Topic: Stop Blaming Bounty Hunter! - page 17. (Read 9219 times)

Theoretically speaking, it's still possible. Remember that volume is important too. If early traders are those who only look to get profits and cash out as early as possible, then I'm not surprised if those 300k tokens can bring the price down to -99%.

Who would sell as early as they got their tokens? Maybe not always bounty hunter, but I believe BH is one of the perpetrators.

It is not fair to blame bounty hunters for coins to decline in price after hitting exchanges. Generally bounty allocation to bounty hunters is a small portion like up to five percent. So mathematically, bounty hunters play a small role even if a coin decrease in price. A good project always does good in the market. So a project need a strong team and good vision to perform well.  

That's true, stop blaming bounty hunters. I am bounty hunter and i am investor too, when i see good campaign that i participate i will invest on the project too. I think many hunters doing like that.
Huge discount be the main reason the price will dump.

Project team itself dumping on many occasions which are done with the thought of money making only not for creating something useful to the community but they take hunters as a reason to blame and hide themselves from the attention.

Bad projects are the ones that get rekt when bounty hunters sell off the little percentage of their token allocation ,if the project is very good enough 2-10% of max supply shouldn't drag down the token value ,without working product or pro teams this will happen when hunters dump tokens

People often feel the need to blame others for situations where they are confronted with harm. Investors blame bounty hunters because they sell rewards from very low prices. But it may be the investors themselves who have caused the price to fall with the idea that Bounty Hunters will 'sell anyway' before the awards are sold. In this case, bounty hunters blame investors. A ridiculous paradox emerges and this process continues. So when does this get better? When people stop blaming others for things they don't like. Let's see if we can see those days.

Good point they cannot blame their investors because they will end up blaming themselves because they are giving a very high bonus percentage to their early investors, so they have nothing left but go to the bounty hunters, there are times that the coins are being dumped even though the bounty hunters have not yet received their shares.

Since I signed up for the Forum, there is a subject that the project teams have been constantly complaining about. People who deal with Bounty are seen as a dumper.

I've been studying for a long time. I talk to many project teams like a private investor and ask how many (%) discounts they can offer to me for a $ 100,000 investment if I want to buy tokens during the ICO process. Coming offers you can not believe. Today I encountered another project. A year ago Winklevoss brothers invested as an early investor to the project. And they will do ICO soon. The price difference between the price they sell now and the investment they received from early investors is exactly 2500 times! I can't believe! They're trying to sell what one person got for $ 1 to another person for $ 2500.

Let's go back to the bounty! Projects usually allocate 3% of the figure they sell for bounty. So for example, a project that collects 10 million investment distributes only 300k bounty. Can you really dump a coin with a 3% bounty (which is distributed to an average of 1000 different people)?

$ 10,000,000 to $ 300,000? Really? Are you that naive? Or do you like to treat bounty hunters as cheap workers?

Please stop blaming bounty hunters! And stop huge discount your early birds. They are dumping your coin, project itself! I think the market needs more transparency!