Topic: [Table] Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos - page 12. (Read 12914 times)

Thanks! Mahdirakib also reported on Chips.gg's new fees a few weeks ago. I haven't updated the thread yet, but it's the next thing I am planning to do now during the winter holidays. 

I think Cloudbet has dynamic withdrawal fees, but there is no mention of the amounts anywhere on the payments page if I remembered it correctly. The numbers in the table are based on the information I got from their live support the last time I asked. I will change it to dynamic if needed with the next update.   

Chips.gg reduced their minimum withdrawal amount from BTC.0005 to BTC.0002 but the fees remain the same.

Cloudbet also reduced their withdrawal fees by a lot, right now they're only charging BTC.000032 but i'm not sure if it's fixed or dynamic though.

Definitely a great table. 
OP has reduced a lot of valuable information into one table that is convenient for analysis and searching for the option that suits you.  It seems to me that the problem here is only to maintain up-to-date information, constantly monitor changes in commissions and some other payments that may arise in each particular casino.  This is a rather laborious process.  It takes a lot of time to check because everything flows, everything changes.  But for a general acquaintance with the situation, the table, even at each current moment of time, is of course good. 

I would also like to thank OP for the work done.!!!

However, those who actually gamble check all the sites announced in this forum and decide to use those sites through their own recharge.  But this topic will help not only the newbies but also everyone to know the withdrawal limit, fees and other issues of any gambling site very easily. So this topic is considered as an important topic for gamblers . i appraised op's work Because he did enough research and hard work to make this list

Thank you for sharing this valuable information with us. I can imagine how much effort it had taken to compile this information.
However, it would be beneficial for us to make the right choice and the right decision. Keep it up, guys,

Resolved only due to the noise that was created and the pressure and negative feedback their actions sparked on Bitcointalk. I see no honesty or professionalism in what they do. In a different case from the one I mentioned, they banned a user and confiscated his coins. After the person created a scam accusation and reported about it on AskGamblers, they now want to investigate why the account was banned. So there way of doing business seems to be banning and accusing players of wrongdoings. If they complain and generate negative vibes, they will investigate what happened.

I doubt they will ever be back in my threads.   

There is still one on going accusation against Trustdice https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/trustdicewin-scam-my-own-money-750-funds-returned-5430895
After reading some posts in that thread, it seems that the case is the same as what experienced by Laki2100 (the one whose issue is resolved).
Of course we need to wait for the rep of trustdice to reply in the new accusation thread to make it fair as we need to hear from both sides.
For now it is better to keep Trustdice out of the list and maybe they will not do another mistakes in the future so Pmalek may add them back in the list.

Have appreciated with OP removing some casino gambling have problem with KYC, I will note and add several scam accusation thread complaint about their withdrawing not process yet and account freeze until suspend based on several reason kinds. But any have ideas from OP when some casino gambling require for KYC when try huge withdrawing fund, they not have term or service should pass KYC at the beginning time joining with casino gambling.

Rule have submit KYC after winning huge amount and try for withdrawing all fund, I have saw many people complaint about KYC require and procedure why have to submit when withdrawing moment, why deposit fund success with account still not success KYC.

OP said that he has received his withdrawal, as well as a bonus of $100. The accusation should be considered as resolved, isn't it? At first TrustDice representative said that OP had done something illegal (late betting activity), but they have paid him finally by discussing about it with their risk management team. However, the representative didn't mention whether the problem was from their server or not. But the good thing is that the user has received his funds.

I appreciate your decision of removing TrustDice from your thread, but I would like to still keep them in the crypto casinos KYC and bonus details thread as they have paid the user.

Late betting is a thing and players who do it on a regular basis get banned or limited on other platforms as well. But several things have to come together for live betting to work and it doesn't work the way the casino spokesperson explained it in the scam accusation thread.

They were saying that the player placed bets after the matches ended. That's not true. The one example they showed, it was proven based on the timestamps that the wager was placed with around 8-9 minutes left on the clock in the 4tq quarter. Late-betting can work if you have a fast video source or if you are live at the venue. You also need a bookie that gets live data slower than you where you will place your bets. If you manage to couple those two things together, you might get an unfair advantage of a few seconds, but certainly not minutes like Trustdice was trying to prove. Most sportsbooks I know don't accept live bets on any markets in the last 1-2 minutes, so there is no chance you can place a bet when the match has finished. You can test this yourself. Open a live basketball match on a sportsbook and check if it's possible to place bets in the last 1-2 minutes. The one exception I can think of is if the match is a tie and the result can go either way but probably not then either.

First time I heard about something called late bets and using that to freeze customer funds and calling this a cheating.
I didn't see they provided any proof for this accusations but I wouldn't use Trustdice anymore, and I will add them to my red list of casinos that should be avoided.

Trustdice.win has now been removed from this thread as well as my other thread, List Of Crypto Casinos with The Best Faucets. I consider them untrustworthy with the way they handled the previously mentioned scam accusation, and suggest that players do their gambling elsewhere.

This thread will be updated with the changes as suggested by Mahdirakib soon and I will also check if the info about the other casinos is correct or needs changing. 

Please be careful if you are playing or if you consider to start playing on Trustdice.win.

There is an active and valid scam accusation against this platform for locking and confiscating a player's deposit and accusing the player of partaking in "late betting" activities.
Delayed payments on trustdice.win, UPD: TRUSTDICE SCAM, 2138$ USDT confiscated

No proof whatsoever has been shown that such actions took place. The forum admin of Trustdice showed one example trying to make it look like the player placed a live bet after the match had already ended. There is proof, however, that this bet was made with 8-9 minutes left on the clock in the 4th quarter.

Trustdice.win can be found on my table in OP. I am still giving them the benefit of the doubt and waiting if they will post some actual proof. If that doesn't happen, I will remove them. Until that time, avoid this bookmaker because your money could be confiscated if you win.

Thanks, I appreciate the updates. It's time I checked the data of all these casinos to make sure the correct ones are in the table, and when I do I will take into consideration the information you provided.

Regarding Bets.io and the withdrawal limits, I rarely consult FAQs or TOS pages when I check that. I inspect the payments/withdrawal pages. In 90% of the cases, the correct numbers are written there when you initiate the withdrawal process. I look for other ways only when that is not the case.

@Pmalek, Here are some updates for you.
• Bets.io: Their minimum withdrawal limit is 0.0012 BTC now and they don't charge anything as withdrawal fee. However, Bets.io FAQ page still showing the old withdrawal limit information of 0.0008 BTC. Check the review of GamblingBro to make it sure that they don't charge any withdrawal fee (see here).
• Chips.gg: Minimum withdrawal has been reduced to 0.0002 BTC. The withdrawal fee is still same.
• Owl.Games: Minimum withdrawal amount is 0.0002 BTC now. The fee is 0.00028+ BTC at this moment (It goes up and down).

Be advised though that this is not a top list of casinos ranked from best to worst. The choice which gambling platform you want to trust with your money should be yours alone after conducting thorough research. I am also not sure who you are agreeing with since I never praised or criticized Primedice in this thread. 

Excellent review! I agree that Primedice is a really good casino and I play in it now. But the first casino I started playing was fairspin and it is a very decent, I think it should be in the top 20

As long as I work with them as a campaign manager, I will try to guide them. I also advised them to completely rework the functionality of the Bitcoin faucet, and make some additions to the demo version, and as far as I know, they quickly responded and started implementing the proposed ideas.

Thanks for the update. I see they mentioned they have now hired more professional individuals to correct the mistakes made by the people who worked for them in the past, particularly the representative they had on Bitcointalk. This is a positive change. Since it's entirely possible that those wrong claims can be solely attributed to that person because they didn't know better, I will give them the benefit of the doubt. It's also true that everyone needs a supervisor or a boss to oversee what they are doing, so someone above the forum representative's paygrade should have noticed the UK license claims and advised the staff member to remove it. But it's a thing of the past now. Except that incident, I don't remember seeing any accusations against the casino by the community.

I will consider adding them to the table with the next update.