~
No seriously, people are free to choose what game they want to play, and each person has his own preference (no need to shill dice lol). I just tried the Limbo and imagine if the multiplier can be materialized without a target.
To me Limbo is like Crash, only faster, because it's not a multiplayer game, and, also, it's more like Crash in the Auto mode, because the target is set, and you can't cash out earlier. At first I thought that you were suggesting something like Crash, but without a target, meaning, like basic Crash game, with the opportunity of cashing out whenever you like. But then I reread your previous post,
Guys, since you like numbers, what do you think about a game like Limbo, but without target payout. It's like an image-less slot with 1% HE and provably fair.
You know, slots are fantastic but the HE is too much 
and it became clear that what you really want is a game, where you can randomly win with various multipliers, sometimes with very big ones, but without a target set in advance. Basically, you want slots, but with much lower house edge.
The thing is that the house edge on slots is so high not because game providers or site owners are so greedy, or something, but rather because, considering possible unexpected big payouts, running slots would be too risky for site owners, and they would go bust one after another, if the payouts were the same, but the house edge was 1%.
That's what I personally think, but I wouldn't mind seeing other opinions.
