leads to a great promoter. To be a good promoter, you need to be aware of the different approaches and angles to take, as well as knowing your competitors. Focusing on the First 50 Days. If too much focus is put on pre-sale activity, then the potential to retain loyal customers is neglected. Turning the Customer into the Brand Promote.
There are two solutions to this type of problem that I know of, the first is
1. Fixed allocation
Every bounty hunters who joined the bounty will get a fixed token per their rank on this forum
2. Limited participants
The bounty campaign will only allow a certain number of bounty hunters so they can get reasonable tokens
1. Fixed allocation
Every bounty hunters who joined the bounty will get a fixed token per their rank on this forum
2. Limited participants
The bounty campaign will only allow a certain number of bounty hunters so they can get reasonable tokens
Bounty hunters are the only medium that could get more audiences/investors. That's why most bounties doesn't have limited slot because they know they can get unlimited outreach to more audiences instead of paying popular social media for ads. As we have seen today there are many good projects that have appeared in the crypto room and there are always many participants joining. It all depends on the bounty manager, where the rules can be applied or not while we can only follow the rules that are applied. If you think a particular bounty campaign has too low bounty reward then find another
Managers here have some power, but they work for the project like the rest of us! They can try to suggest ideas to the team, project owners, they can listen or not, it's up to them. I think we have some good suggestions here, but I don't think this will work, like I said if the team decides to go big with many people and low payouts they will find a manager that will conduct such bounty for them.
There is no shortage for bounty managers but it is hard to find legit managers who will do a background check before accepting the offer to promote their work. If people reject to promote any project that are not accepting these campaign managers who does check everything before promoting then you have the choice to reject promoting those project .
Hmm, reasonable and effective advertisement can be seen when it cover wide range in a project, this can only be done when their is many promoters, so as regards to the limit many manager will not think of that because they will see it as a barrier for their goal or motive which can make their efforts fruitless.
Maybe the allocation can be boost or the manager should determine of hunter required or somehow.
To be realistic many manager will not see reason to reduce promoter ooo.
Maybe the allocation can be boost or the manager should determine of hunter required or somehow.
To be realistic many manager will not see reason to reduce promoter ooo.
Managers here have some power, but they work for the project like the rest of us! They can try to suggest ideas to the team, project owners, they can listen or not, it's up to them. I think we have some good suggestions here, but I don't think this will work, like I said if the team decides to go big with many people and low payouts they will find a manager that will conduct such bounty for them.
There is no shortage for bounty managers but it is hard to find legit managers who will do a background check before accepting the offer to promote their work. If people reject to promote any project that are not accepting these campaign managers who does check everything before promoting then you have the choice to reject promoting those project . usually the many participants are social media bounties, I always see spreadsheets on Facebook and Twitter campaigns of more than 500 participants, in my opinion the solution is only in the bounty manager, because he can change the rules
There are some bounty managers that still apply some strict rules in their bounty to limit the number of bounty participants, yet some still end up getting too low rewards. This is because some of time lack the accounts with high ranks or that they do not have platforms that will make them get a big reward. Also, the quality of work done for the project, such as content creation is very important. All these have their ways of affecting inducing the reward that would be earned.
Project teams want many bounty hunters to join their promotions so the words about their new project can reach every corner of the earth, seriously not every team will allow limiting bounty participants on their bounties, I recommend fixed tokens instead, it's fair enough and kinda Win/Win for everyone, you will know how much tokens or coins you will earn even before the promotion ends
Some projects have limited number of hunters. I have been involved some projects like that.
Jump to: