How do i set up a master node?
I am compiling the guides together now, they'll be up soon!
Topic: [SYNX] Syndicate | Business Management Platform | NEW BETA v1.0.1.7 RELEASED! | - page 156. (Read 235769 times)
June 14, 2016, 10:24:15 PM
I am compiling the guides together now, they'll be up soon!
June 14, 2016, 10:11:09 PM
How do i set up a master node?
June 14, 2016, 10:09:42 PM
The INNO SCRIPT INSTALLER was the cause of the FALSE POSITIVES!
https://virustotal.com/en/url/8d5adf1cf79d5d00c5cb63af0647225350d165b1ab736e985de6d0129fbbbff7/analysis/
https://virustotal.com/en/url/8d5adf1cf79d5d00c5cb63af0647225350d165b1ab736e985de6d0129fbbbff7/analysis/
Please download the wallet with the DLL's from the link below.
https://github.com/SyndicateLabs/SyndicateQT/releases/download/1.0/Syndicate-2016-06-14.zip
The ZIP with wallet & DLL's was scanned CLEAN over 2 hours ago & whoever scanned it neglected to share that information with everyone. Thank you.
https://github.com/SyndicateLabs/SyndicateQT/releases/download/1.0/Syndicate-2016-06-14.zip
The ZIP with wallet & DLL's was scanned CLEAN over 2 hours ago & whoever scanned it neglected to share that information with everyone. Thank you.
Dev, read my previous post.
It's running from extracted ZIP file, contains the exe and dll binaries, instead of SETUP file.
No offence, FALSE POSITIVE or NOT, the app thread of your codes are not clean for some process.
That's why some AV that have abilities to scan file only may passed as clean.
And may not for some AV which have abilities to scan more deeper into each threads could match for some threads may intends to become suspicious behaviors.
I wish I could confirm your codes, caused I'm not one of Qt dev, and have no Qt environment.
I love coins, but I'm concern for security issues which may impact to my whole system.
Thanks for understanding.
Regards,
d.mas
Youre more than welcome to download the zip & scan the exe alone..the inno script compiler was creating the false positives, the details of the first virus total scan even recognized it.
Here is the exe alone.
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/f1ef191375397ed59bdcc46e7c69bb3502a3c609ca7b8b59dd604ec1c260bede/analysis/1465956137/
June 14, 2016, 09:43:57 PM
The INNO SCRIPT INSTALLER was the cause of the FALSE POSITIVES!
https://virustotal.com/en/url/8d5adf1cf79d5d00c5cb63af0647225350d165b1ab736e985de6d0129fbbbff7/analysis/
https://virustotal.com/en/url/8d5adf1cf79d5d00c5cb63af0647225350d165b1ab736e985de6d0129fbbbff7/analysis/
Please download the wallet with the DLL's from the link below.
https://github.com/SyndicateLabs/SyndicateQT/releases/download/1.0/Syndicate-2016-06-14.zip
The ZIP with wallet & DLL's was scanned CLEAN over 2 hours ago & whoever scanned it neglected to share that information with everyone. Thank you.
https://github.com/SyndicateLabs/SyndicateQT/releases/download/1.0/Syndicate-2016-06-14.zip
The ZIP with wallet & DLL's was scanned CLEAN over 2 hours ago & whoever scanned it neglected to share that information with everyone. Thank you.
Dev, read my previous post.
It's running from extracted ZIP file, contains the exe and dll binaries, instead of SETUP file.
No offence, FALSE POSITIVE or NOT, the app thread of your codes are not clean for some process.
That's why some AV that have abilities to scan file only may passed as clean.
And may not for some AV which have abilities to scan more deeper into each threads could match for some threads may intends to become suspicious behaviors.
I wish I could confirm your codes, caused I'm not one of Qt dev, and have no Qt environment.
I love coins, but I'm concern for security issues which may impact to my whole system.
Thanks for understanding.
Regards,
d.mas
June 14, 2016, 08:42:54 PM
damn it was scanned clean hours ago & no one said anything? wow lol
June 14, 2016, 08:28:13 PM
The INNO SCRIPT INSTALLER was the cause of the FALSE POSITIVES!
https://virustotal.com/en/url/8d5adf1cf79d5d00c5cb63af0647225350d165b1ab736e985de6d0129fbbbff7/analysis/
https://virustotal.com/en/url/8d5adf1cf79d5d00c5cb63af0647225350d165b1ab736e985de6d0129fbbbff7/analysis/
Please download the wallet with the DLL's from the link below.
https://github.com/SyndicateLabs/SyndicateQT/releases/download/1.0/Syndicate-2016-06-14.zip
The ZIP with wallet & DLL's was scanned CLEAN over 2 hours ago & whoever scanned it neglected to share that information with everyone. Thank you.
https://github.com/SyndicateLabs/SyndicateQT/releases/download/1.0/Syndicate-2016-06-14.zip
The ZIP with wallet & DLL's was scanned CLEAN over 2 hours ago & whoever scanned it neglected to share that information with everyone. Thank you.
June 14, 2016, 07:44:29 PM
Thats odd because the desktop version of Bitdefender shows it as clean.
Yeah my computer comes up clean, sounds like fudsters are using false positives to spread fud.
If you compare the the "virus" from virustotals link to the virus d.mas posted its not even the same lol
June 14, 2016, 07:22:55 PM
Thats odd because the desktop version of Bitdefender shows it as clean.
June 14, 2016, 06:16:48 PM
NOT SO FAST to be HAPPY
, dev...! 
"Program is behaving in a similar manner to Spyware (LAN bypass backdoor)"
Thread found by EmsiSoft Internet Security AV.
Downloaded & Installed Syndicate-2016-06-14
https://github.com/SyndicateLabs/SyndicateQT/releases/download/1.0/Syndicate-2016-06-14.zip
June 14, 2016, 05:51:27 PM
400 Blocks of the early bird mining reward left! 
June 14, 2016, 04:33:21 PM
Spybot S&D shows nothing! Wallet is all good on my PC
I like the difficulty graph..Thats great to hear!
June 14, 2016, 04:20:44 PM
Spybot S&D shows nothing! Wallet is all good on my PC
I like the difficulty graph.. June 14, 2016, 03:27:50 PM
A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries.
Theres actually ~625 blocks before it halfs.
Theres absolutely no point to infect a file that 99.99999% of the forum is going to check, especially when the third stickied post on the Announcements page warns everyone.
I'm going to continue working on something I believe in, If my time and dedication is going to be the only thing to prove it then its just going to be a matter of time.
Why would you use an installer in the first place? It's just a QT wallet. There is no reason to use an installer to distribute it.
Its a cleaner & more professional method then a folder with an exe & dlls. Using qtwebkit makes it a pain to compile qt5 statically..
There is nothing professional about releasing a simple QT wallet inside an installer that gets 8 hits as a virus. You might think it's more professional but you're wrong. Nobody wants to run an installer just for a simple QT wallet. You should learn how to compile a wallet properly before launching a coin. There is no need to have to include the dlls as separate files.
Have you tried to compile statically with Qtwebkit?
That is just an excuse and has nothing to do with the fact that 99% of QT wallets are compiled statically. If you can't do it with Qtwebkit perhaps you should try one of the other methods available.
You are correct, 99% of them are compiled statically, but how many of the statically compiled wallets use qtwebkit?
Qtwebkit is needed for the block explorer & future updates.
What other method would you like me to use?
June 14, 2016, 03:21:34 PM
A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries.
Theres actually ~625 blocks before it halfs.
Theres absolutely no point to infect a file that 99.99999% of the forum is going to check, especially when the third stickied post on the Announcements page warns everyone.
I'm going to continue working on something I believe in, If my time and dedication is going to be the only thing to prove it then its just going to be a matter of time.
Why would you use an installer in the first place? It's just a QT wallet. There is no reason to use an installer to distribute it.
Its a cleaner & more professional method then a folder with an exe & dlls. Using qtwebkit makes it a pain to compile qt5 statically..
There is nothing professional about releasing a simple QT wallet inside an installer that gets 8 hits as a virus. You might think it's more professional but you're wrong. Nobody wants to run an installer just for a simple QT wallet. You should learn how to compile a wallet properly before launching a coin. There is no need to have to include the dlls as separate files.
Have you tried to compile statically with Qtwebkit?
That is just an excuse and has nothing to do with the fact that 99% of QT wallets are compiled statically. If you can't do it with Qtwebkit perhaps you should try one of the other methods available.
June 14, 2016, 02:55:29 PM
I really like to announce the Coin is added to my Pool -BUT- at the moment looks like the genesis block of the chain is not propperly built:
2016-06-14 07:11:07 ERROR: CheckBlock() : first tx is not coinbase
2016-06-14 07:11:07 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
I'm sorry for that !
Cookie
2016-06-14 07:11:07 ERROR: CheckBlock() : first tx is not coinbase
2016-06-14 07:11:07 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
I'm sorry for that !
Cookie
@Dev why did I get such Warnings and why is the daemon not accepting blocks ?
Cookie
Sorry I don't like to set up another stratum for a single coin - if we find the cause of the problem - we could modify the pool to work - this is the first coin which isn't working ?!
Cookie
June 14, 2016, 02:54:12 PM
A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries.
Theres actually ~625 blocks before it halfs.
Theres absolutely no point to infect a file that 99.99999% of the forum is going to check, especially when the third stickied post on the Announcements page warns everyone.
I'm going to continue working on something I believe in, If my time and dedication is going to be the only thing to prove it then its just going to be a matter of time.
Why would you use an installer in the first place? It's just a QT wallet. There is no reason to use an installer to distribute it.
Its a cleaner & more professional method then a folder with an exe & dlls. Using qtwebkit makes it a pain to compile qt5 statically..
There is nothing professional about releasing a simple QT wallet inside an installer that gets 8 hits as a virus. You might think it's more professional but you're wrong. Nobody wants to run an installer just for a simple QT wallet. You should learn how to compile a wallet properly before launching a coin. There is no need to have to include the dlls as separate files.
Have you tried to compile statically with Qtwebkit?
June 14, 2016, 02:53:06 PM
A code review is meaningless. It's easy to compile executables from different code than what's on github. I'm not saying that's what you did but reviewing the code can't prove that something wasn't added to the released binaries.
Theres actually ~625 blocks before it halfs.
Theres absolutely no point to infect a file that 99.99999% of the forum is going to check, especially when the third stickied post on the Announcements page warns everyone.
I'm going to continue working on something I believe in, If my time and dedication is going to be the only thing to prove it then its just going to be a matter of time.
Why would you use an installer in the first place? It's just a QT wallet. There is no reason to use an installer to distribute it.
Its a cleaner & more professional method then a folder with an exe & dlls. Using qtwebkit makes it a pain to compile qt5 statically..
There is nothing professional about releasing a simple QT wallet inside an installer that gets 8 hits as a virus. You might think it's more professional but you're wrong. Nobody wants to run an installer just for a simple QT wallet. You should learn how to compile a wallet properly before launching a coin. There is no need to have to include the dlls as separate files.
June 14, 2016, 02:40:15 PM
Tell me about this i dont know
June 14, 2016, 02:34:54 PM
June 14, 2016, 02:29:39 PM
Darksend 
?? Wtf is this ?
?? Wtf is this ? Jump to: