Topic: Stop Blaming Bounty Hunter! - page 14. (Read 9219 times)
Very good post! Many projects need us at the beginning but after the end of token sale they change their behavior and we are parasites for them.
Stop blaming bounty hunters for not performing their duties well or discharging their tasks. I always say this business is risky and no one is to blamed or accused when something happens. Sometimes the fault even comes from bounty developers then they'll shift the blame onto bounty hunters.
Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
I think this depends on how you react.
the factor of decreasing tokens after entering an exchange always falls. and we all know that the decline has many causes. one of them is a large discount, a team that is less clever with trade and does not have a precise strategy to increase the price of tokens after entering the market. coupled with the many bounty participants who threw away after that. so I think this is very comprehensive
Of course, there are many factors affecting the price. However, if you sell something to one-tenth of its normal price, then you can't expect it to be traded 10 times when it goes on sale.
Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
I think this depends on how you react.
the factor of decreasing tokens after entering an exchange always falls. and we all know that the decline has many causes. one of them is a large discount, a team that is less clever with trade and does not have a precise strategy to increase the price of tokens after entering the market. coupled with the many bounty participants who threw away after that. so I think this is very comprehensive
Every project team, they don't learn from bitcoins that live without satoshi and they don't learn from other big altcoins projects, why can Bitcoin grow big?
Bitcoin has many large communities that sincerely promote bitcoin, we all know that currently the Bitcoin trading volume is very high even with high prices, the sincerity of the community that has been carried out until now bitcoin is known by many people and many bitcoin users around the world
I believe that projects that have a higher number of communities will last longer than very few investors, they are interconnected and need each project to value their community and investors, rather than flattering investors and sometimes blaming the community, they forget when their project success that their community is involved in promoting them beforehand and is also useful to bring in other investors in the future
Bitcoin has many large communities that sincerely promote bitcoin, we all know that currently the Bitcoin trading volume is very high even with high prices, the sincerity of the community that has been carried out until now bitcoin is known by many people and many bitcoin users around the world
I believe that projects that have a higher number of communities will last longer than very few investors, they are interconnected and need each project to value their community and investors, rather than flattering investors and sometimes blaming the community, they forget when their project success that their community is involved in promoting them beforehand and is also useful to bring in other investors in the future
This is true that the promoters of the project always blaming the bounty hunter for their work that saying of they didn't do the work properly. This is myself who already blamed by the many bounty creator as a bounty hunter. I haven't paid yet my reward after gone two years for the many project.
Yup, i aggree with you, bounty hunters working hard to get tokens or coins. I am wan't to sell my payment under ICO prices, because i need money from my works. If they blame us dumped prices on exchange they are wrong.
Lets see, early promo stage 1 tokens: 0.1, stage 2: 0,2, stage 3; 0.3 and normal price 0.5, people who buy tokens under 0.5 can sell it soon when listed on exchange, then they can buy back with very low price. Investor who dont have experience about ICO or TA, being panic and sell it with low price.
Lets see, early promo stage 1 tokens: 0.1, stage 2: 0,2, stage 3; 0.3 and normal price 0.5, people who buy tokens under 0.5 can sell it soon when listed on exchange, then they can buy back with very low price. Investor who dont have experience about ICO or TA, being panic and sell it with low price.
Not only that , this is also the developer's fault because they are not listed on a better exchange. Most projects like that will only be listed on DEX or unreliable exchanges, then when prices are dumped, developers blame bounty hunters for all the reasons even though those who are behind all of this will benefit from investors and then leave without a real project.
we are all know that, that shitcoin need someone to blame and bounty hunter is a scapegoat here. I will never pay attention to the project that blames the hunter because the price of their coins falls. and I guess that kind of thing happens only to projects that are useless and not in demand by many people so there is no demand in the market that can hold the token price .
one project that extended their referral program for months last year (ternio) later simply decided not to pay anyone, justifying that there was a high number of fake accounts... well maybe there was, but their project claims to eliminate fraud on web advertising lol so..... if this is a lie, they scammed people. if it's true, they just showed a big flaw here, why trust in the project, the team that can't even manage a referral program? 
bear market showed the darkside of many here... lol
bear market showed the darkside of many here... lol sellers gonna sell buyers gonna buy. if it's dropping is due to the lack of buyers, not hunter's fault. if a team claims to have sold lots of tokens in their ico, they should not worry about hunters. Pretty sure that many are faking their sale numbers.
that's right, the team can't be honest with the results of sales and make manipulations. after all, if no one buys a coin at a high price and keeps the price down, it is the fault of the team that cannot bring buyers to their coins on the market. Communities that have coins they clearly want to sell coins and make a profit.
sellers gonna sell buyers gonna buy. if it's dropping is due to the lack of buyers, not hunter's fault. if a team claims to have sold lots of tokens in their ico, they should not worry about hunters. Pretty sure that many are faking their sale numbers.
Good point they cannot blame their investors because they will end up blaming themselves because they are giving a very high bonus percentage to their early investors, so they have nothing left but go to the bounty hunters, there are times that the coins are being dumped even though the bounty hunters have not yet received their shares.
Great point mate, a lot of ICO bounty hunter is suffering and experience not to get their share as particioant of the project, the hunter is always in the 50/50 situation if they can get their share or not, meaning difficult how to stop and how get solution blaming bounty hunters.
Thanks mate, your statement is fact, sometimes when I read where they say blunt hunters are responsible for dumping, it beats my imagination, imagine the percentage given to private investors, also sometime another reason for dump is listing on exchanges with low volume.
actually all depends on how the distribution system is carried out by the team. investors will get first place, with the bonus they receive may sell directly when they can be traded. all depends on the value obtained. but not all investors will sell the assets they have, maybe only bonuses will be obtained at this stage because they want to see how the project will progress in the future.after that the bounty distribution, without any reason most of the bounty hunters will immediately sell the tokens they get, especially if the price is good. it will make prices tend to go down, because surely those who buy the coins are not so much because of the new project. because the downturn made investors a little panicked, and then sold their sets in large quantities. it is very likely to happen and the moment of dump looks like it was done by a bounty hunter.
Thanks mate, your statement is fact, sometimes when I read where they say bounty hunters are responsible for dumping, it beats my imagination, imagine the percentage given to private investors, also sometime another reason for dump is listing on exchanges with low volume.
Good point they cannot blame their investors because they will end up blaming themselves because they are giving a very high bonus percentage to their early investors, so they have nothing left but go to the bounty hunters, there are times that the coins are being dumped even though the bounty hunters have not yet received their shares.
Great point mate, a lot of ICO bounty hunter is suffering and experience not to get their share as particioant of the project, the hunter is always in the 50/50 situation if they can get their share or not, meaning difficult how to stop and how get solution blaming bounty hunters.
Sometimes it's true but most of the time it's a big lie, I have seen so many coins dumped even if bounty hunter's shares are not yet released, it's the huge pre sale bonus is the culprit of this, they gave early birds such a huge amount so if they dump it they still have profit.
when the market or buyer interest in the market is still not too much, of course what happens is a dump. Unfortunately what is known and widely blamed is the Bounty Hunter. whereas in some cases as you say distribution for the most recent passive bounty. some also distribute gradually. how does the bounty hunter dump if that way? even though the allegations for bounties are relatively small compared to the bonus given to investors at presale. 
Sometimes it's true but most of the time it's a big lie, I have seen so many coins dumped even if bounty hunter's shares are not yet released, it's the huge pre sale bonus is the culprit of this, they gave early birds such a huge amount so if they dump it they still have profit.
Happening each other blame I think to be a very sensible thing. Bounty hunters are always targeted to blame when coin prices decline. But we must remember here we are also equally looking for a job to make money. So, in fact, there is no need to blame each other and if the project has a good development, surely the coin price will be back up.
Well who are they going to blame, if they blame investors, of course, investors will turn away from this coin, and of course they cannot blame one of their team, doing so, investors will lose in their team, so that leaves them to blame bounty hunters because they have nothing to blame but the bounty hunters although they cannot prove that.
The reason the bounty hunters are seen as such is because once they already have their rewards they will sell their tokens right of the bat, but if you dig deeper in the market situation of the token you will see that it is not the hunters that are the reason of the dump. As one could investigate there are many reasons of a dump, the main reason will be the investors selling their tokens, another could be that the token have a market volume if that is the case then any small token sale will pull its price down so hard.
Jump to: