Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com - page 1174.

arlekyn13

sr. member

Activity: 288

Merit: 250

Anyone can help me with this?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s | A:0 R:128 HW:0 WU:0.0/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 NB: 1 LW: 281 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to mint.bitminter.com diff 128 with stratum as user myuser
Block: 000151d9281f7c40... Diff:391M Started: [19:54:59] Best share: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
KnC 0: | 0.000/ 0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.0/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2013-10-31 19:54:55] Started cgminer 3.6.6
[2013-10-31 19:54:55] Loaded configuration file /config/cgminer.conf
[2013-10-31 19:54:55] Error in configuration file, partially loaded.
[2013-10-31 19:54:55] Start cgminer with -T to see what failed to load.
[2013-10-31 19:54:55] Probing for an alive pool
[2013-10-31 19:54:59] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 128
[2013-10-31 19:54:59] Network diff set to 391M
[2013-10-31 19:54:59] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
[2013-10-31 19:54:59] Stratum from pool 0 requested work restart
[2013-10-31 19:54:59] Rejected untracked stratum share from pool 0
[2013-10-31 19:57:01] Stratum from pool 0 requested work restart
[2013-10-31 19:57:01] KnC running flushwork

The red led on the miner stays red after reboot.

Phoenix1969

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

LIR DEV

Did you guys leave enablecores running on top of 0.98 to get the good speeds to stay up there?...
I've been doing enablecores, but immediately re-flashing 0.98 back after the reboot....
? Huh

cognoscente

member

Activity: 111

Merit: 10

Quote from: AFox on October 31, 2013, 02:36:56 PM

Does anybody know why ?

Apparently there's no valid case where .97 works better than .96 or .98. It had a bug that was corrected in .98.
In my case, .96 has higher peaks, lower valleys, and less power. .98 has fewer low spots, quicker flushwork, but uses more power. I'm on .98 and liking it.

Crypto_Cumbrian

member

Activity: 113

Merit: 10

Anyone with a Jupiter running 0.98.

I switched back to 0.95, but forgot to take a note of the Stale and Dupe shares at the pool, what figures are 0.98 getting for these.

DigginDeep

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

Well if your hash rate on your pool was worse I would definitely be switching back my self, specially since the higher wattage 98 uses, I'm lucky 98 works great for me

AFox

hero member

Activity: 539

Merit: 517

Quote from: FiatKiller on October 31, 2013, 02:16:20 PM

Fox, did you try enablecores on top of FM 9.8?

Yes, it doesn't help.

CYPER said on an other topic that firmware 0.97 isn't available on KNC's website. Does anybody know why ?
Anyways, it's a good thing I keep a copy on my computer. Here's a link for those how want to download firmware 0.97 : http://1t4pro.1fichier.com/en/index.html

Quote from: DigginDeep on October 31, 2013, 02:35:56 PM

But what I also don't think people realize it's that if your using pre 98 you hash rate it's not accurate, as of pre 98 hardware errors were counted towards your hash rate, and since 98 upgraded cgminer the hash rates are now correct from my understanding.

The only thing I see is that hashrate on the pool is bad with 0.98.

DigginDeep

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

But what I also don't think people realize it's that if your using pre 98 you hash rate it's not accurate, as of pre 98 hardware errors were counted towards your hash rate, and since 98 upgraded cgminer the hash rates are now correct from my understanding.

naRky

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Bitcoin is the future...

Quote from: Xialla on October 31, 2013, 08:48:46 AM

Quote from: ImI on October 31, 2013, 08:41:17 AM

Quote from: Xialla on October 31, 2013, 08:26:32 AM

.98 after ~28hours

nice! any special treatments? extra fans etc?

nope, just opened window in the room, case on.

ASIC slot #1   55.0 ℃
ASIC slot #2   58.0 ℃
ASIC slot #3   61.5 ℃
ASIC slot #4   56.0 ℃

..from now, I'm scared to change anything.)

Same here

cgminer version 3.6.6 - Started: [2013-10-29 15:57:04]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):611.7G (avg):564.0Gh/s | A:24198400 R:224256 HW:606832 WU:7886.4/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 NB: 427 LW: 25833217 GF: 0 RF: 0
Connected to mint.bitminter.com diff 512 with stratum as user xxxxxx
Block: 0005308f7206b594... Diff:391M Started: [19:24:06] Best share: 48.1M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KnC 0: | 611.8G/564.0Gh/s | A:24198912 R:224000 HW:606842 WU: 7886.5/m

FiatKiller

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Fox, did you try enablecores on top of FM 9.8?

AFox

hero member

Activity: 539

Merit: 517

0.98 isn't working out for me.
Back to 0.97.

All the firmware's were run at least 24 hours without any reboot.
For that reason firmware 0.90 to 0.93 aren't listed.

--------------------	0.94	0.95	0.96	0.97	0.98
Average CGminer	270Gh/s	274Gh/s	280Gh/s	284Gh/s	278Gh/s
Average Pool	275Gh/s	263Gh/s	278Gh/s	283Gh/s	269Gh/s
Consumption	485 Watts	305 Watts	313 Watts	313 Watts	348 Watts
Temputure	54 & 62°C	42 & 47°C	42 & 47°C	40 & 44°C	44 & 50°C
Rejected	1.5%	0.22%	0.38%	0.48%	0.61%
HW	2.81%	0.79%	1.08%	1.47%	3.31%
WU	3975/m	3717/m	3933/m	4021/m	3825/m

0.94	0.95	0.96	0.97	0.98

arlekyn13

sr. member

Activity: 288

Merit: 250

My Jupiter that I finally received today stopped working. I upgraded it to 0.98 and was getting just 414Gh/s so i decided to try several "older" FW's. At some point, after reboot, it stopped hashing. It shows 0Gh/s and the red led is on (instead of the green one). Any suggestions?
Also getting only 211Gh/s on both my Saturns on 0.98 FW.

ASIC-K

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Hell?

Quote from: xyzzy099 on October 31, 2013, 01:43:37 PM

Quote from: augustocroppo on October 31, 2013, 01:36:25 PM

Quote from: ASIC-K on October 31, 2013, 12:43:44 PM

whoa, 426m! you solved a block! coooool

Nope.

The pool "solved" the block, not him.

What he did was to use a machine which generated the SHA-256 number for the pool to "solve" the block.

He would only had "solved" the block if he was solo "mining", what is not the case.

I don't get the distinction you are making here. It looks to me like he solved a block for the pool in exactly the same way he might have solved a block for himself if he had been solo mining.

Augusto just being his crabby, permanent on-his-period self as usual.

xyzzy099

legendary

Activity: 1066

Merit: 1098

Quote from: augustocroppo on October 31, 2013, 01:36:25 PM

Quote from: ASIC-K on October 31, 2013, 12:43:44 PM

whoa, 426m! you solved a block! coooool

Nope.

The pool "solved" the block, not him.

What he did was to use a machine which generated the SHA-256 number for the pool to "solve" the block.

He would only had "solved" the block if he was solo "mining", what is not the case.

I don't get the distinction you are making here. It looks to me like he solved a block for the pool in exactly the same way he might have solved a block for himself if he had been solo mining.

ASIC-K

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Hell?

Quote from: augustocroppo on October 31, 2013, 01:36:25 PM

Quote from: ASIC-K on October 31, 2013, 12:43:44 PM

whoa, 426m! you solved a block! coooool

Nope.

The pool "solved" the block, not him.

What he did was to use a machine which generated the SHA-256 number for the pool to "solve" the block.

He would only had "solved" the block if he was solo "mining", what is not the case.

yes, doofus. i know that, thats what i mean you fucktard. why are you still on this forum?

augustocroppo

vip

Activity: 756

Merit: 504

Quote from: ASIC-K on October 31, 2013, 12:43:44 PM

whoa, 426m! you solved a block! coooool

Nope.

The pool "solved" the block, not him.

What he did was to use a machine which generated the SHA-256 number for the pool to "solve" the block.

He would only had "solved" the block if he was solo "mining", what is not the case.

CYPER

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 502

Quote from: ASIC-K on October 31, 2013, 12:43:44 PM

whoa, 426m! you solved a block! coooool

Me too

ASIC-K

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Hell?

Quote from: DigginDeep on October 31, 2013, 12:17:02 PM

So mine has been running at least 36 hours and been very steady at this speed.

whoa, 426m! you solved a block! coooool

Phoenix1969

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

LIR DEV

Quote from: AussieHash on October 31, 2013, 03:43:32 AM

Quote from: DigginDeep on October 31, 2013, 02:20:34 AM

Quote from: Searing on October 31, 2013, 02:04:42 AM

Quote from: btcusr on October 31, 2013, 12:39:30 AM

I think, November miner deliveries has already been shipped and they reach customers today.

Customers can start hashing from tomorrow, 00:00. Shocked

ack hope this is not true and they don't ship till nov 15th as they said..if not what are we looking at every 10 days a 50% difficulty increase? hard to ROI back that way!

They told me they planned to have
A month in between shipping, and I believe they will hold up to that, other wise they would piss off allot of customers, and anyone smart that paid with a credit card could get a refund if they wanted, and would lose allot of customers if they plan on having a gen 2, though a gen 2 would only be worth while if they got much better watt / gig performance

I have heard from a forum member that his $5000 "November" order shipped on 30/10

No way

DigginDeep

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

So mine has been running at least 36 hours and been very steady at this speed.
https://i.imgur.com/uUuVDf3.png
https://i.imgur.com/WQVce3D.png
https://i.imgur.com/EBHqbtF.png

demonmaestro

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Mining for the hell of it.

Mine has been steady just hashing away.

Topic: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com - page 1174. (Read 3049528 times)