Author

Topic: [TEK] TEKcoin Hi-PoS hybrid pos/pow no premine/ipo/ico - page 231. (Read 446060 times)

legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
I am still getting the following message from the new code.

Unable to sign block, wallet locked?

This is a daemon running on linux that is freshly built and synced, and no it is not encrypted.  Can anyone shed light on this?

Honestly not a clue. I've run the daemon and two separate compiles (one static, one not) of the QT on linux without issue. Only thing I can think of is permissions. Try starting the daemon with sudo?

Any more experienced linux guys wanna chime in? It's what I run now, but that's pretty recent. I think at this point I've enough experience to call myself a novice rather than a complete noob Tongue
full member
Activity: 274
Merit: 122
I am still getting the following message from the new code.

Unable to sign block, wallet locked?

This is a daemon running on linux that is freshly built and synced, and no it is not encrypted.  Can anyone shed light on this?
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
Since TEK has no max_subsidy unlike CAP or HYP, there is no economical reason to have a particular stack size. I suggest you to keep them al together, you'll stake faster.
But it does have to do with the health of the coin, and the market.
That's why I said economical reasons Smiley as in "will the selfish and short-minded guy get more TEK out of it?". The fact that getting more coins but with less value makes no sense is out of scope for the selfish-short-minded. Your post is still right. Making the market more liquid is of great importance. Lack of block halving is great for initial distribution and I still like it, even though it comes at the cost of important illiquidity at first (this and high reward, of course).
Yeah, I see your point. But this community does seem to have above average players. We'll see. To me, my method makes sense personally as well as to the community, because I always will have a small amount of coins that I can spend if need be, and always have more coming at a regular interval. But I tend to try to plan farther than tomorrow, and I guess that's not common Cheesy
Code:
mkdir -p ~/cryptos && cd ~/cryptos && rm -rf TEK && git clone git://github.com/maxxine/TEK && cd TEK && qmake-qt5 tekcoin-qt.pro && make && ln -s ~/cryptos/TEK/tekcoin-qt ~/Desktop/TEK
&& ln -s ~/cryptos/TEK/tekcoin-qt ~/Desktop/TEK is only if you want to create a shortcut on your Desktop

Still for Linux, updating should be just one line of code too:
Code:
cd ~/cryptos/TEK && git pull && qmake-qt5 tekcoin-qt.pro && make
It's not a bad idea to add STATIC=1, as that makes it so you can move the client to another computer without recompiling.  so you're last line would be make STATIC=1 -f Makefile. I build all my wallets this way, and it makes for better control, especially since I'm constantly experimenting. It DOES make the final executable program a bit bigger, as it compiles the necessary libraries into the program. Depending on your circumstances and ability to resist playing with your installation. (my ability in that arena is nonexistant Cheesy ) An option to think about.
Can you paste my code with you STATIC=1 value? I fail to see where to place it on the two lines of code.
sure. I usually do it as several lines of code (I always screw up combining code Tongue ) but here you go.

Code:
cd ~/cryptos/TEK && git pull && qmake-qt5 tekcoin-qt.pro && make STATIC=1 -f Makefile 
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Monero Core Team
Since TEK has no max_subsidy unlike CAP or HYP, there is no economical reason to have a particular stack size. I suggest you to keep them al together, you'll stake faster.
But it does have to do with the health of the coin, and the market.
That's why I said economical reasons Smiley as in "will the selfish and short-minded guy get more TEK out of it?". The fact that getting more coins but with less value makes no sense is out of scope for the selfish-short-minded. Your post is still right. Making the market more liquid is of great importance. Lack of block halving is great for initial distribution and I still like it, even though it comes at the cost of important illiquidity at first (this and high reward, of course).

Code:
mkdir -p ~/cryptos && cd ~/cryptos && rm -rf TEK && git clone git://github.com/maxxine/TEK && cd TEK && qmake-qt5 tekcoin-qt.pro && make && ln -s ~/cryptos/TEK/tekcoin-qt ~/Desktop/TEK
&& ln -s ~/cryptos/TEK/tekcoin-qt ~/Desktop/TEK is only if you want to create a shortcut on your Desktop

Still for Linux, updating should be just one line of code too:
Code:
cd ~/cryptos/TEK && git pull && qmake-qt5 tekcoin-qt.pro && make
It's not a bad idea to add STATIC=1, as that makes it so you can move the client to another computer without recompiling.  so you're last line would be make STATIC=1 -f Makefile. I build all my wallets this way, and it makes for better control, especially since I'm constantly experimenting. It DOES make the final executable program a bit bigger, as it compiles the necessary libraries into the program. Depending on your circumstances and ability to resist playing with your installation. (my ability in that arena is nonexistant Cheesy ) An option to think about.
Can you paste my code with you STATIC=1 value? I fail to see where to place it on the two lines of code.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
this was just posted by user MystPhysX Thank you i am sure users will be happy.

mac wallet compile

TEKCoin: https://www.dropbox.com/s/4hvzl47knv2a0lf/Tekcoin-Qt.zip?dl=0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216672.480
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
Xguild

oh Biomech by the way Tompool.org is a tek mining pool. Don't forget them? I will send them a message as well.

ispace.co.uk - TEK pool



i send mesage them

cool. I've contacted miner's point, dsync, and tompool. Central Cavern is down, and Raskul is out of the country for a bit, but I'll let him know in case he's bringing it back.

Any others?


Don't know that one. Can you contact them or post a link?


Also, on buying my stake, I'm not sure I'm selling, but PM me. I'd rather do it off exchange myself.
legendary
Activity: 1033
Merit: 1005
Xguild

oh Biomech by the way Tompool.org is a tek mining pool. Don't forget them? I will send them a message as well.

ispace.co.uk - TEK pool



i send mesage them

cool. I've contacted miner's point, dsync, and tompool. Central Cavern is down, and Raskul is out of the country for a bit, but I'll let him know in case he's bringing it back.

Any others?

legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
oh Biomech by the way Tompool.org is a tek mining pool. Don't forget them? I will send them a message as well.

ispace.co.uk - TEK pool



i send mesage them

cool. I've contacted miner's point, dsync, and tompool. Central Cavern is down, and Raskul is out of the country for a bit, but I'll let him know in case he's bringing it back.

Any others?
sr. member
Activity: 480
Merit: 250
oh Biomech by the way Tompool.org is a tek mining pool. Don't forget them? I will send them a message as well.

ispace.co.uk - TEK pool



i send mesage them
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
Yes just for sanity sake please verify for everyone what is the version number of the latest wallet with the staking fix. What should we all be at come Monday?
v1.1.0.0-gf96a5a-TEK

Unfortunately, it's also what it shows in the older version Tongue It got by us in code review, but it won't affect anything. Just make sure you either compiled from the master github page, or one of the two windows versions that were posted. Presstab's is probably the best, as it has statically linked libraries and don't need .dll files.

@ Johan11, yes, it should start staking at or near that block. In testing it worked within minutes. Given the time frame, however, I would expect a lot of orphans as damn near every holder of TEK is gonna be competing for stake at that point. That didn't happen in testing, but we only had two or three wallets linked at a time.

@mmfiore again. Damn, you guys are quick! Yes, I'll contact them.
I had forgotten them.
hero member
Activity: 808
Merit: 502
oh Biomech by the way Tompool.org is a tek mining pool. Don't forget them? I will send them a message as well.
sr. member
Activity: 480
Merit: 250
Fork in block 506000 - in Monday? on this time is stake on? If I two monts no stake, now is POS on the way?
p.s look - 290 000 transfer http://tek.blockx.info/get/block/0000000000003bc89cf3e0dff2160a4b5da239836cea738030c91460b08784b9
hero member
Activity: 808
Merit: 502
Yes just for sanity sake please verify for everyone what is the version number of the latest wallet with the staking fix. What should we all be at come Monday?
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
How to tell I'm running the correct Wallet

I downloaded the windows wallet from the dropbox link, backup'd my wallet.dat, unzipped it, ran the QT - sync'd, all looks fine.

Is there a way I can tell if I'm on the correct wallet for the fork coming up?




Well, if you have the github link, you can look at a line in main.cpp. But if you are certain you're running the one from the dropbox link, it is correct. The version number wasn't incremented in the source. Thundertoe is aware of it and it'll be fixed at some point, but I noticed it after things were already pushed. The collective decision was to just go ahead anyway. Just be sure you ran the new QT and you're fine.

That is the one presstab linked too, correct?
yes. And also the current master link in github. This update is not much changed. No new features or anything like that, it's just a fix to the staking problem. It looks identical to the previous version, it just has a few lines of code changed to make sure that it starts staking again and that the particular circumstance that caused it to hang in the first place can't happen again.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
How to tell I'm running the correct Wallet

I downloaded the windows wallet from the dropbox link, backup'd my wallet.dat, unzipped it, ran the QT - sync'd, all looks fine.

Is there a way I can tell if I'm on the correct wallet for the fork coming up?




Well, if you have the github link, you can look at a line in main.cpp. But if you are certain you're running the one from the dropbox link, it is correct. The version number wasn't incremented in the source. Thundertoe is aware of it and it'll be fixed at some point, but I noticed it after things were already pushed. The collective decision was to just go ahead anyway. Just be sure you ran the new QT and you're fine.

That is the one presstab linked too, correct?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
How to tell I'm running the correct Wallet

I downloaded the windows wallet from the dropbox link, backup'd my wallet.dat, unzipped it, ran the QT - sync'd, all looks fine.

Is there a way I can tell if I'm on the correct wallet for the fork coming up?




Yes, I was going to ask same question. Thanks.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1022
Anarchy is not chaos.
How to tell I'm running the correct Wallet

I downloaded the windows wallet from the dropbox link, backup'd my wallet.dat, unzipped it, ran the QT - sync'd, all looks fine.

Is there a way I can tell if I'm on the correct wallet for the fork coming up?




Well, if you have the github link, you can look at a line in main.cpp. But if you are certain you're running the one from the dropbox link, it is correct. The version number wasn't incremented in the source. Thundertoe is aware of it and it'll be fixed at some point, but I noticed it after things were already pushed. The collective decision was to just go ahead anyway. Just be sure you ran the new QT and you're fine.
member
Activity: 159
Merit: 11
How to tell I'm running the correct Wallet

I downloaded the windows wallet from the dropbox link, backup'd my wallet.dat, unzipped it, ran the QT - sync'd, all looks fine.

Is there a way I can tell if I'm on the correct wallet for the fork coming up?


member
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
I just got my coins from Cryptsy yayyyyyyyyyyy
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
Still     929 TEK status pending.  845TEK  Processed.
929 TEK   Processed  2014-08-23 13:04:06
Jump to: