T17e review. | Bitcointalksearch.org

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4256

Merit: 8551

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: nordmann666 on May 30, 2020, 05:42:14 PM

use the hiveos version for T17e until vnish will be ready

i use the hiveos version and it´s working good right now

I muscled my t17+ to run 🏃 with lower volts. my middle board does not over heat and I am getting over 63th with lower watt usage.

I used stock bitmain firmware with page inspect.

the gear starts at 17.1 volts and more often then not it sticks at 17.3 or 17.7 or 18.1

any of those settings dont over heat the center board.

if i dont do page inspect it settles@ 18.3 to 18.5 which over heats and shuts down the center board.

nordmann666

member

Activity: 363

Merit: 16

use the hiveos version for T17e until vnish will be ready

i use the hiveos version and it´s working good right now

mikeywith

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 6581

be constructive or S.T.F.U

Quote from: NotFuzzyWarm on May 26, 2020, 10:37:47 AM

Why has it been so hard for others to do the same to show proof of success for their firmware hacks?

I am curious to know if anyone actually reached out to Vnish and requested a block-finding proof and he said no? what is funny about this whole thing is that this image

is at LEAST 6 months old, antpool took their solo pool down in December 2019, it shows alive in this image, so the proof has always been there, on a side note, that person had a bit of terrible luck, hit a block in 5 hours with an S9 only for it to go to the pool, if only he made a typo in the 0,1 pools' URLs.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4256

Merit: 8551

'The right to privacy matters'

Well I have 1.8 ph of gear mining for 16 months zero blocks hit

A lot of the gear is stock bitmain.

My point is 10 s9's = 150th
100 s9's = 1.5 ph

So realistically 1000 s9's at 15ph should hit a block every 50 days

So if only 1000 s9's were done we should have had more then 7 blocks hit last 365 days. once you realize diff was less then 15.1 most of the time the last 365 days

maybe 10 blocks for every 1000 s9's with the firmware.

How many s9's have the firmware mods.
   1000
   10000
  100000
1000000

my best guess is more then 100,000 have been modded.

so 7 x 100 = 700 blocks in the last 365 days were hit with modded firmware. Good luck having more people revealing it.

The real question is why won't bitmain make decent firmware.

such as braiins. The braiins options for the s9 are great and bitmain is simply hurting every s9 owner in the world by refusing to give a similar product.

I won't get into the s11 s15 or s17 or the t15 and the t17. and all variants.

Bitmain could offer good firmware for each and every one six months after eol. they don't.

NotFuzzyWarm

legendary

Activity: 3822

Merit: 2703

Evil beware: We have waffles!

That ^^ works for me and Merit given for it.
Why has it been so hard for others to do the same to show proof of success for their firmware hacks?

favebook

sr. member

Activity: 604

Merit: 416

1st: https://imgur.com/a/iine7Ih (there are 3 photos of proof on this link)

2nd: https://imgur.com/a/A88cGia (there are 2 photos of proof on this link)

Will find more screenshots, do not worry.

Biffa

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 1220

Quote from: favebook on May 25, 2020, 01:33:48 PM

I can get you proof that there were blocks found by Vnish's firmware.

Please.

favebook

sr. member

Activity: 604

Merit: 416

Quote from: kano on May 25, 2020, 11:46:33 AM

The ones I stop are those who modify those miners with firmware that has not been tested that it finds blocks, after they change it.

I can get you proof that there were blocks found by Vnish's firmware.

mikeywith

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 6581

be constructive or S.T.F.U

Quote from: kano on May 25, 2020, 11:46:33 AM

I have a large number of miners who use Avalons on the pool that the source code has been readily available, so it is no where near 100% BM.

I have noway to confirm this claim, but it doesn't matter, 100% or 10% doesn't matter, you are still making money of Bitmain mining gears, and if you are honest about these numbers, why don't you just block bitmain gears?

Quote from: kano on May 25, 2020, 11:46:33 AM

I'm still wondering why you think I should stop people who legally buy miners from mining on my pool.

To prove that you are not a hypocrite because you said:

Quote from: kano on May 25, 2020, 11:46:33 AM

Yes Bitmain violate the licence, I have stated that many times on the forum in the past and recently.

Quote from: kano on May 25, 2020, 11:46:33 AM

The ones I stop are those who modify those miners with firmware that has not been tested that it finds blocks, after they change it.

No proof of finding blocks is the only reason you block them, you don't care about cgminer license as long as you get to make money, you curse bitmain but you don't mind thier gears mining to your pool because they make $$$.

Quote from: kano on May 25, 2020, 11:46:33 AM

Please drop the subject, I won't bother replying any more...

Stop your hypocrite nonsense, stop quoting me, and i won't be commenting on any of your future posts.

Regards.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: mikeywith on May 25, 2020, 11:24:48 AM

Quote from: kano on May 25, 2020, 10:41:38 AM

Go read the GPLv3 license that governs cgminer.

I know very well what violets the cgminer license, I know and you know that Btmian does violate the license, you said that your self, yet you have no issue with earning money by your pool which makes nearly 100% of its profit of firmware that violates this very license, hypocrisy?

Firstly, the word is 'violate'

Secondly, I have a large number of miners who use Avalons on the pool that the source code has been readily available, so it is no where near 100% BM.
In fact the largest miner on the pool is only Avalons ... the people who make them ......................
Can you please stop making up shit to make you arguments seem valid.
I have regularly told people on my pool to get Avalon miners. They are more reliable than BM as pretty much everyone knows anyway.
My miners often do get them at my suggestion.
Some of them, including some of the top miners, specifically only use Avalon miners coz they hate BM as much as me

Yes Bitmain violate the licence, I have stated that many times on the forum in the past and recently.
No need to repeat what I've already said ... as some bazaar sort of argument against me Tongue

I'm still wondering why you think I should stop people who legally buy miners from mining on my pool.
The ones I stop are those who modify those miners with firmware that has not been tested that it finds blocks, after they change it.

Please drop the subject, I won't bother replying any more, I've done it enough times to your incorrect posts, in various threads, that it's a waste of my time.

mikeywith

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 6581

be constructive or S.T.F.U

Quote from: kano on May 25, 2020, 10:41:38 AM

Go read the GPLv3 license that governs cgminer.

I know very well what violets the cgminer license, I know and you know that Btmian does violate the license, you said that your self, yet you have no issue with earning money by your pool which makes nearly 100% of its profit of firmware that violates this very license, hypocrisy?

minefarmbuy

full member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 221

We are not retail.

Quote from: kano on May 25, 2020, 09:32:13 AM

So instead you're going to parter with someone who will be violating the cgminer license.
Wow - great - thanks very much ... scumbag.

I didn't mention working with anyone specifically at this point in time.

Biffa

legendary

Activity: 3234

Merit: 1220

Quote from: mochaaa on May 20, 2020, 06:48:19 PM

There any undervolt/overclock firmware for the T17e yet?

There isn't even the option to enable the options for voltage and frequency in the web code like there is with other 17 models

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: mikeywith on May 25, 2020, 10:18:33 AM

@kano

So does Bitmain firmware, and so does your mining pool by allowing firmware made by Bitmain and Microbt which refuse to release the source code, there is no difference between all of these firmware versions as far as Cgminer license is concerned.

Go read the GPLv3 license that governs cgminer.
You do not know what you are talking about at all.

Quote

On a side note, refrain from posting twice in a row as it's against the forum rules, and your second post will be deleted or merged with the first one in the best-case scenario, and then you will likely accuse the mods of having a biased approach towards your posts which break the from rules. Roll Eyes

You are not a mod - so go find someone else to annoy.
If a mod combines my posts - then so be it - I'm not concerned - and it will probably be Frodo so he'll make more btc from the forum for doing it Tongue

mikeywith

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 6581

be constructive or S.T.F.U

@kano

So does Bitmain firmware, and so does your mining pool by allowing firmware made by Bitmain and Microbt which refuse to release the source code, there is no difference between all of these firmware versions as far as Cgminer license is concerned.

On a side note, refrain from posting twice in a row as it's against the forum rules, and your second post will be deleted or merged with the first one in the best-case scenario, and then you will likely accuse the mods of having a biased approach towards your posts which break the from rules. Roll Eyes

kano

legendary

Activity: 4592

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: minefarmbuy on May 24, 2020, 11:34:45 PM

I believe vinsh has fw for all variants but yes double check. We're hoping to partner with a dev since the 17 series aren't compatible with multiple (over three) coinbase outputs.

So instead you're going to parter with someone who will be violating the cgminer license.
Wow - great - thanks very much ... scumbag.

Quote from: mikeywith on May 20, 2020, 08:54:50 PM

None that I am aware of, the only reputable custom firmware I'd trust would be Braiin's or Vnish (Asic.to and Awesomeminer), you shouldn't trust any firmware without doing your due diligence.

You could contact taserz (Asic.to) or/and patrike (Awesomeminer) to see if they have any plans to support the T17e.

Vnish violates the cgminer license.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

favebook

sr. member

Activity: 604

Merit: 416

Vnish doesn't have firmware for "E" versions yet AFAIK. Waiting for one as well.

minefarmbuy

full member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 221

We are not retail.

I believe vinsh has fw for all variants but yes double check. We're hoping to partner with a dev since the 17 series aren't compatible with multiple (over three) coinbase outputs.

mochaaa

jr. member

Activity: 76

Merit: 3

Wish I would have known the 'E' variants were more time consuming for firmware...

mikeywith

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 6581

be constructive or S.T.F.U

None that I am aware of, the only reputable custom firmware I'd trust would be Braiin's or Vnish (Asic.to and Awesomeminer), you shouldn't trust any firmware without doing your due diligence.

You could contact taserz (Asic.to) or/and patrike (Awesomeminer) to see if they have any plans to support the T17e.

Topic: T17e review. (Read 1756 times)