Topic: Suggestion for the Admin (Admin please read) (Read 626 times)

Here we see the the damaged misfiring mass of junk huge black woman aka the pharmacist classes as his mind spewing forth entertainment.

Let me break you apart in public once again.


1. you created a nice strawman there that you may not even know exists. I never said that. You highlight a statement and mutate it into something a greedy servile loser may read from that, not an objective and balanced enthusiast of this movement who is hugely successful.

a/ they may be motivated to earn money but will still put the interests of the board and this movement ahead of their own selfish desperate dreams of moving out of a cardboard box under the flyover. It depends how desperate people are. I mean someone who is so sneaky and greedy to create a sock puppet to racist sig spam of course would certainly be likely to put their own selfish interests ahead of the boards interests. They may then be tempted to influence board politics to create an environment that favours them and gives them unfair powers over competition.. As explained per my post of the year thread. A real enthusiast will still post in meta regardless of the sig they can spam.

b/you also view this board from the angle of a confirmed loser who has been here years and is still a broke bum. What about most of the other people that are far more adept and skillful individuals that may well be worth 10's of millions of dollars? of course they may well be willing to post without a sig to support the movement that made them extremely wealthy? do you realise that? money just becomes numbers after the point it far exceeds what you will spend. I mean sig spamming/airdrops are fruitless work unless you hit a few good ones like me and get paid millions of dollars for them. Trading is the key to real money here if that is all you care about.


Please don't cast off topic accusations. This post is about removing sigs from meta.

I don't think you are the worst of this bunch but still your supporting outright and proven liars, scammers, trust abusers and considering your own history demonstrating  greedy and being sneaky behaviour ....then perhaps don't cast stones at others without cast iron proof. I am not sure what you are getting at with that last attack anyway. I fight for the fair and equal treatment of all persons here. You do not. Remember that. If that is bad work to you then I can see why you feel I am the enemy.

Bitcoin is money.  You're saying a real enthusiast of money (or of a forum that's devoted to the discussion of money) wouldn't be motivated to earn it?  That idea makes so little sense that it could only have come from you.  Signature campaigns are a fantastic way for bitcointalk devotees to earn some spare bitcoin, and I think all the excellent posters here ought to have the chance to take part in a sig campaign--there's nothing wrong with campaigns, per se.  It's only when the shitposters start piling into them (which they have) that it gets problematic.

Wow, a scammer who got tagged is siding with cryptohunter.  Who would have thought?  You're in great company, CH.  Keep up the bad work.

Yes I brought up some very valid reasons why meta should be for real enthusiasts who are discussing/promoting "good " ideas that operate for the benefit of the entire forum not be from a bunch of people obviously motivated by personal financial enrichment. Real enthusiasts will contribute wearing no sigs would they not? why would their motivation be dulled by the lack of their paid2post sigs ? surely not just posting to spam4bucks are they?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-is-meta-not-a-sig-spam-free-zone-surely-you-want-real-enthusiasts-opinions-5116691

I am pleased though that more people are starting to notice the glaring same sigs plastered all over meta by the same DT and merit sources. Not easy to miss though is it.

Ban sigs here and drain the swamp.

I have only "SUGGESTED" if it's not worthy, it's up to the admin to discard it, there is pretty much nothing wrong with it. Why do you think I would be requesting something like that? If you "DISLIKE" the suggestion, that's fine, no one is forcing you to like.


Least interested in replying something that's irrelevant to the thread. If you got something worthy to say it will be replied. Btw, it's far better than the "BESTMIXER".


Firstly, that's "NOTHING" to do with what the topic is for since you purely "WISH" to prove you are so so "GOOD" whatever you said is set on stones, then obviously you got nothing but to come up with "OFFTOPIC". Anyhow just for sake of replying. You probably are "SUGGESTING" people the way to do it. And basically saying that anyone using that way is "SCAMMER", while whatever you do got "CERTIFICATE" of honesty!

It's not even "WORTHY" to explain you the effort that's required to create a project, like MAYA. I am going to post some "SCREENSHOT" on the main thread, there I would love to hear your "VALUE" judging thoughts

However, I would no "FURTHER" reply to off-topic discussion here. If you have views on the "SUGGESTION" you are welcome to give.

Yea, its take too much efforts for create a project. I checked with Fivrr with your website. They asking me only $350 to create similar website including smart contract. And they are agree to delivery within 15 days. So is it take too much efforts ? On the other hand your whitepaper is free because it's just only copy pasted. If you order with whitpaper then you need more extra $100 and they will provide you unique whitpaper. You are not believing me? Just open an account on Fiverr and look on their gig. Even someone agree to create website for $50. Just use search button on fiverr.


    

but sir! how are you going to promote  plagiarized "Maya shitcoin " then ?

Do you know that you can report all offtopic post by using "Report to moderator" button.
People are able to create the scene there because  some users in forum are still promoting scam.

Ps: Did you like to create one more topic for admin , requesting to show the trust on all boards and to the guest users also?

Would have been a good April Fools joke 

Actually, I am not having problem. I am just suggesting this. Like I have said it before, IF you disagree with me on this it's obviously fine. But I just wanted to hear your view. It's completely fine with what you said. Anyone is capable of ignoring ads themselves, but my view is just simple if section like "SERIOUS DISCUSSION" can be done that way then those 2 mentioned sections are much more sensitive, but again if you disagree, it's fine.


Lol 

I checked scam thread and I can see that there are too many bestmixer's signature participants in it. I blame DarkStar_ for not sending mass message to chipmixer's signature participants to kick bestmixer out of that thread.

My suggestion is to implement new system, if number of bestmixer's signatures in one thread is higher than chipmixer's signatures, every chipmixer's signature participant should receive message with link to that thread and warning, something like "if you don't post in this thread you will be banned". We can also run ICO for bitcointalk automated message system to make things easier. There you go, problem solved, there is no need to make restrictions.

In our body we have many organs, and we don't cut it out when we get an issue with an organ, as an example headache. Instead, we try to figure out a solution - in this case a pain killer med.

Now in your case, you are having a problem with ads to the boards you mentioned, maybe some more are also having the same problem. So what's the solution? The solution is what bL4nkcode said.

But the majority is not having problem imo, if the majority of the members having the same problem then Theymos would have disabled ads in those boards a long time ago.

Now lock this thread and go to your profile to set your ad preferences.

There is really no disagreement what you said, it's fine.

The thing that is not understood is that we "AGREED" about the part but the problem was that there was no confirmation IF that was the issue.

Again this is not the TOPIC. I simply asked the question IF signatures should be "ALLOWED" or "NOT". So if you agree fine if not then also fine.

Those figures are not an opinion, they are a fact. On average, threads on Bitcoin Discussion and Altcoin Discussion get 10-30x more view than a scam ICO accusation thread.


Copying text without providing a reference is pretty much the definition of plagiarism. Despite you trying to play it off as not being an issue, plagiarism is dishonest, untrustworthy, and potentially illegal, especially when you are doing it for your own financial gain.


I'm only replying to something you brought up.

Your calculation is fine but did you consider the "ACTIVITY"? On those sections, you are unlikely to see your thread getting the type of attention you get. But anyway, it's your opinion if you disagree then like I said it's fine, everyone have their own views.

Again, we DONT want to talk about something, the thread is "NOT" created for. But still just answering. The whitepaper got no issues, the only issue is that there were no "REFERENCE" given of the sources we used. And we were ready to talk about that but OP was not interested. But again this is not the topic.

Ok. I have adjusted my post below to make it not at all about your case, and instead just speaking in generalities:



The average fake ICO Scam Accusation thread gets around 150 views. The average of the first 100 topics in Bitcoin Discussion is over 1200 views. The average of the first 100 topics in Altcoin Discussion is almost 4000 views. If someone was posting purely for attention, why would they spend 10 times as long creating a Scam Accusation thread which will get 10 times less views? Purely in terms of attention, this is less than 1% as efficient as just opening new topics in Bitcoin and Altcoin Discussion.

I'm afraid your argument holds no weight.


Months or years of effort, but you can't be bothered to take a few hours to write your own whitepaper? Please.

Like I already mentioned, there are couple more factors than just Signature. But again, don't you believe IF any place that really "NEED" to have Signature disabled is "SCAM ACCUSATION" and "META" section?

While you are absolutely "FREE" to give your opinion, it's fine if you disagree as not everyone is going to agree with everything.


That's true advertisement is part of modern life, but let's be specific. And let's focus what I have mentioned.

I believe "ADVERTISEMENT" "SIGNATURES" are precious to say the LEAST not for this forum, but overall.

So anyone will be "FOOLISH" to say that it shouldn't be "ALLOWED", but that where it's "IMPORTANT" that my suggestion is understood "CORRECTLY".

I believe those 2 sections mentioned (Scam Accusation and Meta) are sections where it's built for making the forum "BETTER", it shouldn't be "AVAILABLE" for self interest or promotion. There is NO ONE, who can "GUARANTEE" the intention of any individual but it's logical to know this way it's creating conflict of interest, if something like "EXISTS".

While I might not be using Bitcointalk for years, but I have "CLEARLY" understood that Bitcointalk and Admin mindset is "NEVER" about benefitting himself, as if that was the case then there are MULTIPLE ways available to do so. Hence, his IDEA (MY VIEW) is to make the place "WORTHY" and that is ONLY possible IF those 2 "CRITICAL SECTIONS" are used correctly instead of getting "MISUSED" for personal interest.

So just again to close it out for you, please just read my suggestion again, as it's VERY IMPORTANT that you understand I am talking about just those "2 SECTIONS" not the whole forum. But yes, if you STILL disagree, then it's fine.


Yeah, you are right there are "SOME" but how many? I believe I can count them easily through my fingers, while the ones that I pointed are "MAJORITY", so when those 2 MENTIONED people CAN LIVE without signatures, why can't the other Sherlock Homes lovers can do the SAME?

Well, tmfp is using the signature space just to convey a message. No links. Also, you need to read a few more of the scam accusation threads, rather than just the ones that pertain to you. You will find other examples, such as JollyGood.

Personally I think signature advertisement isn't a odd looking thing to anyone without you. Advertising has already been a part and parcel of modern life. There was a time when it was hard to find digital billboards on streets but now its been so much popular. Every legal companies should get a proper opportunities to use their advertisement on our forum where its not spoiling forums reputation but increasing. We have to keep it on mind that if any company or project showing their interest to use their ads on our forum then its a sign that bitcointalk forum has a great value on their business. Increasing forum values is always a better option for forum users too.

You have already got the way to get decided about seeing signatures or not but if you want to make it same for everyone than its honestly unfair. Worlds most of the online sites take this as their own promotion method by showing others advertisement on their sites. Its really hard to find who are not agree with that. As a forum member I have my dream that one day worlds most famous companies and organisation will compete to put their signature or advertisements on our forum. Because its a matter of measurement how much value this forum got on their mind.

Yes, and because posts there don’t add to post counts. If you disagree, then we can agree to disagree on the topic, but in any case, you don’t have my support.

Absolutely not. I believe Avatars should be "ALLOWED" because it is OFTEN used as personal image as well plus AVATAR don't have "LINKS", which SIGNATURES have.

So my suggestion is "PURELY" for "SIGNATURES" not Avatar at all.

Yes, but how do you know those are really the LINKS to SERVICE that actually intent to help? Can't this be judge as promotion too? Also, I hardly found ANY such Signature which was "ACTUALLY" for such purpose you mentioned.

One MAJOR reason why you see "SUCH" support here about the idea is that it's created by "ME" and in more specific way, a person who has "9 (NINE)" RED TRUST.  Although, I am not saying it's 100% due to that, as there are obviously people who genuinely are "AGAINST" the idea, not me. But by large, it's to do with me presenting this.

Had this done by some "HIGH RATED" people, I bet things would have seen a "DIFFERENT" angle.

But anyhow, that's how life is.


Lol, I was waiting for you

Where did the "PROJECT" comes into this? There is not "SINGLE" word said about that or anything like that? The thread is SIMPLY based upon suggestion on whether the Advertisement (signatures) should be allowed on those 2 mentioned thread or not.

So what's hurting you so much? Are you worried that how will you be able to "HELP" the "COMMUNITY" if Signatures are "STOPPED"?

Lol, so now we become another account of someone else.... Right.

You talk about efforts? Do you know HOW MUCH effort it takes to create a PROJECT, as big as ours? It takes "MONTHS" if not years to create it, not DAYS. But you can't understand because you level is to do "CHEAP" things in order to get "ATTENTION".

I am repeating MYSELF, the thread is "SIMPLY" for suggestion of my IDEA.

IF you don't like it, please proceed with letting your "VIEWS" but kindly do not "CHANGE" TOPIC for sake of your OWN PURPOSE.