Anyway, I see no point in discussing this because you're obviously just going to stick with the same old bullshit and I'm not going to change my mind unless some new evidence comes to light (and you two posting at the same time along with all the other irrelevant nonsense isn't going to cut it).
Well ok then...
PS: Once I will start doubting your mind I will stop debating with you. I will seek an investigation from the community because the truth is that S_Therapist is not mdayonliner. This is how an investigation should work...
- Accuser (You are saying S_Therapist = mdayonliner)
- Defender (Me fighting to establish the truth which is S_Therapist is not my alt)
In a court the Accuser presents his evidences, the Defender presents his evidences, a jury makes the decision based on the evidence they are likely to stay neutral. If you ask an accuser to give the decision then he will always speak for him that he himself is always right and likewise the defender will do the same.
I am seeking an investigation from the forum members who were/are watching this topic. The members who can stand in a neutral ground. I believe there are a lot of member who are able to think and act neutral. There are a lot of members who do not fear debating with a DT like hilariousetc. They are not afraid to speak the truth when they see it. I need only those members please.
You do not have to support me, sympathy me or show any favor to me. Please do the same for hilariousetc too. Do not ignore any fact or do any favor just because hilariousetc is a DT and very old member. Please be always aware that you will be talking based on the evidences. The truth is counting on you. I will accept the justice whatever it is but please again PLEASE make sure you guys are doing the right thing.
Can I see some members to step up to be the Jury? please...There are some members who will never find themselves in the neutral ground (which I believe). With all due respect, I will request them not to be the part of the jury. So, the list of members that are not fit to be the Jury:
xtraelv
marlboroza (I am sorry but I strongly believe your opinions are biased by xtraelv)
TheUltraElite (sorry mate, in some occasions I found you feel better by insulting me. I really don't know why it happened)
AdolfinWolf (sorry mate, I think you really have issues with me. Again not sure what I did to you)
digaran (not sure he is around but no disrespect mate)
bigmelons25 (
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.38101775)
DigBick <= Not sure if I spelled the user correctly
There may be few more but above are enough to avoid. I believe this people will never find in a neutral ground. I found (believe from heart) they always wanted to humiliate me.
I will welcome hilariousetc too if he has any preference, if he also wants anyone to exclude or whatever. Please feel free. Make it a fair ground for both of us.
I am going to create an investigation topic in the investigation section in one or two days. I will bring some evidences there to support my claim on that topic.
So, it's clear: I am convinced that hilariousetc has a very poor judgement. He has failed to see the truth, perhaps he never tried enough. I am worried how many forum members are victim of his poor judgements. Anyway that's not my concern at the moment.
With due respect hilariousetc, please from now on - do not argue with me or ask me any question. If you have any then ask the Jury. Give the evidences or whatever you have to the Jury. Also I hope you will not make fun of me, for you it could be funny but it may offend me. I hope we both are man enough to respect each others.
I need someone who can...
- provide me the data for post history of mdayonliner and S_Therapist please. Post history from October 04, 2018 to till now. (It's the date when S_Therapist started)
- If it's possible to have a graphical view of the posting time for both users.
LoyceV is it possible for you mate? I know you are the data warehouse.
Thanks