Ideally, you'd rotate the picture before wiping EXIF.
Or just not strip non-sensitive EXIF tags in the first place, by allowing a whitelist of safe tags. Note that rotating a JPEG can't be performed losslessly unless its size is a multiple of its macroblock size (usually 16 pixels). 
Topic: TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk - page 14. (Read 20188 times)
I'll check if I can implement some rotation function at upload time.
Ideally, you'd rotate the picture before wiping EXIF.Yes, I have to check how I can put this function, in the edit option that exists at the time of upload.
@fillippone how does the image appear in the thumbnail that appears, before clicking upload? Does it appear in the correct position or not?
I'll check if I can implement some rotation function at upload time.
Ideally, you'd rotate the picture before wiping EXIF. This time it is difficult that the picture were taken with strange orientations…
I am pretty sure the crane was vertical and gravity was properly working.
I am pretty sure the crane was vertical and gravity was properly working.
This happens, because the image orientation rules are in the metadata - EXIF, and the EXIF are removed as soon as you upload.
I'll check if I can implement some rotation function at upload time.
Today first time I am trying to use talkImg but every time when I am trying to upload image it's not working and message appearing error 401 anyone can give update about this error why I am facing this issue.
With I want to use this what is the best way of having this in good and easy working, thanks.
With I want to use this what is the best way of having this in good and easy working, thanks.
I have not received any information about any problems with the service, nor is there any record of downtime.
This could be a problem with your connection. Did you use Tor or a VPN? Can you provide more information on how you tried to access the site?
Today first time I am trying to use talkImg but every time when I am trying to upload image it's not working and message appearing error 401 anyone can give update about this error why I am facing this issue.
With I want to use this what is the best way of having this in good and easy working, thanks.
With I want to use this what is the best way of having this in good and easy working, thanks.
From time to time I experience problems like this:
<…>
<…>
This happened again:
<….>
Damn, talking, why are you doing this to me…
Damn, talking, why are you doing this to me…
This time it is difficult that the picture were taken with strange orientations…
I am pretty sure the crane was vertical and gravity was properly working.
Outside the forum?
I don't think so as the service is hardly visible on the top search results of different search engines if someone is looking for image hosting sites unless if the person types up the full name of the search in the search space.
Also, there are very few forums that are fashioned like bitcointalk when it comes to posting images so this would make me think the Bitcointalk and altcointalk members are mainly the only peoples frequently using the service
I don't think so as the service is hardly visible on the top search results of different search engines if someone is looking for image hosting sites unless if the person types up the full name of the search in the search space.
Also, there are very few forums that are fashioned like bitcointalk when it comes to posting images so this would make me think the Bitcointalk and altcointalk members are mainly the only peoples frequently using the service
Yeah, that's pretty much what I meant - btctalk forum members would use it in other places (and maybe recommend it to others etc), like the altcoinstalk forum, or other, lesser-known forums that use the same or similar engines.
I know I do, and probably I'm not the only one.
Drop in uploads from June of -228 is only a 3.7%. The overall activity of bitcointalk (number of posts) dropped by over 14% (according to ninjastic.space), which probably indicates that TalkImg is no longer only used on this forum and probably has spread to other parts of the internet.
It could even be. But it's unlikely. Around +90% of visits to the website are direct, that is, people who go directly to talkimg.com. This means that they are people who already know the site.
Over the past year, you've already noticed that there are periods with more uploads and others with fewer uploads.
I don't think so as the service is hardly visible on the top search results of different search engines if someone is looking for image hosting sites unless if the person types up the full name of the search in the search space.
Probably most of those users have an account here and uses talkimg to post images on other platforms too ( i'm one of these users too). Because as you said, the site doesn't have google seo metrics to show up in google top pages unless visited or search directly. 
Drop in uploads from June of -228 is only a 3.7%. The overall activity of bitcointalk (number of posts) dropped by over 14% (according to ninjastic.space), which probably indicates that TalkImg is no longer only used on this forum and probably has spread to other parts of the internet.
Outside the forum?I don't think so as the service is hardly visible on the top search results of different search engines if someone is looking for image hosting sites unless if the person types up the full name of the search in the search space.
Also, there are very few forums that are fashioned like bitcointalk when it comes to posting images so this would make me think the Bitcointalk and altcointalk members are mainly the only peoples frequently using the service
The numbers for this month of July may be a little lower than the previous month, but that was because in the months of May/June we had a greater movement due to the pizza competition. Another interesting point is that this month more images were seen on the forum than before, with more than 1TB of bandwidth used.
Drop in uploads from June of -228 is only a 3.7%. The overall activity of bitcointalk (number of posts) dropped by over 14% (according to ninjastic.space), which probably indicates that TalkImg is no longer only used on this forum and probably has spread to other parts of the internet.
Anyhow, thanks for the great work!
I've sent you a small tip and would encourage others to do the same. Donation addresses are at the bottom of the page.
Statistics July 2024____________________
The numbers for this month of July may be a little lower than the previous month, but that was because in the months of May/June we had a greater movement due to the pizza competition. Another interesting point is that this month more images were seen on the forum than before, with more than 1TB of bandwidth used.
Since July, it has been possible to make donations via LN: [email protected] I believe it is useful for those users who prefer to use LN to make donations.
Personally, I continued to prefer SegWit directly: bc1qhwnncpdd8gfzqwjkk9n052wf7g9mvks3xaa7qa
Regardless of how you support TalkImg, whether by donating or using this service, I am very grateful. Without you, this project would not be possible, to be what it is today and it is here to continue. It's just that today I can continue guaranteeing it.
Here are the numbers for the month:
 | Number of uploads in the month: 5 991 (-228 that in the last month) |
 | Total disk space in the month: 2GB (+0.17 that in the last month) |
 | Number of visits to the talkimg.com website in the month: 6 923 (-5 896 that in the last month) Estimated number of times images were viewed on the forum in the month (hits): 5 943 001 (+1552k that in the last month) Bandwidth in the month: 1.08TB (+270GB that in the last month) |
Top 3 Images Viewed
In development...
I'm still not very familiar with LN, but is that a negative?
I would have expected a much lower transaction fee for LN. As in: 2 sats instead of more than 400.I am not sure what wallet you were using (joker-josue) (or whether your wallet matters?), but I was sending from a Phoenix wallet, and I did not do anything except scan the barcode through the Phoenix App, and then chose the number of sats that I was sending, which was changing from the 1 sats in the invoice to send 102,594 sats, and so the total with the fee was 103,008.376 sats. As far as I know, there was no option to change the fees, yet I was not using the wallet in any kind of advanced user way, I just sent from what was in front of me.
I'm still not very familiar with LN, but is that a negative?
I would have expected a much lower transaction fee for LN. As in: 2 sats instead of more than 400.But will I be able to control this, or is it the responsibility of the wallet I'm using?
I'm still not very familiar with LN, but is that a negative?
I would have expected a much lower transaction fee for LN. As in: 2 sats instead of more than 400. O.k. I just tested it out. It looks like it came as an invoice for 1 satoshi, but the invoice could be edited to change the amount, which I did, and it looks like my payment went through with two hops and fees of around $0.29 (414.376 satoshis).
Thanks for the support.
I'm still not very familiar with LN, but is that a negative?
TalkImg Info____________________
I inform you that it is now possible to make donations via Lightning (LN).
If you are interested in making donations this way, simply use: [email protected]
Thank you for all your support!
O.k. I just tested it out. It looks like it came as an invoice for 1 satoshi, but the invoice could be edited to change the amount, which I did, and it looks like my payment went through with two hops and fees of around $0.29 (414.376 satoshis).
TalkImg Info____________________
I inform you that it is now possible to make donations via Lightning (LN).
If you are interested in making donations this way, simply use: [email protected]
Thank you for all your support!
https://res.cloudinary.com/dexi5ilcj/image/upload/v1721845968/IMG_2769_ftvkji.jpg
https://res.cloudinary.com/dexi5ilcj/image/upload/a_90/v1721845968/IMG_2769_ftvkji.jpg
It's great to see that just add a_90 I think if @joker_josue add TalkImg another features that increase the images regulations.
https://res.cloudinary.com/dexi5ilcj/image/upload/a_90/v1721845968/IMG_2769_ftvkji.jpg
It's great to see that just add a_90 I think if @joker_josue add TalkImg another features that increase the images regulations.
Without a doubt, it had very interesting features. But I don't know if the costs are worth it for the main objective.
Either way, I will think of situations that could be useful.
From time to time I experience problems like this:
Of course the image is right on my phone.
In the past republishing fixes the problem, but not this time.
On other occasion, the preview is tilted, but the full image is correct.
What am I doing wrong?
Of course the image is right on my phone.
In the past republishing fixes the problem, but not this time.
On other occasion, the preview is tilted, but the full image is correct.
What am I doing wrong?
Here's the default image you uploaded using talkimg.com re-uploaded to Cloudinary by myself.
Here's the final rotated url-based image I transformed by simply including the rotation parameter (a_90 for a 90 degrees rotation in between the URL after the /upload.
https://res.cloudinary.com/dexi5ilcj/image/upload/v1721845968/IMG_2769_ftvkji.jpg
https://res.cloudinary.com/dexi5ilcj/image/upload/a_90/v1721845968/IMG_2769_ftvkji.jpg
It's great to see that just add a_90 I think if @joker_josue add TalkImg another features that increase the images regulations.
Jump to: