Topic: Star Trek Crypto Coin thread - Big changes are coming!! - page 8. (Read 40218 times)

I'm using the kr105 cgminer with ufccoin.com and all I'm getting are rejects with reason "H-not-zero".  Has anyone seen this?

Thanks a lot bitcoinfx, let see how high next time .

Most SHA256 coins are just a profitable as BTC to mine. Not necessarily a bad thing. Plus look at the marketcaps of these SHA256 coins.

4    Peercoin    $ 122,912,581    $ 5.84    21,063,728 PPC
18    Zetacoin    $ 3,926,489    $ 0.025    159,747,221 ZET
24    Terracoin    $ 2,148,788    $ 0.43    4,967,550 TRC
26    Freicoin    $ 1,780,970    $ 0.05    35,888,382 FRC
41    AsicCoin    $ 498,117    $ 0.0012    405,190,402 ASC
43    Unobtanium    $ 446,390    $ 3.39    131,578 UNO
53    Bytecoin    $ 250,249    $ 0.14    1,844,078 BTE
56    Deutsche eMark    $ 221,875    $ 0.062    3,583,550 DEM
59    BetaCoin    $ 147,983    $ 0.026    5,628,298 BET
62    Tigercoin    $ 126,963    $ 0.005    25,286,184 TGC
72    Joulecoin    $ 55,717    $ 0.016    3,547,120 XJO

According to this thread here http://scificointalk.com/index.php/topic,147.0.html 70k UFC is equal to 1 btc. This gives us a market cap of 110 BTC. 110 x 826 USD (BTC-E) = $90,000 USD market cap.

So even with scrypt mining, UFC has a low market when compared to these SHA256 coins and even other scryptcoins. I am sure that UFC is more marketable than betacoin and asiccoin. I understand that by going to SHA256 it excludes most miners because of the cost barrier to enter the mining game is high. But in the end, the network still gets secured, and those that want to acquire UFC will have to go to the exchange to buy it. If coins are being created only for miners, and the only thing that miners do is sell coins to convert to BTC, then where are the buyers? SHA256 creates a market of buyers for the coin, just like BTC, its much better to buy the coin then to buy hardware to mine it.

Ports are available for icarus/lancelot, ztex 1.15x, 1.15y and Cairsmore CM1.
The code currently achieves around 800MHash/s at 195Mhz on the lancelot board and around
1.5Gh/s on the quad boards (1.15y, CM1).

I will be continuing the UFC giveaway tomorrow over at the official scifi exchange. I am taking the night off from cryptos so I can unwind for a bit.

On a side note, how many coins are currently using the Blake-256 algo? I can only name two, Blakecoin and UFC! Remember everyone, scrypt asics are out in the wild now. GPU miners will soon be pushed out of Scrypt just like GPUs left SHA256.

I predict that  Blake-256 will be the next generation algo that will cater to the true decentralization of hashing power.

Guys, giveaways are happening here: http://altcoingiveaways.com
We can still promote over there!


EDIT: check this out: http://altcoingiveaways.com/index.php/topic,563.0.html
And this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/giveaway-10-10-ufc-a-star-trek-coin-441655

I noticed an issue earlier with transactions...  I re-checked all files with examDiff and on closer inspection there was a difference in the code, that caused issues with DPZ...

I had to update the windows client again... SO this update is mandatory..

Linux users that build from source do not need to upgrade, as the file was only wrong in the windows client code.


https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0v-yGBvWGMxRTlhV290OFJfU0U/edit?usp=sharing   .7z

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0v-yGBvWGMxUDJjZUczQTlQTDg/edit?usp=sharing   .zip


back to where I wanted to be 3 days ago now...  I have been testing all night with help from another forum member... and the issue is sorted.  But please report any issues if you find any on this thread...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4831356

BTCoyz From the Dwarf !