Someone had to be blamed for the dumped prices for token
And the easiest set of people to be blamed are hunters.
Bounty hunter are defenseless and cannot even alter any change in rules or terms of bounty
Let’s just keep our head down, and participate in the best projects
Topic: Stop Blaming Bounty Hunter! - page 10. (Read 9219 times)
Bounty hunters cannot be blamed for the falling prices of project coins. Coins come to the bounty hunters when the price is already low. Many also do not sell their earned coins, but keep them in wallets and over time they turn into empty wrappers.
Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
You really can dump the coin if you have even 0.1% of it. The volumes are very low sometimes when the coin is young and there are just few exchanges where it is listed. You can track some graphs and see bounty and airdrop dumps clearly.
There are so many factors are play on why a coin or token drops in value. It could just be from bad timing with launching during a bear market even though the project has a solid foundation and goal. Hunters are only allocated a small percentage of the total amount anyways so they shouldn't be blamed.
I believe that bounty hunters are innocent. Especially nothing depends on them. I would say that they themselves work.
Bounty hunters are innocent cause in a fact most of the bounties allocate just 5% of the tokens for bounty rewards, how can just 5% hurt a project? What hurts some
project is reckless team, they are the ones who dump most of the coins when they hit first exchange and they disappear with that money. In that way they drive price
down and after disappearing project has no chance for recovering. Buyers, investors, together with bounty hunters are the most hurt by this, we have worthless tokens
in our wallets and we can do nothing about that.
Yes. Why blame blame hunters ?? they sell tokens received from work done when following campaign that is being followed. this amount is only a small part of the total supply provided. so let's think positively about this, and don't blame each other.
Totally agree with you, Bounty hunters are getting very small allocations of tokens today, so they do not have a big influence on the price. It is very unlikely they are the reason of the token price dump.
Indeed, so far I also do not feel that I or other bounty hunters are people who drop prices, because they get a small number of tokens so that it will not be able to make the price of the token fall.But the thing is, even if they just have a small allocations, the moment they dump, a lot of speculators dumps as well, the usual domino effect that we have seen so many times in any crypto market including bitcoin.
That's why bounty hunters have the bad image and I do think that it will remain like that, in my opinion.
sometimes I even wonder why project managers give such huge discounts to early birds forgetting if these early birds dumps one-third of their discounted tokens, they still won't be at loss. why then blame hunters who work tiredness for a project with just a minimum allocation of about 5% be the only ones who dump. Is time project managers consider all these and stop blaming hunters for what they do not do. hunters are not cheap workers.
Totally agree with you, Bounty hunters are getting very small allocations of tokens today, so they do not have a big influence on the price. It is very unlikely they are the reason of the token price dump.
Indeed, so far I also do not feel that I or other bounty hunters are people who drop prices, because they get a small number of tokens so that it will not be able to make the price of the token fall.
I have always believed that bounty hunters have no or little effect on dumping of coins which causes price crashes. Huge discount allocation and lack of marketable products are some of the causes leading to price devaluation especially soon after listing of such coin on Exchange(s).
Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
yes ... I strongly disagree if there are parties who say that the bounty hunter is a dumper ... because the bounty hunter has done his job during the bounty period for up to 2-3 months ... and this takes a long time ... and it is impossible for them sell at a low price because the bounty hunter wastes a lot of time promoting the project to completion ...
But sometimes I also see that after the distribution to the bounties the price of the token is getting dumped, can it be said by the bounty ?? what is clear is that if the hunters think clearly there will be no dump.
I agree with your statement, initial discount should not be large so that the last investors are not harmed and the price can also be stable when the token enters market.
Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
yes ... I strongly disagree if there are parties who say that the bounty hunter is a dumper ... because the bounty hunter has done his job during the bounty period for up to 2-3 months ... and this takes a long time ... and it is impossible for them sell at a low price because the bounty hunter wastes a lot of time promoting the project to completion ...
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
I think blaming the bounty hunters ONLY is useless because the truth is its not only the bounty hunters that are dumping the token. Investors and the team itself too are dumping the coin for the sake of profit. I'm not blaming the bounty hunters ONLY but they are one of the reasons why the price of the token after listing on an exchange plummets immediately. 
I think the fall in the price of tokens after listing is not a bounty hunter mistake. because it's true of your explanation above, that the bounty hunters are so many participants, but overall they all only get a funding allocation of a few percent of the total 100%. it's not a mistake, I think it's fair. precisely what plays a big role in the fall in the price of tokens is that holds a large number of tokens when buying at a cheap price, and then after the listing process is complete, they sell everything.
so it's clear, that this is not a bounty hunter's mistake, even investors can be blamed here if discussing the price of tokens that suddenly fall after the listing process.
so it's clear, that this is not a bounty hunter's mistake, even investors can be blamed here if discussing the price of tokens that suddenly fall after the listing process.
it seems ridiculous to blame the bounty hunter considering the allocation for bounty is relatively small and not all bounty hunters will directly sell their coins or tokens, I think dumper comes from investors who bought at the beginning because they got a big bonus,
If a coin falls heavily in value, then the problem is not in bounty hunters, but in project itself as they have a erroneous market-entry strategy and their coin have zero liquidity. Bounty hunters own a very small % of coins from total amount and with normal coin liquidity they could not greatly affect the price.
yeah, and maybe early onvestors with big bonus is a part from the dumpers mate
if the team care with their project, i'm sure the team will do something to safe the price from their project stable
Good point of view they should stop blaming the bounty hunters because they are only have small allocation coming from the project, i think more or less 5% of total supply. We should look at from other side which is the early investors having huge of bonus during pre-sale.
you did say the right thing, so far many people have blamed the hunter's bounty for the fall in the price of a new coin.whereas the total supply for bounty hunters is not much compared to investors.
but i think investors or bounty hunters cannot be blamed. all of this depends on the project team, if they can develop their project well, more and more people will believe in the project and the fall in coin prices will not occur.
If a coin falls heavily in value, then the problem is not in bounty hunters, but in project itself as they have a erroneous market-entry strategy and their coin have zero liquidity. Bounty hunters own a very small % of coins from total amount and with normal coin liquidity they could not greatly affect the price.
yeah, and maybe early onvestors with big bonus is a part from the dumpers mate
if the team care with their project, i'm sure the team will do something to safe the price from their project stable
Bounty Hunters shouldn’t be blamed, we all know that project is handled by the developers and team, they have funds analysts to know the possibilities and flow of the investment to avoid any problems. Only few of the funds is allocated to the bounties which is served to promote the projects to the people.
That few allocated will be big if launch in the exchange and no one is interested in buying. The result will be a dump, I think the team here should make a strategy not to release the entire bounty if the coin has not gain enough liquidity yet in an exchange.
It should be a good idea, I mean a win-win for all.
OK, I think your idea is pretty good, locking coins for the right road bounty hunter that the developer must do when they don't have liquidity on the market. And it is not my intention to blame the bounty hunter indeed, but on average the newly listed projects in exchange have few interested parties while the bounty hunters sell them directly, this will cause dumping. But it's fair, if the project feels very good and has a lot of interested people, so there's no need to lock the coin bounty.
Jump to: