Topic: Solution to too many promoters - page 10. (Read 3286 times)
This is a very nice suggestion and only few bounty managers are doing it while others are not, the reason is up to them. But however, if the allocation is good enough maybe the bounty manager might remove limits which of course will still attract more participants while the good thing is, they will end up with a tangible reward. On the other hand, bounty managers that doesn't place limits only ends up making participants works less rewarding and it doesn't make sense. Also, this issue of limitations makes most participants or bounty hunters appreciate most bounty managers over others and it will remain that way.
Bounty managers can also use fixed tokens for bounty hunters depending on their ranks, you will even know how many tokens you'd make before you start the bounty campaign, limited participants is good too
The most ridiculous bounty Campaign presently with huge participants and a cruel bounty rule is injective protocol, the allocation is very limited and yet over 240 bounty participants joined the signature campaign, the higher the number of the people that join the better for the team, so cruel, limited participants is the best presently and I will oy follow bounty managers that implements such fairness
I prefer joining bounty campaigns with limited participants, there is a chance you will earn good dollars out of the Campaign, unlimited bounty participants most times won't give good rewards, you will be earning something close to Airdrop rewards
Everyone likes a bounty campaign that limits the participants, because it will be far better than a bounty campaign that opens space for everyone without any restrictions, this will certainly make the hunters more active and faster in drawing conclusions before the slots are full. 
I prefer joining bounty campaigns with limited participants, there is a chance you will earn good dollars out of the Campaign, unlimited bounty participants most times won't give good rewards, you will be earning something close to Airdrop rewards
Yes, like the IQ.Cash campaign, they have a low budget but not limited to participants. In the end, each participant received only $ 5-10 for a few weeks of work. It is even lower than participating in airdrops 
Limited bounty Campaign is the reason why you will see too many participants on a bounty spreadsheet nowadays, I'm ok with this though because too many bounty projects are scam, it's better to have 10 legit bounty Campaigns than 100 scam bounty projects
Everyone will clearly agree that the participant restrictions are applied to the bounty campaign, because that will have a good effect on rewards and will be directed to whom he can quickly, and the manager will not feel tired when working on updates to the weekly spreadsheet table for the bounty campaign he holds. 
There are two perfect solution to overcrowded bounty participants
1. Fixed tokens per bounty hunters
2. Limited bounty participants per Campaign
These two solutions works wonder and few bounty managers
It's only good for bounty participants, but it won't be good for the project. If they limit the participants, I believe their project will not be exaggerated, the projects only care about the number of participants because they want as many people to know the project as possible. 1. Fixed tokens per bounty hunters
2. Limited bounty participants per Campaign
These two solutions works wonder and few bounty managers
Strongly agree with your suggestion, just by limiting bounty hunters to join an allocation campaign will be fair enough, fair and the problem is solved.
Sometimes I am very sad if a good project is always a lot of participants and the results are not fair because the allocation is a little divided among many bounty hunters.
Sometimes I am very sad if a good project is always a lot of participants and the results are not fair because the allocation is a little divided among many bounty hunters.
There are two perfect solution to overcrowded bounty participants
1. Fixed tokens per bounty hunters
2. Limited bounty participants per Campaign
These two solutions works wonder and few bounty managers
1. Fixed tokens per bounty hunters
2. Limited bounty participants per Campaign
These two solutions works wonder and few bounty managers
Its rare to find bounties with fixed bounty hunters unless they are paying in any listed crypto currency because they are not spending money from their pockets and they fixed rewards for bounty pool so no matter how many participants they are going to spend the same reward amount that is why bounties never wanted to limit the number of participants.
Limited bounty Campaign is the reason why you will see too many participants on a bounty spreadsheet nowadays, I'm ok with this though because too many bounty projects are scam, it's better to have 10 legit bounty Campaigns than 100 scam bounty projects
I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters
JUST IF
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
Many bounty managers are already becoming aware of too many bounty hunters in our midst today, for example three different bounty campaigns are ongoing that are using limited participants strategyJUST IF
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
1. DIA Bounty Campaign from Bubbalex
2. Ibidtowin bounty Campaign from Exidious
3. Oikos round 2 bounty Campaign from Oikos team
4. ARCS bounty Campaign from Bounty Detective
It's happening already
I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters
the problem is there are lots of cheater in each bounties that's why the rewards is too little for those fair accounts that doing their job properly with no cheating.
JUST IF
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Do you think that Company cares about the counts of participants?when the truth is they are the one that benefits from this?Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
common open your eyes,because the team doesn't care about hunters because all they care is their incoming profit.
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
The Company Knows ABout cheaters thats why they concern nothing about the allocations of rewards,What do you think??
what is important is that we advertised their company and thats all.
This is of course a very good decision, but unfortunately the companies which making bounties will not make such concessions, after all, they need as many bounty hunters as possible would promote their companies and they don’t care what pennies we will earn.
Most bounty managers won't accept this, more bounty hunters means more awareness for the new project, this is something that bounty managers can pull off of they won't, bubbalex had to put a 50 limited participants on his latest bounty because the whole allocation worths 5000$ only, another bounty manager that can do this again is bounty detective
Viewing multiple projects has also run participant restrictions. And the result they get more coins when compared to projects that are not restricted participants. We can see the Bounty project with Bitcoin payments. Participants are also limited but only with an account above full members who can join.
But all the definite decisions in the hands of Bounty managers. Seeing many altcoins of course we must also be intelligent in determining the Bounty project. So, despite the many bounty participants, we can still get good results.
the big problem is that bounty hunters work with projects without doing any project analytics. very often they do promotion for scam projects and many investors can be scammed But all the definite decisions in the hands of Bounty managers. Seeing many altcoins of course we must also be intelligent in determining the Bounty project. So, despite the many bounty participants, we can still get good results.
They couldn't limit the participants unless they strongly believe that they have enough publicity to achieve their goals.
The reason why they start bounty is for their projects publicity so why would they limit the people who would promote their project that could affect their growth?
I believe that they wouldn't do it after all they already invested on it by allocating some funds for it if you would put yourself on their place I think you would also understand it.
We as a bounty hunter are getting less but they as a project owner are paying up the same amount the problem is that we are too crowded and there are only few projects to promote.
The reason why they start bounty is for their projects publicity so why would they limit the people who would promote their project that could affect their growth?
I believe that they wouldn't do it after all they already invested on it by allocating some funds for it if you would put yourself on their place I think you would also understand it.
We as a bounty hunter are getting less but they as a project owner are paying up the same amount the problem is that we are too crowded and there are only few projects to promote.
Viewing multiple projects has also run participant restrictions. And the result they get more coins when compared to projects that are not restricted participants. We can see the Bounty project with Bitcoin payments. Participants are also limited but only with an account above full members who can join.
But all the definite decisions in the hands of Bounty managers. Seeing many altcoins of course we must also be intelligent in determining the Bounty project. So, despite the many bounty participants, we can still get good results.
But all the definite decisions in the hands of Bounty managers. Seeing many altcoins of course we must also be intelligent in determining the Bounty project. So, despite the many bounty participants, we can still get good results.
Bounties problem presently
1. We have too many jobless people around the world due to COV-19 and some fresh people came on here to join bounties because of the pandemic
2. Bounties have too low budgets nowadays, you can hardly see a project that will give up 100k $
3. Bounties are very limited, there aren't too many Campaigns to get bounty hunters occupied
It's true that limiting bounty participants per bounty project is the perfect answer
1. We have too many jobless people around the world due to COV-19 and some fresh people came on here to join bounties because of the pandemic
2. Bounties have too low budgets nowadays, you can hardly see a project that will give up 100k $
3. Bounties are very limited, there aren't too many Campaigns to get bounty hunters occupied
It's true that limiting bounty participants per bounty project is the perfect answer
We have many greedy developers, bounty managers like those rules because they will be managing a small number of participants and they can easily distribute, but knowing developers of the project, they want as many promoters in a minimum cost and so, they always have the last say on the how the project will run, they want a full advantage of the campaign.
I also think like this. however, if it is the will of the bounty manager, then it is possible that the funds can be deposited in escrow, or use USDT or other coins as payment to be more secure. in addition, participants will definitely be selected and become more selective, and impose limits. unfortunately, developers sometimes want to do massive advertising, which makes the number of participants unlimited. Jump to: