Topic: T17e review. - page 2. (Read 1757 times)
There any undervolt/overclock firmware for the T17e yet?
@AlecMe
I went into great detail explaining the cause of this issue in my topic but let me summarize the part which matters for you, you have a faulty PSU.
There are mainly two types of sensor errors, one which fails to read temps on all sensors on all boards (your case), this is without a doubt a PSU issue, the other one where only a single board fails to report temps, that board has a bad chip/heatsink.
In both scenarios, you should always Sdflash that miner and then flash the latest firmware, if the problem remains, then for your case, test the miner with a different PSU.
I went into great detail explaining the cause of this issue in my topic but let me summarize the part which matters for you, you have a faulty PSU.
There are mainly two types of sensor errors, one which fails to read temps on all sensors on all boards (your case), this is without a doubt a PSU issue, the other one where only a single board fails to report temps, that board has a bad chip/heatsink.
In both scenarios, you should always Sdflash that miner and then flash the latest firmware, if the problem remains, then for your case, test the miner with a different PSU.
Anyone expericed something within the lines of:
t17e 53th
I doubted the sensors have all died, as after a forced reboot (unplug and plug back in) it works again, a couple of days max and then again the hash has disappeared.
the machine keeps running though.
Bitmain where kind to reply and gave me the SD firmware to flash on it.
To continue...
Any help, as always, is appreciated.
t17e 53th
Code:
2020-05-16 14:16:38:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:16:51:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:16:58:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:17:11:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:17:18:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:17:31:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:17:38:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:17:51:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:17:58:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:18:11:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:18:17:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:18:30:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:18:37:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:18:50:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:18:57:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:19:10:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:19:16:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:19:29:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:19:36:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:19:49:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:19:56:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:20:09:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:20:15:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:20:28:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:16:51:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:16:58:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:17:11:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:17:18:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:17:31:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:17:38:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:17:51:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:17:58:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:18:11:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:18:17:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:18:30:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 0, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:18:37:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:18:50:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:18:57:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:19:10:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:19:16:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:19:29:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 2, chip = 195, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:19:36:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:19:49:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 1, sensor = 3, chip = 180, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:19:56:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:20:09:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 0, chip = 51, reg = 1
2020-05-16 14:20:15:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 0
2020-05-16 14:20:28:temperature.c:739:get_temp_info: read temp sensor failed: chain = 2, sensor = 1, chip = 36, reg = 1
I doubted the sensors have all died, as after a forced reboot (unplug and plug back in) it works again, a couple of days max and then again the hash has disappeared.
the machine keeps running though.
Bitmain where kind to reply and gave me the SD firmware to flash on it.
To continue...
Any help, as always, is appreciated.
Interesting T17E problem raised its ugly head. Don't think its limited to this particular model but most of the *17 range.
Log file looks normal up till the moment of outage, when it switches from temperature readouts to errors reading the temp chips.
This is after over a month of uptime with no errors.
Log file looks normal up till the moment of outage, when it switches from temperature readouts to errors reading the temp chips.
This is after over a month of uptime with no errors.
Please continue to follow up. I would like to know how fast they come and how well they work.
Also I mention that some do use aftermarket firmware on the t17 so if you decide to do that let us know if that works well for you.
Also I mention that some do use aftermarket firmware on the t17 so if you decide to do that let us know if that works well for you.
We have accepted the offer. Because more machines were offered to compensate for THs loss.
Our last order was T17+ 50 THs - batch February 1-10. We still didn't receive it due to coronavirus. Seller now offers a change order to T17 40 THs, which were manufactured in Malaysia. That way Seller can send it next week. Otherwise, we need to wait more, as the Bitmain factory in China is not operating at full capacity.
If they are offering a good coupon or $ difference in return with that T17 40TH/s, I'd accept that.
Our last order was T17+ 50 THs - batch February 1-10. We still didn't receive it due to coronavirus. Seller now offers a change order to T17 40 THs, which were manufactured in Malaysia. That way Seller can send it next week. Otherwise, we need to wait more, as the Bitmain factory in China is not operating at full capacity.
My t17e's do not do spec they do 53th at 3200 watts way over on power
My 1 t17+ does better then spec it does 64-65th at 2990 watts a little higher hash then spec and at 46 or 47 watts more efficient then spec.
From Feb 2019 to Jan 2020 I ordered and my partners ordered lot of bitmain gear. 35 plus pieces
the 2 t17e's were the only gear under spec
the 1 t17+ did the best over spec.
They represent
the best (t17+) close to a full 5% better then spec
the worst (t17e) about 5% worse then spec
Does this mean you should buy t17+ ?
I have 1 coupon left I plan to buy this unit https://shop.bitmain.com/product/detail?pid=00020200107140204896zxU627b8066E
a t17+ for 1011 due to ship feb 11.
I am waiting for my last unit on order a s17 pro to ship due to ship jan 11-20.
My 1 t17+ does better then spec it does 64-65th at 2990 watts a little higher hash then spec and at 46 or 47 watts more efficient then spec.
From Feb 2019 to Jan 2020 I ordered and my partners ordered lot of bitmain gear. 35 plus pieces
the 2 t17e's were the only gear under spec
the 1 t17+ did the best over spec.
They represent
the best (t17+) close to a full 5% better then spec
the worst (t17e) about 5% worse then spec
Does this mean you should buy t17+ ?
I have 1 coupon left I plan to buy this unit https://shop.bitmain.com/product/detail?pid=00020200107140204896zxU627b8066E
a t17+ for 1011 due to ship feb 11.
I am waiting for my last unit on order a s17 pro to ship due to ship jan 11-20.
Seems like Bitmain don't have the T17+ which you have anymore, the only available type is the 57th
This one does not look much different from the T17e, which has the specs below.
The one you got does 65th at 2990w which is much more efficient than these two,that's about 46w/th which is just as efficient as the the S17e that does 64th for 2880w.
This one does not look much different from the T17e, which has the specs below.
The one you got does 65th at 2990w which is much more efficient than these two,that's about 46w/th which is just as efficient as the the S17e that does 64th for 2880w.
I can do the 2 t17e's
I have a teamviewer set to the 2 17e's
Room is in clifton super good air fans cooling
we are feeding the room filtered outside air it is 50f air right now.
full size of both units.
https://i.imgur.com/woNzZ1K.png
https://imgur.com/Fa48cOo.png
both do well at 53th
but that area has filtered air.
stable internet.
temps now stay under 80f with input air at 2 sources both filtered.
we fixed power drop to 185 volts so power is good.
It is not true data center grade but it is decent setup for mining.
I can not show the t17+ it is at a spot that I can not do a safe teamviewer connection
the t17+ is doing 64-65 th at 2990 watts
the t17e is doing 53-54th at 3200 watts
the t17+ is cooler it is better gear.
of course it is all about feeding it 3000 watts of stable power. you need to be able to do this.
I have a teamviewer set to the 2 17e's
Room is in clifton super good air fans cooling
we are feeding the room filtered outside air it is 50f air right now.
full size of both units.
https://i.imgur.com/woNzZ1K.png
https://imgur.com/Fa48cOo.png
both do well at 53th
but that area has filtered air.
stable internet.
temps now stay under 80f with input air at 2 sources both filtered.
we fixed power drop to 185 volts so power is good.
It is not true data center grade but it is decent setup for mining.
I can not show the t17+ it is at a spot that I can not do a safe teamviewer connection
the t17+ is doing 64-65 th at 2990 watts
the t17e is doing 53-54th at 3200 watts
the t17+ is cooler it is better gear.
of course it is all about feeding it 3000 watts of stable power. you need to be able to do this.
better then 64th about 66th see links
maybe I got a unicorn
maybe I got a unicorn
That is impressive to say the least, phill would you please post a screenshot of both t17e and t17+ temps and fans? I am confused about which to buy out of these three
T17,T17e,T17+, i have T17 running good, T17e on it's way but not a T17+ , my main concern is heat !
Summer here is really hot, i want to stack more of the gear that has the least temperature regardless of efficiency and price per TH among the T series, S series is a no-go.
t17+ update
so far it runs great on viabtc
better then 64th about 66th see links
https://i.imgur.com/tp1WWCX.png
https://i.imgur.com/tiUcS1j.png
maybe I got a unicorn
so far it runs great on viabtc
better then 64th about 66th see links
https://i.imgur.com/tp1WWCX.png
https://i.imgur.com/tiUcS1j.png
maybe I got a unicorn
Could you take a photo front and back of the controlboard?
maybe tomorrow.
I am a bit sick most likely the flu. I just moved it from my garage test bed to buysolar's solar array.
I don't feel up to driving back over his place at the moment.
does very well on via btc
full size
https://i.imgur.com/MExXvvX.png
this unit is a freaking beast.
64-66th
and 2990-3010 watts
i wish i had gotten two of these and only 1 t17e
to be clear my t17+ 64th crushes my t17e 50th
basically 14 or 15 th more and 300-400 watts less.
lets say 350:less watts.
at five cents is a 150 per year in power cost.
at ten cents is a 300 per year is power cost.
it is 65th lets hope it just runs.
Could you take a photo front and back of the controlboard?
t17+ in the house 64 th version
9:07 pm 3630.74kwatts on meter 65.2th
7:07 pm 3624.14kwatts on meter 65.3th
6:07 pm 3621.18kwatts on meter 65.2th
5:37 pm 3619.71kwatts on meter 65.2th
5:07 pm 3618.23kwatts on meter 64.9th
4:37 pm 3616.74kwatts on meter 65.5th
4:07 pm 3615.24kwatts on meter
so far 1500 watts in 30 minutes
doing about 65.5 th
early numbers are 3000watts /65.5th = 45.80 watts a th
now 2990 watts in 60 minutes 2990/64.9th = 46.07 watts a th
now after 3 hours 45.43 watts a th
now after 5 hours 47.54 watts a th
need to get longer reads but if true to this a nice unit
I am very impressed at the power used for my t17+ 64 th
it just arrived today
Mining here below
http://solo.ckpool.org/users/146UJM5kgzLVUV23CXCf33KQKHckoX1gx3
9:07 pm 3630.74kwatts on meter 65.2th
7:07 pm 3624.14kwatts on meter 65.3th
6:07 pm 3621.18kwatts on meter 65.2th
5:37 pm 3619.71kwatts on meter 65.2th
5:07 pm 3618.23kwatts on meter 64.9th
4:37 pm 3616.74kwatts on meter 65.5th
4:07 pm 3615.24kwatts on meter
so far 1500 watts in 30 minutes
doing about 65.5 th
early numbers are 3000watts /65.5th = 45.80 watts a th
now 2990 watts in 60 minutes 2990/64.9th = 46.07 watts a th
now after 3 hours 45.43 watts a th
now after 5 hours 47.54 watts a th
need to get longer reads but if true to this a nice unit
I am very impressed at the power used for my t17+ 64 th
it just arrived today
Mining here below
http://solo.ckpool.org/users/146UJM5kgzLVUV23CXCf33KQKHckoX1gx3
Code:
{
"hashrate1m": "68.3T",
"hashrate5m": "66.6T",
"hashrate1hr": "19.8T",
"hashrate1d": "980G",
"hashrate7d": "1.48T",
"lastshare": 1578086807,
"workers": 2,
"shares": 26698540695,
"bestshare": 13461125718.35872,
"bestever": 13461125718,
"worker": [
{
"workername": "146UJM5kgzLVUV23CXCf33KQKHckoX1gx3",
"hashrate1m": "68.3T",
"hashrate5m": "66.6T",
"hashrate1hr": "19.8T",
"hashrate1d": "980G",
"hashrate7d": "1.48T",
"lastshare": 1578086807,
"shares": 26666371071,
"bestshare": 13461125718.35872,
"bestever": 13461125718
}
]
}
stratum+tcp://btc.viabtc.com:3333
philipma1957new.249t17plus
x
I see. Well, I hope you can get a firmware out for T17e series.
I have the opposite problem. They stop hashing when it becomes too cold. Say -13C oustside temp, not sure what’s it inside the data center.
Most miners I have seen have 0-40C range.
The new 17 series of miner S17,T17 Do not like the cold with their firmware. If you load my aftermarket firmware it slowly warms up the chips if it is too cold out and will still run. We have a client in Siberia that runs them at -20C
yeah my one t17e running well in a warm room 80f
and my other t17e running poorly in a cold room 30f this will soon be put into place in clifton the warmer room.
and my other t17e running poorly in a cold room 30f this will soon be put into place in clifton the warmer room.
Jump to: