Topic: Stop badmouthing new projects - page 4. (Read 2314 times)
I am not going to badmouth new projects, but sometimes it is required, because some of them are useless. And their primary purpose is to cheat with community
To be frank, no one can badmouth a project if actually it is doing right or on the right path. Most projects after getting the required funds will start giving excuses. The truth is, good projects don't fear listing nor if the price is down because the team believes in what they want to achieve thus working on it while the price will increase as time passes.
Talking about ICOs, I don't think there is anyone who will be courageous enough to participate in it, even if the project is top-notch it will take more to convince investors to participate; that is to show the level of lessons most people have learnt and thus saying 99% of ICOs are scams.
Talking about ICOs, I don't think there is anyone who will be courageous enough to participate in it, even if the project is top-notch it will take more to convince investors to participate; that is to show the level of lessons most people have learnt and thus saying 99% of ICOs are scams.
I do get it very well, most ICO projects are scam projects or end up as scam projects but the fact that most ICO's ended up as scam projects does not mean every new project or ICO project out there is a scam project. Let the project run and at the long run, we will see whether it was a scam or not. some of these projects just needed funds to continue but since they terminated the project does not mean they scam projects.
It's true that not all new coins or new projects are not good, but many projects now have considerable benefits, and even old coins are worthless now, I have saved a few coins from the old project, but now they have no value anymore and fall very far away
people aren't doing that for no reason, the new projects are actually horrible that is why everyone hates them. for a very long time now we are not seeing good projects come out anymore. in the past 2 years there has been at least 2000 new projects and only 1 or 2 of them were decent enough to be called a "cryptocurrency" the rest of the 1998 projects were pure shitcoins with majority of them being ICOs or any alternative name they call it these days like IEO...
otherwise all of us are desperately waiting for good projects to come out and start actually competing with bitcoin instead of pump and dump coins that advertise fake competition that doesn't exist and vanish when they are done pumping.
otherwise all of us are desperately waiting for good projects to come out and start actually competing with bitcoin instead of pump and dump coins that advertise fake competition that doesn't exist and vanish when they are done pumping.
I agree with you, it’s like some people have already created the great projects. There is nothing new now. And we all still desperately waiting for something unique and useful. The majority of projects about crypto is too much and unfortunately many of them are terrible, they don’t offer something new. I hope we can see more qualified and promising projects again.
I do not think that 99% percent of icos are scam we need to change our thinking a bit here, each ico is like a new startup or a new real life business so as a real life business startup you should know that not all businesses end up as success same is the case with icos, some are success some just do ok and some fail so we should not confuse failed projects with scams, scams are also there but less and such projects are basically copy paste projects and are opened just to raise funds some how and exit and i think such scammers should be brought to court of justice and criminal proceedings should be done against them.
That is the problem i think, too much copy and paste projects just doing the same thing over and over again and i hope there is a way to bring this people to just because i have lost so much money investing in exist scam projects
Yes, people badmouth new projects because 99.9% of them are not in anyway adding to the growth of Crypto space. Most of these new projects are just replica of the existing ones. Most of their ideas are not useful in real world. Therefore I don't see any wrong if prospective investors speak ill of these new projects that are popping up on a daily basis.
There is no way people won't badmouth projects especially new projects that turn out to be fake or scam but at the same time most of this faults comes from investors side . lack of research can make any investor pick the wrong project
Well, most of these new projects are not up to the standard and i think that's the major reason why people are badmouthing them. But nevertheless, we still have some projects that are worth going for.
Yes 99% of ICOs are scams. And also, a new project can't be badmouthed if they really offered what they said they will. There is a difference that a project after ICO is working but price is low and a project after ICO tends to do nothing. Some might even try to list then abandon the project.
In my own opinion, the rate of scams in ICO is too much and thus the reason IEO came and is doing pretty well; at least to an extent there won't be exit scam.
In my own opinion, the rate of scams in ICO is too much and thus the reason IEO came and is doing pretty well; at least to an extent there won't be exit scam.
Many peoples have experienced scam projects, so most of them are pessimistic about new project.
Unless they can certain a new project is real, i think they won't say any good thing from it.
Even a good new project won't get trust from investors at first time and that is normal.
Unless they can certain a new project is real, i think they won't say any good thing from it.
Even a good new project won't get trust from investors at first time and that is normal.
Positive critics is fine in my opinion and people have a right to express it. It allows others to learn from those projects so they don't repeat same mistakes.
1994 best cars aren't the best anymore
Best old PC in the past can't keep up with today's hexacore PC's.
Best old PC in the past can't keep up with today's hexacore PC's.
Just one point in response to this part - good crypto projects, BTC and ETH for example, are under continuous development, so I don't think the comparison here to old cars and pcs is necessarily valid. The ETH of say 2025 will be very different to the ETH that started out. Yes there are limitations and you can only go so far with the evolution, but good projects will always improve themselves.
yes, i am always looking for great projects to invest. Artificial intelligence is limitless and I believe everything has changed. When Binance was founded, it was not well known, it gradually went up based on good strategies of CZ.
Next is Globalcoin, run by Mark and I also believe that this is one of the coins that will change the crypto market in the future.
Next is Globalcoin, run by Mark and I also believe that this is one of the coins that will change the crypto market in the future.
And I do not shield the Pacebok revolutionary coin. The policy of the company upset me. The ban on Russia and China. What is this policy? Binans and I like how he continues to grow.
yes, i am always looking for great projects to invest. Artificial intelligence is limitless and I believe everything has changed. When Binance was founded, it was not well known, it gradually went up based on good strategies of CZ.
Next is Globalcoin, run by Mark and I also believe that this is one of the coins that will change the crypto market in the future.
Next is Globalcoin, run by Mark and I also believe that this is one of the coins that will change the crypto market in the future.
Only stupid people are badmouthing the new projects, because they are forget about the fact that there are a lot of good projects around them.
it doesn't matter if we hate their project and tell everyone honestly and dev and the project team can improve better. then we just keep quiet and investors will cry over their money when the project fails or does not continue after the sale is complete.
Investors will cry after failing to research properly and turned everything into scam, nothing is certain as ico's will be concluded whether it willsucceed or turned into failure or scam after the sale period is over and how the team behind will build the future of their project, very important
to keep measuring potentials and assess properly.
I also disagree if 99% ico is a scam because there are still some projects that are serious and successful, some say 99% of new projects are just fraud maybe they have a bad experience when investing in ico in the past, and they don't see from the good side there are still many successful projects.
No one is going to badmouth a new project, if it has two properties: it should have an unique idea, and it should be reasonably priced. But in case the project can't satisfy these two conditions, then get ready for a barrage of criticism. People are putting their hard earned money in to these projects, and they have every right to criticize if there is anything wrong with them.
it doesn't matter if we hate their project and tell everyone honestly and dev and the project team can improve better. then we just keep quiet and investors will cry over their money when the project fails or does not continue after the sale is complete.
I believe those who do that have probably lost their money or scammed in one way or the other because the more cryptocurrency grows, the more the scammers and as such investors need to be extra careful about that.
Jump to: