Topic: Stake.com Censors Users, Blocks Withdrawals, and Now Steals Monthly VIP Bonuses - page 3. (Read 1192 times)

Thanks for bringing this up, but let's clarify a few things.

“Case is closed”: The case is far from closed, despite the tag in the scam accusation listing. This isn’t about personal conflicts; this is about Stake using its defenders, puppets, and influence to muddy the waters and make serious accusations disappear. Anyone looking at the evidence will see that these issues—rigged games, illegal payments, unethical practices—are still unresolved.

Misleading Users: If anything, Stake and its defenders have been the ones misleading users. I will update my threads to make it clear this case is ongoing, but let's not pretend the tagging system wasn’t manipulated in Stake’s favor.

Your Suggestion: I appreciate the example you provided with the Rollbit scam case. That said, if the community was as vigilant about holding Stake accountable as it seems to be about smalle


To holydarkness and others discussing the "resolved" status:


Let’s clarify the situation regarding my post on Stake’s ANN thread:

A Change in Tone Does Not Equal Resolution:
My statement about focusing on "peace and understanding" does not mean that the accusations against Stake were resolved. It reflects a personal decision to move forward and focus on broader issues, but it does not retract or negate the evidence and concerns raised.

Manipulation of Context by Stake Supporters:
Stake’s defenders are attempting to spin this as a victory or resolution in their favor. Let’s not forget the pattern here—Stake and its associates often use such narratives to manipulate the perception of unresolved issues and mislead the community.

Focus on Facts:
The evidence against Stake still stands, including the allegations of rigged games, unethical practices, and user exploitation. No official resolution or acknowledgment has come from Stake. The post you referred to is being taken out of context to suit their agenda.

To Those Supporting Stake or Downplaying the Issue:
If you believe the case is resolved, I invite you to provide evidence of any concrete actions or changes made by Stake to address the allegations. Otherwise, this looks like yet another attempt to silence critics and protect a fraudulent operation.

Let’s keep the focus where it belongs—on holding platforms like Stake accountable for their actions, not on twisting personal reflections into false resolutions.

Are... we talking about me and my list here in place of "the thread listing the scam accusation" and "the owner of the listing"? If so, then rest assured that [once again] that thread is not authoritarian, I will not abuse the list to my own agenda simply because [borrowing your words], "a conflict between you and the owner of the listing".

It was marked as resolved due to the OP's own written statement, on Stake's ANN thread


Was it a wrong interpretation that the case can be marked as resolved by OP wanting to focus on peace and understanding? Move forward? And, though his path let him away from these platforms, he wish everyone the best in their journey. I'll more than happy to change it given an insight from other party.

One thing that I think I need to say though, is that I find myself really surprised that you thought I will do such action, that I will abuse the list for a personal annoyance toward someone.

IMO they just think your case is closed because your topic has been tagged as resolved in the thread listing the scam accusation cases along with your other threads regarding this platform. I don't really understand why but I guess the reason belongs to a personal conflict between you and the owner of the listing. But in order to avoid misleading the users you should clearly mention in the OP of the thread or in its title that the case is still unresolved or ongoing as clinexrino did for his own IMO [UNRESOLVED]Rollbit SCAMS money from restricted players with 0% chance of lose

I honestly don't mind getting banned if that’s what it takes—they should just refund my money. It’s not just about being treated unfairly; there are serious allegations that this casino is involved in funding terrorism, especially in North Korea.

The level of unethical behavior is beyond comprehension. I hope Eddie and all his staff will face justice soon for their actions.

For those who want to know more about what’s really going on, visit https://www.stakeexposed.com

To be honest I don't think any regulated fiat casino would do something like that, they would prefer ban you from using their platform than applying specific discriminatory measures indicating that they treat their customers unfairly or with favoritism whenever they want. But despite its success this casino obviously doesn't care of its reputation. IMO it's because of the public they target : young people that don't know anything about casinos and sportsbooks, who won't complain and do anything if they get scammed or treated unfairly. I think it will change when team or people they sponsor will hear about unprofessional or dishonest behaviors from them, and will want to stop working with them or when regulators from the countries where they compete will prohibit their advertising.

Where did all the Stake defenders go? It’s awfully quiet now. Shame on you for supporting such a deceitful company, one that actively engages in unethical practices and tries to silence anyone who speaks out. Defending a company like Stake only shows complicity with their behavior. The truth is coming out, and Stake won’t be able to hide behind its deceit much longer.

I just wanted to address this ridiculous response: "Please bear in mind that post-monthly bonuses are not mandatory bonuses and are not in any way related to your statistics but are rather a token of appreciation that we provide our players with."

Really? Is this how Stake treats its players? I received $0.30 as my post-monthly bonus for being a Platinum III VIP, despite my recent activity on the platform. Prior to that, my monthly bonus for October was just $6.57, which is unreasonably low given my deposits and wagering activity.

To make matters worse, my account on the Stake community has been restricted for one year, and my threads have been deleted without any explanation.

If Stake’s idea of appreciation is to single out players who raise legitimate concerns and essentially silence them, it speaks volumes about their practices. Users deserve better than this.


https://talkimg.com/images/2024/10/29/K74kG.jpeg



Bonus Summary

Date	Type of Bonus	Amount
10/29/2024	Post-Monthly Bonus	$0.30
10/26/2024	Weekly Bonus	$3.00
10/19/2024	Weekly Bonus	$4.50
10/15/2024	Monthly Bonus	$6.57

September Deposits

Date	Amount
09/24/2024	$571.55
09/12/2024	$212.13
09/12/2024	$1,065.19
09/12/2024	$840.36
09/06/2024	$1,059.24
09/06/2024	$1,061.64
09/06/2024	$320.05

@AHOYBRAUSE,

Thank you for your insight, and I appreciate you sharing your experience.

Stake singled out me on my bonus, because I exposed their fraud practices.

Since I have a LOT of experience with stake I want to add one thing. 70k wager and a loss of 2600$ would NEVER EVER pay 474$, and I mean EVER.
Trust me, I am sure about this. Loss has an impact but not THAT big of an impact. I have had 300k-900k wager months (900k 1 time only) and even with a loss and 900k wager and I barely 300-400$ monthly. That like 13x your wager by the way, and still only 400$. And wager is still a much bigger factor than loss.
So thinking you could get 474$ monthly with such a small wager is actually out of this world. That would mean a 15-20% loss back actually, stake doesn't do that.
Even an absolute nonsense site like https://stakebonus.com/monthly-bonus/calculator/ when entering your numbers says 362$, and this site is so wrong. I just entered some of my numbers and this site gives amounts that are 2x or 3x of what I got.
So I think an appropriate number for your 70k wager and 2600$ loss month would be around 200$ (and only because of the high loss). Obviously this is still much more than 7$ but also considerably less than the numbers mentioned here.

@Shishir99,

You seem to have misunderstood from the start. I never received $474—that was an estimated bonus based on my activity, which Stake failed to provide. What I actually got was a mere $6.57, which is a fraction of what was expected. Stake has literally stolen the money I rightfully earned by not providing the proper bonus, and it’s disappointing that you missed this key point from the very beginning.

This isn't about personal attacks; it's about raising awareness of unethical practices. If you’ve now come to understand the seriousness of the situation, that’s a start. But make no mistake—Stake's actions here are not acceptable, and it’s crucial to continue pointing out these issues until they’re addressed fairly.

You came to the point now. You are just a frustrated kid who started the personal attack at first saying I am writing for my signature quota and you know I make living with that. LOL. All I said is, your monthly bonus depend on your monthly statistics and not on your overall stats. You could simply say that you have wagered a hefty amount last month and show the monthly stats. But you never pointed out that, you started attacking me instead.

I had to check your screenshots twice to understand that you actually wagered 70K in a month and got $474 in bonus which is not a small amount of money. Now it is up to you and stake and I have to agree that if someone get $6 as a monthly bonus, this is something stake should look at.

@Shishir99,

You seem to be confusing a genuine concern with personal grievances. If I were defending Stake, I certainly wouldn't be wearing their signature or promoting them. The fact remains that you are still ignoring the key issue: I had a significant deposit and wagering activity last month, which entitled me to more than just a $6.57 monthly bonus.

This isn’t about receiving "free money" as you call it. The monthly bonus is simply another form of rakeback—a reward for the activity I’ve already generated for Stake. For the record, I received the exact same amount for my weekly bonus—$6.57—just before the monthly bonus of $6.57. This points to a deliberate reduction in what I should have rightfully received, and other users have agreed and pointed this out, even on Stake's own forum.

And just to be clear, I don’t own any website, so stop running your mouth in unnecessary places. If you don’t want to engage constructively, that’s up to you, but dismissing my concerns without acknowledging the facts shows a lack of understanding about what’s happening here. I suggest you check the discussion on Stake’s own forum before jumping to conclusions: Stake Community Forum Discussion.


I appreciate your acknowledgment that there must be something wrong with the bonus calculation. It’s crucial that Stake addresses these discrepancies, especially for loyal players like myself who expect fair treatment based on our activity.

While I’m hopeful for a resolution, the lack of transparency and the arbitrary nature of the bonuses raises serious concerns about Stake's practices. It's vital for all users to hold the platform accountable, and I intend to continue bringing attention to these issues until they are resolved.

Thank you for your input, but let's not lose sight of the real problems at hand.

You started the personal attack while I was sharing my point of view after reading the whole thread. But you came up with a dirty idea to play with me and say something like I am not contributing anything and writing here because of my signature campaign post quota. When you expect respect from someone, you should do the same thing. I am not wearing a stake signature, and I am not their employee. Why do I have to defend them? You should have respected my opinion and think what I wrote. I still believe that the casino bonus does not depend on your overall stats (lifetime stats). If you are looking for a monthly bonus, It depends on your monthly stats. Nothing is wrong when they see a VIP member holding his rank, but they do not wager much anymore. Giving out free money to less active users won't benefit their business. This is not charity. They are here to do business. I do not bother to check your fucking website after your personal attack. Keep that in your pocket and move forward.

You confuse defending with explaining. I simply explained to you what the chat confusion might have caused, that's why I quoted you because you got the wrong idea about what happened there when he accidentally was told he would have another account.
Also, being platinum 6 in a 4 year span doesn't make anyone a highroller, I am far from that. I am not concerned because I did nothing wrong actually. that's just how it is. I also obviously hope OP gets this resolved since I repeatedly stated as well that there must be something wrong with the calculation.

I appreciate your wish for me to understand why my bonus has been reduced, but unfortunately, Stake’s lack of transparency has made it impossible to get a straightforward answer. This isn’t about one-off errors or agents "sending a reply to the wrong person." It’s about a pattern of obfuscation, minimizing rewards, and silencing users who raise legitimate complaints. I have seen this pattern with most of these crypto casinos.

Thanks again for your balanced input. It’s clear that we need more voices here that aren’t afraid to hold these platforms accountable.

Honestly, I wouldn't have talked about that if you didn't quote me to defend the casino while wearing its signature (with ref link) and while I wasn't even talking to you. I personally think people should stay cautious with what they do and they say when there could be a conflict of interest in their position, even if they are very fair and honest but it's just my personal ethic and I don't ask anyone to share it. If you are platinum 6 (ie 10+ millions wagered afaik) you are a high roller, so you should be concerned about all those issues reported here because one day you might face them too, and it's nice to tell us here how Stake normally handles multi-accounts according to what you've seen around you but it would have been interesting to tell it on other threads where people are not treated this way IMO. Anyway I hope kingbj21 will be able to know why his bonus has been decreased.

I see that you've resorted to personal attacks instead of actually addressing the issues at hand. Calling me a "frustrated kid" or assuming that I'm just trying to blackmail Stake for a bonus only reveals your ignorance about the situation. This isn't about losing money I couldn't afford or trying to blackmail a casino—it's about holding a company accountable for their unethical and illegal practices.

Stake has been deceiving users with unclear bonus structures, illegal UPI deposits in India, and a lack of transparency. You seem to think that defending them makes you some kind of hero, but the reality is that people like you are part of the problem. Blindly defending a company, regardless of the evidence of their wrongdoing, doesn’t make you informed—it makes you complicit.

If you can't understand the seriousness of my claims, or if you’re too busy throwing around insults to actually engage in a constructive discussion, then you're not contributing anything meaningful here. I recommend that you take a moment to actually educate yourself on the broader issues with Stake, which are well-documented on platforms like Stakeexposed.com.

You think it's funny that I'm exposing these practices? Fine, laugh all you want. But one thing is clear: I won't stop exposing fraud and standing up for what's right. If you have nothing constructive to add, then perhaps it’s time for you to move on.

You feel a bit confused to be honest. I can voice my opinion (regardless of my campaign) and I also said that it's true the bonus amounts decreased over time. I am a 4 year player on stake, have platinum 6 level and I know what I am talking about.
And about the "withdraw only mode" I actually know 3 persons personally that had this happen and they have withdrawn, just so you know. Also on the stake forum you can read about cases like that. Do yourself a favor and check it out.

And, I didn't "promptly" ask the OP of a different case to lock it, I just did because that's what people here are supposed to do. If your case is resolved you are supposed to update and lock to avoid further spamming, that's how things are handled here. You are in no place to judge me about my signature. I am nobody to blindly defend sites, never was never will. I said that in the case we are talking about there is definitely something wrong with the calculation, didn't I? Also it's a fact the support agents have several chats open, sending a reply to the wrong person happens and it happened to me so often actually. That's why I reacted to your reply, because you didn't take this into consideration. Cheers

I am sure you would call me a stake promoter if I were there wearing a stake signature at this moment. But, I am sorry that you did not get that chance. You just tried to prove that I am spamming here for my signature quota. Nah? Whatever you try to say does not actually help your case. You are just a frustrated kid who is addicted to gambling and lost some money that you cannot afford to lose. So, you tried to find a way to blackmail the casino and get some bonus. But, don't think nobody knows how this casino bonus works.

Haha. LOL. You just proved how desperate you are to prove that Stake isn't giving you a bonus. Grow up, kid. That's not how it works. I understand you are trying to make a living by doing this, but I am sorry for you. 

IMO you shouldn't intervene in cases regarding the casino you're promoting with a referral link into your signature because you're not objective, and even look a bit biased actually. Could you point out a case where this casino as just put the account in "withraw only mode" and kindly let the customer withdrawing all his funds without asking anything else after being accused of multi-accounting? I am very curious about that tbh. In the last case we've seen here(the one where you've asked the OP to promptly lock his thread before giving more informations), the customer had to threaten them to sue the big bosses in Australia, to be able to get his funds back.
Here it's the same with this customer agent, right after talking about his boss, the agent poorly apologized and claimed to have confused him with another customer while what he said was apparently in line with previous Eddie's statements according to you.