Topic: Stay Calm, IEOs aren't a threat - page 13. (Read 2682 times)
Either ICO or IEO the service of bounty hunters is still needed because there is no way ICO or IEO will archive their goal without promoting their project.
The Initial Exchange Offering is still a quite new phenomenon but there is no doubt that this will continue to grow with time. An IEO is completely different from ICO as the exchange is a tangible execution model, rather than an idea in a technical document. Hence, the chances of it performing in the long term are greater. With time, the IEO may change the face of crypto banking for the better for it might help to make crypto-currencies and exchanges more appealing to the wider market.
Again, IEOs are very new. There’s no telling how many exchanges will want to take part or what that participation will even look like.
It’s my opinion that IEOs aren’t going to see the kind of rapid bubble type of hype that the ICOs of 2016 and 2017 brought us.
This is what regulation does, whether it be self imposed or governmental, regulation takes away the volatility and calms the waters a bit.
Some might call it boring, but like it or not, this is what happens.
It’s my opinion that IEOs aren’t going to see the kind of rapid bubble type of hype that the ICOs of 2016 and 2017 brought us.
This is what regulation does, whether it be self imposed or governmental, regulation takes away the volatility and calms the waters a bit.
Some might call it boring, but like it or not, this is what happens.
Owing to the fact that IEO is an excellent idea, but we still need to be mindful on the fact that the projects has been received into the community. With a supporting responility to help in increase the ubx.
I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
Not every exchange has a deemed popularity. So people are still hearing from social news which the hunters doing. Some shilling by hunters are still effective of marketing if the project is really need an audience for their product. So I'm not convince that bounty will disappear even with the release of many IEO now.
If IEO will be the solution to the growing numbers of ICO scammers, I would support this rather than ICO. Ieo can still launch a bounty if they just want too and I am not worried with this. We want a solution for ICO scam projects and this might help to reduce them or eliminate much better
It is imperative to always be on the alert, because there is always the possibility that even 100% guaranteed services and situations can be really terrible, so I think that the situation as a whole may not seem very guaranteed in the future.
I think offering tokens everywhere will not be able to guarantee investors and the risk of scam will always be there, even from KYC they still dare not to be responsible for the price of tokens they offer so you should remain vigilant about offering tokens like that even though they came from a large exchange place. 
ICO's had been established and I think there are lesser companies now who will start from scratch again.
It is also the easiest method and user friendly way to make a crowd funding.
There is still STO which is being advertised and yet it seems it cannot go to the way ICO did. Some just wants to stay with the older style and just do their projects as good as they could to invite more investors.
Something new will not help, it will just divide us once again.
It is also the easiest method and user friendly way to make a crowd funding.
There is still STO which is being advertised and yet it seems it cannot go to the way ICO did. Some just wants to stay with the older style and just do their projects as good as they could to invite more investors.
Something new will not help, it will just divide us once again.
Yeah, it's one step easier than doing an STO. STO means they have to be regulated, and then depending on which country it's launched from, it could be very difficult to ensure all the investors are from eligible countries, difficult to get them KYC, and then difficult to manage the distribution to individuals.
This Exchange Offering is something of a hassle free experience. Platform handles all that and the project collects funds. I wonder what fee the platform charges to these guys!
It is imperative to always be on the alert, because there is always the possibility that even 100% guaranteed services and situations can be really terrible, so I think that the situation as a whole may not seem very guaranteed in the future.
of course IEO not a trhreat, it was a new solutions for avoiding fake and scam ICO out there, im feeling safer participating in IEO because their project already partnering with exchanger.
IEO are not threats to bounty hunters and not too long there are some IEO projects that launched there bounties on btt forum to I'm sure bounty hunters won't be left out ,they will always need us to promote there projects
I agree with you. They will hire advertisers when they will manage a lot of campaigns. They can't do it because they are lacking manpower so they need the help of these bounty hunters to advertise a certain project. When this happen, I think there will be changes into how bounty hunters will advertise the project like change of rules something like that.
On the other hand, there are some exchanges which are popular already in different social media and there are some popular exchanges like Binance are launching IEO's already. What do they only need is just posting ads on Facebook, twitter and different social media platforms and since there are many traders on their exchange, many will be aware of the incoming IEO so they don't need too many people to advertise the project since they are popular and many will be aware once they posted it on different platforms.
On the other hand, there are some exchanges which are popular already in different social media and there are some popular exchanges like Binance are launching IEO's already. What do they only need is just posting ads on Facebook, twitter and different social media platforms and since there are many traders on their exchange, many will be aware of the incoming IEO so they don't need too many people to advertise the project since they are popular and many will be aware once they posted it on different platforms.
Why would anyone think IEO as a threat?
It is not something against crypto. Or some way to scam people. It is actually a way to not get scammed because no exchange would list a scam, it would destroy them. Just an ico where you can buy on exchanges.
It is not something against crypto. Or some way to scam people. It is actually a way to not get scammed because no exchange would list a scam, it would destroy them. Just an ico where you can buy on exchanges.
No end means to promoting projects and as a bounty hunter our services will always be needed ,just because many projects are turning to IEO doesn't mean that they won't need to promote there projects that's where we will always come in so worryless my dear fellow bounty hunters we will always be needed
I also think that IEO is just a temporary trend in the market, nothing more.
If investors would love it, I think it will stay and continue to increase participation from investors.
I'm not sure but I kinda think that this is a new trend of ICO, through exchange as they are more reputable and investors can trust them.
I also think that IEO is just a temporary trend in the market, nothing more. Is there any statistics available about all IEO spent during this time, what percentage of money from all ICOs during this time did they collect? I think something about 1%. These are not the numbers that are worth seriously talking about.
Time as usual will put everything in its place. I think everything here seems very, very strange despite the fact that IEO actually looks really super strange. This is, after all, a hybrid model, because, on the whole, there are few of the funds that they began to receive from traders for exchanges.
I think those who will be affected by the failure of the ICO or IEO are those exchanges, so the exchange place that holds the IEO should really select a good project so that it will not have a negative impact on anyone participating in the IEO.I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
People seem to be concerned about IEOs and how they pose to be a threat but I always rebuke it as uninformed assertion. Bounty is a form of marketing and as such very crucial to the development and growth of the industry. Cryptocurency needs bounty hunters more.
We created a chat on the subject of IEO, there we discuss everything that is interesting and can help make a successful IEO. Here is a link if anyone is interested: https://t.me/ieoone
ICO's had been established and I think there are lesser companies now who will start from scratch again.
It is also the easiest method and user friendly way to make a crowd funding.
There is still STO which is being advertised and yet it seems it cannot go to the way ICO did. Some just wants to stay with the older style and just do their projects as good as they could to invite more investors.
Something new will not help, it will just divide us once again.
It is also the easiest method and user friendly way to make a crowd funding.
There is still STO which is being advertised and yet it seems it cannot go to the way ICO did. Some just wants to stay with the older style and just do their projects as good as they could to invite more investors.
Something new will not help, it will just divide us once again.
Jump to: