Well here in Dubai you have to win the toss if you want the advantage.
No matter how big your D*ick is you are going to choke 99% if you lose the toss, unless you are Netherland facing Kiwis or Singapore facing India. It's bound to happen, you just have to accept it. There might be some exception when your opposition shit the bed which is very possible in cricket but having said that Dubai wicket is not suitable for any multiple team tournament at all. We do have last 20 matches numbers, if you still think otherwise then you are fucked as cricket fans.
I have seen this factor as well, but I am not very sure why is this so prevalent in Dubai. Last year it was understandable as the dew was playing a very important factor there and the team batting second was getting a huge advantage. But now here dew is not that much in the ground. Also teams batting first are also winning but yes Winning the toss and choosing the correct team has become really important in Dubai, which obviously sucks. But I don't know what can be changed in the ground for changing this fate. Dubai wicket is quite bad no doubt about that. I think Dubai is the favourite choice for Asia cup because there you will find supporters of all these nations ready to pay huge money so becomes very profitable event for ICC.
It was surprising to see renowned Pakistani batsmen struggling against second string bowlers such as Pramod Madushan and Maheesh Theekshana. And then the spinners (Wanindu Hasaranga and Dhananjaya de Silva) finished the work that was started by the pacers.
These second-string dead bowling did cause India to be eliminated from the Asia Cup
Pakistanis have a habit of spreading such fake conspiracy theories,
And what about the Indians? They think they are the king of cricket because of IPL but the reality is that they can't win against Pakistan and Srilanka.
Don't worry about it. It was a genuine mistake, they made this tournament unnecessary long after the group matches. It should've been knockout but what can we do? Nothing I guess.
I really like this format instead of going straight to the knockout, anyone can beat anyone on a given day and might be lucky to reach the finals. in this format only strong teams will be progressed and weak teams are exposed. I must say, the final should also be best of three, instead of one.
I think luck can still play a factor anyways, Pakistan for example after defeat in the Group match was lucky to have won against India in Super 4, not to forget the lucky win against Afghanistan which came out of nowhere. But anyways if eventually, it is going to be a super 4 why not just start with Super 6 in the first place? Just because no one will see the matches with Hong Kong?