Pages:
Author

Topic: STAFF member xDeathwing is a SCAMMER! - page 2. (Read 9600 times)

legendary
Activity: 2087
Merit: 1015
September 13, 2013, 01:36:06 AM
How about two misunderstandings.

xDeathwing, when will I get my money back?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3119855

I don't know if i'll take a Scammer or Untrustworthy tag but for this subject, i don't know...
I paid 0.05 to both person as i said before so i don't see any problems.

Wrong. Answer.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3120352
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3121690
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
September 13, 2013, 01:29:15 AM
How about two misunderstandings.

xDeathwing, when will I get my money back?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3119855

I don't know if i'll take a Scammer or Untrustworthy tag but for this subject, i don't know...
I paid 0.05 to both person as i said before so i don't see any problems.

Wrong. Answer.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 504
always the student, never the master.
September 13, 2013, 01:19:01 AM
all you goofy motherfuckers in here on your moral crusade about xDeathwings actions are ridiculous. if you honestly think that he should have to pay .5 btc for a video, whether he said it or not, you are a waste of breath. the fact that he paid .05 btc at all shows some type of resolve in his charachter. you're all a bunch of fucking idiots, pure and simple, and all you try to do is create a fight out of a minor misunderstanding.
legendary
Activity: 2087
Merit: 1015
September 13, 2013, 12:59:19 AM
Sorry for my english
I received a payment from the xDeathwing in the amount of 0.05 BTC from which pleases me.
Please, do not take the next payment Smiley I recognize that xDeathwing made ​​a mistake by making a typo.
Please close the thread and not returning to it.
Exactly what I said!

We didn't know Sitnicki's perspective so this entire thread was simply a witch hunt, and we should have waited for Sitnicki's input.

Now that we have it, he recognized the typo and was pleased with the outcome making this entire thread irrelevant.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
September 13, 2013, 12:55:36 AM
Sorry for my english
I received a payment from the xDeathwing in the amount of 0.05 BTC from which pleases me.
Please, do not take the next payment Smiley I recognize that xDeathwing made ​​a mistake by making a typo.
Please close the thread and not returning to it.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
September 12, 2013, 09:32:00 PM
Wow... this looks great for the forum...  Roll Eyes



You gave me cancer sir, 98 activity 997 post, useless posts.

Excellent mod post! Seriously, excellent mod post... for SA, but not here.

I'll have to correct you here. This kind of post would be bannable on SA, mod or not. We frown on the use of tired, old catchphrases. Mostly because we invented them. 10 years ago. Like the one above. That was one of them.

Is 'SA' the forum version of ebaumsworld? Sure does sound like it.

Oh no, you didn't just go there. Be glad I like you, or I would be... would be.... would be posting pictures of your house and sending you Dominoes Pizza and little tiny packets of flour labeled cocaine. (The trick is it's not flour, it's cocaine)

You send people free cocaine? Can i sign up for some of that? Cool

Fuck the cocaine, I want flower. I know this chick with a yeast infection and I want to bake bread.
member
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
September 11, 2013, 04:36:59 PM
I don't think that bounties are generally enforceable. In an informal bounty like this without specific language to the contrary, the bounty creator retains sole control over who receives the bounty, even if the community disagrees with him. So I don't think that xDeathwing is obligated to pay anything, though due to the confusion and small amount of money involved, he probably should pay 0.5.

I removed him as a moderator because this is all a bit shady, and his conduct in this thread leads me to believe that he is too reckless/careless to be a good moderator, not because I believe him to be guilty of scamming in this case.

Adding my voice to all the praise. Way to handle this situation, theymos.

I agree, theymos handled this the right way.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
Cuddling, censored, unicorn-shaped troll.
September 11, 2013, 04:35:27 PM
I don't think that bounties are generally enforceable. In an informal bounty like this without specific language to the contrary, the bounty creator retains sole control over who receives the bounty, even if the community disagrees with him. So I don't think that xDeathwing is obligated to pay anything, though due to the confusion and small amount of money involved, he probably should pay 0.5.

I removed him as a moderator because this is all a bit shady, and his conduct in this thread leads me to believe that he is too reckless/careless to be a good moderator, not because I believe him to be guilty of scamming in this case.

Adding my voice to all the praise. Way to handle this situation, theymos.
vip
Activity: 756
Merit: 503
September 11, 2013, 04:12:17 PM
Wow... this looks great for the forum...  Roll Eyes



You gave me cancer sir, 98 activity 997 post, useless posts.

Excellent mod post! Seriously, excellent mod post... for SA, but not here.

I'll have to correct you here. This kind of post would be bannable on SA, mod or not. We frown on the use of tired, old catchphrases. Mostly because we invented them. 10 years ago. Like the one above. That was one of them.

Is 'SA' the forum version of ebaumsworld? Sure does sound like it.

Oh no, you didn't just go there. Be glad I like you, or I would be... would be.... would be posting pictures of your house and sending you Dominoes Pizza and little tiny packets of flour labeled cocaine. (The trick is it's not flour, it's cocaine)

You send people free cocaine? Can i sign up for some of that? Cool

It's trick cocaine that's actually anthrax.  Undecided

Nope, ricin. 

legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
September 11, 2013, 04:11:08 PM
Dude just let it go, he is not a mod anymore...

No, but technically he still owes .45 BTC unless Sitnicki and he agree upon something else.

well he is a "scammer" and we can't do anything about it
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
September 11, 2013, 04:07:36 PM
Dude just let it go, he is not a mod anymore...

No, but technically he still owes .45 BTC unless Sitnicki and he agree upon something else.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
September 11, 2013, 01:41:47 PM
I'm sorry, but this is ridiculous. You offered .5 BTC for someone to provide a service to you, they provided the service, and you are trying to send .05 BTC.

You claim you made a typo. But you were not upfront about this. You were not honest about this. Instead you MODIFIED a post in which you were quoted, without noting the change, to say ".05 BTC." That is extremely shady.

Let's say you did make a typo... you're still obligated because that is the amount you agreed to pay. If the person on the other end of the transaction decided to be understanding of you allegedly "making a typo," then that would be okay. But they haven't. And you haven't spoken to them. Because you seem to think you can say one thing and do another.

That is not how respectable people operate.

For those saying this does not fit the definition of a scam... the definition "a dishonest scheme; a fraud." The definition of fraud: "wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain."

I think it is quite deceptive to act like you said something you didn't, and even try to tamper with the evidence (the quoted post) to make it look like you said something else.

That's messed up man. And I think you know you're in the wrong here. You just don't want to be out the money. So man up and talk it over to sitnicki. Maybe he'll be understanding.

John

Dude just let it go, he is not a mod anymore...
member
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
September 11, 2013, 12:49:08 PM
I'm sorry, but this is ridiculous. You offered .5 BTC for someone to provide a service to you, they provided the service, and you are trying to send .05 BTC.

You claim you made a typo. But you were not upfront about this. You were not honest about this. Instead you MODIFIED a post in which you were quoted, without noting the change, to say ".05 BTC." That is extremely shady.

Let's say you did make a typo... you're still obligated because that is the amount you agreed to pay. If the person on the other end of the transaction decided to be understanding of you allegedly "making a typo," then that would be okay. But they haven't. And you haven't spoken to them. Because you seem to think you can say one thing and do another.

That is not how respectable people operate.

For those saying this does not fit the definition of a scam... the definition "a dishonest scheme; a fraud." The definition of fraud: "wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain."

I think it is quite deceptive to act like you said something you didn't, and even try to tamper with the evidence (the quoted post) to make it look like you said something else.

That's messed up man. And I think you know you're in the wrong here. You just don't want to be out the money. So man up and talk it over to sitnicki. Maybe he'll be understanding.

John

+1
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 251
September 11, 2013, 11:39:03 AM
I'm sorry, but this is ridiculous. You offered .5 BTC for someone to provide a service to you, they provided the service, and you are trying to send .05 BTC.

You claim you made a typo. But you were not upfront about this. You were not honest about this. Instead you MODIFIED a post in which you were quoted, without noting the change, to say ".05 BTC." That is extremely shady.

