Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com - page 1223.

soy

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1013

Quote from: soy on October 24, 2013, 12:58:01 PM

Quote from: soy on October 24, 2013, 12:51:57 PM

Quote from: Phoenix1969 on October 24, 2013, 12:42:29 PM

Quote from: soy on October 24, 2013, 12:39:28 PM

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc... as mentioned earlier..

No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans. So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine. ...trying to get on the dreadmill..

KnC 0: | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m

not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier. That first figure cycles up and down.

about 4 mph and watching bering sea gold - gonna cash in my BTC and head up to them there hills.

Stepped off the dreadmill and the internet goes down. Happened yesterday just as I got back from a jog. The local highway is being widened from 2 lane to divided highway. Fiber is run along the road. Cable was down 2 hours at least. Bummer.

Cablez

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

I owe my soul to the Bitcoin code...

Is there a way to identify which physical board is being identified by the bertmod output? It says there is a board 0,2,3,4 with boards 2 and 3 being much warmer than the other two. I would assume that those would be the rear boards, correct?

DPoS

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: paranoidx on October 24, 2013, 12:20:02 PM

Quote from: xyzzy099 on October 24, 2013, 12:04:16 PM

I'm not sure why you need to remove this file - I would think it would just overwrite it, but if you really want to remove it:

SSH into the machine, then:

# cd /config
# rm asic_test

The '#' is the command line prompt - don't type that.

Thank you.

and yes, DPos, wouldn't the asic_test get overwritten one you load the new firmware??

little tired of proving everything for people... simple to do a test right?

either upgrade and reboot twice with ,96 and see if it does that 1-2 min runthrough and reboots itself or add extra char or two in the file and see if it overwrites

i believe there is logic somewhere that checks to see if the file is there and then skips the self test.. but i've been messing with bfgminer the past few days so i don't really remember exactly

i usually rename the asic_test files to asic_testXX so I keep record of any changes

dextryn

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 100

Quote from: Micky25 on October 24, 2013, 04:01:03 PM

I have about the same and feel totaly comfortable.

Ultimately I'm feeling fine too. Hash rate is great. Heck, I remember gpu mining and having 12 of them pegged at 80 for months.

Micky25

legendary

Activity: 974

Merit: 1000

I have about the same and feel totaly comfortable.

dextryn

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 100

Crap, everyone is reporting their chips running in the 45 degree range. I have one at 48, two at 55 and one at 64. I'm hashing at a pretty stable rate of around 540-550. Should I be concerned about the temps?

btc_uzr

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

let's have some fun

Quote from: ImI on October 24, 2013, 03:34:14 PM

Quote from: btc_uzr on October 24, 2013, 02:50:37 PM

https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

more than 0,5PH/s dropped off the network ?

you ever heard the term "variance"?

Yes sir.
And I'm aware what mathematical probability is and how hashrate is being approximated.

ImI

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1019

Quote from: btc_uzr on October 24, 2013, 02:50:37 PM

https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

more than 0,5PH/s dropped off the network ?

you ever heard the term "variance"?

Phoenix1969

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

LIR DEV

264/3984
1st red mark is 0.97, second is vrm wiggle

ffernandex

full member

Activity: 143

Merit: 100

Quote from: Phoenix1969 on October 24, 2013, 01:30:39 PM

Yes, I have one Sat that stays rock-solid on 280...

so maybe 560 for Jupiter?...anyone got a Jup with better?

edit: still climbing WU's & Gh/s on the slo sat.... slowly
was 253/3920 now 262/3973 still going...

My hosted jupiter used to be in that range, and a couple times it even averaged +600GH/s, but now since the last FW update it's been stuck in the 400's range for at least a couple days.

very very disappointing

Micky25

legendary

Activity: 974

Merit: 1000

sorry, I tripped over a wire.

btc_uzr

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

let's have some fun

https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate

more than 0,5PH/s dropped off the network ?

josh_nc

member

Activity: 95

Merit: 10

http://bitcoincharts.com/bitcoin/

Count 265,677

Blocks
last 24h: 87 <<<<< Is this correct??? First time I see this since the beginning of the year....
avg. per hour: 3.63 <<<<< If this is right wow!!! It could mean diff going down for 1st time ever!!!

Difficulty 267,731,249
Next Difficulty in 435 blocks 371,623,920

Phoenix1969

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

LIR DEV

Quote from: timmmers on October 24, 2013, 01:25:17 PM

Quote from: Phoenix1969 on October 24, 2013, 01:18:12 PM

Quote from: timmmers on October 24, 2013, 01:14:53 PM

Quote from: Phoenix1969 on October 24, 2013, 01:02:19 PM

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s Will keep updated...

I think that soy mentioned that a few dozen pages ago. Things get lost in here though

yeah, I know, but the slo sat is at the bottom of the stack, and hard to reach the vrm's, and I wasn't going to tear the thing apart for a test... so I resorted to doing it live & running... I know.... seems to continue to rise... more WU & another GH/s...

It would be nice to know the theoretical limit. I'm sitting on a merc hashing at 140 solidly. So that may be a good one. Sats should manage 280 at least then from that? Maybe more in time, it's only been a week after all.

Yes, I have one Sat that stays rock-solid on 280...

so maybe 560 for Jupiter?...anyone got a Jup with better?

edit: still climbing WU's & Gh/s on the slo sat.... slowly
was 253/3920 now 262/3973 still going...

sbfree

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

I think it's time KNC allowed for us to play with some volt settings within reason so we don't fry our units but yet get to squeeze more out of them, they can take it....per .90

timmmers

sr. member

Activity: 1176

Merit: 265

Quote from: Phoenix1969 on October 24, 2013, 01:18:12 PM

Quote from: timmmers on October 24, 2013, 01:14:53 PM

Quote from: Phoenix1969 on October 24, 2013, 01:02:19 PM

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s Will keep updated...

I think that soy mentioned that a few dozen pages ago. Things get lost in here though

yeah, I know, but the slo sat is at the bottom of the stack, and hard to reach the vrm's, and I wasn't going to tear the thing apart for a test... so I resorted to doing it live & running... I know.... seems to continue to rise... more WU & another GH/s...

It would be nice to know the theoretical limit. I'm sitting on a merc hashing at 140 solidly. So that may be a good one. Sats should manage 280 at least then from that? Maybe more in time, it's only been a week after all.

sbfree

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

soy, .90 crashed....and everything below .94 didn't work or help me...back to .95 square 1 again see what happens....

.90, knc if you are listening had great numbers for me, but not sure what why it crashed....

btc_uzr

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

let's have some fun

Quote from: soy on October 24, 2013, 01:16:09 PM

(...) and the bitcoin may buy me a new car one day

I'd say you can do so after some hours of mining, depending on your standards

or maybe never

Phoenix1969

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

LIR DEV

Quote from: timmmers on October 24, 2013, 01:14:53 PM

Quote from: Phoenix1969 on October 24, 2013, 01:02:19 PM

just now...
Just as a little test... I gently just pressed on the vrm's on the slo sat, and rocked them side to side a tad with the tip of my finger. One of the vrm's gave a little "Click".
within 30 seconds, a couple cores were re-enabled in cgminer... and it has gained about 20 WU's in about 5 minutes, and 2-3 gh/s Will keep updated...

I think that soy mentioned that a few dozen pages ago. Things get lost in here though

yeah, I know, but the slo sat is at the bottom of the stack, and hard to reach the vrm's, and I wasn't going to tear the thing apart for a test... so I resorted to doing it live & running... I know.... seems to continue to rise... more WU & another GH/s...

soy

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1013

Quote from: soy on October 24, 2013, 12:58:01 PM

Quote from: soy on October 24, 2013, 12:51:57 PM

Quote from: Phoenix1969 on October 24, 2013, 12:42:29 PM

Quote from: soy on October 24, 2013, 12:39:28 PM

But I don't understand why if the warm BBB backs up Merc's why it wouldn't back up a Jupiter 4x as much.

I agree... It just doesn't make any sense... I think it's the VRM's getting cooled by playing with the cardboard, etc... as mentioned earlier..

No, in fact my arrangement probably warms the VRMs a little as I've now got a kind of wind tunnel to the ASIC module and that first passes over the BBB - note the small 120vac 3 watt at the wall fan pushing in from the far left and the two front fans. So, the ½ fan width cardboard down over the BBB might be better buy I ain't fooling with mine. ...trying to get on the dreadmill..

KnC 0: | 130.2G/135.7Gh/s | A:7589658 R:346355 HW:441631 WU:2091.4/m

not sure but I may have seen a 136GH/s avg earlier. That first figure cycles up and down.

about 4 mph and watching bering sea gold - gonna cash in my BTC and head up to them there hills.

warming up in here and need air movement while running so on comes a fan. won't be after bering sea gold as I swim like a rock. and the bitcoin may buy me a new car one day

Topic: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com - page 1223. (Read 3049524 times)