SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching - page 213.

Ballscack

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Quote from: roma__11 on June 25, 2018, 02:54:51 PM

Quote from: Ballscack on June 25, 2018, 02:41:33 PM

Quote from: roma__11 on June 25, 2018, 02:25:50 PM

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod
i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner?
https://ibb.co/fqmpc8

I know Purk,BBR ~ 0.00002000 BTC, Vega 6500-6900 Kh/c = 31 Purk = 0.00062000 BTC and Vega64 = 2400 CNv7 1100 mem = Maximum Graft 0.00037200. (It's right now)
Any Miner Wild Keccak which is now, very buggy, so I'll ask again, maybe make a good miner?

2400 CNv7

how?? that is not posible on vega 64 only on the 16gb fe one

6x vega i get 35mh on keccak so bad...

roma__11

newbie

Activity: 115

Merit: 0

Quote from: Ballscack on June 25, 2018, 02:41:33 PM

Quote from: roma__11 on June 25, 2018, 02:25:50 PM

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod
i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner?
https://ibb.co/fqmpc8

I know Purk,BBR ~ 0.00002000 BTC, Vega 6500-6900 Kh/c = 31 Purk = 0.00062000 BTC and Vega64 = 2400 CNv7 1100 mem = Maximum Graft 0.00037200. (It's right now)
Any Miner Wild Keccak which is now, very buggy, so I'll ask again, maybe make a good miner?

Ballscack

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Quote from: roma__11 on June 25, 2018, 02:25:50 PM

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

what coin is so profitable? and what software u use for vege? i get 2150hs v7 monero on vega 64 @ 1502 core 1100 mem low power mod

i get best results at with BXB-miner maby we can use it to optimize sbr miner?

https://ibb.co/fqmpc8

roma__11

newbie

Activity: 115

Merit: 0

Wild Keccak then the most effective algorithm, on it vega gets from 0,00050000 BTC now, can learn about possibly create a normal miner?

heavyarms1912

full member

Activity: 729

Merit: 114

Quote from: dingdongtobias on June 25, 2018, 01:38:36 PM

Quote from: heavyarms1912 on June 25, 2018, 12:30:51 PM

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 10:04:34 AM

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 05:43:40 AM

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

how to hell can you go 118 and dual threads??

why not? here's a 120 hashing at 1050. You can even go higher than 120.

dingdongtobias

newbie

Activity: 156

Merit: 0

Quote from: heavyarms1912 on June 25, 2018, 12:30:51 PM

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 10:04:34 AM

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 05:43:40 AM

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

how to hell can you go 118 and dual threads??

ViWe

newbie

Activity: 57

Merit: 0

Quote from: heavyarms1912 on June 25, 2018, 12:30:51 PM

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 10:04:34 AM

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 05:43:40 AM

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

RX580 8gb
Normal-v7: double threads, intensity 80, 1060+h/s
Lite-v: double threads, intensity 153, 2230+h/s
https://imgur.com/a/OoWoAEy

heavyarms1912

full member

Activity: 729

Merit: 114

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 10:04:34 AM

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 05:43:40 AM

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

I use 118 intensity dual threads on 8gb cards CN-V7

coke15

member

Activity: 176

Merit: 10

Quote from: livada on June 25, 2018, 07:23:49 AM

i test nanopool 1 hour . Srbiner say 10900-11200HR
nanopool say: 10800-13000HR

Al ok with HR report. Mybe u use BAD pool.

hi

i'm on nanopool for weeks
srbminer 56k/hs ----->nanopool 53,5k/hs MAX.

something goes wrong...

on nanopool,i'm ALWAYS -10/-20% theorical earning....0-5% ok but -10/-20% no glop :/

roma__11

newbie

Activity: 115

Merit: 0

In "Wild Keccak" there are no plans to make a miner? all the rest is unstable (

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: dingdongtobias on June 25, 2018, 10:08:00 AM

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 10:04:34 AM

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 05:43:40 AM

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

no because we use 2 threads and 54-56 intensity on 580 8g

Not heavy? On normal CN v7? And what speed?

dingdongtobias

newbie

Activity: 156

Merit: 0

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 10:04:34 AM

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 05:43:40 AM

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

no because we use 2 threads and 54-56 intensity on 580 8g

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Quote from: UnclWish on June 25, 2018, 05:43:40 AM

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

No one tries CN-v7 on 1.6.1. on 8Gb cards? With intensity higher 100-100?

heavyarms1912

full member

Activity: 729

Merit: 114

Quote from: dragonmike on June 25, 2018, 06:33:30 AM

Doktor, I assume the compute errors are overclock related. Do you know whether they are coming from too high core or mem values by any chances? On Polaris cards I can always check the memory errors in HWinfo but that feature isn't enabled for Vega's HBM memory...

There are also instance when OC settings that won't show BUS_error or compute error in SRBminer but would show up in xmr-stak.
Interestingly, the hashrates were quite low on pool side when such errors were happening.

CharlieCox

member

Activity: 212

Merit: 12

Just a short report. I had issues with Cast, the speed was good however it would simply stop hashing randomly after a few hours of mining. I switched to SRB last night. So far, so good. The configuration process was easy.

livada

newbie

Activity: 417

Merit: 0

Quote from: Mashy81 on June 25, 2018, 05:09:41 AM

Quote from: vmozara on June 25, 2018, 01:39:08 AM

Quote from: Mashy81 on June 24, 2018, 07:42:05 PM

It depends greatly on the pool and the day. Somedays I average above for the 24hrs and some days under.
Nanopool is far more stable and always the same or higher hashrate 24hr average.
Hashvault ok and cryptoknight.cc pool always less.
There are soo many factors. Look at the average over several days

It is not about the pool or the day

If after 2 weeks pool show that one rig has total of 14000000000 hashes and other ones have 13000000000 or even 11000000000, it means that some machines are hashing less than the others, and all of them are 6xVega with 12000H/s

It happens on supportxmr, it happens on nanopool, it happens on many others
I am not saying that somebody is stealing the hashes, because some machines are hashing well, but there must be some hardware or software difference that affects the miner or data sent by miner, simply because SRB and CAST have this issue and STAK doesn't

You are forgetting the luck factor. Also not even every card will get the same shares or hashrate.
At the end of the day if people can't work out which mining software they get the most out of they shouldn't be mining. SRB I get the most in my pocket. I also agree it is far more stable than xmr stak and cast.
I have also noticed that hardware errors and agressive overclocks will case lower excepted hashrate at the pools.

i test nanopool 1 hour . Srbiner say 10900-11200HR
nanopool say: 10800-13000HR

Al ok with HR report. Mybe u use BAD pool.
https://image.prntscr.com/image/1_dBnWPnTZy34hPG46NAAw.jpg

test on ROCK POOL heavy 2 hour
srbiner say 6150HR
ROCKpool say 5800-6300HR
again all ok with HR report
https://image.prntscr.com/image/EJ4nNrkqSpuNYjmaCyfrLA.jpg
-
https://image.prntscr.com/image/Esptqf-dTWe5J3cbFT-mag.jpg

dragonmike

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 556

Doktor, I assume the compute errors are overclock related. Do you know whether they are coming from too high core or mem values by any chances? On Polaris cards I can always check the memory errors in HWinfo but that feature isn't enabled for Vega's HBM memory...

UnclWish

sr. member

Activity: 1484

Merit: 253

Does anyone can use high intensiity 100-110+ on 1.6.1 CN-v7 algo without speed drops?

Mashy81

jr. member

Activity: 225

Merit: 1

No one makes anyone use this software.
Big thanks to the Dev. For working hard and giving us this software

Mashy81

jr. member

Activity: 225

Merit: 1

Quote from: vmozara on June 25, 2018, 01:39:08 AM

Quote from: Mashy81 on June 24, 2018, 07:42:05 PM

It depends greatly on the pool and the day. Somedays I average above for the 24hrs and some days under.
Nanopool is far more stable and always the same or higher hashrate 24hr average.
Hashvault ok and cryptoknight.cc pool always less.
There are soo many factors. Look at the average over several days

It is not about the pool or the day

If after 2 weeks pool show that one rig has total of 14000000000 hashes and other ones have 13000000000 or even 11000000000, it means that some machines are hashing less than the others, and all of them are 6xVega with 12000H/s

It happens on supportxmr, it happens on nanopool, it happens on many others
I am not saying that somebody is stealing the hashes, because some machines are hashing well, but there must be some hardware or software difference that affects the miner or data sent by miner, simply because SRB and CAST have this issue and STAK doesn't

You are forgetting the luck factor. Also not even every card will get the same shares or hashrate.
At the end of the day if people can't work out which mining software they get the most out of they shouldn't be mining. SRB I get the most in my pocket. I also agree it is far more stable than xmr stak and cast.
I have also noticed that hardware errors and agressive overclocks will case lower excepted hashrate at the pools.

Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching - page 213. (Read 237263 times)