Anyway FH vs lower FH isn't really BBJ worthy? Dunno... Maybe do it at least quads vs quads and up and let's see how high the jackpot goes. 
I'd support this change as well. To be quite honest, 2222 is the minimum that I'd truly consider a "bad beat".
That said, congrats to the winners (and losers)! lol
we set the jackpot to hit on aces full of tens or better so the jackpot players win the extra payout more frequently. it is our first try at bbj so we may adjust in the future, but we think the low qualifier keeps the game exciting. as the site grows and more jackpot table hands get played per day we may consider raising the qualifier to keep the jackpot hitting every few months on average. internal discussion also produced an idea for 'easy beat' and 'hard beat' jackpots. after software refactor is complete we will address current bugs and then move to building new features like multiple jackpots.
