Hi, any intensity tips for StelliteV4? Rx580 rig here, 13000 total in CN heavy, 11900 in Stellite. Is this expected?
The optimal Stellite algo configuration and h/s is very similar if not identical to the v7 algo due to the way it is coded.
Topic: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.9.3 - native algo switching - page 225. (Read 237263 times)
June 11, 2018, 06:04:40 PM
The optimal Stellite algo configuration and h/s is very similar if not identical to the v7 algo due to the way it is coded.
June 11, 2018, 04:48:28 PM
How to switch to next pool in the list ?
r - reload pools and use the first pool
r - reload pools and use the first pool
go read first page.
or
read README.txt
June 11, 2018, 04:31:00 PM
How to switch to next pool in the list ?
r - reload pools and use the first pool
r - reload pools and use the first pool
June 11, 2018, 04:14:42 PM
What is this?
https://image.prntscr.com/image/EomGSxQKREKg0w97UYvkYQ.jpg
0HR 5 sec and go back and mining work ok.
https://image.prntscr.com/image/EomGSxQKREKg0w97UYvkYQ.jpg
0HR 5 sec and go back and mining work ok.
I have the same issue on 1.6.0
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Mining time: 0 days, 2 hours, 27 minutes, 9 seconds
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Algo: normalv7
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Pool: pool.electroneum.hashvault.pro:5555
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Connected since: 2018-06-11 19:12:27
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Last job received : 441 seconds ago
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: System shutdown temperature: 80
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Accepted/Total shares: 225/225
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Average time to find share: 39 seconds
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_5: 16
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_13: 12
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_2: 10
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_1: 9
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_15: 10
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_12: 14
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_3: 9
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_10: 7
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_11: 13
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_9: 6
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_4: 4
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_14: 10
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_6: 8
Full log with this problem
http://pasted.co/ea87db25
Please don't be retarded.
This error reporting exists from the first versions, it shows which video card calculated an invalid result. Like in claymore miners.
June 11, 2018, 03:43:36 PM
vega 56 8 gb
the monitor is connected to an integrated integrated card.
at worksize 16 more gives
ok. what intensyti and worksize u use for HEAVY algo ?
HEAVY do not use. shitcoin.
6vega 56 :
v7 14$
heavy 24$
and you tell this.
ok noob mining v7
June 11, 2018, 03:23:57 PM
vega 56 8 gb
the monitor is connected to an integrated integrated card.
at worksize 16 more gives
ok. what intensyti and worksize u use for HEAVY algo ?
HEAVY do not use. shitcoin.
June 11, 2018, 03:22:32 PM
Some of these results are not making sense at all.
I have tweaked my Asus RX580 (8GB) according to best guide and not getting over 1000 hash on each.
I dont think its possible unless you having clocked it to have hundreds of memory errors and card then fuck up..
I have tweaked my Asus RX580 (8GB) according to best guide and not getting over 1000 hash on each.
I dont think its possible unless you having clocked it to have hundreds of memory errors and card then fuck up..
So! If you don't know how to do it then it is impossible?
Didnt say its impossible, just saying with the dodgy overlocks your not considering power draw.
Considering the safety of your cards, then good luck with your power bill vs profit of mining.
Good luck with the life of your cards..
Crazy overclock? Nope.
Insane power draw? Nope.
I can reach average 1100H/s in heavy with 1310/2020 (Samsung, 940mv cvddc) with no pain. Well, I did some tests with intensity but was not hard to find the perfect balance (between 56 and 58).
For Micron @heavyarms shared his own timings some pages ago and they are great. Ubermix timings are good for Samsung. So, there are many knowledge around this thread to find best performance.
I'm trying to find a way to break 1000H/s with stability with my Elpida. I had good results with some mixing, but when I reach 1000H/s with low memory clock, the ETHash performance drops even with high clock (it doesn't makes sense).
You did hardcoded bios mod or you using OverDriveNTool?
June 11, 2018, 03:19:28 PM
Some of these results are not making sense at all.
I have tweaked my Asus RX580 (8GB) according to best guide and not getting over 1000 hash on each.
I dont think its possible unless you having clocked it to have hundreds of memory errors and card then fuck up..
I have tweaked my Asus RX580 (8GB) according to best guide and not getting over 1000 hash on each.
I dont think its possible unless you having clocked it to have hundreds of memory errors and card then fuck up..
So! If you don't know how to do it then it is impossible?
Didnt say its impossible, just saying with the dodgy overlocks your not considering power draw.
Considering the safety of your cards, then good luck with your power bill vs profit of mining.
Good luck with the life of your cards..
You need good timing straps to reach 1k+ on CN-V7. 8gb cards can do 1k+ on CN-Heavy easily.
I have also got 1260 H/s on an RX 570 8gb card (1466/2300 clocks). They do 1140 H/s @ 1250/2240 clocks and 900mV core (105w from wall). So it's pretty much possible.
Also, All 4gb cards that I have Elpida, Hynix do 1k+ on CN-V7.
DOnt belive this at all, you getting higher has than me on a 570 not even 580 card and you have full stability.
So how often your cards crash ?
June 11, 2018, 03:05:15 PM
V1.6.0
+ As some have issues with miner 'just waiting some time' on startup, i added more logging option so we can catch where it hangs, and i can possibly fix that
Reproduced + As some have issues with miner 'just waiting some time' on startup, i added more logging option so we can catch where it hangs, and i can possibly fix that
[2018-06-10 02:38:44] Heating up system, please wait...
[2018-06-10 02:38:43] CryptonightV7 mode enabled
[2018-06-10 02:38:44] DevFee pools loaded
[2018-06-10 02:38:44] DevFee pool SET
[2018-06-10 02:38:44] DevFee address SET
ok, now i know its not the new devfee method that is problematic.
But i would suggest to try now a previous version that you know was working good.
Nothing was changed in the new version in the GPU's initialisation process (this is where it hangs), so my guess is something at your side is causing this.
Comparing his log with mine:
[2018-06-09 13:52:22] CryptonightV7 mode enabled
[2018-06-09 13:53:46] DevFee pool SET
[2018-06-09 13:53:46] DevFee address SET
I don't have the "DevFee pools loaded", maybe is this what is slowing down my startup.
well then your firewall is probably blocking srbminer.com domain, and it cant get the devfee pools from online. add an exception to your firewall for the srbminer.com domain.
Ok.
1) Can you add more logging to understand what srbminer.com was blocking? Because this issue not reproduce always.
2) Now i'm downgrade to version 1.5.5.1 and i dont have this issue "Heating up system, please wait..." maybe for now.
3) Is it possible to compile/load kernels in order as GPUREORDER? if set. I have issue at compile step (blue screen) and it will good if can know whic card start at this moment.
4) Is it possible to make "1" index based? After several night, whith test card to investigate blue screen, i make many bug with convert card numbers in hwinfo and in miner ) I would be very grateful )
June 11, 2018, 02:55:33 PM
What is this?
https://image.prntscr.com/image/EomGSxQKREKg0w97UYvkYQ.jpg
0HR 5 sec and go back and mining work ok.
https://image.prntscr.com/image/EomGSxQKREKg0w97UYvkYQ.jpg
0HR 5 sec and go back and mining work ok.
I have the same issue on 1.6.0
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Mining time: 0 days, 2 hours, 27 minutes, 9 seconds
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Algo: normalv7
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Pool: pool.electroneum.hashvault.pro:5555
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Connected since: 2018-06-11 19:12:27
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Last job received : 441 seconds ago
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: System shutdown temperature: 80
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Accepted/Total shares: 225/225
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: Average time to find share: 39 seconds
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_5: 16
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_13: 12
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_2: 10
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_1: 9
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_15: 10
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_12: 14
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_3: 9
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_10: 7
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_11: 13
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_9: 6
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_4: 4
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_14: 10
[2018-06-11 21:39:36] stats: HW error: BUS_ID_6: 8
Full log with this problem
http://pasted.co/ea87db25
June 11, 2018, 02:44:39 PM
Hi, any intensity tips for StelliteV4? Rx580 rig here, 13000 total in CN heavy, 11900 in Stellite. Is this expected?
June 11, 2018, 02:20:50 PM
Some of these results are not making sense at all.
I have tweaked my Asus RX580 (8GB) according to best guide and not getting over 1000 hash on each.
I dont think its possible unless you having clocked it to have hundreds of memory errors and card then fuck up..
I have tweaked my Asus RX580 (8GB) according to best guide and not getting over 1000 hash on each.
I dont think its possible unless you having clocked it to have hundreds of memory errors and card then fuck up..
So! If you don't know how to do it then it is impossible?
Didnt say its impossible, just saying with the dodgy overlocks your not considering power draw.
Considering the safety of your cards, then good luck with your power bill vs profit of mining.
Good luck with the life of your cards..
Crazy overclock? Nope.
Insane power draw? Nope.
I can reach average 1100H/s in heavy with 1310/2020 (Samsung, 940mv cvddc) with no pain. Well, I did some tests with intensity but was not hard to find the perfect balance (between 56 and 58).
For Micron @heavyarms shared his own timings some pages ago and they are great. Ubermix timings are good for Samsung. So, there are many knowledge around this thread to find best performance.
I'm trying to find a way to break 1000H/s with stability with my Elpida. I had good results with some mixing, but when I reach 1000H/s with low memory clock, the ETHash performance drops even with high clock (it doesn't makes sense).
June 11, 2018, 02:04:39 PM
vega 56 8 gb
the monitor is connected to an integrated integrated card.
at worksize 16 more gives
ok. what intensyti and worksize u use for HEAVY algo ?
June 11, 2018, 01:56:03 PM
[2018-06-08 23:07:33] Error CL_OUT_OF_HOST_MEMORY when creating clCreateCommandQueue for DeviceID 0 (Thread 0)
[2018-06-08 23:07:33] Error initing GPU's. Stopping miner process
[2018-06-08 23:07:33] Error initing GPU's. Stopping miner process
what caused the error ?
1.4.9 works, and 1.5.9 gives the following error
with the same settings
normalv7
"gpu_conf" :
[
{ "id" : 0, "intensity" : 112, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2},
{ "id" : 1, "intensity" : 112, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2},
{ "id" : 2, "intensity" : 112, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2},
{ "id" : 3, "intensity" : 112, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2},
{ "id" : 4, "intensity" : 112, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2},
{ "id" : 5, "intensity" : 112, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2}
]
vega 56 8 gb
the monitor is connected to an integrated integrated card.
at worksize 16 more gives
June 11, 2018, 12:57:06 PM
getting around 980-1030 H/s on CN-Heavy from 8GB RX470s with Samsung memory and 8GB RX570s with Micron. great!
That is good speed.
June 11, 2018, 12:41:51 PM
getting around 980-1030 H/s on CN-Heavy from 8GB RX470s with Samsung memory and 8GB RX570s with Micron. great!
June 11, 2018, 12:20:25 PM
I'm getting ~500 H/s on R9 280x @ default settings, v1.6.0. Is that what should i expect? I was hoping more though
Point algo. Double threads enabled? Try to manual increase intensity. June 11, 2018, 12:12:20 PM
I'm getting ~500 H/s on R9 280x @ default settings, v1.6.0. Is that what should i expect? I was hoping more though
June 11, 2018, 11:42:53 AM
you are in SRBMiner thread!
try here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/srbpolaris-v35-bios-editor-for-amd-rx4xx-and-rx5xx-cards-1882656
try here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/srbpolaris-v35-bios-editor-for-amd-rx4xx-and-rx5xx-cards-1882656
June 11, 2018, 11:36:05 AM
Some of these results are not making sense at all.
I have tweaked my Asus RX580 (8GB) according to best guide and not getting over 1000 hash on each.
I dont think its possible unless you having clocked it to have hundreds of memory errors and card then fuck up..
I have tweaked my Asus RX580 (8GB) according to best guide and not getting over 1000 hash on each.
I dont think its possible unless you having clocked it to have hundreds of memory errors and card then fuck up..
So! If you don't know how to do it then it is impossible?
Didnt say its impossible, just saying with the dodgy overlocks your not considering power draw.
Considering the safety of your cards, then good luck with your power bill vs profit of mining.
Good luck with the life of your cards..
You need good timing straps to reach 1k+ on CN-V7. 8gb cards can do 1k+ on CN-Heavy easily.
I have also got 1260 H/s on an RX 570 8gb card (1466/2300 clocks). They do 1140 H/s @ 1250/2240 clocks and 900mV core (105w from wall). So it's pretty much possible.
Also, All 4gb cards that I have Elpida, Hynix do 1k+ on CN-V7.
I want to see that...
Can't get more that 700h/s with Elpida 570 pulse 4gb (with stak and SRB)
I've got 14 RX 570's with Elpida mem hashing at 960 on average.
Jump to: