Stay Calm, IEOs aren't a threat - page 11.

kevinex

full member

Activity: 282

Merit: 100

Quote from: Ziskinberg on April 08, 2019, 11:46:34 PM

Less risky but high potential for the investors.

This idea was considered successful already, the number of ICOs now have decrease as they know it will not be patronize by investors.
As an investor, it's just right to find a platform where they can minimize the risk and IEO was the answer for that.

investors must know which exchanges are trusted and which are not. after all, as more IEOs grow, their success will also diminish, not as well as at the beginning of the IEO's popularity because its success reached hardcap in a few moments.

Ziskinberg

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 666

Quote from: Golstrim on April 07, 2019, 03:59:35 PM

IEOs should repeat sucess of ICOs. Probably impact won't be so huge, but I will try to catch as much IEOs as possible in order to increase my portfolio.
I consider IEO as a less risky way to invest money compared to ICO

Less risky but high potential for the investors.

This idea was considered successful already, the number of ICOs now have decrease as they know it will not be patronize by investors.
As an investor, it's just right to find a platform where they can minimize the risk and IEO was the answer for that.

Golstrim

sr. member

Activity: 1456

Merit: 253

Margin Trader

IEOs should repeat sucess of ICOs. Probably impact won't be so huge, but I will try to catch as much IEOs as possible in order to increase my portfolio.
I consider IEO as a less risky way to invest money compared to ICO

nicster551

sr. member

Activity: 896

Merit: 253

Quote from: BitFinnese on April 07, 2019, 03:21:52 AM

Quote from: 94K on April 06, 2019, 12:48:25 PM

I absolutely agree that IEOs aren't a threat instead it's the KYC involved which may drive some investors away. However, I believe a IEOs are better than some ICOs.

There are strict rules that an exchange is implementing before hosting an IEO. They need to submit their team profile and the exchange make it sure that there are real people behind the project. Remember the exchange need to protect their reputation, so they will be the first one to conduct research on the project. If there is no red flag then the IEO will commence. With this option, I agree that IEO is way better than ICO in terms of verifying people behind the project.

Not all exchange does that, I know some exchanges that hosts IEO and doesnt care about the identity of the team. They just want to get paid. But several known exchanges are very careful like binance, bittrex, huobi and kucoin.

BitFinnese

copper member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 500

Quote from: 94K on April 06, 2019, 12:48:25 PM

I absolutely agree that IEOs aren't a threat instead it's the KYC involved which may drive some investors away. However, I believe a IEOs are better than some ICOs.

There are strict rules that an exchange is implementing before hosting an IEO. They need to submit their team profile and the exchange make it sure that there are real people behind the project. Remember the exchange need to protect their reputation, so they will be the first one to conduct research on the project. If there is no red flag then the IEO will commence. With this option, I agree that IEO is way better than ICO in terms of verifying people behind the project.

I agree with OP, there are too many crowdfunding projects that exchanges cannot accommodate and so bounty will still be needed.

ivankozloviz

jr. member

Activity: 30

Merit: 1

All exchanges are not enough to stamp projects, so in any case, the ICO will be popular and in particular the bounty services will also be needed!

Yutikas_11920

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: beckspace on April 07, 2019, 01:11:37 AM

I think, the projects that will make the IEO will need advertising and promotion just like the projects that make ICO. Therefore, I think that the projects that make IEO will always need bounty hunters to have a big community. I see that many old projects that listed on exchanges are also organizing a bounty campaign. So bounty works never ends.

indeed advertising and promotion can be a good strategy from the IEO project to make the offer sell well, but the most important thing for the success of the IEO is not only from the marketing strategy, but usually investors will see from the projects and platforms that they want to develop, very useful for many people or not.

RockDJ

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 100

Hopefully we will assume so because good bounties are diminishing rapidly. IEOs has posed to be a better fund raising alternative to project developers who need IEOs to raise funds than bounty hunters to pool investors to their ICOs

beckspace

hero member

Activity: 931

Merit: 500

I think, the projects that will make the IEO will need advertising and promotion just like the projects that make ICO. Therefore, I think that the projects that make IEO will always need bounty hunters to have a big community. I see that many old projects that listed on exchanges are also organizing a bounty campaign. So bounty works never ends.

Botnake

hero member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 667

Quote from: mardaed on April 07, 2019, 12:21:01 AM

Quote from: ghermghuda on March 19, 2019, 09:53:57 AM

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

IEO for me is better than ICOs because all of this project must be in the secure platform or exchange and also is will avoid to many scammer unlike ICOs.

I would agree wit that, the new trend has made this market revive.
It's good now that we have this platform and we can minimize the risk in investing in ICO.
This is still called ICO IMO since it's crowdsale offering but through a secure way which is from exchanges.
We should also be wise in choosing exchanges, choose only those who have good reputation.

Deylandra

jr. member

Activity: 54

Merit: 1

Okay but doesn't ICO sound catchier than IEO?

mardaed

full member

Activity: 994

Merit: 105

Quote from: ghermghuda on March 19, 2019, 09:53:57 AM

I have overhead many people in various bounty groups talking about how bounty campaigns are gonna die should we move on from ICO to rampant IEO issuance (maybe the exchanges shall take over the advertisements or so).

Fact is that if IEOs become a thing, many projects will arise and hence the services of bounty hunters shall be required again. Every project needs advertisements to expand and that's why we are there as bounty hunters. This is the same way ICOs grew in number.

All we should hope for is a better crypto ecosystem because at the end, we shall be needed for promotion in one way or the other

IEO for me is better than ICOs because all of this project must be in the secure platform or exchange and also is will avoid to many scammer unlike ICOs.

Enzo05

full member

Activity: 938

Merit: 102

Part of the marketing strategy is to keep promoting your product and bounty hunters are there to help. IEO's is not a threat because still, they need to promote their product using bounty campaigns so they can well disseminate their project.

mrdeposit

hero member

Activity: 1358

Merit: 509

Quote from: btc-facebook on April 06, 2019, 06:58:08 PM

Well I don't think bountier will not have a bright future because of IEO, projects will still need an advertisement for it's project, gaining some audience and investor through bounty program will still worked.

Advertising is always necessary, maybe IEOs changed situation little, but not all of the projects can be sold at binance. Also, most ICOs are waiting for good condition. Everything will come back when status is good.

btc-facebook

legendary

Activity: 1862

Merit: 1015

Well I don't think bountier will not have a bright future because of IEO, projects will still need an advertisement for it's project, gaining some audience and investor through bounty program will still worked.

dimastegar

sr. member

Activity: 798

Merit: 251

Small Trader

Initially I was worried about the development of the IEO which could be said to be quite a lot, which could have an impact on the reduction in bounty campaigns. However, I think returning to the respective IEO projects. They also still need promotion for their projects. And bounty campaign is one of the best solutions for promoting ICO or IEO projects.

CryptoGosu

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 105

I think that bounty depends on where the token will be sold. Some IEO conducted bounty. Therefore, I think that the IEO will not affect the bounty. Besides, I don’t think that the IEO will exist for a long time.

shamc

copper member

Activity: 336

Merit: 1

IEO's will certainly put a dent into the bounty campaigns available. All of the good ones will go straight onto the exchanges and won't need us to promote them. BTT didn't need a bounty campaign, time to get a day job ..

seggardinggins

full member

Activity: 616

Merit: 100

Quote from: 94K on April 06, 2019, 12:48:25 PM

I absolutely agree that IEOs aren't a threat instead it's the KYC involved which may drive some investors away. However, I believe a IEOs are better than some ICOs.

I still haven't seen the overall potential of the IEO, which may be considered foreign to me and ICO itself is already very good, actually this year it looks bad. I also hope that the IEO will be better than the ICO in the future.

94K

member

Activity: 350

Merit: 10

HiveNet - Distributed Cloud Computing

I absolutely agree that IEOs aren't a threat instead it's the KYC involved which may drive some investors away. However, I believe a IEOs are better than some ICOs.

Topic: Stay Calm, IEOs aren't a threat - page 11. (Read 2682 times)