Topic: Stay Calm, IEOs aren't a threat - page 9. (Read 2682 times)
Looking at the features of IEO, its just an upgrade of ICO. The crypto ecosystem can't do away with bounty hunters. Promotion of crypto projects can only be done by bounty hunters faster and cheaper compared to project managers paying for their project to be advertise by media institutions. IEO was introduced to help investors come back and invest into the crypto ecosystem.
Sure, it doesnt metter - ICO or IEO. Doesn't metter how is good project if no one knows about it. Now we see a new wave of reborn advertizing in crypto world. And that is exciting.
IEOs are more trusted from the investors as exchanges are supervising the project. They should not
be a threat for bounty hunters as they bringing back the trust for investing in crypto.
be a threat for bounty hunters as they bringing back the trust for investing in crypto.
IEOs have a very positive effect on the market. I think that in the future there will be many more profitable bounties and IEO will contribute to this. I am very positive. I think that a good time for bounty may come.
IEO shouldn't be seen as a threat to bounty hunters but rather as an advantage because the services of Bounty hunters will surely be needed no matter the form of crowdsale that gets used by most projects. IEO should be seen as a blessing by bounty hunters because it will reduce the rate of scam projects and projects that just use bounty hunters without paying them. Because these projects will be reviewed by the exchange that conducts the crowdsale and exchanges won't want to promote fake projects so that their integrity is not jeopardize.
True, I hope that more IEO projects will use the services of Bounty hunters to voice their projects to the public, so that it will be a good blessing for Bounty hunters, because in my opinion the IEO is the safest place now than the ICO. I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
IEOs are not a threat to bounty hunters. IEOs are not a threat to ICO Pools. IEOs need marketing campaigns, and both are going to be essential to help those projects build enough hype.
IEO shouldn't be seen as a threat to bounty hunters but rather as an advantage because the services of Bounty hunters will surely be needed no matter the form of crowdsale that gets used by most projects. IEO should be seen as a blessing by bounty hunters because it will reduce the rate of scam projects and projects that just use bounty hunters without paying them. Because these projects will be reviewed by the exchange that conducts the crowdsale and exchanges won't want to promote fake projects so that their integrity is not jeopardize.
Wait, come to think of it, most of the projects that goes to the IEO doesn't have bounty program except for a few. This to me looks like a way of avoiding bounty hunters. Nevertheless, advertisement will still be an ongoing thing so they'll need bounty participants. The real issue will be how to see those projects.
Surely they need a Bounty mass promotion is the best way to promote their projects, and the IEO is one good sale so there will be no fraud.
I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
Not a threat? Maybe
But destroyed icos reputation completely? Yes
So what’s the difference ?
I have seen supposed icos concert to ieos since the recognition and hypes from binance
It will end up being a threat
Wait, come to think of it, most of the projects that goes to the IEO doesn't have bounty program except for a few. This to me looks like a way of avoiding bounty hunters. Nevertheless, advertisement will still be an ongoing thing so they'll need bounty participants. The real issue will be how to see those projects.
Ooooh, this is pertaining to bounty participants. IEO or Intial Exchange Offering is sadly a centralized solution to the rampant scam ICOs that plague the crypto scene last 2017. So now every fundraising effort is now vetted by your favorite exchange. To bounty hunters, it's still the same ICO, it is just handled by exchanges now.
I don't see IEO as a threat to bounty hunters because some projects in IEO still employ the services of hunters.
Not all projects can carry out IOEs, some of those that will sometimes be able to turn to us for help, marketing a company launched through bounty is paying off.
Cryptocurrency users do not always understand the difference between Eco companies and IOE. Basically there is information that investors can be much calmer for their money, but the difficulties for the team is a completely different matter. If such a problem exists, the company's ico market will expand. 
Not all projects can carry out IOEs, some of those that will sometimes be able to turn to us for help, marketing a company launched through bounty is paying off.
I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
Agree, every project needs advertising to share info about the project and collect community. One thing is different in IEO fundraising is that exchange usually guaranty listing of the project token. And I think soon hype will calm down and projects had to advertise their crowd sales.Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
I think that depends on exchange, do they want to make that token fomo. As Okex IEO is an example, it was x16 after the IEO ended, an unbelievable price
This is not something to be worried about as I have seen few projects that are IEO projects yet still have bounties eg ,bluenote ,air wallet ,token mom ,high bank etc ,its not the end for bounty hunters but only the beginning ,the more all other projects are turning to IEO the better for bounty hunters
I think that the teams willn't give up the services of the hunters and ICO will continue, but thanks to the IEO, the scam projects will gradually leave the market. But it also seems to me that in IEO the exchanges will advertise their coins too in parallel and oblige investors to purchase them at a reduced price.
Though crowd sales takes time but the main thing is that the tokens are being almost evenly distributed to the investors and its not likely that we may face pump and dump situation.But the total IEO scheme that is being taken up by many crypto start ups are really not doing very good.And the outcome is that hardly people get to buy in the IEO.And moreover what exchanges do is that they make it compulsory that IEO participation can be done only using their own coins for example BNB LOL. 
I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
Actually IEO is a good thing, because there are many peoples who buy cryptocurrency to investing in IEO.
And of course this will make cryptocurrency price increasing due the increasing demands to participating in IEO.
But they buy altcoins, of course, depending on the needs of each IEO. Suppose the IEO is in binance, of course they will buy a BNB and like other exchanges too. But what you say is good for this IEO. And ICO is also still a lot of people investing there. So we can only always support what's happening now.
I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.
All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other
Actually IEO is a good thing, because there are many peoples who buy cryptocurrency to investing in IEO.
And of course this will make cryptocurrency price increasing due the increasing demands to participating in IEO.
Jump to: