Moreover I don't understand why you are saying in your feed back the accusations are fake while it's not denied that the funds deposited by the plaintiff have been illegally seized by the casino.
On a brand new forum account, OP claimed funds were frozen for having multiple accounts and winnings were mainly from slots.
Stake is a casino, Sportsbetting or slots. It doesn't matter how a punter makes his money in a casino, as long as it's made through legit bets. It would be harder for OP to prove the legitimacy of their winnings if it was slots, but with sports-betting there are bet slips(which can be accessed publicly on stake) + OP has provided all the betslips as evidence long before stunna made their first reply(check imgur link). Making it very hard to deny the legitimacy of their winnings.
After being limited, OP used multiple accounts to get around the limit. That's the allegation. Stake said "we don't want your action over $X" and OP pretended to be multiple different people and then wagered more than the limit.
This individual placing bets obtained their profit from betting on sports not casino on 15+ accounts. They made these accounts to circumvent limits and restrictions put on previous accounts and have used their entire extended family's ID along with other potentially bought or borrowed ID's in an attempt to get around these limits. We have a number of methods that gave us very high confidence to link these accounts far beyond the ID's used. I don't want to share all details of the investigation as they will try to find ways to circumvent in the future. They have made a substantial profit all in all because of their use of a bulk of accounts.
The same question arises again,
If it is indeed true, then why did it only become a problem when they were winning.
A player is free to break rules, as long as they are losing? But once someone starts to win, the winning customer will be put under a microscope to find any faults and will be held liable for them without providing any verifiable evidence to back their claims(Since Stunna has already said they won't give any evidence about how connections b/w these accounts were made)?
There would have been no problem from Stake's side if OP lost all of their deposit(100k), why would it be? In a way, OP was playing a losing game. It's a violation of trust and a predatory practice.
Let this be known that OP's account was level 2 verified. Stake already had OP's identification. So they were given the green signal to go ahead and place their bets(but weren't told that they wouldn't be allowed to win
and will be suspended if they make a profit and try to withdraw it).I am also curious about why their previous accounts(if any), were limited or banned. Did they break a rule?
They played a fair game and won the money through legit bets. They are ready to verify their identity. I even asked for a video verification for my own purpose(to make sure I wasn't supporting an impostor). For obvious reasons I won't share the video here, it should be OP's choice.(Edit: I can see that they have already posted a video here) https://streamable.com/9wmyr4
If they can't provide evidence or prove anything, then OP deserves all of their balance(deposit+profit)
Edit: They deserve all of their funds. Else Stake will be violating their own T&C
And since their gaming license is more or less irrelevant Source:https://www.gamblingsites.org/laws/curacao/
I would consider them a rogue casino, if they fail to do so. Since they will be held accountable to nobody and are free to exploit their customers when the opportunity presents. In this case, it is a Ukrainian woman.
All transactions shall be checked in order to prevent money laundering. If a player becomes aware of any suspicious activity relating to any of the Games of the Website, s/he must report this to Stake immediately. Stake may suspend, block or close a Stake Account and withhold funds if requested to do so in accordance with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act or on any other legal basis requested by any state authority."
Which government agency has requested a seizure of my funds? Am I breaking money laundering laws? obviously not..
Then on what legal grounds are you holding them? You can kick me out, but you can't withhold funds.
