Most of the campaign project they always took the blame for bounty hunters when the price value of their token is dumping.
So most of them they are locking the token for the bounty participants after their main token sales. But this is very unjust honestly speaking.
Topic: Stop Blaming Bounty Hunter! - page 5. (Read 9219 times)
Indeed the Bounty manager shouldn't blame Bounty hunters. Although the allocation of prizes for Bounty hunters is usually only 2%. But it will be very influential when they jointly sell tokens at cheap prices in the market so that subsequent buyers do not dare to buy higher prices.
I don't see the bounty manager blaming bounty hunter. Most of the investors are in projects with bounty, or the bounty hunter complains that why the token price is falling too much.
Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
We really need more transparency, those ICO's who offers that huge discount is just inviting investors to invest and then dump their coins for profit, any ICO would like to have a good start and they will offer a very high bonus percentage, so they can kick their campaign and their funding as early as possible.
It is rather unfortunate how some projects start to blame bounty hunters for the dumping of their coins. But ideally, how can bounty allocation of 1% to 5% yield the dumping of the entire token supply. Dumping comes from investors and the team of a project not bounty hunters.
When bounty hunters dump tokens it sometimes affect the token pruce as well just like when early investors dump huge bags of the token,if the project is not good enough and managed by good teams this same problem will keep happening
Indeed the Bounty manager shouldn't blame Bounty hunters. Although the allocation of prizes for Bounty hunters is usually only 2%. But it will be very influential when they jointly sell tokens at cheap prices in the market so that subsequent buyers do not dare to buy higher prices.
I wonder why most bounty managers and project managers blame bounty hunters for dumping always. Bounty hunters are only given just less than 5% of the whole token allocation and how can such number or percentage have influence on the market? I s high time project managers consider the fact that even project that lock the tokens of hunters for a time even get dumped, who dumps then?
Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.
Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?
$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?
Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!
what's interesting here is when the project team considers the bounty hunter to be a dumper ... lol
even though it is allocated for each project about 2% of the total supply, and even then it is still shared with all bounty participants in various categories. I am sure that not all bounty participants immediately sell when the project is first listed on the exchange, some of them will surely withhold what they get from the bounty program. sad indeed ... but this is happening right now, bounty hunters are victims.
I think it is not completely true that bounty hunters will dump price of coins. Bounty hunters get their rewards for their hard work and none can throw their assets for peanuts. So bounty hunters are rather there to support a project.
Early project investors are the real dumpers and project devs and teams are the one making this mistakes over and over again,selling tokens to early presale investors at unbelievable price is the main problem affecting new projects,bounty hunters are not to be blame for this
It's true. Anyway, I think that now there are not real investors at all. Only bounty hunters ...
Early project investors are the real dumpers and project devs and teams are the one making this mistakes over and over again,selling tokens to early presale investors at unbelievable price is the main problem affecting new projects,bounty hunters are not to be blame for this
Hey OP,
Are you paying attention to some hypocrites developers who blames their failure on innocent hunters?
They are mostly just using that as an excuse to hold someone responsible for their scam, we have some professional scammers that has already planned it out, they lure investors with huge discounts, enter exchange, dump the token , so that the project can disappear, investors blames it on the developers for not being active, while developers shift blame on hunters for dumping, and then investors shift their blame too from developers to hunters, that is the end of the story, once investors accepts his or her faith and forgets about it, then they have professionally scammed without anybody tagging it as scam, but as a failed projects cause by the dumping of hunters.
Are you paying attention to some hypocrites developers who blames their failure on innocent hunters?
They are mostly just using that as an excuse to hold someone responsible for their scam, we have some professional scammers that has already planned it out, they lure investors with huge discounts, enter exchange, dump the token , so that the project can disappear, investors blames it on the developers for not being active, while developers shift blame on hunters for dumping, and then investors shift their blame too from developers to hunters, that is the end of the story, once investors accepts his or her faith and forgets about it, then they have professionally scammed without anybody tagging it as scam, but as a failed projects cause by the dumping of hunters.
I have now realised most project managers themselves do not know what really goes on in the market but keep blaming bounty hunters for what they have not done. They easily forget how wonderfully they served the early birds ignoring the fact that they are the possible ones to dump and still gain from the dump. It is high time project managers notify this problem and find reasons to solve it than blaming bounty hunters.
We can't blame hunters, because we're having freedom on the decisions that might occur after the long run. It's not only hunters who dumped their coins, but also those panic investors who always sell after the project ended. It now became a speculations that hunters dumped after the bounty campaign, but sadly those investors also did it much worst than the hunters.
Before you blame Bounty hunters, you better evaluate the cause of price declines. I have the same opinion as you, that blame Bounty Hunter is not true. Investors have a larger number of coins, while bounty hunters have fewer coins. And we have to see the development of the coin, if the coin has a good development, of course, the coin will be back up again.
This thread is wrong in blaming the bounty hunters.First, bounty hunters are mostly replying in this thread, they know and they defend what is right.
I am a bounty hunter and of course I will depend that bounty hunter is not the reason for dump, at least it overall perspective.
Before you blame Bounty hunters, you better evaluate the cause of price declines. I have the same opinion as you, that blame Bounty Hunter is not true. Investors have a larger number of coins, while bounty hunters have fewer coins. And we have to see the development of the coin, if the coin has a good development, of course, the coin will be back up again.
Bounty hunters are not to be blamed for any projects failure and we deserve to be treat right, new projects will still need bounty hunters to create awareness in the future so we help a lot but its really sad how many developers are treating hunters like pests
Its a bad idea to always put the blame of price crash of any project to the bounty hunters when a coin is listed on any exchange no one blames the investors for dumping after all they want to recoup their profits hence dumping massively while no one put the blame on them its only the bounty hunters been on the receiving end the OP has proven critic of hunters wrong by giving out a detailed analysis of percentage distributions of tokens straight to the Point which is very laudable and commendable.
one thing we seem to forget is that we always think the investor nee much ,money than the hunter but its not true. Most hunters really cherish their tokens are willing to hold unless otherwise.
In all cases, if the project fails, the organizers are tempted to blame anyone in order to evade responsibility to the vain expectations of all participants. And bounty hunters are first on the list of victims. But everyone understands this perfectly, and there is no point in looking for the guilty parties of the project’s inconsistency, since there is no time or desire for this.
The bounty hunters are not mainly responsible for the failure of a project. Most of the project sell their token at a very low price in private sale. During the ICO, Project gives a big discount and sale their token. Because of all this, the price of token fall down. On the other hand, most of the project has no active team and they scam after ICO. Bounty hunter receives only a few token. So Stop Blaming Bounty Hunter!
Jump to: