Author

Topic: Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Alfa Romeo F1 Team - page 242. (Read 278259 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1914
Merit: 328
3000 spins? damn , obviously that's not normal in a pragmatic game may I know what game are you playing? I'm really curious to try
My worst experience was at The Dog House game by pragmatic 900+ spins without bonuses then I blacklisted this game
now almost 3 years I have never played this game and maybe not forever.
3000 spins is a lot to do, and I don't know how long we have to wait for it to finish. I only used 100 spins, and even then, I had to use auto spin, so I didn't have to hold down my mouse to play. Pragmatic is a game that can provide big profits, but maybe that doesn't apply to some slot games, so even if we use lots of rounds, it's still difficult for us to get big wins.

I wonder how much betting he used and how long it took him to complete all those rounds. But what is clear, it may require a large balance to be able to complete 3000 rounds. Keep the enthusiasm to try until you get big profits.
We can double click the spin button so that the reels won't roll for too long. Maybe there is also an instant play feature for some of them. It's a great help if we are rushing and wants to see the results immediately. 100 spins is already a great number if one is playing the normal way and then betting with a good base bet.

I don't usually use the auto play function because the experience is much better if I am the one who clicks the spin button. It wasn't tiring though but if I am going to play with 3k spins then that's a different story anymore Grin. I think my fingers will be erased right after the game is finished. The minimum bet for pragmatic slot is $0.03 so if times 3000, that was still a whopping 90 dollars.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 881
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Martingale doesn't really work even in short timeframe. The laws of probability is just being seen more clearly during longer lime frames. But it also guarantees that you might as well lose earlier. When it's a game of luck there are no patterns that work.
Actually, martingale is a fairly effective strategy for making a profit. If you rely on martingale for a short period of time, it's tantamount to hoping for luck, because martingale is a strategy that cannot be done quickly.
Unfortunately, what needs to be considered when using the martingale strategy is that gamblers need more money because if you rely on limited money, this strategy will never work.
There have been many gamblers out there who have proven this strategy, but they are a little overwhelmed because they have to spend more money than usual.
Maybe rich gamblers can easily spend big money to aim to get more profits, but for small gamblers this strategy is very difficult for them to implement.


Martingale is the death of every serious gambler as it only work if you have unlimited money. Sooner or later you will los it all.

The math of course says it improbable that a 50/50 bet will land on the same side like 15-20 times but experience says otherwise.

Only starting with 0.01$ and lose lets say 15 times on a row you would already be down 328$. But who starts with 1 cent? If you start with 1$ and "only lose 10x in a row you are down 1k already.

The most important aspect is that you always just win you base amount. All the stress and finally win on the 11th try and get your money back, plus 1$ . Totally not worth it.
hero member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 521
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Martingale doesn't really work even in short timeframe. The laws of probability is just being seen more clearly during longer lime frames. But it also guarantees that you might as well lose earlier. When it's a game of luck there are no patterns that work.
Actually, martingale is a fairly effective strategy for making a profit. If you rely on martingale for a short period of time, it's tantamount to hoping for luck, because martingale is a strategy that cannot be done quickly.
Unfortunately, what needs to be considered when using the martingale strategy is that gamblers need more money because if you rely on limited money, this strategy will never work.
There have been many gamblers out there who have proven this strategy, but they are a little overwhelmed because they have to spend more money than usual.
Maybe rich gamblers can easily spend big money to aim to get more profits, but for small gamblers this strategy is very difficult for them to implement.
hero member
Activity: 1708
Merit: 566
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
As long as you are happy with your own strategy, that is all that matters. I understand that there could be some other people who may not like it and will say that they will never do what you do, which is fine because if that's not for them then they should not do it but as long as it is good for you and you are happy about it then there is no reason why you should not have anything like this at all, keep doing what you love doing and as long as you are happy about it then you do not have to listen to anyone else at all.

I wouldn't do it neither, however just because I wouldn't doesn't mean that I would tell you not to neither, that would be stupid of me to say.
Yes, that's how it is in gambling, everyone has their own strategy and maybe it is very different from what other people do, but as you said, if you are satisfied then do it. I also realize this, I also will not be able to do a strategy that will make me lose in a short time. Every player has their own style of play and it suits how they feel, including me. So far what I've done has been better and more profitable for me personally, that's what makes me like to apply it when I play gambling.
This brings a question to my mind, and this is ...

In a game where the gambler is totally dependent on luck to win, does strategy still work?
I know strategy could work for sports betting and the likes, since this form of gambling is more dependent on once level of knowledge on sports, there are strategies one could apply to have a better chance of winning their bet.

But for casino games where only luck applies, what form of strategy could make the gambler have a better chance of beating the house ?
As I said before, things like this are not real evidence when a strategy can conquer the ratio of luck and this kind of thing is still a fifty-fifty but this comes back again to comfort and confidence.
One can play gambling in any way they want. I like to gamble by doing what I'm doing now and that just adds to my confidence in gambling, so that's enough. It doesn't mean that by implementing a strategy we will always be profitable because of course things like this we also have to look at an important aspect, namely luck.

Yes, that's how it is in gambling, everyone has their own strategy and maybe it is very different from what other people do, but as you said, if you are satisfied then do it. I also realize this, I also will not be able to do a strategy that will make me lose in a short time. Every player has their own style of play and it suits how they feel, including me. So far what I've done has been better and more profitable for me personally, that's what makes me like to apply it when I play gambling.
I agree, everyone has his own style of gambling. That is why we keep trying different gambling platforms to find the best suitable option in the long run. Whatever makes money for me and I keep enjoying this activity I will not regret to keep repeating the same process.
This is the point, but on the other hand we also have to be aware that conditions like this are not only focused on money, I think because there are a number of other things that are of course felt especially by being in gambling when talking about making money actually it doesn't make sense because we know how strong it is we are in gambling that will still win is the casino.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1312
I wonder how long until they lose customers because of this, weekly/monthly rewards is the only attractive thing about stake.

Even if the cut down the reward or make a new requirement to be eligible for the base bonus of the weekly/monthly bonus, they wont lose their customer as long as the requirement is just to wager because it is something normal. They will lose customers if they remove the weekly/monthly bonus completely. However saying that weekly/monthly rewards is the only attractive offer is obviously a subjective opinion. There are still many other offers in Stake that can make players stay and play at Stake especially for active players.
member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 57
Primedice.com & Stake.com
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1168
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
If you played dice, martingale is a very effective strategy to recover losses but due to house edge, it is only effective for a short period of time.  If we prolong our gameplay, the strategy to recover our losses will become strategy to drain our balance faster since series of losses increases the longer we roll the dice.
Martingale doesn't really work even in short timeframe. The laws of probability is just being seen more clearly during longer lime frames. But it also guarantees that you might as well lose earlier. When it's a game of luck there are no patterns that work.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1280
Get $2100 deposit bonuses & 60 FS
As long as you are happy with your own strategy, that is all that matters. I understand that there could be some other people who may not like it and will say that they will never do what you do, which is fine because if that's not for them then they should not do it but as long as it is good for you and you are happy about it then there is no reason why you should not have anything like this at all, keep doing what you love doing and as long as you are happy about it then you do not have to listen to anyone else at all.

I wouldn't do it neither, however just because I wouldn't doesn't mean that I would tell you not to neither, that would be stupid of me to say.
Yes, that's how it is in gambling, everyone has their own strategy and maybe it is very different from what other people do, but as you said, if you are satisfied then do it. I also realize this, I also will not be able to do a strategy that will make me lose in a short time. Every player has their own style of play and it suits how they feel, including me. So far what I've done has been better and more profitable for me personally, that's what makes me like to apply it when I play gambling.
This brings a question to my mind, and this is ...

In a game where the gambler is totally dependent on luck to win, does strategy still work?

I know strategy could work for sports betting and the likes, since this form of gambling is more dependent on once level of knowledge on sports, there are strategies one could apply to have a better chance of winning their bet.

But for casino games where only luck applies, what form of strategy could make the gambler have a better chance of beating the house ?

There are strategies that are implemented in the luck-type game, but they are only effective in the short term and often losses in the long run.   but bankroll management strategies do work to minimize your losses.

If you played dice, martingale is a very effective strategy to recover losses but due to house edge, it is only effective for a short period of time.  If we prolong our gameplay, the strategy to recover our losses will become strategy to drain our balance faster since series of losses increases the longer we roll the dice.
legendary
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1261
-snip-
Strategy can be same as "Knowledge".

If you are playing with a player without "Strategy/Knowledge", and he messed up the game while the type game is against the house (Example like Blackjack). We as the player who has strategy/knowledge are gonna be mad/pissed off.

Why? because that player can ruin the game while the dealer can be bust but because him who are playing like "Idiot" then the dealer win. No matter you have a luck, bad section and other think people should have strategy.

The strategy is not being used for chasing the luck, but make sure you're playing with correct no matter win/lose.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1083
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
As long as you are happy with your own strategy, that is all that matters. I understand that there could be some other people who may not like it and will say that they will never do what you do, which is fine because if that's not for them then they should not do it but as long as it is good for you and you are happy about it then there is no reason why you should not have anything like this at all, keep doing what you love doing and as long as you are happy about it then you do not have to listen to anyone else at all.

I wouldn't do it neither, however just because I wouldn't doesn't mean that I would tell you not to neither, that would be stupid of me to say.
Yes, that's how it is in gambling, everyone has their own strategy and maybe it is very different from what other people do, but as you said, if you are satisfied then do it. I also realize this, I also will not be able to do a strategy that will make me lose in a short time. Every player has their own style of play and it suits how they feel, including me. So far what I've done has been better and more profitable for me personally, that's what makes me like to apply it when I play gambling.
This brings a question to my mind, and this is ...

In a game where the gambler is totally dependent on luck to win, does strategy still work?
I know strategy could work for sports betting and the likes, since this form of gambling is more dependent on once level of knowledge on sports, there are strategies one could apply to have a better chance of winning their bet.

But for casino games where only luck applies, what form of strategy could make the gambler have a better chance of beating the house ?
hero member
Activity: 1708
Merit: 566
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
As long as you are happy with your own strategy, that is all that matters. I understand that there could be some other people who may not like it and will say that they will never do what you do, which is fine because if that's not for them then they should not do it but as long as it is good for you and you are happy about it then there is no reason why you should not have anything like this at all, keep doing what you love doing and as long as you are happy about it then you do not have to listen to anyone else at all.

I wouldn't do it neither, however just because I wouldn't doesn't mean that I would tell you not to neither, that would be stupid of me to say.
Yes, that's how it is in gambling, everyone has their own strategy and maybe it is very different from what other people do, but as you said, if you are satisfied then do it. I also realize this, I also will not be able to do a strategy that will make me lose in a short time. Every player has their own style of play and it suits how they feel, including me. So far what I've done has been better and more profitable for me personally, that's what makes me like to apply it when I play gambling.
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1155
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
~
EDIT: In stake forum people report wagering like 2k and losing some only got 0.1$ weekly.  Grin
That is not true, i wagered below $2k and the weekly bonus was around $8, people do post bullshit all the time and it is not wise to take those into face value unless they provide any evidence and even so they can contact the support and enquire about their situation. I think you need to verify your account to become eligible for these bonuses and they are doing that to avoid abuse.

Sorry what? Evidence? Here you go. Platinum 1 account, down to 8 cent for months. Base amounts do not exist anymore. Extra logged into my gf's account, we only claim these whopping 8cent if there is monthly/pre/post in the same week.

Also, nobody needs to verify anything at stake, unless you want to or you just registered ( new rules) . SO please don't spread false information. Guess you are the one who did after all.  Roll Eyes


Normally the basic bonus for platinum is $10 if your bonus is less than $10, it means your gambling activity in a week is less than $100 or even without wager
Please remember when you have just claimed a weekly bonus and play it in the dice game and reach $1K wager it was not counted as a wager in the next week
because the reset time has not been activated well maybe a case like this that happened to some people so he was surprised his weekly bonus was lower.
Anyway, there are some scenarios that can occur that affect the bonuses of each user this is not the first time I heard it.
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1026
In Search of Incredible
~snip~
There is nothing to be surprised. Stake.com had given more than $10 million in bonus during the previous weekly boost time. Maybe they are trying to reduce their bonus cost by applying new rules on it. I can see some complaints about the low weekly bonus amount on Stake forum. You won't receive anything at other casino without having wagering activity. Stake was generous with the bonus as they were giving a decent base reward to it's VIP users. I'm wondering how much you have wagered in this weekly and monthly period!
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 881
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
~
EDIT: In stake forum people report wagering like 2k and losing some only got 0.1$ weekly.  Grin
That is not true, i wagered below $2k and the weekly bonus was around $8, people do post bullshit all the time and it is not wise to take those into face value unless they provide any evidence and even so they can contact the support and enquire about their situation. I think you need to verify your account to become eligible for these bonuses and they are doing that to avoid abuse.

Sorry what? Evidence? Here you go. Platinum 1 account, down to 8 cent for months. Base amounts do not exist anymore. Extra logged into my gf's account, we only claim these whopping 8cent if there is monthly/pre/post in the same week.



Also, nobody needs to verify anything at stake, unless you want to or you just registered ( new rules) . SO please don't spread false information. Guess you are the one who did after all.  Roll Eyes

hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 911
Have Fun )@@( Stay Safe
~
EDIT: In stake forum people report wagering like 2k and losing some only got 0.1$ weekly.  Grin
That is not true, i wagered below $2k and the weekly bonus was around $8, people do post bullshit all the time and it is not wise to take those into face value unless they provide any evidence and even so they can contact the support and enquire about their situation. I think you need to verify your account to become eligible for these bonuses and they are doing that to avoid abuse.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1102
Interesting strategy but does it work out ? If you increase your stakes after a good session and you have a bad streak, you will not only loose the profit you made but also will make a substantial loss. Most of the times, I always keep with the same bet size .
When we are in gambling, things like a good or bad beat are actually natural.
I don't really understand for other people, but for me personally things like this mostly work out well even though I don't deny that sometimes something is bad there but in a ratio I think 2:1 I can still get good things when this strategy is implemented.
This is for me, although I do realize that things like this will definitely be different from other people and there will be those who disagree with this.
As long as you are happy with your own strategy, that is all that matters. I understand that there could be some other people who may not like it and will say that they will never do what you do, which is fine because if that's not for them then they should not do it but as long as it is good for you and you are happy about it then there is no reason why you should not have anything like this at all, keep doing what you love doing and as long as you are happy about it then you do not have to listen to anyone else at all.

I wouldn't do it neither, however just because I wouldn't doesn't mean that I would tell you not to neither, that would be stupid of me to say.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 881
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
“We did some changes to the weekly bonus now. You have to wager a little bit more in order to get the base amount.”

That’s what Eddie just said on stream, these exact words.

So they basically cut the rewards again, god knows how many times now in the last 12 months.
I wonder how long until they lose customers because of this, weekly/monthly rewards is the only attractive thing about stake.

The greed it real.

EDIT: In stake forum people report wagering like 2k and losing some only got 0.1$ weekly.  Grin
member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 57
Primedice.com & Stake.com
Quarter Final 1 Voting Now Open 🚨

Option 1:
$50k Bonus Drop, 5,000 Claims, $10k wager, Drop Amount $10

Option 2:
$50k Bonus Drop, 10,000 Claims, $5k wager, Drop Amount $5

Vote Now 🗣️

https://twitter.com/Stake/status/1636852122938638342
legendary
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1261
-snip-.
Damn, I applause for you.

Did you playing focused in one single slot only spinning 3,000 spin ? If that a yes, I'm salute to you because you're still trying playing on that slot while the section is really bad. My maximum spin on bad section while the multiplier bonus is shit + cannot hitting any bonus is 500 spin (that's my max)

But, you're can spin more than 3,000 spin could be almost like same buying 15-20 bonus feature. Damn.
newbie
Activity: 333
Merit: 0
You can only pray that you will never have an issue with Stake!

[email protected] is not willing to solve issues!

[email protected] and [email protected] ignore!

Bijan ignores its Crypto Gambling Foundation ⚖️ - Fair Gambling For All thread!
Jump to: