Topic: Stop badmouthing new projects (Read 2309 times)
Badmouthing new projects are not the best thing for the crypto industry. The fact that a similar project came on board and ended up as scam does not mean all new projects are going to follow that trend and badmouthing such projects is really not appreciable to the crypto market as it drastically destroys the reputation of these new projects.
One could react to bad communication of recent new projects as scam. How can a telegram page of a project see no response of any admin for more than 2 months, its a level of irresponsibility if we consider them a good team. They should be able to update the social media regularly and respond to questions from investors and potential holders of the coin. It is common lately and can refer to several projects with such cases.
With Crypto ICOs you see how many companies fail, it's probably similar success hit rates with real companies you just never see them because they've gone bust before you even had a chance to hear about them.
Should be analyze correctly so you can act according to your favor and not just to make assumptions that can lead you to a worse decisions, you have to be positive and not to look only for bad things but also to look for brighter future ahead.
even in bad market conditions we can actually easily find a good project. those who keep going and developing when the market is bad and don't choose to stop waiting for the market to improve can be our choice to invest.this is like what happened during 2018, you can see so many new projects delaying. even now you can see the project like dying.
Absolutely, but I think most of those people are trying to be over protective which normally does not yield any positive outcome. But I have also noticed that any rumor that pops out has some iota of truth which should not be overlooked but should be analyzed critically.
Should be analyze correctly so you can act according to your favor and not just to make assumptions that can lead you to a worse decisions, you have to be positive and not to look only for bad things but also to look for brighter future ahead. 
I really understand bounty hunters if they have that kind of perspective, I just hope it will be fine soon. Joining a bounty project for 20weeks and getting nothing is such disappointing that they would probably started to hate new projects, it was so easier to earn back then, that 2months bounty prize is like worth 6months now. Even ICO investors lose interest in investing because of the problem in the platform community.
Everyone has their opinions and are free to share them . Many of those people that are saying 99% of ICOs are scams might have fallen into many bad projects that's why they have that opinion about ICOs. The simple truth is that you can't have all good or all bad there is always a good in bad and bad in good.
We have no problems with new projects but investors and bounty hunters, hate new projects that do not give us updates anymore after accumulating funds from investors, and bounty hunters hate developers who keep delaying bounty hunter's shares, they even locked it after the distribution.
each of them have their opinion about developers team or maybe projects developtment progress.even on early stage many people doubt the future if this projects.so many opinion out from their opinion.as actually its our mistakes, why we could choose projects like this?
I just don't understand why some folks are found of this nature, if you can't promote a project, why badmouth it whiles you have no vivid evidence to back your claim. Badmouthing new projects is a bad act which should be quit because most time new projects don't have strong advisors to stand in the gab of such crisis and the team then backs off which isn't helping the crypto industry.
No one is badmouthing them for fun, rather people are pouring out their grievances as a result of what happened to them. The truth still remains that most ICOs are scams, have nothing to offer other than to make away with investors funds. Although most failed to carryout their research but yet the rate of scamming was out of hand, now with IEOs today who is talking about ICOs again? No one.
Each one of us has the right to judge the newly launch project and they analyzed it before because not all of the new projects ended badly and not all of the new projects ended well. And so data gathering strategy will be good for the project you are going to be with is the right thing to do to avoid of being scammed.
New projects should now show a new level. To them now more demands. Because circumstances forced it. A large number of fraud could not affect the trust of people and therefore now it is difficult to trust them.
I agree, there wouldn't be that many negative responses if the project was not doing bad things. They should act more professional.
New projects should now show a new level. To them now more demands. Because circumstances forced it. A large number of fraud could not affect the trust of people and therefore now it is difficult to trust them.
The present landscape of ICO projects is that they ate going through a time of doubt and increase scrutiny brought by the bear market. a decrease in trust in investors. Such huge numbers of projects have fizzled in light of the fact that they couldn't build up their project. Be that as it may, we additionally don't have to get into the new project in light of the fact that not every new project are phony.
Unfortunately, when investors have started to trust new projects, then the project does not develop with the capital that has been obtained, I am very enthusiastic about new projects popping up, and I hope to find diamonds in it.
And with what help then the project develops?So that you understand on a voluntary basis only units can really work. The rest really need to pay something.Because of this, in most cases, an ICO is carried out.
Badmouthing new projects is what has killed most projects that are supposed to be functioning by now. Sometimes these new projects need huge funds to operate and these funds can only be available through investors and the moment people start badmouthing these projects, investors start ignoring such projects and immediately leads to the collapse of these projects which is very bad.
EVen you said 99% of the new projects are scams and useless shits then how can you expect no bad comments about the upcoming new projects again and again.It is true that those projects helped the crypto arket to grown much stronger but even after they did they made profits and didn't finish their project as complete work once team made millions from their idea.
You said it all. New projects most times have the tendency to surpass old project in terms of development but because most ICOs turned out to be scam we tend to look at most new projects that way. Every project should be given chance to perform and then can be judged.
We cant really the people on looking at that way yet we know on where do ICO's end up,Its been used by scammers to get millions of dollars into its investors this is why negative impressions would be there or shall we say its being stained out because of these scenarios.We do have our own insights and just let other people do speak on what are there views.There might be still some good projects but finding them wont really be easy.
You said it all. New projects most times have the tendency to surpass old project in terms of development but because most ICOs turned out to be scam we tend to look at most new projects that way. Every project should be given chance to perform and then can be judged.
Absolutely agree. Only after all it is possible to develop already existing projects, many of which stand still, and not to release a large number of useless and monotonous projects. But in any case, the market must develop.
Jump to: