Hi guys,
question no. 7 says:
7. Atletico Madrid was always known for their granite defense but this season is a bit different and we can see them conceding more than usual. They are hosting a good Ath. Bilbao team, will both teams score in this game?
My answer was "NO", they are not going to score both in this game, which was correct. The game ended 1-0 for Atletico. How is that answer wrong
There is nothing to worry about mate,
Probably a mistake, don't read to much into it just yet, I'm Trofo and Cryptofrka will take more than twice to go through the questions and every answers before the final table and scores are updated.
Hey no no, I wasn't worrying, just surprised that nobody brought it up yet. So no worries!
Now I would like to ask a question and make a suggestion: in the table for Division 3, for example, Jinetics1111 now leads with a SF : SA = 7 : 0 score. I bring this up now because I could also hope for MAAManda to now show up again and I take home a bunch of points as well. I assume that when people have equal H2H points, the SF : SA score will be relevant.
For the person who did submit answers, it is of course right to get the 3 points. But the SF : SA statistics get totally screwed and don't reflect a realistic result anymore. Wouldn't it make more sense if instead of SF : SA , you put down the freebet points? Those are actually the number of answers somebody really got right. But if the SF : SA statistics decide in the end, the bottom line is that if you take this day as an example, a play does not only get the 3 points but also points on top for even wrong answers. If you think about a theoretical H2H situation between Jinetics1111 and me, he literally receives 2 points for the division for exactly the same wrong answers that I gave. That doesn't really make sense.
In soccer leagues it is usually a 2:0 and 3 points when one team breaks the rules or doesn't show up. 3 points, again, are totally correct, and relatively, the 2:0 is also fine, but when you look at the standings in the table, wouldn't you want the person with the most correct answers and the most points be at the top in the end?
After all I don't care that much but since you guys said that you want to keep this competition running for several seasons to come, I think it is at least worth to think about. Perhaps you could add freebet points as a column and make that one the decisive statistic instead of "SD" if two people have the same number of points. Even though someone can still earn easy 3 points when the opponent doesn't show up, but there is still more weight on getting your answers right than just submitting them and get points for wrong answers as well when the opponent doesn't show up.
This is not all too important for Division 3 as there is not as much on the line, but imagine two guys are equal in points in Division 1 and rank 1 submitted less correct answers than rank 2, but still got points because two times an opponent didn't show up.
Hope you get my point here and I hope I got the rules right so this makes sense.
Cheers!
). It was @Jinetics1111 luck that I didn't participate in the first round, and for this round, I've answered all the answers. 
Not that I want to complain, it just shows that we also need to put some thought into our choices. 