Let's say you did make a typo... you're still obligated because that is the amount you agreed to pay. If the person on the other end of the transaction decided to be understanding of you allegedly "making a typo," then that would be okay. But they haven't. And you haven't spoken to them. Because you seem to think you can say one thing and do another.

That is not how respectable people operate.

For those saying this does not fit the definition of a scam... the definition "a dishonest scheme; a fraud." The definition of fraud: "wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain."

I think it is quite deceptive to act like you said something you didn't, and even try to tamper with the evidence (the quoted post) to make it look like you said something else.

That's messed up man. And I think you know you're in the wrong here. You just don't want to be out the money. So man up and talk it over to sitnicki. Maybe he'll be understanding.

John
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
September 11, 2013, 11:11:58 AM
Pass.

I knew there was a catch. Cry
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
September 11, 2013, 11:08:35 AM
Wow... this looks great for the forum...  Roll Eyes



You gave me cancer sir, 98 activity 997 post, useless posts.

Excellent mod post! Seriously, excellent mod post... for SA, but not here.

I'll have to correct you here. This kind of post would be bannable on SA, mod or not. We frown on the use of tired, old catchphrases. Mostly because we invented them. 10 years ago. Like the one above. That was one of them.

Is 'SA' the forum version of ebaumsworld? Sure does sound like it.

Oh no, you didn't just go there. Be glad I like you, or I would be... would be.... would be posting pictures of your house and sending you Dominoes Pizza and little tiny packets of flour labeled cocaine. (The trick is it's not flour, it's cocaine)

You send people free cocaine? Can i sign up for some of that? Cool

It's trick cocaine that's actually anthrax.  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
nahtnam.com
September 11, 2013, 10:51:57 AM
Wow... this looks great for the forum...  Roll Eyes



You gave me cancer sir, 98 activity 997 post, useless posts.

Excellent mod post! Seriously, excellent mod post... for SA, but not here.

I'll have to correct you here. This kind of post would be bannable on SA, mod or not. We frown on the use of tired, old catchphrases. Mostly because we invented them. 10 years ago. Like the one above. That was one of them.

Is 'SA' the forum version of ebaumsworld? Sure does sound like it.

Oh no, you didn't just go there. Be glad I like you, or I would be... would be.... would be posting pictures of your house and sending you Dominoes Pizza and little tiny packets of flour labeled cocaine. (The trick is it's not flour, it's cocaine)

You send people free cocaine? Can i sign up for some of that? Cool

hahaha hahaha...
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
September 11, 2013, 09:18:46 AM
Wow... this looks great for the forum...  Roll Eyes



You gave me cancer sir, 98 activity 997 post, useless posts.

Excellent mod post! Seriously, excellent mod post... for SA, but not here.

I'll have to correct you here. This kind of post would be bannable on SA, mod or not. We frown on the use of tired, old catchphrases. Mostly because we invented them. 10 years ago. Like the one above. That was one of them.

Is 'SA' the forum version of ebaumsworld? Sure does sound like it.

Oh no, you didn't just go there. Be glad I like you, or I would be... would be.... would be posting pictures of your house and sending you Dominoes Pizza and little tiny packets of flour labeled cocaine. (The trick is it's not flour, it's cocaine)
b!z
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1010
September 11, 2013, 09:09:38 AM
Wow... this looks great for the forum...  Roll Eyes



You gave me cancer sir, 98 activity 997 post, useless posts.

Excellent mod post! Seriously, excellent mod post... for SA, but not here.

I'll have to correct you here. This kind of post would be bannable on SA, mod or not. We frown on the use of tired, old catchphrases. Mostly because we invented them. 10 years ago. Like the one above. That was one of them.

Is 'SA' the forum version of ebaumsworld? Sure does sound like it.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
September 11, 2013, 09:03:36 AM
Wow... this looks great for the forum...  Roll Eyes



You gave me cancer sir, 98 activity 997 post, useless posts.

Excellent mod post! Seriously, excellent mod post... for SA, but not here.

I'll have to correct you here. This kind of post would be bannable on SA, mod or not. We frown on the use of tired, old catchphrases. Mostly because we invented them. 10 years ago. Like the one above. That was one of them.
Pages:
Jump to: