Lanka Premium League
As we know that the T20 World Cup has now finished and India has won the trophy. And now after that the Lanka Premium League has been started and 3 matches already been played. And today there are 2 matches between these 4 teams.
Dambulla Sixers vs Jaffna Kings
Colombo Strikers vs Galle Marvels
There are only 5 teams which are participating in this league. Four are mentioned above and 5th one is Kandy Falcon. And according to the current situation CLS, KAF and GAM has 2-2-2 points. So let's see with today match which team will climb in points table.
Topic: T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion - page 144. (Read 232284 times)
Lmao. What investigation are you talking about? This is all just silly talk basically. Sky clearly took the catch properly without touching the boundary rope and dumb haters are just trying to spread nonsense.
Anyone with a half-decent brain wouldn't even bother discussing this stuff since it wasn't controversial at all. Think!
People should raise questions about the mentality and performance of South African players instead of raising questions about the catch. South Africa wouldn't even won the match if it was a six. 30 runs were required from 30 balls, and they let it happen to 16 runs from last 6 balls. They have lost the match in the same way as the way they won against Bangladesh and Nepal.Anyone with a half-decent brain wouldn't even bother discussing this stuff since it wasn't controversial at all. Think!
There are always replacements; it's better to replace than having veteran in team who is not performing. Anyway Washington Sundar and Axar Patel are couple Jadeja replacements that come to the mind.
There were already talks about giving young players chance even before this t20wc started, and replacing the guys like Rohit and Kohli.
Yeh Axar Patel really showed his talent in recent world cup and some how we can say he has huge role in that world cup winning because he took handsome wickets throughout the tournament in every critical match when team are in danger. So he can easily fit jaddu place while Washington hasn't showed any ordinary performance in international duty so we can't say anything about him while for Kohli and Rohit I think they already have several player who really took that responsibility like we have the young jasiwal, Gill and the emerging player of thier IPL season A.Sharma of Surpriser Hyderabad who can not only played aggressive as a oppner in power play but bowled critical overs too when needed while they have Rinku too to filled the Middle order too. But I believe they are youngster they will took time to perform better in higher level where pressure are at peak level. There were already talks about giving young players chance even before this t20wc started, and replacing the guys like Rohit and Kohli.
By the way that's not a right thing you are blaming only one person for the match losing. Which I think is not good. Because in my point of view he was holding the wickets because holding wickets was also an important matter of a match. They tried well but unfortunately they lost. Buy saying that Miller is responsible for this I don't agree on it. First of all I will blame the South African bowlers who did not able to stop the score and India made 176 runs. If they control the score to South Africa could win the Final match. So I will blame the whole team. Not only a one man.
Not really following it yet but LPL is already in progress and currently, the third match of this league is in progress between Colombo Strikers and Kandy Falcons. I do not like this experiment of 16-17th over fielding restrictions as it will make things more difficult for the bowlers. We do not only want to see the fours and sixes and bowlers having no impact on the game 
And for the Major League Cricket, the matches will be played at Morrisville and Dallas, the focus is to make the USA a hub of cricket too. Since the matches being played at the USA and being a first world country, there is no doubt that in the coming years it will attract the players around the world after the IPL.
And for the Major League Cricket, the matches will be played at Morrisville and Dallas, the focus is to make the USA a hub of cricket too. Since the matches being played at the USA and being a first world country, there is no doubt that in the coming years it will attract the players around the world after the IPL.
This time Major League Cricket will be much more popular and visible in the United States. The hosting of T20 World Cup a few weeks ago was a big boost for the American cricket and there will be much more interest in MLC from now onwards. And a number of superstars are participating this time, including Sunil Narine, Kieron Pollard, Pat Cummins, Wayne Parnell, Faf du Plessis, Dwayne Bravo and Steve Smith. And teams from all over US are being represented, and they are planning an expansion next year.
Anyone following the Lanka Premier League? This time they have introduced a feature called "power blast". It means that during 16th and 17th overs of the innings, only four players will be permitted outside the 30-yard circle. LPL 2024 is scheduled to happen from 1st July to 21st July, but there is an overlap with Major League Cricket in the USA (5th July to 28th July). And without any doubt, MLC is much more popular compared to LPL in major markets such as India and Middle-east.
Not really following it yet but LPL is already in progress and currently, the third match of this league is in progress between Colombo Strikers and Kandy Falcons. I do not like this experiment of 16-17th over fielding restrictions as it will make things more difficult for the bowlers. We do not only want to see the fours and sixes and bowlers having no impact on the game
And for the Major League Cricket, the matches will be played at Morrisville and Dallas, the focus is to make the USA a hub of cricket too. Since the matches being played at the USA and being a first world country, there is no doubt that in the coming years it will attract the players around the world after the IPL.
Kenya Quadrangular Cup, 2024. Zambia Vs Kenya match. Zambia won the toss and elected to bat first. Zambia started fairly well. Mohammad Bhaidu played very good innings. he made 62 runs from 44 balls six boundaries and four over boundary. Kenyan bollwer tried bowling under control. Towards the end, the Zambian batter was out too soon, Zambia managed to score 153 runs off 8 wickets in 20 overs. Kenya opened their batting with a target of 154 runs.Tanzeel Sheikh and Shem Ngoche played quite well. Especially Shem Ngoche played very good innings he made twenty-eight runs out of twelve deliveries.Kenya reached their target in 16.5 overs.
Anyone following the Lanka Premier League? This time they have introduced a feature called "power blast". It means that during 16th and 17th overs of the innings, only four players will be permitted outside the 30-yard circle. LPL 2024 is scheduled to happen from 1st July to 21st July, but there is an overlap with Major League Cricket in the USA (5th July to 28th July). And without any doubt, MLC is much more popular compared to LPL in major markets such as India and Middle-east.
Colombo Strikers vs Kandy Falcons 3rd match today both teams have already entered the field. This match has started at Pallekele International Cricket Stadium, Pallekele. The performance of the batsmen between the two teams will depend on which team will win this match. Colombo Strikers The team came out to bat and set a target of 198 runs for the loss of 7 wickets in 20 overs. Colombo Strikers team batsman Sadeera Samarawickrama was out for 28 runs in 26 balls. Muhammad Waseem was out for 32 runs in 18 balls. Kandy Falcons team batsmen overcame this run to win the match.It will be very difficult.
People should raise questions about the mentality and performance of South African players instead of raising questions about the catch. South Africa wouldn't even won the match if it was a six. 30 runs were required from 30 balls, and they let it happen to 16 runs from last 6 balls. They have lost the match in the same way as the way they won against Bangladesh and Nepal.
Well, if it was a six, then for sure South Africa would not be needing 16 in the last overs as they would have the more set batsmen still on the crease and the runs required would have been a lot less in the last over, making less pressure on the south African team. That was a crucial catch and it turned the game in the favor of the Indian team.
Anyway, there is no need to think if that would have happened or that would have not happen, because nothing can be changed now. The teams has thier chances in that final and India come out to be a better team.
Lmao. What investigation are you talking about? This is all just silly talk basically. Sky clearly took the catch properly without touching the boundary rope and dumb haters are just trying to spread nonsense.
Anyone with a half-decent brain wouldn't even bother discussing this stuff since it wasn't controversial at all. Think!
People should raise questions about the mentality and performance of South African players instead of raising questions about the catch. South Africa wouldn't even won the match if it was a six. 30 runs were required from 30 balls, and they let it happen to 16 runs from last 6 balls. They have lost the match in the same way as the way they won against Bangladesh and Nepal. Anyone with a half-decent brain wouldn't even bother discussing this stuff since it wasn't controversial at all. Think!
It's true that some people put allegations on ICC for favouring India in sky catch at such crutical stage where miller can easily divert results in thier favour but I think it's all about third umpire and ICC so soon investigation will get things out of some cheating or wrong decision has happened.
Hey bro, South Africa are known to be a sloppy team which was made more evident by their final defeat. 30 runs needed from 30 balls when Henry Klaassen got out At this moment if South Africa had played with a single run per ball then South Africa would have easily won the match. 99 percent of cricket fans thought South Africa would win the cup but I was in no way prepared for South Africa to lose like that. However, I only blame David Miller for the loss of this match. Despite having such a responsible and aggressive cricketer like him, why finish the game like this in the last over. In no way will I blame anyone else in South Africa, only David Miller was responsible for losing this match.
India vs Zimbabwe starting soon. Am excited for this one since India is testing out many young and successful IPL players like Parag, Mukesh Kumar, Avesh, Rinku, Jaiswal, Gaikwad etc.
Gill is the captain. This is a great opportunity for them to prove themselves on the international stage and Zimbabwe players to try and rise back up.
Gill is the captain. This is a great opportunity for them to prove themselves on the international stage and Zimbabwe players to try and rise back up.
The South African team was the main reason for their defeat here, enough said the performance of the South African team. But when opening batsmen get out very easily, opening batsman Reeza Hendricks has performed abysmal. And another player Markram did not perform well as captain.
How can a team win where key batsmen get out so easily, Satran's deficiency in Reeza Hendricks and Markram would have been compensated if they could have performed a little better. However, the batsmen of the first offensive phase are the main reason for the South African team not winning.
Talking about the opener Reeza Hendricks, he was the first wicket of the team South Africa and he was out by Jasprit Bumrah as Bumrah gave ball too fast inside outswing and even with the naked eye it was a treat to watch and it was even better as we saw in slow motionand in zoom. The ball took a bounce like it would go in but went outside and directly hit to the stumps. It also could be played but the ball was too fast which caused of Reeza Hendricks wicket and the South African team also lost their opening wicket early at the score of 7 runs.
You are right I also think South Africa loses only the slow batting of David Miller. David Miller takes retirement from T20 cricket with a sad back of not winning the World Cup. David Miller is a good player but unfortunately, he could not finish the match sadly he is retiring from international cricket he had tears in his eyes when the presentation of the match was going on it is really sad that a team that won If he loses. David Miller played very slow cricket in the final match of the World Cup only scoring 21 runs from 17 balls with only 1 boundary hit. if he played aggressively then South Africa easily won the tournament final. in the last over they tried well but the catch was taken on the boundary and lost the final match by a narrow margin.
By the way that's not a right thing you are blaming only one person for the match losing. Which I think is not good. Because in my point of view he was holding the wickets because holding wickets was also an important matter of a match. They tried well but unfortunately they lost. Buy saying that Miller is responsible for this I don't agree on it. First of all I will blame the South African bowlers who did not able to stop the score and India made 176 runs. If they control the score to South Africa could win the Final match. So I will blame the whole team. Not only a one man.The South African team was the main reason for their defeat here, enough said the performance of the South African team. But when opening batsmen get out very easily, opening batsman Reeza Hendricks has performed abysmal. And another player Markram did not perform well as captain.
How can a team win where key batsmen get out so easily, Satran's deficiency in Reeza Hendricks and Markram would have been compensated if they could have performed a little better. However, the batsmen of the first offensive phase are the main reason for the South African team not winning.
You are right I also think South Africa loses only the slow batting of David Miller. David Miller takes retirement from T20 cricket with a sad back of not winning the World Cup. David Miller is a good player but unfortunately, he could not finish the match sadly he is retiring from international cricket he had tears in his eyes when the presentation of the match was going on it is really sad that a team that won If he loses. David Miller played very slow cricket in the final match of the World Cup only scoring 21 runs from 17 balls with only 1 boundary hit. if he played aggressively then South Africa easily won the tournament final. in the last over they tried well but the catch was taken on the boundary and lost the final match by a narrow margin.
By the way that's not a right thing you are blaming only one person for the match losing. Which I think is not good. Because in my point of view he was holding the wickets because holding wickets was also an important matter of a match. They tried well but unfortunately they lost. Buy saying that Miller is responsible for this I don't agree on it. First of all I will blame the South African bowlers who did not able to stop the score and India made 176 runs. If they control the score to South Africa could win the Final match. So I will blame the whole team. Not only a one man.The second wicket of the South African player was too much important as it was the wicket of their captain who played very well in the past. One and the only Aiden Markram was out by Arshdeep Singh, he gave ball onto the off side and it was swinging in a different direction. Let me explain. He gave a ball that was going to off side slowly and Aiden Markram thought he could hit on it and take a single but the bat took the edge was and Pant picked that catch very easily and Aiden Markram lost his wicket on just 4 runs while he used 5 balls.
Markram? That dude was out of form since IPL 2024 which is why his wicket didn't really matter much. What mattered far more were the wickets of De Kock, Klaasen and Miller who almost took the game away from India.For me, the game-changing moments were Klaasen throwing away his wicket and Sky taking Miller's catch under insane pressure.
You really blame Markram's wicket when they only lost match in last couple overs?
A match is won from the top order players and we saw both Reeza Hendricks and Aiden Markram got out cheaply. Yes i know that they lost the way in the last few overs but then if they had one more batter after David Miller (the upper batting order played with more responsibility), the results would have been in South Africans favor.Yes, they didn't have batter or batting all-rounder cushion in lower-middle order but still I disagree that top-order needs to perform to win the game, they can fail, and when that happens someone from rest of batters needs to perform, and Klassen did completely overcame deficiency of top-order fail in finale.
David Miller takes retirement from T20 cricket with a sad back of not winning the World Cup.
I search Google after reading your comment, there is nothing about Miller's retirement. Are you sure? 
You shouldn't trust anything that comes from social media, specifically fb. Though, If news is from official handles, it can be trusted. In this case, no announcement from David Miller himself, or the SA cricket handle — so this news is a hoax.
You are right I also think South Africa loses only the slow batting of David Miller. David Miller takes retirement from T20 cricket with a sad back of not winning the World Cup. David Miller is a good player but unfortunately, he could not finish the match sadly he is retiring from international cricket he had tears in his eyes when the presentation of the match was going on it is really sad that a team that won If he loses. David Miller played very slow cricket in the final match of the World Cup only scoring 21 runs from 17 balls with only 1 boundary hit. if he played aggressively then South Africa easily won the tournament final. in the last over they tried well but the catch was taken on the boundary and lost the final match by a narrow margin.
By the way that's not a right thing you are blaming only one person for the match losing. Which I think is not good. Because in my point of view he was holding the wickets because holding wickets was also an important matter of a match. They tried well but unfortunately they lost. Buy saying that Miller is responsible for this I don't agree on it. First of all I will blame the South African bowlers who did not able to stop the score and India made 176 runs. If they control the score to South Africa could win the Final match. So I will blame the whole team. Not only a one man. 
David Miller takes retirement from T20 cricket with a sad back of not winning the World Cup.
I search Google after reading your comment, there is nothing about Miller's retirement. Are you sure?
Same here, i also found nothing about David Miller's retirement. Maybe he needs to share the link from where he read this news or maybe there are too many fake posts in social media
Jump to: