Topic: Stake.com Censors Users, Blocks Withdrawals, and Now Steals Monthly VIP Bonuses - page 2. (Read 1192 times)

My case is also unadressed, hence I am trying to find a support on my flag to try to get to spotlight. I am getting muted in this forum since the day I have written about rollbit. I deserve my compansation but sadly “if razer doesn’t respond” or I don’t get enough support on my case; my case will be counted as resolved by holydarkness. Even if it isn’t.

May I ask you if you count cards when you play Blackjack games, because I'm not sure you can overcome the house edge of the games by counting cards at online casino thanks to the small portion of the shoe they deal in reality but if you get large bonuses, you can certainly make some profits in the long run from them. It could be the hidden reason why they have revoked your VIP bonuses in the same way as they limit stakes (and/or lock withdrawals) of good sport bettors actually, no?

Stake’s Clown Circus: The Saga Continues

After months of silence, the Stake Complaints Department finally decided to respond—only after HolyDarkness jumped into the conversation. Coincidence? I think not. This clearly indicates the close ties between HolyDarkness and Stake, as his intervention magically unlocked a reply.

Here’s what they sent me:

“You can access and download the requested information by visiting the following link: https://fake.com/casino/my-bets?type=casino and https://fake.com/transactions/archive.”

What did I ask for? A

GDPR-compliant summary of ALL my deposits, betting, and withdrawals.

What did they provide?

A daily archive of bets, with many moved to .json space.

Translation: Obfuscated data that’s incomplete, useless, and noncompliant.

Stake, if you think this is fulfilling your legal obligations, think again. The GDPR mandates full access to personal data in a readable format—not breadcrumbs leading to partial archives.

Enter the Clowns: AHOYBRAUSE and the "Alt Account" Delusion

And now, we have AHOYBRAUSE playing the part of Stake’s cheerleader, calling me a "clown" and accusing me of running an alt account. For someone with zero evidence, you sure have a lot of confidence. Prove Black Jacky is my alt, or admit you’re throwing baseless accusations.

As for your comment about my $0.08 bonus—keep laughing. It’s a perfect representation of Stake’s exploitative practices. After wagering over $1M, I get a bonus that’s less than a pack of gum. Stake’s mockery of its players is evident in every action they take.

Stake’s Clown Circus: The Saga Continues

After months of silence, the Stake Complaints Department finally decided to respond—only after HolyDarkness jumped into the conversation. Coincidence? I think not. This clearly indicates the close ties between HolyDarkness and Stake, as his intervention magically unlocked a reply.

Here’s what they sent me:
“Visit stake.com/casino/my-bets and stake.com/transactions/archive.”

What did I ask for? A GDPR-compliant summary of ALL my deposits, betting, and withdrawals.
What did they provide? A daily archive of bets, with many moved to .json space. Translation: Obfuscated data that’s incomplete, useless, and noncompliant.

Stake, if you think this is fulfilling your legal obligations, think again. The GDPR mandates full access to personal data in a readable format—not breadcrumbs leading to partial archives.

Enter the Clowns: AHOYBRAUSE and the "Alt Account" Delusion

And now, we have AHOYBRAUSE playing the part of Stake’s cheerleader, calling me a "clown" and accusing me of running an alt account. For someone with zero evidence, you sure have a lot of confidence. Prove Black Jacky is my alt, or admit you’re throwing baseless accusations.

As for your comment about my $0.08 bonus—keep laughing. It’s a perfect representation of Stake’s exploitative practices. After wagering over $1M, I get a bonus that’s less than a pack of gum. Stake’s mockery of its players is evident in every action they take.

To the Forum Readers

Let’s not lose sight of what’s happening here:

Stake’s Noncompliance: They’ve failed to provide GDPR-compliant data despite repeated requests.

Deflect and Distract: Instead of addressing their illegal practices, Stake’s defenders focus on personal attacks and conspiracy theories.

Connections Exposed: HolyDarkness intervenes, and suddenly, Stake responds. This level of coordination raises serious questions about neutrality.

My Challenge to Stake’s Defenders: If you’re so confident in Stake’s integrity, prove me wrong. Meet me at the blackjack tables, or better yet, have Stake release my full betting and transaction history. I dare you.

To Stake: Your attempts to evade accountability won’t work. Every incomplete response, every defender’s distraction, only strengthens the case against you. Transparency isn’t optional—it’s a legal requirement.

Stay vigilant, friends. The truth is on our side.

🎭👑
KingBJ21

@holydarkness, I can only advise you to ignore this clown and his alt account, every word you post here is basically a waste of your valuable time. You could help other people instead of speaking to a wall that doesn't want to face reality.
This individual and his alt account is basically insulting you in every 2nd post and you still take your time trying to understand the situation. And yet the next reply you get from him just is straight up garbage and rude again, not even addressing what you have asked of advised to do.

And at OP, tomorrow you will get you 0.08$ monthly bonus, any plans what you gonna do with it? 

Nutildah: The Knight in Shining Nitropolis 

Oh, look! Nutildah swooping in like a hero in a gritty kitty slot, trying to save HolyDarkness from the scorching flames of this discussion. What’s the rescue mission here? Stake failing to respond? AI content? Or the nitty-gritty—wait, is that Nitropolis? Let’s break this circus act down. 



1. "Nitty-Gritty"? More Like Kitty-Litter 

First off, Nutildah, you’re accusing me of using AI to write “gotcha” pieces? That’s rich. Where’s your proof? Because my evidence against Stake is as real as the withdrawals they conveniently froze. Unlike their shady practices, my points are backed by facts, not fiction. 

And if you’re diving into the “nitty-gritty,” I hope you’re bringing the Gritty Kitty vibes of Nitropolis—maybe ELK Studios will sponsor you. Just make sure you don’t confuse “feline sass” with “Stake apologist claptrap.” 



2. Roleplay Circus: Meet the Cast 

Let’s take a moment to applaud the cast of Stake’s circus: 
- Eddie as the mastermind ringmaster, pulling strings behind the scenes. 
- HolyDarkness as the ever-faithful acrobat, spinning narratives tighter than their KYC demands. 
- Ryaz and Abhyo as the juggling defenders, trying (and failing) to keep up with Stake’s ever-shifting defenses. 
- And, of course, Bijan Tehrani, whose role as Stake’s silent accomplice in the shadows brings this show full circle. 

If Stake were a slot game, they’d be titled: “Circus of Compliance: Rigged for the House.” 



3. Why So Defensive? 

Nutildah, you say you’re not a Stake fan. Cool story, bro. Then why the urge to jump into their defense, throwing around baseless accusations of “dishonest hit pieces”? Could it be that the truth hurts? Stake’s silence is evidence enough of their guilt. They can’t respond because they have no leg to stand on. 

Pro Tip: Next time you want to accuse someone of dishonesty, make sure your side isn’t guilty of, oh, I don’t know, rigged games, illegal payment methods, GDPR violations, and exploiting gamblers. 



4. Stake’s Empire of Cards is Crumbling 

This isn’t about “smear campaigns.” It’s about justice. It’s about holding Stake accountable for their predatory practices, their illegal UPI transactions, their rigged blackjack, and their deliberate refusal to comply with GDPR. 

Every attack from defenders like you only strengthens the case against Stake. Why? Because your focus isn’t on addressing the facts—it’s on trying to discredit those exposing the truth. 

The Takeaway 

Nutildah, if you’re here to defend the indefensible, you’re just another clown in the circus. Stake’s silence speaks volumes. The evidence against them is overwhelming. And no amount of theatrics or slot-themed references will change that. 

To everyone else: Stay focused. Stay united. Stake’s empire is crumbling under the weight of its own greed and deceit. Let’s make sure we’re the ones to bring it down. 

Sincerely, 
🎭👑 
KingBJ21 

Kudos to you for looking into the nitty gritty of these situations and making it clear what's going on here. Sometimes I get the impression that people really are on a smear mission and could care less about the outcome of their dispute, or the reason why it didn't go in their favor. This would explain the theatrical effect of using AI to write these "gotcha" tabloid-esque summaries which don't appear to be based in anything factual.

BTW, I'm not even a fan of Stake, I just hate dishonest hit pieces.

🎆 Stake’s Silence: The Ultimate Admission of Guilt 🎆

Let’s start with a fact Stake cannot escape: Stake has stopped communicating.Their complaints department has ignored my grievances, refusing to cooperate or provide the data I’ve lawfully requested under GDPR. Let me make one thing clear: Stake has no right to blame me when their actions—or lack thereof—are the root cause of this mess. Their silence is damning and deliberate.



1. Stake’s Silence = Stake’s Guilt 

Stake defenders, take note: Silence isn’t compliance. Silence is avoidance. 

• Ghosting Complaints: Stake’s refusal to respond isn’t just negligence—it’s a blatant strategy to dodge accountability. No clarifications, no cooperation, just radio silence. 

• GDPR Breach by Design: GDPR mandates compliance, but Stake turns it into a mockery. If they’re confident in their operations, why the delay? Why the silence? 

Stake’s playbook: ignore, deflect, and hope the storm blows over. Unfortunately for them, the storm is here to stay. 



2. The “Identity Confirmation” Circus 

Let’s call out this charade for what it is: Stake weaponizing GDPR’s Article 12(6) as a stalling tactic. 

• Verified, Yet Ignored: I’ve completed KYC3. My email and documents are verified. Their demands for selfies with “Stake Rules” scribbled on paper? That’s not confirmation—it’s an excuse to delay compliance. 

• A Law Unto Themselves: GDPR isn’t a buffet where Stake can cherry-pick clauses. Compliance isn’t optional, no matter how many hoops they try to create. 

Bottom Line: Stake’s intent is clear—they’re hiding something. If they were aboveboard, compliance wouldn’t be this hard. 



3. The Global Fraud Empire 

Stake’s silence isn’t just a GDPR violation—it’s the hallmark of a company built on exploitation and deceit. 

• Rigged Games: Stake Originals? More like Stake Fraud. The evidence is overwhelming, from rigged blackjack to manipulated odds. 

• Illegal UPI Payments: Stake gleefully violates Indian banking laws, exposing users to legal risks. 

• Exploitation at Scale: Vulnerable gamblers, misled newbies, even minors—Stake’s greed knows no bounds. 

This is Eddie’s empire of lies: a house of cards waiting to collapse. 



4. A Call to Arms: Join the Revolution 

To every victim of Stake’s fraud, this is your moment. This isn’t just my fight—it’s ours. 

• Share Your Stories: Every voice matters. Post your experiences, expose their tactics, and demand accountability. 

• Demand Action: Regulators and watchdogs are already circling. With enough pressure, we can force Stake to answer for their crimes. 

To Stake defenders like HolyDarkness: The evidence is clear, the fraud undeniable. By defending them, you’re standing on the wrong side of history. 



5. The Final Warning 

Stake, the clock is ticking. Your silence, your stalling tactics, your outright refusal to comply with GDPR—it all points to one thing: guilt. No PR spin can save you now. 

To the community: The time for action is now. Stake’s empire of deceit is crumbling, but it needs one final push. Let’s bring it down together. 

Stand up. Speak out. Join the fight. 

Sincerely, 
🎭👑 
KingBJ21 

Throughout the long words you gave as reply, I believe we all can safely assume that the answer is "no, I have not provide the verification they asked." So I'll try to make it as clear and redundant as I can to explain, and hope that you'll understand.

[Screenshots of the clauses being mentioned here will be provided at the bottom of the post, for reference as well to make it easier for reader to read without having to go back and forth between pages. Links are there to prove that the snippets are indeed from a real article and not fabricated.]

What they asked is not a verification in sense of re-performing KYC. You've done your KYC3 [I'll take your words for it] and they most likely know about it, as they said that they can locate the account through the email address. I also believe they are more than happy to provide the data you requested. If not happily, then at least they are compelled to provide the copy of it to you by the GDPR "bylaws", that you dilligently mentioned and bring to their attention without fail, Article 15(3), "Right of access by the data subject", as well as article 12(3), "Transparent Information [...]" specifying the maximum time of data being handed to the Data Subject.

However, if you're willing to read just a tad bit more below what you cited to them, on 12(6), I would sincerely hope that after reading that, you can easily understand that that is the situation that applied here, that  they counter you with "the controller may request the provision of additional information necessary to confirm the identity of the data subject."

You did not give the additional information that can help them confirm the identity of the Data Subject, so they can't provide the documents being requested.

Thus, day 0.

Provide them with necessary identification as they requested to eradicate any reasonable doubt they have, and the timer will start, we'll be on day 0 hour 0 minute 0 second 1.

It is not me being confused, it is you being confused... or deliberately pretend you don't understand, but I'll choose to give a benefit of doubts and think that you simply misunderstood the situation.

It is not a GDPR violation, it is not a comedy, it is not a clown... well, at least, we are not the clown here. It's either [1] you simply misunderstood their instruction and request, thinking they wanted you to re-perform KYC while you've done it, while what they asked and enacting is GDPR 12(6), confirmation of the data subject, or [2] you understand things completely, you simply refused to do it and take this path.

If this excessive words still failed to help you understand, then I raise my hands in the air and declare that I can not help you further with understanding your situation with GDPR data request.

---

15(3)


12(3)


12(6)

@HolyDarkness  

Ah, HolyDarkness, the self-appointed defender of Stake’s crumbling empire. It’s almost admirable how tirelessly you perform, but let’s add some clarity to your confusion:  


1. Stake’s GDPR Comedy Routine  
You’re here trying to sell the idea that Stake’s GDPR violations aren’t violations because they’ve invented extra hurdles for users. Spoiler alert:  
GDPR isn’t a Suggestion: It’s the law. Stake doesn’t get to “personalize” compliance by adding selfie requests to delay requests.  
Already Verified, Still Ignored: I’ve done KYC3, but now they want a selfie with “Stake Rules” scribbled on a Post-it? That’s not verification—it’s a gimmick to buy time.  
Reality Check: Stake isn’t a bank—it’s a gambling platform known for cutting corners. Your bank analogy is as solid as Eddie’s promise of fair play.  

No matter how you spin it, Stake has had over 100 days to comply and failed. That’s not my fault, nor does it absolve them of legal liability.  


2. The Eddie Playbook: Lies, Loopholes, and Larceny  
Let’s not kid ourselves—this is classic Eddie Hearn management:  
Fraudulent Reloads: Promises of loyalty rewards that vanish faster than a gambler’s bankroll.  
Rigged Games: Stake Originals? More like live theft. The evidence speaks for itself.  
Illegal UPI Transactions: Stake’s gleeful disregard for Indian banking laws is just the cherry on top of their compliance failures.  

Eddie’s built an empire on deception, and the cracks are showing. Stake is one regulatory investigation away from a full collapse.  


3. Clowns in the Audience (Yes, That’s You)  
HolyDarkness, your attempts to distract from the real issues are as transparent as Stake’s rigged odds. Let’s break down your role in this farce:  
Loyal to a Fault: You’ve hitched your wagon to a company that’s burning bridges with customers, regulators, and anyone with common sense.  
Ignoring Evidence: Both my case and BlackJacky’s are publicly documented, independently verifiable, and damning. Yet you cling to your denial like it’s a life raft.  
PR in Disguise: Let’s be honest—you’re doing more damage control for Stake than their actual team. If you’re not on Eddie’s payroll, you should demand back pay.  


4. The Bigger Picture  
This isn’t just about me or BlackJacky. Stake’s fraud impacts thousands, if not millions, of users worldwide. Their shady practices:  
Exploit Vulnerable Gamblers: Stake doesn’t just profit from addiction—they actively fuel it.  
Mislead New Users: Glossy ads and influencer promotions hide the reality of rigged games and nonexistent support.  
Dodge Accountability: From Curacao to the UK, regulators are catching on. The clock is ticking.  

By defending Stake, you’re aligning yourself with a sinking ship. Don’t say we didn’t warn you when it finally goes under.  


5. The Last Act  
HolyDarkness, you’re playing the fool in Stake’s theater, but the audience is no longer amused. The evidence against Stake is overwhelming, and your attempts to deflect only amplify the noise.  
- Stake’s GDPR violations? Documented.  
- Their fraudulent practices? Exposed.  
- Your role as their cheerleader? Embarrassing.  

The regulators are circling, and Eddie’s show is running out of acts. You can keep juggling excuses, but when the curtain falls, you’ll be left holding the bag.  

So enjoy your clown shoes while they last. The spotlight is shifting, and when it lands on Stake (and you), there’ll be no escape.  

Sincerely,  🎪👑
KingBJ21  

Are you sure about that? Because if you're right it shows they are not asking the same things to every customers, and they are freely discriminating some of them without justification or notice.



@kingbj21
It's not good to mix your topics like that, users won't understand what you're talking about and will think your issues about censorship, locked withdrawals and VIP Monthly bonuses have been resolved. In addition if a moderator thinks you are now talking about a new subject he can lock or archive your thread.
Besides that, if your request has been sent from the email address registered on your account or if you have initially made it from the chat feature of your account I agree that seems unnecessary and time-wasting to ask those KYC proofs. But TBH I wouldn't say it's the worst thing we've ever seen from them, if they don't ask anything else afterwards.

In other words, no, you have not provide them with the proof of ownership like they asked? The photo, govt ID, and a piece of paper with info of the account details which data you asked? On that case, then the narrative where they refuse to give your and breached GDPR policy, exceeding the 30 days timeline as mandated by GDPR, and withholding information for 90+ days is not true, simply because you are on day 0.

The process itself is yet to be initiated, because you have not provide them with the requirement they ask to give you the data.

This is not about you have had your KYC before and now them asking for some selfie and govt. ID as redundant. It's two whole different things. You asked for the data of the person who --somewhere in the past-- passed KYC3 on their platform, and they asked you to prove the ownership of the account before they can release the data.

I believe it is not hard to understand at all. Like... at all.

If it is, though, allow me to try to explain in other scenario: suppose you opened an account in a bank. You provided identification like govt ID, phone number, email address, home address, some forms, they perhaps even take your photo and fingerprints [my banks do] for their database. Let's say that's KYC3-equivalent of your Stake account.

Three months later, you called the bank, wanting to know your balance or a transaction, or whatever reason you reached them.

Yes, you're entitled to get that info, but the bank are also under obligation and/or entitled to ask for proof of ownership. Thus they'll ask for verification that usually about your DoB, mother's maiden name, home address, billing address, last three transactions, or other. That is the equivalent of them asking you those info prior to providing you a copy of your betting data.

Is it easier to understand now?

So yeah, to repeat, if you have not provide any of the document they asked to prove your credibility, that thread is completely invalid, Stake did and does not withheld information and violated GDPR and mismanage data, as you have not provide the information they need to verify ownership.

So, I'll ask again, in case it's actually already provided in other correspondencies you had with them, but not shown here: have you?



I am initially happy with ignoring you, but then you mentioned as above quoted about the GDPR non-compliance issue and how "By silencing dissent and misrepresenting cases, you’ve aligned yourself with a fraudulent empire.", and now when I address the issue and explain what actually transpires, you suggest that I might want to step off the stage before the spotlight turns in my role in this farce, whatever that "spotlight" imply and signify?

So which one is it? Silence so "the spotlight wont turn on me" or my silence is aligning myself with fraudulent empire?

KYC Requirements Already Fulfilled: My identity is confirmed through your system. Asking for redundant proof undermines the entire purpose of KYC.

Privacy Risks: Stake has already demonstrated a lack of transparency, so why should I trust you with even more personal data?
Legal Compliance: Under GDPR, data subjects are entitled to their data without excessive hurdles. Additional proof is unnecessary when my identity is verified.

This is yet another delay tactic. If Stake was serious about compliance, it wouldn’t use frivolous verification demands to withhold data from users.


Stake’s Circus Act: The Final Showdown 🎭 

Stake’s endless excuses and its defenders’ feeble justifications are no longer entertaining. Here’s the harsh reality: 

1. Stake’s Circus is Falling Apart: No amount of deflection can hide the facts—GDPR violations, fraudulent reloads, and rigged games are not anomalies; they are Stake’s standard operating procedure. Your empire of deceit is unraveling, Eddie. 

2. The Fanboys Keep Dancing: 
   - Abhyrosse, you’re just another performer in Eddie’s circus, doing mental gymnastics to defend the indefensible. Your loyalty is amusing, but it won’t stop the truth from surfacing. 
   - HolyDarkness, you might want to step off the stage before the spotlight turns on your role in this farce. 

3. The Puppet Masters: 
   Eddie: The self-appointed ringmaster who thinks he can spin a web of lies and go unnoticed. Your "provably fair" claim is as transparent as your reload bonuses. 
   HolyDarkness & AHOYBRAUSE: The sidekicks juggling excuses, trying to keep the audience distracted while the house of cards collapses. 

4. The Facts Speak for Themselves: 
   Both my case and BlackJacky’s are independently verifiable. The evidence is damning, and no amount of gaslighting or insults will change that. 

5. Pulling Eddie to the Party: 
   Eddie, let’s get one thing straight—you’ve orchestrated this entire show. You’ve built an empire on deceit, but the curtain is closing, and the audience is no longer fooled. You and your crew have dodged accountability for far too long, but 2025 will be the year the players rise, regulators act, and your circus collapses. 

So, Eddie, HolyDarkness, AHOYBRAUSE, and all your loyal fanboys—enjoy the last act of your circus. The storm is here, and it’s going to be spectacular. 🌪️ 

🎪 Your clown shoes fit perfectly. Wear them proudly. 🤡 

Obviously you aren't smart enough the differentiate between normal stake account KYC and what the support asked for. At KYC you send a picture of your ID for level 2, that's it. They clearly ask for a picture of him with the ID in his hand and the stake username on a letter. It's not so hard to understand this simple question they asked. But yeah, of course for you it is.
Why do you even bother to answer holy when he didn't even spoke to "you"? Oh wait, of course he spoke to you since blackyjacky and kingbj are operated by the same person, yet another proof. 

The answer to your question is in the screenshots, are you not able to see it?

And have you provided them with the verification they asked; a photo of yourself holding your govt. issued ID as well as a piece of paper proving the ownership of the account which data you requested in the manner that they specified?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-alert-stakecoms-gdpr-violations-and-data-mismanagement-5524433

This is the thread about GDPR, that you're talking about, amongst other [plenty of] threads you have against Stake? Do you mind to substantiate the thread with supporting evidences to validate the situation? Screenshots of your request and them denying or withholding it, perhaps?

@holydarkness, 

Your repeated attempts to deflect and trivialize the seriousness of Stake’s unethical practices only expose your alignment with their tactics. Let me set the record straight, because your narrative is misleading at best and complicit at worst. 

1. 100 Days of GDPR Violations – Stake’s Complete Disregard for Law

It’s been 100 days since I submitted a formal GDPR data request as a fully KYC3-verified customer. The law is clear: 
- Maximum Deadline: 30 days, extendable to 90 in “exceptional circumstances.” Stake has exceeded this without providing any valid justification or update. 
- Data Access is a Right, Not a Privilege: Stake’s delays and obfuscation show contempt for GDPR, transparency, and its own customers. 

For 100 days, Stake has: 
- Ignored my legal rights. 
- Closed over 30 support tickets without meaningful resolution. 
- Claimed endless “escalations” to phantom departments that produce zero results. 

This is a textbook example of GDPR non-compliance, and I’m escalating this with regulators. By downplaying this issue, you’re defending clear violations of international law. 

2. Mislabeling My Case as Resolved 

You falsely marked my case as “resolved,” using my reflective post on awareness and peace as justification. Let me be unequivocal: 
- That post was about moving forward personally, NOT about Stake addressing my grievances. 
- My accusations against Stake remain valid, unresolved, and pressing. 

Here’s the ongoing list of unresolved issues: 
- Fraudulent VIP Bonuses: Platinum 1 members receiving $0.10 reloads after wagering millions? This is both insulting and fraudulent. 
- Withdrawal Blocks: Arbitrary restrictions without explanations or timelines. 
- Illegal Operations in India: Stake uses unlawful UPI payment systems to target users in jurisdictions where online gambling is banned. 
- Rigged Games: Evidence of predatory practices across their platform, especially in blackjack and other casino games. 

Your claim that personal conflicts don’t affect your decisions doesn’t hold up. By misrepresenting my case as resolved, you’ve misled others and undermined the purpose of your list. If you care about fairness, update my case to “in progress” or “unresolved” immediately. 

3. The Stake Circus Crew 🎪 

Let’s talk about the cast of characters enabling this circus: 
- Eddie: The master manipulator, building his empire on deception and stolen funds. 
- AHOYBRAUSE: The sycophantic fanboy, more invested in defending Stake’s reload crumbs than addressing systemic fraud. 
- You, holydarkness: The so-called overseer, selectively blind to the mountain of evidence against Stake while silencing dissent with bureaucratic maneuvers. 

Instead of holding Stake accountable, you’re performing damage control for a company that flouts the law, mocks its customers, and rigs its systems for profit. 



@Saint-loup, 

I appreciate your objective observations. You’re absolutely correct that my case being marked as resolved misrepresents the truth and risks misleading other users into thinking these issues have been addressed. For clarity: 
- Nothing has been resolved. Stake’s GDPR violations, fraudulent practices, and predatory systems remain unaddressed. 
- Transparency is vital. Mislabeling my case damages the integrity of dispute-tracking systems and leaves other victims without recourse. 

Your suggestion that I clarify my case’s status is appreciated, but the responsibility ultimately lies with those maintaining these lists to ensure accuracy. 



To Stake’s Fan Club and Defenders 

To the die-hard apologists clinging to Stake’s narrative: 
- Stop gaslighting users who bring forward valid concerns. 
- Recognize that defending a platform built on deceit makes you complicit in its actions. 

Special shout-out to: 
- AHOYBRAUSE: Your blind loyalty is as laughable as Stake’s “provably fair” claims. 
- HolyDarkness: By silencing dissent and misrepresenting cases, you’ve aligned yourself with a fraudulent empire. 



Call to Action 

To the broader community: 
1. File Complaints with Regulators: Stake’s GDPR violations alone warrant severe penalties. 
2. Expose Their Practices: Share your experiences and evidence of their fraud. 
3. Demand Accountability: Don’t let Stake and its enablers continue unchecked. 

To @holydarkness and @Saint-loup: This isn’t just about my case—it’s about exposing the systemic issues with Stake and holding them accountable. You can either stand for transparency and fairness or remain part of the problem. 

The storm is here, and Stake’s house of cards is coming down. 

Thank you for the honest explanation and POV. I can understand that from others' shoes, who only read briefly [as we have to admit that reading all of OP's post, all of them, across threads, boards, topics, and theories, and follow what transpires in full is almost impossible] can perhaps lead to a confusion on why the case is marked as resolved while the OP still... that.

I can assure you and I will really appreciate if you would be so kind to bear in mind for future cases and reference that any conflict or heated argument I have with a casino player or fellow overseers during a resolution attempt will not affect their status on my list in a sense that I will one-sidedly mark it as resolved out of spite or other reason. I'll most likely just leave my device, "walk it off" by chilling and handling other issues and calmed myself and return only when I am sure I am not influenced by anything that agitate me in the past.

One case-on-point will be the case of Rollbit v. tetaeridanus where circumstances kinda stacked in an unfavorable situation, with him being in a bad state and I had a situation myself that his several jabs annoyed me, so I walked away and take the spectator seat, and returned to the case when I think it's time to return to it and re-try to get his situation resolved, all while the status of the case is "in progress" instead of marked as "resolved".

Now, moving to OP's situation itself themselves, I will honestly appreciate your input: do you think the status should be rewritten as "in progress" or perhaps other status? With reference to what OP said as quoted above, as well as the nature of OP's post in general [achieved by reading his entire post history] and the likelihood of Stake addressing it formally and officially is next to the birth of velociraptor within this year?

For added reference and to answer what probably bewildering your mind, if I may speak what's on my mind freely [though I am sure it'll offend OP, but pretty much anything I said at this point is an offense for him, so... [shrug]], the lack of enthusiasm and response to OP's thread is, IMO, not due to the status on the list, but it's because most of the overseer who frequently come to this board already read OP's threads and the messages he tried to convey, with some overseer even tried to explain patiently, and it came to a deaf ear. So they leave. Another come, did the same, ended up with similar result, and they too leave. Ultimately, the low traction of his threads.

I've seen your other post on Cinexrino's thread, I won't reply on both topics to say the same thing, especially overthere while I haven't posted before and I think it's a bit off-topic on top of that.
I saw this case (and the other ones from OP regarding this platform) were marked are closed and resolved in your lists, I was surprised since I still see OP posting angry messages and serious accusations against this casino here and in the ANN thread of the platform. So I looked at this topic and the other one regarding accusations of illegal activities in India, and I didn't find anything showing those accusations have been addressed and solved. I deduced from this, it was related in a way or another to the open conflict between you and him, and you've decided to close the case so as to not have to deal with him anymore. I guessed you've chosen the "resolved" option because you've considered having made enough for his cases, but unfortunately users having no clues about your conflict with him could think those accusations have really been adressed and won't bother to check by themselves further. So I suggested Kingbj21 to do the same as what Cinexrino did in order to signal his cases are still open and not addressed.