Pages:
Author

Topic: [TAT.VIRTUALMINE] - page 8. (Read 39878 times)

full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 22, 2013, 08:03:09 AM
Why cant you just reply to a PM man.. seriously..  Sad
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Bitcoin Play!
June 22, 2013, 08:01:46 AM
ThickAsThieves is now outright lying - he is making up an imaginary user that have talked to him on IRC for 4 hours?!??

I never used IRC in my life!
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
June 22, 2013, 08:00:03 AM
After looking at the share price - holy shit - I am glad I never invested in this. I won't be in the future unless TAT makes it right for everyone.

I think everyone defending TAT is actually him or his accomplices? Why would you defend an investment that is, and has constantly lost money and your losses are funneled towards the issuer? I have no proof that they are sockpuppets, but he seems to accuse everyone of being a sockpuppet(s).

A moderator could probably confirm that I have never posted from any account but this one. I don't have time to play socking games.

full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 22, 2013, 07:57:33 AM
TAT can you atleast reply to the PM i sent you.. not too much of a hassle...
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
June 22, 2013, 07:55:16 AM
I appreciate the support guys, you have no idea.

I spent literally 4 hours trying to reason with this guy via chat. It all boils down to him wanting special treatment to erase his risks.

My wife just said to me, "Well if you don't have haters, you haven't made it, have you?" Heh.
hero member
Activity: 656
Merit: 500
June 22, 2013, 07:53:10 AM
To be honest, TAT is nowhere near to scammer, eventhough he probably made this bond purely on getting fast BTC to get more shares of AM in sight of completing 5k for a board seat. He still did this so people would actually profit on this marginally. But ofcourse you are gambling in a way on whatever BFL,AVALON etc starts shipping their products and hammering the difficulty.
So whoever is crying about this now is a fool, you should do your homework properly!
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
June 22, 2013, 07:51:28 AM
Bitcoinplay attempted to blackmail TAT into buying back his shares at IPO price or he would slander TAT on the forums. TAT didnt give in to the demands so bitcoinplay is carrying out his threat and badmouthing him all around the place. TAT rightly left that feedback so others know he will try to blackmail people if he doesnt get what he wants.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
June 22, 2013, 07:50:52 AM
can anyone give me a summary on this? what happened? why is thickasthieves leaving negative feedback for people?

1. People (or singular person with multiple accounts, the jury is still out on that one) don't read or understand the details of this asset.
2. People lose BTC because of point 1.
3. People go on to slander TAT in an attempt to get him to repay their losses. Including leaving negative feedback for TAT.
4. TAT responds to the negative feedback by giving his own negative feedback.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 22, 2013, 07:50:43 AM
How is it that someone bought 700 shares at 0.004560 and mu order not got filled??  Huh
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 22, 2013, 07:49:20 AM
share prices are dropping like stone.. he doesnt bother replien back.. people lose money.. TAT accuses a guy of bein a sock.. Guy starts bitchin.. TAT leaves negative feedback..
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 22, 2013, 07:47:09 AM
Well what do you expect if you go on bitchin around at every forum..  Undecided
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Bitcoin Play!
June 22, 2013, 07:39:06 AM
I just noticed that thief has left me negative feedback.

This is an abuse of the feedback system, he is trying to get me to remove my feedback.

I made a thread about this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/thickasthieves-abusing-feedback-system-to-silence-critics-please-remove-240552
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
June 22, 2013, 07:37:57 AM
I'm beginning to think there should be some kind of IQ test before anyone is allowed to do investments.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 22, 2013, 07:37:19 AM

[/quote]

If someone does not trust TAT to continue his/her business the maximum price is 0.0052 BTC at current difficulty. Other people may value it higher.


[/quote]

Would love to sell off at that rate.. but its approaching 0.0045 at the moment.. and its losing out fast.. and TAT is doing nothing.. and that has hurt me the most.. maybe i was naive in thinking someone would help out others at the cost of some profit..
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 22, 2013, 07:35:16 AM
no need to act like idiots.. i am sure we can all work things out in a civilised manner without the trolling..
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
June 22, 2013, 07:32:56 AM
Now theres no smear from my side.. i trusted you TAT thats why i bought into this .. i am not calling you a cheat or scammer.. no..i am not a troll.. i just want to say we have already had our loss.. it wouldnt be too hard on you to atleast help us recover some of our loses from your profits..
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
June 22, 2013, 07:32:02 AM
The only thing that determines the market price of the asset is the market, supply and demand. And with an increasing difficulty, the dividends go down and therefore people are willing to pay less for the asset.

It's all very transparent.

There are two other values that can be found in the contract under buyback rights.
Buyback rights are rights that TAT has. If he decides, for whatever reason, that he doesn't want to operate the fund anymore, he can buy shares back at 110% of the most highest trade price in the last week or at 200 times the most recent dividend (his choice, so that means whichever is lower).

There is no guarantee that a buyback will occur, nor is there an option for an asset holder to enforce such a buyback. The right lies solely with the issuer.


If someone does not trust TAT to continue his/her business the maximum price is 0.0052 BTC at current difficulty. Other people may value it higher.

full member
Activity: 230
Merit: 100
June 22, 2013, 07:31:45 AM
But at what rate?? since yesterday they have dropped down from 0.0057 to 0.0045.. thats huge.. the only thing is that TAT doesnt seem to care about saving this asset at all.. any kid of positive reinforcement would surely help stabilise the situation
In the same way you could complain about Asicminer selling their USB sticks for 2 BTC.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
June 22, 2013, 07:29:21 AM
Since this person (and I believe at least one other sock of his) seems to be starting a smear campaign, I'm going to try and comment on this once only.

Every asset I offer is as transparent as I can make it, more so than most issuers. I make good on every promise I make. My reputation is important to me, but I will not play games with trolls.

This holder is upset that a mining bond is no longer worth what it was during IPO. Plain and simple. It appears he sold out and moved on to the next cheapest one anyway, so it's likely he'll be yelling at Deprived in a couple weeks too. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2548895

Carry on, and apologies for this distraction.
hero member
Activity: 487
Merit: 500
Are You Shpongled?
June 22, 2013, 07:29:00 AM
When the price of this drops, this thief can buy back for cheaper. So it is in his interest to drop the price.

Please leave negative feedback for thickasthieves! I just did. Make him regret profiting from his investors. This is wrong.

Did you really put 225 BTC (per your feedback for TAT) into Virtualmine? It certainly is unfortunate you lost money, but if you invested that amount then you really ought to learn to diversify better.
Pages:
Jump to: