Topic: Solution to too many promoters - page 8. (Read 3286 times)
I doubt this will happen, with a limited or allotted budget for promotion without limit for participants is beneficial for the team because they will have more exposure with a certain budget. That is why altcoin bounties with a fixed bounty pool have no limit in regards to participants, unlike bitcoin bounties which pay per participants instead of counting stakes per week.
If bounty has a big budget then I believe they don't need to limit the participants. Limiting participants will prevent the project from getting the attention of the bounty hunter and the project will not get too much fomo.
I understand your point but which project has big bounty budget that actually maintain their price? There is none, don't believe projects that promise 200k to 1million dollars worth of tokens, they sound big but they won't cost more that 20k to 30k when trading starts on exchangeIf bounty has a big budget then I believe they don't need to limit the participants. Limiting participants will prevent the project from getting the attention of the bounty hunter and the project will not get too much fomo.
I understand your point but which project has big bounty budget that actually maintain their price? There is none, don't believe projects that promise 200k to 1million dollars worth of tokens, they sound big but they won't cost more that 20k to 30k when trading starts on exchange
If bounty has a big budget then I believe they don't need to limit the participants. Limiting participants will prevent the project from getting the attention of the bounty hunter and the project will not get too much fomo.
One thing you need to understand here is that a good project would attract a lot of bounty hunters and what the team is looking for is right exposure for their project and the more people promote their project the better the exposure the project have. I think for me it is better to have a fix token for individual in their campaign and once the budget is exhausted the stop admitting people
Kingcasino was a bad project and it attracts many bounty hunters, can you spare a minute of your time to check kingcasino bounty spreadsheet? Not all bounty hunters are smart enough to spot good bounty projects amongst the bad ones. 
One thing you need to understand here is that a good project would attract a lot of bounty hunters and what the team is looking for is right exposure for their project and the more people promote their project the better the exposure the project have. I think for me it is better to have a fix token for individual in their campaign and once the budget is exhausted the stop admitting people
Right. It's a lot of things to worry about when we joining the bounty campaigns that don't have enough funds to pay for participants. Of course, every project wants to expose its reputation throughout the market by using bounty hunters. Limiting participants is one of the most important things to do if the project wants to encourage their bounty hunters. Obviously, higher rewards, harder works! I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters
JUST IF
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
That's quite hard if I am a developer I want as many bounty hunters to promote my project in a small allocation, if I am a bounty hunter and I see a project has potential in the market I will join it even if we have many participating I prefer a project with small allocation but big potential than a bogus project with high allocation. JUST IF
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
Yeah i think bounties currently have low reward and now you mention it, the reason could be the number of participants.
Limiting the number of bounty participants is a good thing to be done, because it will attracting more qualify promoters due the high reward.
We should think again about that, we can't randomly limiting the campaign and it must be made based on how much allocation and how big will be received by the participants. In fact, so many bounties were getting ordered by the team. The manager will do when the team has been taking such a decision. Limiting the number of bounty participants is a good thing to be done, because it will attracting more qualify promoters due the high reward.
I feel there are 3 sides to the issue of many promoters, the terms the project devs choose to work with, the conditions set aside by the bm and the terms for bounty. Some bm prefers low participation while some projects prefer large participation, it is up to the bm to strike a balance between rewards cap and participant cap
One thing you need to understand here is that a good project would attract a lot of bounty hunters and what the team is looking for is right exposure for their project and the more people promote their project the better the exposure the project have. I think for me it is better to have a fix token for individual in their campaign and once the budget is exhausted the stop admitting people
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
There are already some restrictions being made by some Bounty Managers depending on the preferred style of the Creators of that project. They already implemented this kind of bounty managing and it really affects the outcome of bounties. The bounty hunters will have great profit and in that way, more people will support it in a way that they want to have their own profit by buying tokens from that bounty.
Good allocations and limited participants is a good way to earn decent rewards and assurance will be guaranteed after bounty ends. I joined recently bounties that so many participants and end up only 20$ rewards for 12 weeks of promotions. Doing social media campaigns is not that good anymore because the allocation is small and with unlimited participants its really impossible to earn big rewards. Only on articles and translations are worth it now to joined and even signature campaign is quite fair too.
The solution is very appropriate if the allocation of a small bounty limits the participants who want to join but I personally before join the bounty saw the allocation and how many participants if not comparable then I look for another bounty
But not many people like you, they will be willing to join because they have many accounts. I have seen many people using multiple accounts and bounty fraud, which is why we have so many bounty hunters right now. 
The solution is very appropriate if the allocation of a small bounty limits the participants who want to join but I personally before join the bounty saw the allocation and how many participants if not comparable then I look for another bounty
I think when the world conditions are in crisis like now, even the smallest bounty is obliged to be a participant of the bounty campaign because in my opinion, if you miss a golden opportunity it will only make us regret it because it is a waste of the opportunity to earn money and survive. 
The solution is very appropriate if the allocation of a small bounty limits the participants who want to join but I personally before join the bounty saw the allocation and how many participants if not comparable then I look for another bounty
I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters
JUST IF
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
The Project owners wanted full advertising so why would they limit the participants when even if they are paying low still there are many bounty hunters that will participate?JUST IF
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
Why not tell the BOUNTY HUNTERS to not join when they already saw the amount of allocated payments is getting smaller?
it is not about the managers and owners but about the Hunters.
Agree with you, bounty currently has a very low budget. Therefore limiting the participants will be a good way to protect the interests of bounty hunter. Just like the campaign I'm in, they limited 150 participants to signatures with a budget of about $ 7000 for signatures, I think it's really reasonable.
Well, that did solve the problem in the problem of a small prize to be distributed to limited participants. it will make the prize look bigger. however, something like this happens only to projects that are paid for bitcoin and ethereum. For bounties, it seems that currently it is still very rarely applied, especially for bounties that do not yet have a market. 
Agree with you, bounty currently has a very low budget. Therefore limiting the participants will be a good way to protect the interests of bounty hunter. Just like the campaign I'm in, they limited 150 participants to signatures with a budget of about $ 7000 for signatures, I think it's really reasonable.
Yeah i think bounties currently have low reward and now you mention it, the reason could be the number of participants.
Limiting the number of bounty participants is a good thing to be done, because it will attracting more qualify promoters due the high reward.
Limiting the number of bounty participants is a good thing to be done, because it will attracting more qualify promoters due the high reward.
I strongly agree that the bounty manager puts restrictions on each bounty allocation, because the results we receive are quite large and we can enjoy it, but we must respond quickly when there are new projects that will appear so that we can be registered in the project.
Jump to: