Pages:
Author

Topic: [SUPPORT THREAD] BFx2 Bitfury USB stick miner - page 4. (Read 27398 times)

legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
I agree for bfgminer seems better hashrate ,it has reconnect issues though you have to restart if you got disconnected.
Those should be fixed in git as of a few days ago...
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
I agree for bfgminer seems better hashrate ,it has reconnect issues though you have to restart if you got disconnected.
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
I performed the mods shown here... I added a fan and replaced R6 with a 1.2k resistor. I have 3 of them in a cheap powered USB hub. Here are my observations:

1. First of all, the fan makes a huge improvement in heat. Before it was not possible to really touch, now you can handle it easily. Of course they now physically take up 2 USB ports.
2. Running CGMiner, I played with the bits settings and bits=54 yielded the best result.
3. Running a single unit in the hub, I see a fairly solid 4.8-5Gh with spikes higher, but it degrades to 4-4.3 over time.
4. Running more units lowers the speeds into the 3-4.2's. I assume it's due to not enough power from the hub.

I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong, but I'm disappointed I don't see the solid 5G performance with these mods. Maybe I should do the pencil mod also?

You might see better results with BFGMiner, so try that and report back.

Adding the fan is a huge help. Since you seem to be handy with soldering, do you have a DMM? How many volts are you getting across the decoupling capacitors near the BF chips when hashing?
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
I think goodney designed it to reach 4 ghash, 5 is with pencil mod and you have to actively cool it.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1000
I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong, but I'm disappointed I don't see the solid 5G performance with these mods. Maybe I should do the pencil mod also?
not sure, but without proper power it may not be that useful ?
hero member
Activity: 556
Merit: 500
I performed the mods shown here... I added a fan and replaced R6 with a 1.2k resistor. I have 3 of them in a cheap powered USB hub. Here are my observations:

1. First of all, the fan makes a huge improvement in heat. Before it was not possible to really touch, now you can handle it easily. Of course they now physically take up 2 USB ports.
2. Running CGMiner, I played with the bits settings and bits=54 yielded the best result.
3. Running a single unit in the hub, I see a fairly solid 4.8-5Gh with spikes higher, but it degrades to 4-4.3 over time.
4. Running more units lowers the speeds into the 3-4.2's. I assume it's due to not enough power from the hub.

I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong, but I'm disappointed I don't see the solid 5G performance with these mods. Maybe I should do the pencil mod also?


hero member
Activity: 556
Merit: 500
I don't think I'm seeing the performance from my 3 Twin Bitfuries that I'm supposed to be getting. I'm running with 2 Antminer U2's as well. The Antminers are overclocked. The BXMs are unmodified, I'm running the BXMs with (cgminer) --bxm-bits=52.

I'm also getting a lot of work restarts and stale shares that I never got before with just the 2 U2's. The problems get worse if I run any higher, and seem to increase over time.

It this typical or is there something I should do differently?

This is my screen after about a minute:

cgminer version 4.3.0 - Started: [2014-05-11 18:39:09]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):14.47G (1m):14.15G (5m):12.05G (15m):2.758G (avg):13.96Gh/s
A:582  R:20  HW:49  WU:175.6/m
Connected to stratum-lb-usa48.btcguild.com diff 4 with stratum as user
Block: 1df8b649...  Diff:8G  Started: [18:39:09]  Best share: 3.54K
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[USB management [P]ool management [Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
0: BXM 0       :                         | 3.291G / 2.976Gh/s WU:43.6/m
1: BXM 1       :                         | 3.106G / 2.820Gh/s WU:42.1/m
2: BXM 2       :                         | 3.879G / 3.979Gh/s WU:56.4/m
3: ANU 0       :                         | 2.377G / 2.239Gh/s WU:14.1/m
4: ANU 1       :                         | 2.125G / 2.159Gh/s WU:21.3/m
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2014-05-11 18:44:51] Accepted 1a1c73e3 Diff 10/4 BXM 2
[2014-05-11 18:44:54] Accepted 28fefc30 Diff 6/4 BXM 0
[2014-05-11 18:44:54] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 8
[2014-05-11 18:44:54] Stratum from pool 0 requested work restart
[2014-05-11 18:44:54] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested

[2014-05-11 18:44:54] Rejected 29acb369 Diff 6/4 BXM 1  (olddifficulty)
[2014-05-11 18:44:54] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested

[2014-05-11 18:44:54] Rejected 230739c3 Diff 7/4 BXM 0  (olddifficulty)
[2014-05-11 18:44:55] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested

[2014-05-11 18:44:55] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested

[2014-05-11 18:44:55] Rejected 228c1ff5 Diff 7/4 BXM 1  (olddifficulty)
[2014-05-11 18:44:55] Rejected 0e4fe3e0 Diff 18/4 BXM 2  (olddifficulty)
[2014-05-11 18:44:55] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested

[2014-05-11 18:44:55] Rejected 33b1f1bd Diff 5/4 BXM 2  (olddifficulty)
[2014-05-11 18:44:56] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested

[2014-05-11 18:44:56] Rejected 13dee601 Diff 13/4 BXM 1  (olddifficulty)
[2014-05-11 18:44:56] Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested

[2014-05-11 18:44:57] Rejected 30ca6375 Diff 5/4 BXM 1  (olddifficulty)
[2014-05-11 18:44:57] Accepted 0c8236da Diff 20/8 BXM 0
[2014-05-11 18:44:58] Accepted 094ce5e4 Diff 28/8 BXM 2
legendary
Activity: 1775
Merit: 1032
Value will be measured in sats

Hello,

Miner runs really well without the "bxm bits = XX" entry? If so, how fast, or the entry is absolutely necessary?

regards


When i took it away then ran a lot slower, like only 3 gh/s, so would suggest keeping it in. "bxm bits=54"  worked best for me too.
legendary
Activity: 1775
Merit: 1032
Value will be measured in sats

Hello,

Miner runs really well without the "bxm bits = XX" entry? If so, how fast, or the entry is absolutely necessary?

regards


When i took it away then ran a lot slower, like only 3 gh/s
legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2499
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
Will I be able to use the BFx2 and an Antminer U2 on the same machine using CGMiner?

The reason why I ask is that my CGMiner options are device specific:  --icarus-timing=short --anu-freq=300

So I don't see how I can control a BFx2 at the same time. Or can I run multiple instances of CGMiner?
You can run more than one type of ASIC device on one CGMiner instance. The options are ASIC specific and only affect that type of ASIC. So just add --bxm-bits=XX (where XX is 52, 53 or 54) to your command line and you're good to go.

hero member
Activity: 556
Merit: 500
Will I be able to use the BFx2 and an Antminer U2 on the same machine using CGMiner?

The reason why I ask is that my CGMiner options are device specific:  --icarus-timing=short --anu-freq=300

So I don't see how I can control a BFx2 at the same time. Or can I run multiple instances of CGMiner?
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
Hi goodney thanks for reply
I tried your suggestions and  i can make two instances running tf and rf exclusively.

However i run the 6 rf first and then the 3 tf.
At first all rf runs fine after i run the tf
Bfgminer for rf immediately drops 1 of the miners in this case bpm 4.
And for bfgminer running 3 tf throws user privelege error
Help again please ?

If i unplug one of the RF so running 5 Rf (12,5W) and 3 Tf (15W) then bfgminer also like when running 6 rf drops the speed of 1 of the miner.

Thanks before

We need to determine if it is a Windows, hub or software issue. It seems like either Windows or the hub, and adding the 9th device is the problem.

Do you have another hub, or other USB ports on your computer? Since the RedFury miners are USB 2 power compatible, I suggest plugging the RedFury's into another hub or into ports directly on your computer. If this works, then it is a hub issue.

If it still doesn't work, then it is likely a Windows issue. Can you confirm that the two combination of 8 miners works (6 RF, 2 TF; 5 RF, 3 TF), but adding the 9th miner causes problems?

newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
Hi goodney thanks for reply
I tried your suggestions and  i can make two instances running tf and rf exclusively.

However i run the 6 rf first and then the 3 tf.
At first all rf runs fine after i run the tf
Bfgminer for rf immediately drops 1 of the miners in this case bpm 4.
And for bfgminer running 3 tf throws user privelege error
Help again please ?


If i unplug one of the RF so running 5 Rf (12,5W) and 3 Tf (15W) then bfgminer also like when running 6 rf drops the speed of 1 of the miner.
 

Thanks before
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
I'm trying to run 3 TwinFuries with 6 RedFuries with bfgminer 3.99.0 provided by luke-jr here.
I'm using Orico A3H10 USB hub, the remaining 1 slot I use a USB fan to cool the miners.


6 RedFuries ~ 15W
3 TwinFuries ~ 15W

Total is about 30W. The hub comes with a 48W supply. Throw in conversion efficiency and the power for the hub itself and you *could* be bumping up against the power limit of the hub.

So the simple test is to try with one RedFury and one TwinFury. If that works, then keep adding miners until it doesn't work.

For bfgminer I would go get the latest version and try the following:

bfgminer -o stratum+tcp:// -u -p -S bfx:all --set bfx:osc6_bits=54

This should enable all TwinFury miners and the RedFury's should just work too.

If you try separate bfgminer instances, then you should do:

-S bfx:all -S bpm:none for the TwinFury instance

and

-S bpm:all -S bfx:none for the RedFury instance.
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
Hi, need help

I'm trying to run 3 TwinFuries with 6 RedFuries with bfgminer 3.99.0 provided by luke-jr here.
I'm using Orico A3H10 USB hub, the remaining 1 slot I use a USB fan to cool the miners.

My problem is I can only get 3 TF and 5 RF working, one of them doesnt work.

I try running 3.10.0 bfgminer and I can get all 6 RFs working.

I try to run separate instances but if i use for example - d 0 , it only enables 1 chip and disables the rest of the miners.

Is there a command line I can use to make them all work ?
Thinking of running  two separate instances the 3.10.0 bfgminer for the RF and the 3.99.0 for the TF, please help ?

legendary
Activity: 1775
Merit: 1032
Value will be measured in sats
Goodney two of my miners
one has dead chip, hashing at half speed
the other one was working fine with bits 53, but now the chip slowly dies.
Bfgminer keeps throwing "x of x results were bad, reinitialising"
Is there anything I can do to get them working at full speed again ?


I find it helps if you provide some extra cooling via fans and that keeps them hashing at full speed.
member
Activity: 102
Merit: 10
Goodney two of my miners
one has dead chip, hashing at half speed
the other one was working fine with bits 53, but now the chip slowly dies.
Bfgminer keeps throwing "x of x results were bad, reinitialising"
Is there anything I can do to get them working at full speed again ?

With BitFury chips there is a known percentage that are bad... who did you buy the miners from?
sr. member
Activity: 395
Merit: 250
Goodney two of my miners
one has dead chip, hashing at half speed
the other one was working fine with bits 53, but now the chip slowly dies.
Bfgminer keeps throwing "x of x results were bad, reinitialising"
Is there anything I can do to get them working at full speed again ?
full member
Activity: 228
Merit: 100
This is not good for my Chi... Yifu
Anyone interested in Bulk orders of these miners,
contact me,

dipo 5Volt 20Amp 19 Port USB hubs to clear also

cheers,
kev
Pages:
Jump to: