Ok guys V.99b has been officially released to paid members. Please go to your paid membership page and download:
http://bitcoinlasvegas.net/kncminer-titan-custom-firmware-mod-paid-membership-page/If you paid and have a login account, it will let you through. If you paid and it does not let you through, then I need to manually add you. That means just register a username on my site, and email me at
[email protected] and tell me your a premium member and tell me your username. Ill verify your account and then upgrade you to premium, and email you back. From then on youll always have access to the premium page. If you want to be automatically notified about updates, then see the note on the premium membership page.
Thanks Vegas
Just want to thank you and Gentarkin for continuing to improve this mod! I have installed the latest premium V.99b to all 3 Titan Controllers and they are all running well so far. I do noticed a bit more hashrate fluctuation, but that's probably expected since it has been hot where I am at and the new software is doing a better job of keeping the cubes at a safe temperature.
May I make a suggest for the next firmware release? How about adding some kind of scheduler to turn off bfgminer/mining at certain configurable hours, when it is hot or when the electricity rate is at the highest during peak hours? This is more for future consideration if Litecoin difficulty continues to rise faster than the norm. We can turn off mining when it is unprofitable and turn it back on when it is profitable.
Im happy your happy w/ the firmware! Thanks for your purchase!
Im already testing code for the next release of v.99c =)
Regarding ur suggestions:
Thats quite easy to do, power off the rig... LOL =P
No, but seriously... my code already has temperature adjustment built in, hence the DCDC threshold setting. It will autoclock up / down for you =)
A schedule of turning off & on is really not needed. I used to think I could outsmart elec company by mining during offpeak hours and not much at all during peak hours. In the end all calculations came out extremely close.... so really, thats kinda pointless.
Ive had several requests for scheduling features or clock settings / scheduling based on expected temps. It takes way more work to impliment then I think is worth it. I think may people forget that the temperature based clock is already built in, and the other folk dont really think about what they are asking .... in the end its like asking someone to reinvent the wheel.
I do appreciate the suggestions tho =)