That goes back to the question, What makes a coin a novelty coin? Who would be the one to make the decision whether or not a coin is legitimate or not? Thats a position that no one can make, if you think a coin is a novelty coin, great. Others dont.
I agree that that goes to most altcoins, but a coin based off of an internet meme is clearly a novelty coin. I mean. The coin is based entirely on a joke. If that's not novelty, then I don't know what is. Same for Bernankoin. The coin is clearly satire as the dev would admit. Or KittehCoin. Another joke/meme coin. I get that with most coins the line is very unclear but you have to admit that these are very intended for novelty and fun. And ever since DOGE there has been lots of novelty coins popping out. They're taking lots of space from other alternate crypto. Altcoins already have a bad reputation but this is going even as far to make them into an actual joke. The biggest reason why I think a sub-forum is needed for these coins is that they can be seen as separate from other crypto (even though I think most of the "other crypto" is borderline novelty too). Altcoins have been pretty bad this year but now they're even worse and if this continues (which I believe will if nothing is done about it), they'll become even worse. This whole easy-going and fun mentality is also giving lots of room for more scamming and market manipulation. I'm not asking to make a sub-forum for whatever coins I think are bad, but for the coins that anyone can clearly see as novelty. If a coin is purely built around a joke, internet meme or satire then it is for novelty purposes. Even if it expands to getting traded and all, as long as it's main purpose and status remains around the joke, then it's still a non-serious coin, even if it makes serious profit for certain pumpers and lucky bystanders.
What about a joke coin with a higher market cap than Bitcoin? Someone was messing around and bought fractions of Dogecoins for something like $400 each, so the market caps were showing $3 Trillion USD. Even with that sort of fluke, whether its a joke or not, there is serious money being held in doge, which again brings use back to, how do you completely detirmine if a coin is a novelty or not. If there was Stupidcoin, but it had a new POW system, the coins were $1000 per coin, and had a huge userbase, would it still be considered a novelty coin?
Theres just no way to enforce a split between alt coins and novelty coins. Its completely up to ones own opinion.
You can do that easily by splitting the alt section into 3:
-Namecoin
-Litecoin
-Other.
Why bother separating garbage from junk?
That is opinion as well, what makes Litecoin or Namecoin special? Sure they are amongst the oldest alt coins, but the same goes with Solidcoin/Microcash, Peercoin, Freicoin, Yacoin, and a plethera of other slightly newer coins.
I decided a long time ago that I would not be the judge of a coins validity. If its a good idea, people will use it, if its a stupid coin, it will die. No more fair way than that. As long as the creator isn't putting malware into the wallet, I don't care if someone decides to make SUPERULTRABESTCOIN or anything else.