Pages:
Author

Topic: Stay Calm, IEOs aren't a threat - page 11. (Read 2640 times)

full member
Activity: 282
Merit: 100
April 09, 2019, 12:49:22 AM
Less risky but high potential for the investors.

This idea was considered successful already, the number of ICOs now have decrease as they know it will not be patronize by investors.
As an investor, it's just right to find a platform where they can minimize the risk and IEO was the answer for that.
investors must know which exchanges are trusted and which are not. after all, as more IEOs grow, their success will also diminish, not as well as at the beginning of the IEO's popularity because its success reached hardcap in a few moments.
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 636
For campaign management look for Little Mouse!
April 09, 2019, 12:46:34 AM
IEOs should repeat sucess of ICOs. Probably impact won't be so huge, but I will try to catch as much IEOs as possible in order to increase my portfolio.
I consider IEO as a less risky way to invest money compared to ICO
Less risky but high potential for the investors.

This idea was considered successful already, the number of ICOs now have decrease as they know it will not be patronize by investors.
As an investor, it's just right to find a platform where they can minimize the risk and IEO was the answer for that.
sr. member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 253
Margin Trader
April 07, 2019, 04:59:35 PM
IEOs should repeat sucess of ICOs. Probably impact won't be so huge, but I will try to catch as much IEOs as possible in order to increase my portfolio.
I consider IEO as a less risky way to invest money compared to ICO
sr. member
Activity: 896
Merit: 253
April 07, 2019, 04:24:49 AM
I absolutely agree that IEOs aren't a threat instead it's the KYC involved which may drive some investors away. However, I believe a IEOs are better than some ICOs.

There are strict rules that an exchange is implementing before hosting an IEO.  They need to submit their team profile and the exchange make it sure that there are real people behind the project.  Remember the exchange need to protect their reputation, so they will be the first one to conduct research on the project.  If there is no red flag then the IEO will commence.  With this option, I agree that IEO is way better than ICO in terms of verifying people behind the project.
Not all exchange does that, I know some exchanges that hosts IEO and doesnt care about the identity of the team. They just want to get paid. But several known exchanges are very careful like binance, bittrex, huobi and kucoin.
copper member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 500
April 07, 2019, 04:21:52 AM
I absolutely agree that IEOs aren't a threat instead it's the KYC involved which may drive some investors away. However, I believe a IEOs are better than some ICOs.

There are strict rules that an exchange is implementing before hosting an IEO.  They need to submit their team profile and the exchange make it sure that there are real people behind the project.  Remember the exchange need to protect their reputation, so they will be the first one to conduct research on the project.  If there is no red flag then the IEO will commence.  With this option, I agree that IEO is way better than ICO in terms of verifying people behind the project.



I agree with OP, there are too many crowdfunding projects that exchanges cannot accommodate and so bounty will still be needed. 
jr. member
Activity: 30
Merit: 1
April 07, 2019, 04:12:48 AM
All exchanges are not enough to stamp projects, so in any case, the ICO will be popular and in particular the bounty services will also be needed!
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
April 07, 2019, 02:52:35 AM
I think, the projects that will make the IEO will need advertising and promotion just like the projects that make ICO. Therefore, I think that the projects that make IEO will always need bounty hunters to have a big community. I see that many old projects that  listed on exchanges are also organizing a bounty campaign. So bounty works never ends.
indeed advertising and promotion can be a good strategy from the IEO project to make the offer sell well, but the most important thing for the success of the IEO is not only from the marketing strategy, but usually investors will see from the projects and platforms that they want to develop, very useful for many people or not.
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
April 07, 2019, 02:36:54 AM
Hopefully we will assume so because good bounties are diminishing rapidly. IEOs has posed to be a better fund raising alternative to project developers who need IEOs to raise funds than bounty hunters to pool investors to their ICOs
hero member
Activity: 931
Merit: 500
April 07, 2019, 02:11:37 AM
I think, the projects that will make the IEO will need advertising and promotion just like the projects that make ICO. Therefore, I think that the projects that make IEO will always need bounty hunters to have a big community. I see that many old projects that  listed on exchanges are also organizing a bounty campaign. So bounty works never ends.
hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 667
April 07, 2019, 01:51:32 AM
I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

IEO for me is better than ICOs because all of this project must be in the secure platform or exchange and also is will avoid to many scammer unlike ICOs.


I would agree wit that, the new trend has made this market revive.
It's good now that we have this platform and we can minimize the risk in investing in ICO.
This is still called ICO IMO since it's crowdsale offering but through a secure way which is from exchanges.
We should also be wise in choosing exchanges, choose only those who have good reputation.
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 1
April 07, 2019, 01:42:33 AM
Okay but doesn't ICO sound catchier than IEO?



full member
Activity: 994
Merit: 105
April 07, 2019, 01:21:01 AM
I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

IEO for me is better than ICOs because all of this project must be in the secure platform or exchange and also is will avoid to many scammer unlike ICOs.

full member
Activity: 938
Merit: 102
April 06, 2019, 08:18:40 PM
Part of the marketing strategy is to keep promoting your product and bounty hunters are there to help. IEO's is not a threat because still, they need to promote their product using bounty campaigns so they can well disseminate their project.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 509
April 06, 2019, 08:17:22 PM
Well I don't think bountier will not have a bright future because of IEO, projects will still need an advertisement for it's project, gaining some audience and investor through bounty program will still worked.
Advertising is always necessary, maybe IEOs changed situation little, but not all of the projects can be sold at binance. Also, most ICOs are waiting for good condition. Everything will come back when status is good.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1015
April 06, 2019, 07:58:08 PM
Well I don't think bountier will not have a bright future because of IEO, projects will still need an advertisement for it's project, gaining some audience and investor through bounty program will still worked.
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 251
Small Trader
April 06, 2019, 07:53:24 PM
Initially I was worried about the development of the IEO which could be said to be quite a lot, which could have an impact on the reduction in bounty campaigns. However, I think returning to the respective IEO projects. They also still need promotion for their projects. And bounty campaign is one of the best solutions for promoting ICO or IEO projects.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 105
April 06, 2019, 07:17:26 PM
I think that bounty depends on where the token will be sold. Some IEO conducted bounty. Therefore, I think that the IEO will not affect the bounty. Besides, I don’t think that the IEO will exist for a long time.
copper member
Activity: 336
Merit: 1
April 06, 2019, 03:27:56 PM
IEO's will certainly put a dent into the bounty campaigns available. All of the good ones will go straight onto the exchanges and won't need us to promote them. BTT didn't need a bounty campaign, time to get a day job ..
full member
Activity: 616
Merit: 100
April 06, 2019, 03:08:41 PM
I absolutely agree that IEOs aren't a threat instead it's the KYC involved which may drive some investors away. However, I believe a IEOs are better than some ICOs.
I still haven't seen the overall potential of the IEO, which may be considered foreign to me and ICO itself is already very good, actually this year it looks bad. I also hope that the IEO will be better than the ICO in the future.
94K
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 10
HiveNet - Distributed Cloud Computing
April 06, 2019, 01:48:25 PM
I absolutely agree that IEOs aren't a threat instead it's the KYC involved which may drive some investors away. However, I believe a IEOs are better than some ICOs.
Pages:
Jump to: