If bounties were restricted to few persons, the reward would have been more substantial than what we have now, some projects are so conscious of giving hunters peanut, so when a campaign doesn't get a certain amount of participation, they slash the reward to ensure that the hunters gets a small amount of tokens after the participation and that's unfair.
Can you provide the list of some projects that did this? As far as I know, the project will only cut their bounty allocation if ever that they don't raise their maximum target or if the allocation is fixed, it is the bounty managers job to make sure that it will be fixed even if there is a few bounty hunters will participate. 
Topic: Solution to too many promoters - page 6. (Read 3253 times)
I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters
JUST IF
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
I think one reason why nowadays we have receive low bounty rewards because all the bounty hunters now are so cautious and vigilant in looking a legit bounty campaign. They are making sure that they will get paid even if they have receive less than they received before. JUST IF
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
The conditions in the crypto market for new projects have changed a lot over the past 3 years.
If earlier a project, even with a weak marketing company, could easily carry out a successful fundraising, today it is necessary to make truly titanic efforts so that investors look at your project and decide on an investment.
I think this is for the best, because now it’s extremely difficult for any garbage to get to the top, but for good projects the conditions have become more complicated.
Therefore, the more hunters participating in the project, the higher the chances that he will succeed.
An alternative would be bounty companies that accept only really effective hunters, this would create a natural precedent for improving the overall quality of work among bounty hunters due to the increasing complexity of the conditions.
If earlier a project, even with a weak marketing company, could easily carry out a successful fundraising, today it is necessary to make truly titanic efforts so that investors look at your project and decide on an investment.
I think this is for the best, because now it’s extremely difficult for any garbage to get to the top, but for good projects the conditions have become more complicated.
Therefore, the more hunters participating in the project, the higher the chances that he will succeed.
An alternative would be bounty companies that accept only really effective hunters, this would create a natural precedent for improving the overall quality of work among bounty hunters due to the increasing complexity of the conditions.
If bounties were restricted to few persons, the reward would have been more substantial than what we have now, some projects are so conscious of giving hunters peanut, so when a campaign doesn't get a certain amount of participation, they slash the reward to ensure that the hunters gets a small amount of tokens after the participation and that's unfair.
that's good, the restriction will be effective if the bounty is too much. will be the same if the bounty is only a little while the restriction makes other bounty hunters unable to take part. I agree with the restrictions and prizes that can be set for each participant. hopefully this can be taken into consideration by the development team and prospective development team who will share the bounty here and it is a success.
I also agree, aside from having a certain number of participants for a bounty campaign, it will also help to filter the bounty participants to increase the quality of the post for advertising the project. It will be an advantage for both project and bounty hunters if this solution will be implemented. that's good, the restriction will be effective if the bounty is too much. will be the same if the bounty is only a little while the restriction makes other bounty hunters unable to take part. I agree with the restrictions and prizes that can be set for each participant. hopefully this can be taken into consideration by the development team and prospective development team who will share the bounty here and it is a success.
I also agree, aside from having a certain number of participants for a bounty campaign, it will also help to filter the bounty participants to increase the quality of the post for advertising the project. It will be an advantage for both project and bounty hunters if this solution will be implemented. However, it might be good also to do first is to minimize the number of the projects being introduced in the forum. Because of their numbers investors find it hard to chose and invest with. Then most likely investors now are learning that investing in ICO projects is a big NO No for it is a high chance of being a scam project.
that's good, the restriction will be effective if the bounty is too much. will be the same if the bounty is only a little while the restriction makes other bounty hunters unable to take part. I agree with the restrictions and prizes that can be set for each participant. hopefully this can be taken into consideration by the development team and prospective development team who will share the bounty here and it is a success.
I also agree, aside from having a certain number of participants for a bounty campaign, it will also help to filter the bounty participants to increase the quality of the post for advertising the project. It will be an advantage for both project and bounty hunters if this solution will be implemented. 
that's good, the restriction will be effective if the bounty is too much. will be the same if the bounty is only a little while the restriction makes other bounty hunters unable to take part. I agree with the restrictions and prizes that can be set for each participant. hopefully this can be taken into consideration by the development team and prospective development team who will share the bounty here and it is a success.
Because the price of DIA has gone up many times compared to its original price. Thus bounty hunter received a large sum of money coming from it. The DIA's initial budget is only $ 5,000 so only a handful of people are involved in this campaign
According to what DIA telegram admin say, all the listings of DIA tokens on hoo, biki, hotbit, uniswap and others were not made by them. Team says that tokens are locked till August 18. Bounty hunters haven't received tokens yet.
Probably early investors made this pump, or fake tokens are traded on these exchange (or some sort of "future" tokens). Or the team lies about not transferring tokens to uniswap (where all trade started).
I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters
JUST IF
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
JUST IF
Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?
Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants
What do you think??
The problem in the bounty is a scam and unfair. because the manager does not limit the participants is also a problem. I have an idea that if I become a manager, I will adjust the number of participants according to the allocation of rewards. because besides being an easy job for the manager, bounty participants also get a decent reward. how is my idea?
The truth is that bounty hunting was more lucrative before now, and that was simply because there were fewer hunters on many campaigns. Now we have much more hunters and the reward are even lesser. The best way out is to limit the hunters by any criteria the bounty manager feels fit and share the reward with a limited set of hunters. This would make the bounty hassle more rewarding for hunters.
Actually it did change. Now it has become common to distribute in batches. Answer question about the project before you are accepted. Social media campaign most common rule was “5 retweet+2tweet“, now bounty asks to “retweet with comment using hashtags”. Bounty pulls have decreased. Project ask to “register on a wallet site where tokens will be send”
The current bounty system hasn't changed much since a few years ago on the forum and the only difference is the amount allocated. We have nothing to complain about because it's not a mandatory job but an opportunity to earn money and experience blockchain technology. However, each manager has their own style of work and we must know it before joining any campaign.
Because the price of DIA has gone up many times compared to its original price. Thus bounty hunter received a large sum of money coming from it. The DIA's initial budget is only $ 5,000 so only a handful of people are involved in this campaign
According to what DIA telegram admin say, all the listings of DIA tokens on hoo, biki, hotbit, uniswap and others were not made by them. Team says that tokens are locked till August 18. Bounty hunters haven't received tokens yet.
Probably early investors made this pump, or fake tokens are traded on these exchange (or some sort of "future" tokens). Or the team lies about not transferring tokens to uniswap (where all trade started).
I think I still like things the way it is currently, the current system makes the money to reach almost every participating bounty hunter, in all honesty I think it is the roject developers that ought to increase their allocation for bounty campaigns and promotion
As long as the price of the token will not make the hunters disappointed again and then even with the small allocation and it's still worth to participated but remember when the dev offered a lot of allocation but the price of token was zero and is not it look so bad? 
I agree with your points, and it makes sense! Recently Bubbalex limited the participants in his DIA signature and twitter campaign, and now I see the impact of limitation! Almost every full member will make thousands of dollars from the DIA coin; twitter participants also earned good rewards! Bounty manager should follow this, I hate the Sofico bounty management team, they are ruining the greatness of crypto bounty campaign, they Don't limit participants, and they give shit rewards to their supporters. Bounty managers should follow what you pointed out!
I think it doesn't really matter if there are too many promoters in a bounty means project it so good that many join but if the allocation is small then it depends on each individual want to join or not, but if allocation small, there are many participants then the prize that will be small
Agree, restrictions on bounty participants can have a good impact on participants' income but do not know what the impact will be on the project, is it bad because of a lack of news distribution so that the project does not run smoothly due to participant boundaries or there are other impact
if the bounty hunter is still thinking about allocations, then you better join the bounty with Bitcoin payments, because you will definitely be paid according to your work, we all know the project allocation for the bounty program is uncertain, and there are many scam projects, so you have to choose the right one. bounty manager for your work
I think I still like things the way it is currently, the current system makes the money to reach almost every participating bounty hunter, in all honesty I think it is the roject developers that ought to increase their allocation for bounty campaigns and promotion
Jump to: