Lauda, Hilari, suchmoon, LoyceV, The Pharmacist (who else I missed)...
Please ask me questions (if any) about the alt issue.
Topic: S_Therapist = mdayonliner - page 8. (Read 4155 times)
Side note for S_Therapist, I have stated in the bustadice campaign thread that with all the new changes to DT, I will give users til I grade the campaign this week to get their negative rep sorted out or they lose their spot and pay for the week. You need to work on proving your case if you can
I have been tagged for several cases. The only thing which is wrong here is- I'm alt of mdayonliner. 
I bought that account.
It's enough. I don't see any point of further discussion. Account buyer can't be trusted as well. Probably more then 1 bought account gonna be on DT over the next few months. With the new system in place almost everyone has a shot at being on DT that can meet the minimum requirements.
This is why I think maybe we should all think about tagging the same users as long as their offense has been proven. This was 1st mentions by EcuaMobi as you'll see in the quote posted below.
I've just seen this and I'm liking both the idea and the effects to the DT1 list.
Just one thought: since DT1 can change every month so can the DT2 list, so now it makes more sense for several DT1/DT2 members to tag scammers, just in case any tagger stops being DT2 for a few months (I know the idea is for everyone to customize their trust list, but most newbies will still rely on default trust).
And I want to insist on my suggestion regarding trust: guest should see some trust. Default trust would make sense but any trust. Non registered users are still being scammed by known scammers because they don't see the tags.
Just one thought: since DT1 can change every month so can the DT2 list, so now it makes more sense for several DT1/DT2 members to tag scammers, just in case any tagger stops being DT2 for a few months (I know the idea is for everyone to customize their trust list, but most newbies will still rely on default trust).
And I want to insist on my suggestion regarding trust: guest should see some trust. Default trust would make sense but any trust. Non registered users are still being scammed by known scammers because they don't see the tags.
Side note for S_Therapist, I have stated in the bustadice campaign thread that with all the new changes to DT, I will give users til I grade the campaign this week to get their negative rep sorted out or they lose their spot and pay for the week. You need to work on proving your case if you can
I suppose you need forum account to buy account which means that you have at least one more account somewhere.
Yes, it's - utlptcAnd you've been using it to cheat on forum giveaways:
Bitcointalk username- utlptc
BTC add- 3QgPV499xYx2e2seerY1ct3tM9xB8dGpZQ
BTC add- 3QgPV499xYx2e2seerY1ct3tM9xB8dGpZQ
Bitcointalk Username- S_Therapist
Bitcoin address for payout- 3CWKKv7Vao46tTxTnMzqtic1usrc3r8VTd
Bitcoin address for payout- 3CWKKv7Vao46tTxTnMzqtic1usrc3r8VTd
Ok, let me ask this another way. Please post the TX ID of that BTC purchase.
Can I keep it private? or it's really necessary?update:
Ok so here you have it, above. I wanted to keep it private. Damn!
So when did that house visit happen? I'm thoroughly confused by your timelines.
Not that it matters much anymore. Just curious.
And I thought he came by to repay a loan, not tobuy sell BTC.
Not that it matters much anymore. Just curious.
And I thought he came by to repay a loan, not to
Please read the response for o_e_l_e_o
Ok, let me ask this another way. Please post the TX ID of that BTC purchase.
I had shared it earlier.
When alia had her issues I read that there were a demand for coming in live video to prove ownership.
That idea came from alia, and would possibly have resulted in a video chat with an underage sex worker.It won't disprove anything.
I AM ME (mdayonliner), and hilari was wrong in everything about me. I admit that offering the $100K escrow was a mistake from my port but people do mistake right? That does not make people bad like the way people get idea about me from my rating.
So when did that house visit happen? I'm thoroughly confused by your timelines.
Not that it matters much anymore. Just curious.
And I thought he came by to repay a loan, not tobuy sell BTC.
Not that it matters much anymore. Just curious.
And I thought he came by to repay a loan, not to
Please read the response for o_e_l_e_o
Ok, let me ask this another way. Please post the TX ID of that BTC purchase.
When alia had her issues I read that there were a demand for coming in live video to prove ownership.
That idea came from alia, and would possibly have resulted in a video chat with an underage sex worker.It won't disprove anything.
I bought that account.
It's enough. I don't see any point of further discussion. Account buyer can't be trusted as well. he visited once. I bought some BTC from him and he paid cash to me.
If you bought BTC from him, why was he also paying you in cash? Regardless, you just said earlier in this thread that he visited you to pay back the loan you had given him:Anyway, after taking the loan he was one or two days late to pay me back, I was waiting and saw his account was not logged in for few days too. So I called and he said his account got hacked but he will give me the money back. Which he did by the way. He even came to my house to see me.
Which is it? He visited you so you could buy BTC from him or so he could pay back his loan?
The loan money was back using another payment method of the local.
He visited my house to sell his BTC for cash it was long after the loan things
So when did that house visit happen? I'm thoroughly confused by your timelines.
Not that it matters much anymore. Just curious.
And I thought he came by to repay a loan, not tobuy sell BTC.
Not that it matters much anymore. Just curious.
And I thought he came by to repay a loan, not to
Please read the response for o_e_l_e_o
Please respond.
Please read my last response.Quote
It is not hard to tell your friend to do video call.
Not my friend but someone I know, I trust, he respects me and I do respect him too. he visited once. I bought some BTC from him and he paid cash to me.
If you bought BTC from him, why was he also paying you in cash? Regardless, you just said earlier in this thread that he visited you to pay back the loan you had given him:Anyway, after taking the loan he was one or two days late to pay me back, I was waiting and saw his account was not logged in for few days too. So I called and he said his account got hacked but he will give me the money back. Which he did by the way. He even came to my house to see me.
Which is it? He visited you so you could buy BTC from him or so he could pay back his loan?
I bought that account.
It's enough. I don't see any point of further discussion. Account buyer can't be trusted.I bought that account.
Buying hacked account and then gets hacked. I suppose you need forum account to buy account which means that you have at least one more account somewhere.
Wasn't he hacked at the time? Or did he visit you more than once?
he visited once. I bought some BTC from him and he paid cash to me.So when did that house visit happen? I'm thoroughly confused by your timelines.
Not that it matters much anymore. Just curious.
And I thought he came by to repay a loan, not to
I bought that account.
It's enough. I don't see any point of further discussion. Account buyer can't be trusted as well. There is lot of different between post quality of S_Therapist and pkmoney. I bought that account.
Buying hacked account and then gets hacked. I suppose you need forum account to buy account which means that you have at least one more account somewhere.
When alia had her issues I read that there were a demand for coming in live video to prove ownership. I can do that if S_th... has not issue with that. If S_th... do not know how to come live in google then I can teach him too.
It is not hard to tell your friend to do video call.
@ suchmoon, Hilari, Lauda, LoyceV, The Pharmacist...
When alia had her issues I read that there were a demand for coming in live video to prove ownership. I can do that if S_th... has not issue with that. If S_th... do not know how to come live in google then I can teach him too.
is that something we can do?
When alia had her issues I read that there were a demand for coming in live video to prove ownership. I can do that if S_th... has not issue with that. If S_th... do not know how to come live in google then I can teach him too.
is that something we can do?
Wasn't he hacked at the time? Or did he visit you more than once?
he visited once. I bought some BTC from him and he paid cash to me. Also consider this side too...
Imagine the scenario, if he would open his account in my house then theymos could see same IP.
Wasn't he hacked at the time? Or did he visit you more than once?
-snip-
Which is why I said "consistently". You said he's only been to your house once, which would explain his IP matching yours once. If his IP matches yours consistently, then we know you are lying.
But as I said, IPs not matching doesn't prove your innocence.
If the boss will look at their IP history it may be confirmed or not.
This is easily avoided by using different VPN servers for each account, using one account on PC with landline/fiber and the other via mobile data, using one account only via Tor, using one account over public or neighbor's wifi, etc.
If the IPs are consistently the same then it proves it, but if they are different then it doesn't disprove it.
Exactly, this can prove if they are alts if they always have the same IP (also as you said it cannot prove if they are not alts due to VPN)
We have a chance to get the answer, but they seem overconfident about it so I think the IPs will result different between them.
Jump to: