I can confirm that Lauda and other trusted members did an investigation regarding Zeroxal.
Zeroxal was not able or willing to explain double evasion of forum ban, advertising of counterfeit goods, selling botnet/cloud mining packages.
I can also confirm, that Lauda told me about the extortion and that it was only in purpose of gaining furthor evidence.
Zeroxal was not able or willing to explain double evasion of forum ban, advertising of counterfeit goods, selling botnet/cloud mining packages.
I can also confirm, that Lauda told me about the extortion and that it was only in purpose of gaining furthor evidence.
I hereby state as well, the above is all true, as I have seen both the pgp and the evidence. Thank you.
I hereby confirm the same.
Thanks
Just because you are doing an investigation does not allow you to extort a suspected criminal. Telling others about an extortion attempt in advance doesn't remove criminal liability, it only potentially adds a potential conspiracy charge.
Only if they gained the evidence through the extortion attempt (if it's not sanctioned). Evidence gained through 'regular' investigation wouldn't be voided. In the case of Zeroxal it's safe to say that there is plenty of evidence......
Doesn't change the fact that there are people on here with positive trust doing worse than "renting a botnet".
As for Lauda, if she had no problem taking 1 btc from a well known scammer then why does she have a problem with getting funds from Zeroxal that aren't "clean"? Pretty retarded opinion if you ask me.
