Pages:
Author

Topic: Stronger AML Enforcement Might Actually Save Crypto - page 3. (Read 601 times)

legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1130
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
full member
Activity: 593
Merit: 100
BBOD The Best Derivatives Exchange
Is this a good thing? They are helping governments to control Cryptocurrency investors and make the government feel better. But investors think anxious, and they worry when their identities released to governments, they worry that the government will tax their investments.
copper member
Activity: 2940
Merit: 4101
Top Crypto Casino
People are praying for KYC-AML and any kind of regulation thinking it will help for mass adoption. Yes, a little but not much.
Bitcoin was created to avoid all these limits but since some years people want it back as if they liked having a leash. F**k that, Bitcoin can become a popular alternative currency without stupid laws, not in line with reality. It's just helping the Finance to infest us.
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
regulations are not the same as consumer protections. people can still be scammed. just look at the mortgage and credit card sector that offer huge interest rates, not many/any months of payment breaks/error correcting before they enforce. and if the institution offering the credit does something wrong, they never have to be accountable.

regulations are mainly to make big well financed businesses that can afford to hoard large sums to pay for licences, get certified with shiny sherrif badges to police their customers. its a fake veil of trust having the title of being regulated, but once you pull the veil away you see the truth.
companies that are regulated get to write their own policy guidelines for how they will police their customers and report customers that perform tasks that are not damaging/dangerous to anyone else, but may (emphasis: may) result in some tax dodging mainly.

yes wall street only want to work with other wall street certified entities. all so they can have their boys club of shuffling funds around knowing the licence will protect and cover them.

this stuff keeps out the new entities and the individuals who could offer better, but just are not on the same level

crypto does not need saving from the likes of businesses with regulations. what crypto actually needs is to untie its dependence on fiat and become more a product/service<->crypto model without the need of fiat involvement in the middle

but there are always going to be fiat lovers who just want to never understand crypto. but just dip their toe into it long enough to increase their fiat balance and run back to fiat. and its these fiat lovers that care only about speculation a FOMO price spikes for greedy fiat gains. NOT to 'save crypto'
jr. member
Activity: 312
Merit: 1
https://www.forbes.com/sites/yayafanusie/2019/05/29/stronger-aml-enforcement-might-actually-save-crypto/?utm_content=92934236&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&hss_channel=tw-3972254294#73d10bfb7e78

Saw this article today and made me really think about this topic. What are your thoughts?

I feel like the KYC and AML companies such as Ciphertrace and Refinitiv are really helping with regulations and making governments feel better about crypto
Pages:
Jump to: