Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com - page 1293.

sickpig

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1008

Quote from: DeaDTerra on October 17, 2013, 11:41:08 AM

With FW 0.96 my numbers have gone from 520,525 and 540 to 450,500 and 520 Ghash. This is quite the decrease in performance.
I have been running them for about an hour so it might still be variance, anyone else getting similar results?
//DeaDTerra

are those numbers at the pool or reported back form cgminer ?

FeedbackLoop

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: DeaDTerra on October 17, 2013, 11:41:08 AM

With FW 0.96 my numbers have gone from 520,525 and 540 to 450,500 and 520 Ghash. This is quite the decrease in performance.
I have been running them for about an hour so it might still be variance, anyone else getting similar results?
//DeaDTerra

There were quite a few blocks mined in the last hour and flushwork still seems to be poor in KNC's cgminer so it might be just that (also fixed my 0.96 and running it, it was just the config file).

DeaDTerra

donator

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: DeaDTerra on October 17, 2013, 11:41:08 AM

With FW 0.96 my numbers have gone from 520,525 and 540 to 450,500 and 520 Ghash. This is quite the decrease in performance.
I have been running them for about an hour so it might still be variance, anyone else getting similar results?
//DeaDTerra

has your HW gone down?

No they seem roughly the same.
//DeaDTerra

soy

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1013

Quote from: Silv0r on October 17, 2013, 11:29:20 AM

Can confirm this. With 0.96 I'm "only" getting 107GH/s and with 0.95 it was an average of 115GH/s (Mercury).
Any idea to improve this? Think It could run at least 120 - 130GH/s?!

ty,
Silv0r

There was mention of grading numbers but I was unsure if it had to do with the power modules or the ASIC modules. Has yours one of those stickers having a number 1 to 4?

DeaDTerra

donator

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

With FW 0.96 my numbers have gone from 520,525 and 540 to 450,500 and 520 Ghash. This is quite the decrease in performance.
I have been running them for about an hour so it might still be variance, anyone else getting similar results?
//DeaDTerra

Silv0r

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

22°C, Case off and no direct house pointed. But temperature from the ASIC chip is at 31.0°C. I think this is okay.

Greetings

Searing

copper member

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1465

Clueless!

Quote from: Biffa on October 14, 2013, 02:37:41 PM

36X Day 2 here just changed status to "Shipped" its a pickup so I guess they have to now ship it to their office where it can be picked up from as I imagine they don't want ppl having around the factory.

just a note my 304x unit just got the tracking number like 2hrs ago it is showing DHL tomorrow (Friday) i'd call if DHL and set things up at least they can give you the DAY it arrives from this number 1-800-225-5345 er again the tracking number shows Brussels calling the number and a live person told me it would arrive tomorrow ..(I was shocked) just so you are warned!

anyway the point of this is it took 2 1/2 days to go from Sweden to the Midwest usa...so jump on the DHL tracking when you get the number imho

Searing

Sitarow

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1047

Quote from: Silv0r on October 17, 2013, 11:29:20 AM

Can confirm this. With 0.96 I'm "only" getting 107GH/s and with 0.95 it was an average of 115GH/s (Mercury).
Any idea to improve this? Think It could run at least 120 - 130GH/s?!

ty,
Silv0r

Please give a little more info. What is your ambient room temp? do you have the case off and extra house pointed at the unit?

Sitarow

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1047

Quote from: loktang1125 on October 17, 2013, 11:28:18 AM

Quote from: sickpig on October 17, 2013, 11:22:00 AM

Quote from: loktang1125 on October 17, 2013, 11:19:15 AM

HW backed to 10% with 0.96

care to elaborate?

the interface looks much better
i have about 1.3% hw with 0.95 and i got like 10%+ after i upgraded to 0.96

my 10 mins experience

Pro : better statistics ( hashrate, Wu etc)
able to add more pools

Con : Hw rate increased
small drop of hashrate

If you follow the first impressions thread you will notice that v0.9.3 and v0.9.4 both had higher hw erros however the accepted shares submitted <---- what you get paid for is greater on those vs v0.9.5

I think that they may have found a happy medium with v0.9.6

In order to gauge proper results I would pay attention to Harware error rate over the course of a few hours.

If the HW% drops then you have acquitted cooling.

Also if v0.9.6 is anything like v0.9.4 the speed can take a few hours to ramp up.

Silv0r

full member

Activity: 204

Merit: 100

Can confirm this. With 0.96 I'm "only" getting 107GH/s and with 0.95 it was an average of 115GH/s (Mercury).
Any idea to improve this? Think It could run at least 120 - 130GH/s?!

ty,
Silv0r

FeedbackLoop

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

0:96 I get a pool submission failure after doing the first work. Weird. Rolling back.

loktang1125

full member

Activity: 164

Merit: 100

Quote from: sickpig on October 17, 2013, 11:22:00 AM

Quote from: loktang1125 on October 17, 2013, 11:19:15 AM

HW backed to 10% with 0.96

care to elaborate?

the interface looks much better
i have about 1.3% hw with 0.95 and i got like 10%+ after i upgraded to 0.96

my 10 mins experience

Pro : better statistics ( hashrate, Wu etc)
able to add more pools

Con : Hw rate increased
small drop of hashrate

btc_uzr

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

let's have some fun

my hashrate was better with 0.95 - I'm switching back

sickpig

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1008

Quote from: loktang1125 on October 17, 2013, 11:19:15 AM

HW backed to 10% with 0.96

care to elaborate?

loktang1125

full member

Activity: 164

Merit: 100

HW backed to 10% with 0.96

timmmers

sr. member

Activity: 1176

Merit: 265

So much nicer with a regular news update isn't it?

Paladin69

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1000

Quote from: sickpig on October 17, 2013, 10:43:14 AM

Quote from: Paladin69 on October 17, 2013, 10:38:47 AM

Quote from: chrono030 on October 17, 2013, 10:34:53 AM

Quote from: Paladin69 on October 17, 2013, 10:32:17 AM

Quote from: sickpig on October 17, 2013, 10:28:19 AM

fw 0.96 is out
https://www.kncminer.com/news/news-52

Can't say I remove browser cache files very often for firefox. Just clear the history?

Who wants to volunteer to flash this firmware? I did the deed on .92 and .93 for folks. A bit hesitant to do .96 as i've had great luck with .95.

I'm not home so luckily I get to watch others be the guinea pig.

guys join the kncminer irc channel @ freenode there are already a bunch of brave miners that have flushed their box with the new firmware.
pZombie have a dead module and 0.96 seems to fix it

Crap...I sent a dead module back two days ago.

sickpig

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1008

Quote from: Paladin69 on October 17, 2013, 10:38:47 AM

Quote from: chrono030 on October 17, 2013, 10:34:53 AM

Quote from: Paladin69 on October 17, 2013, 10:32:17 AM

Quote from: sickpig on October 17, 2013, 10:28:19 AM

fw 0.96 is out
https://www.kncminer.com/news/news-52

Can't say I remove browser cache files very often for firefox. Just clear the history?

Who wants to volunteer to flash this firmware? I did the deed on .92 and .93 for folks. A bit hesitant to do .96 as i've had great luck with .95.

I'm not home so luckily I get to watch others be the guinea pig.

guys join the kncminer irc channel @ freenode there are already a bunch of brave miners that have flushed their box with the new firmware.
pZombie have a dead module and 0.96 seems to fix it

Paladin69

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1000