[TESTNET]Bismuth - New Language, Interpretation Engines, DAPPs - page 21.

HCLivess

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1090

=== NODE IS OK! ==

Quote from: raetsch on August 10, 2016, 12:51:01 AM

Quote from: alexcrownjr on August 09, 2016, 08:28:12 PM

ubuntu 16.04 x64

when press Generate QR

Code:

python gui.py                                                                                                                                                                                       ⏎ master ✱ ◼
Exception in Tkinter callback
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/lib-tk/Tkinter.py", line 1540, in __call__
    return self.func(*args)
  File "gui.py", line 121, in qr
    top.wm_iconbitmap(tempFile)
NameError: global name 'tempFile' is not defined

kill node.py and trying restart

Code:

2016-08-10 04:39:30,413 (1452) Node already running?
2016-08-10 04:39:30,414 (1453) [Errno 98] Address already in use
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "node.py", line 1427, in 
    server = ThreadedTCPServer((HOST, PORT), ThreadedTCPRequestHandler)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 417, in __init__
    self.server_bind()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 431, in server_bind
    self.socket.bind(self.server_address)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 228, in meth
    return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args)
socket.error: [Errno 98] Address already in use

And add me to test please. my address 5ae46ae9398df525026467afa5820d98d453c4ee1c7b695c6bd0738d

search for the python processes with ps aux and kill them (well, on my testsystem the only python-thingie is bismuth, so be careful)

Do you know anyone good at thread optimizing for Python?
I might want to add a launcher + pid dump, but that's not optimal... however, corporations do it like that Cheesy

raetsch

legendary

Activity: 957

Merit: 1006

Quote from: alexcrownjr on August 09, 2016, 08:28:12 PM

ubuntu 16.04 x64

when press Generate QR

Code:

python gui.py                                                                                                                                                                                       ⏎ master ✱ ◼
Exception in Tkinter callback
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/lib-tk/Tkinter.py", line 1540, in __call__
    return self.func(*args)
  File "gui.py", line 121, in qr
    top.wm_iconbitmap(tempFile)
NameError: global name 'tempFile' is not defined

kill node.py and trying restart

Code:

2016-08-10 04:39:30,413 (1452) Node already running?
2016-08-10 04:39:30,414 (1453) [Errno 98] Address already in use
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "node.py", line 1427, in 
    server = ThreadedTCPServer((HOST, PORT), ThreadedTCPRequestHandler)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 417, in __init__
    self.server_bind()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 431, in server_bind
    self.socket.bind(self.server_address)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 228, in meth
    return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args)
socket.error: [Errno 98] Address already in use

And add me to test please. my address 5ae46ae9398df525026467afa5820d98d453c4ee1c7b695c6bd0738d

search for the python processes with ps aux and kill them (well, on my testsystem the only python-thingie is bismuth, so be careful)

HCLivess

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1090

=== NODE IS OK! ==

Quote from: kahir on August 09, 2016, 11:37:11 PM

im new to this ... my wallet been moving around for 1 hour .. idk if it fully sync or what .. also i notice that the wallet don't use any bandwidth ... just like 1kb download / 1kb upload ... so i think its stuck for some reason this is what is there

2016-08-10 06:32:41,042 manager(351) Current connections: 3
2016-08-10 06:32:41,127 worker(1322) Announcing 0000000703 length of transaction
2016-08-10 06:32:42,565 worker(1115) Client: Received sync_______ from 62.210.161.232:2829
2016-08-10 06:32:42,766 worker(1230) Client: Sending block height to compare: 11788
2016-08-10 06:32:43,147 worker(1239) Client: Node is at block height: 00000010059
2016-08-10 06:32:43,147 consensus_add(281) Opinion of 62.210.161.232 hasn't changed
2016-08-10 06:32:43,147 consensus_add(290) Consensus IP list:['62.210.161.232', '94.113.207.67', '127.0.0.1']
2016-08-10 06:32:43,148 consensus_add(291) Consensus opinion list:[10059, 11788, 11788]
2016-08-10 06:32:43,150 consensus_add(296) Current active connections: 3
2016-08-10 06:32:43,150 consensus_add(297) Current block consensus: 11788 = 66.6666666667%
2016-08-10 06:32:43,150 worker(1251) Client: We have a higher, sending
2016-08-10 06:32:43,338 worker(1282) Client: Will seek the following block: 54b11ff0a15db83c1d57807b28eb521b3265492b9246d5f016108b59
2016-08-10 06:32:43,563 update_confirmations(75) Updated number of confirmations for 54b11ff0a15db83c1d57807b28eb521b3265492b9246d5f016108b59
2016-08-10 06:32:43,657 worker(1299) Client: Node is at block 10059
2016-08-10 06:32:43,790 worker(1313) Node: Selected (10060, u'1469997395.77', u'9f5c5f8e1b1c017b8e450223ac06cdf4f2242ef6f9a1a804c29c431d', u'9f5c5f8e1b1c017b8e450223ac06cdf4f2242ef6f9a1a804c29c431d', u'0.0', u'Hxk6LF7noMUxRc/LWA1CYr94XRG7vUR9d1J5Eg5ytRuUiNbIEDbzIucm+3qj3N/2yE/vKE7xmz1WeLBWVSQ6OFSzXvpeaOatbIpRCGfnpDrFpKek56qj/f8hglhkm3y875L9N8QuPVEWWIf8abDlWpWcsby6Bwea1uCOnDpH/zg=', u'-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\nMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDDpmIPlaooWu71CoicRzAyFJHN\nrFXUa8jWNWo0VkbE3+H8tI2OIHvDySkFQrG/mglfYtXmKuXVMODiLihjmSM8mztg\nrD5ZfIrKUM5YcR1lprp6oHNCPVDPEuOxYxHED29gXDvZnCrNPgPrtAWISyBFedUM\nv65AWd5R/j2m6tKgTQIDAQAB\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----', u'9f513f0cb2f6e3e6723198771432938d28fc63d8386a9077d46e7b69', u'0.0561162189338', u'0', 1) to send
2016-08-10 06:32:43,892 worker(1322) Announcing 0000000703 length of transaction
2016-08-10 06:32:44,234 worker(1115) Client: Received sync_______ from 62.210.161.232:2829
2016-08-10 06:32:44,463 worker(1230) Client: Sending block height to compare: 11788
2016-08-10 06:32:44,770 worker(1239) Client: Node is at block height: 00000010059
2016-08-10 06:32:44,770 consensus_add(281) Opinion of 62.210.161.232 hasn't changed
2016-08-10 06:32:44,773 consensus_add(290) Consensus IP list:['62.210.161.232', '94.113.207.67', '127.0.0.1']
2016-08-10 06:32:44,773 consensus_add(291) Consensus opinion list:[10059, 11788, 11788]
2016-08-10 06:32:44,773 consensus_add(296) Current active connections: 3
2016-08-10 06:32:44,775 consensus_add(297) Current block consensus: 11788 = 66.6666666667%
2016-08-10 06:32:44,776 worker(1251) Client: We have a higher, sending
2016-08-10 06:32:45,104 worker(1282) Client: Will seek the following block: 54b11ff0a15db83c1d57807b28eb521b3265492b9246d5f016108b59
2016-08-10 06:32:45,305 update_confirmations(75) Updated number of confirmations for 54b11ff0a15db83c1d57807b28eb521b3265492b9246d5f016108b59
2016-08-10 06:32:45,398 worker(1299) Client: Node is at block 10059

I think you're ok, 1kb upload/download is completely fine with 3 connected nodes

we dont have the bitcoin/peercoin/nxt/ethereum basecode
we are the revolution

HCLivess

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1090

=== NODE IS OK! ==

Quote from: alexcrownjr on August 09, 2016, 08:28:12 PM

ubuntu 16.04 x64

when press Generate QR

Code:

python gui.py                                                                                                                                                                                       ⏎ master ✱ ◼
Exception in Tkinter callback
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/lib-tk/Tkinter.py", line 1540, in __call__
    return self.func(*args)
  File "gui.py", line 121, in qr
    top.wm_iconbitmap(tempFile)
NameError: global name 'tempFile' is not defined

kill node.py and trying restart

Code:

2016-08-10 04:39:30,413 (1452) Node already running?
2016-08-10 04:39:30,414 (1453) [Errno 98] Address already in use
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "node.py", line 1427, in 
    server = ThreadedTCPServer((HOST, PORT), ThreadedTCPRequestHandler)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 417, in __init__
    self.server_bind()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 431, in server_bind
    self.socket.bind(self.server_address)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 228, in meth
    return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args)
socket.error: [Errno 98] Address already in use

And add me to test please. my address 5ae46ae9398df525026467afa5820d98d453c4ee1c7b695c6bd0738d

thanks, ill need to get myself one of those ubuntus
anyway, all graphics file handling will need to be reworked for non-win oss
for now I commited a disabled button for non-win oss

kahir

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

im new to this ... my wallet been moving around for 1 hour .. idk if it fully sync or what .. also i notice that the wallet don't use any bandwidth ... just like 1kb download / 1kb upload ... so i think its stuck for some reason this is what is there

2016-08-10 06:32:41,042 manager(351) Current connections: 3
2016-08-10 06:32:41,127 worker(1322) Announcing 0000000703 length of transaction
2016-08-10 06:32:42,565 worker(1115) Client: Received sync_______ from 62.210.161.232:2829
2016-08-10 06:32:42,766 worker(1230) Client: Sending block height to compare: 11788
2016-08-10 06:32:43,147 worker(1239) Client: Node is at block height: 00000010059
2016-08-10 06:32:43,147 consensus_add(281) Opinion of 62.210.161.232 hasn't changed
2016-08-10 06:32:43,147 consensus_add(290) Consensus IP list:['62.210.161.232', '94.113.207.67', '127.0.0.1']
2016-08-10 06:32:43,148 consensus_add(291) Consensus opinion list:[10059, 11788, 11788]
2016-08-10 06:32:43,150 consensus_add(296) Current active connections: 3
2016-08-10 06:32:43,150 consensus_add(297) Current block consensus: 11788 = 66.6666666667%
2016-08-10 06:32:43,150 worker(1251) Client: We have a higher, sending
2016-08-10 06:32:43,338 worker(1282) Client: Will seek the following block: 54b11ff0a15db83c1d57807b28eb521b3265492b9246d5f016108b59
2016-08-10 06:32:43,563 update_confirmations(75) Updated number of confirmations for 54b11ff0a15db83c1d57807b28eb521b3265492b9246d5f016108b59
2016-08-10 06:32:43,657 worker(1299) Client: Node is at block 10059
2016-08-10 06:32:43,790 worker(1313) Node: Selected (10060, u'1469997395.77', u'9f5c5f8e1b1c017b8e450223ac06cdf4f2242ef6f9a1a804c29c431d', u'9f5c5f8e1b1c017b8e450223ac06cdf4f2242ef6f9a1a804c29c431d', u'0.0', u'Hxk6LF7noMUxRc/LWA1CYr94XRG7vUR9d1J5Eg5ytRuUiNbIEDbzIucm+3qj3N/2yE/vKE7xmz1WeLBWVSQ6OFSzXvpeaOatbIpRCGfnpDrFpKek56qj/f8hglhkm3y875L9N8QuPVEWWIf8abDlWpWcsby6Bwea1uCOnDpH/zg=', u'-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----\nMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDDpmIPlaooWu71CoicRzAyFJHN\nrFXUa8jWNWo0VkbE3+H8tI2OIHvDySkFQrG/mglfYtXmKuXVMODiLihjmSM8mztg\nrD5ZfIrKUM5YcR1lprp6oHNCPVDPEuOxYxHED29gXDvZnCrNPgPrtAWISyBFedUM\nv65AWd5R/j2m6tKgTQIDAQAB\n-----END PUBLIC KEY-----', u'9f513f0cb2f6e3e6723198771432938d28fc63d8386a9077d46e7b69', u'0.0561162189338', u'0', 1) to send
2016-08-10 06:32:43,892 worker(1322) Announcing 0000000703 length of transaction
2016-08-10 06:32:44,234 worker(1115) Client: Received sync_______ from 62.210.161.232:2829
2016-08-10 06:32:44,463 worker(1230) Client: Sending block height to compare: 11788
2016-08-10 06:32:44,770 worker(1239) Client: Node is at block height: 00000010059
2016-08-10 06:32:44,770 consensus_add(281) Opinion of 62.210.161.232 hasn't changed
2016-08-10 06:32:44,773 consensus_add(290) Consensus IP list:['62.210.161.232', '94.113.207.67', '127.0.0.1']
2016-08-10 06:32:44,773 consensus_add(291) Consensus opinion list:[10059, 11788, 11788]
2016-08-10 06:32:44,773 consensus_add(296) Current active connections: 3
2016-08-10 06:32:44,775 consensus_add(297) Current block consensus: 11788 = 66.6666666667%
2016-08-10 06:32:44,776 worker(1251) Client: We have a higher, sending
2016-08-10 06:32:45,104 worker(1282) Client: Will seek the following block: 54b11ff0a15db83c1d57807b28eb521b3265492b9246d5f016108b59
2016-08-10 06:32:45,305 update_confirmations(75) Updated number of confirmations for 54b11ff0a15db83c1d57807b28eb521b3265492b9246d5f016108b59
2016-08-10 06:32:45,398 worker(1299) Client: Node is at block 10059

alexcrownjr

member

Activity: 63

Merit: 10

ubuntu 16.04 x64

when press Generate QR

Code:

python gui.py                                                                                                                                                                                       ⏎ master ✱ ◼
Exception in Tkinter callback
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/lib-tk/Tkinter.py", line 1540, in __call__
    return self.func(*args)
  File "gui.py", line 121, in qr
    top.wm_iconbitmap(tempFile)
NameError: global name 'tempFile' is not defined

kill node.py and trying restart

Code:

2016-08-10 04:39:30,413 (1452) Node already running?
2016-08-10 04:39:30,414 (1453) [Errno 98] Address already in use
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "node.py", line 1427, in 
    server = ThreadedTCPServer((HOST, PORT), ThreadedTCPRequestHandler)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 417, in __init__
    self.server_bind()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/SocketServer.py", line 431, in server_bind
    self.socket.bind(self.server_address)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/socket.py", line 228, in meth
    return getattr(self._sock,name)(*args)
socket.error: [Errno 98] Address already in use

And add me to test please. my address 5ae46ae9398df525026467afa5820d98d453c4ee1c7b695c6bd0738d

HCLivess

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1090

=== NODE IS OK! ==

This version finally fixes the bouncing block height bug which only came to clearer light with the higer usage of the network. Thank you all for participating and please do upgrade, this can be considered a critical bugfix.

https://github.com/hclivess/Bismuth/releases/tag/0.91

Updated bio:

Quote

I work for one of the largest banking corporations in the world. I belong among the top 30% upwork.com Python programmers, have been actively coding since 2012.

HCLivess

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1090

=== NODE IS OK! ==

Let's try the new version (patch)

https://github.com/hclivess/Bismuth/releases/tag/0.901

Quote

communication between nodes improved for a more reliable sync
this release does not include the blockchain (consider patch)
mildly experimental

HCLivess

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1090

=== NODE IS OK! ==

Hello, a little technical update: the blockchain is currently very unstable, I am working on improvements. This is a residue from skipping from the old sync mechanism to the new one, and some bugs were to be expected. I will release the fix as soon as I verify it.

Thank you for your support

I will send coins once this is resolved to all registered testnet addresses so we can wreak some more chaos

Thank you for your patience

Also, I would like to thank the guys who are doing the stress test

Quote

d8720affcab5a2784f2ca8ca328519737a606de9f8de1548103eecc1
bfc5215560c3ee4614e3b5ab3e85f4ad76aeaf2b3f6bea5e0081e9b1

and all others

HCLivess

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1090

=== NODE IS OK! ==

Quote from: hankrules on August 08, 2016, 03:24:47 PM

Quote from: HCLivess on August 08, 2016, 01:28:31 PM

I am an anarchist. My age is 32. I want a new society. I cannot be stopped. I will not be stopped. I won't stop until I destroy all corporations and set everyone free

You've been watching too much Mr. Robot Tongue

You don't understand. I am Mr. Robot

hankrules

hero member

Activity: 673

Merit: 500

Quote from: HCLivess on August 08, 2016, 01:28:31 PM

I am an anarchist. My age is 32. I want a new society. I cannot be stopped. I will not be stopped. I won't stop until I destroy all corporations and set everyone free

You've been watching too much Mr. Robot Tongue

ALATAY2K16

full member

Activity: 188

Merit: 105

Quote from: frobley on August 08, 2016, 02:56:25 PM

Quote from: ALATAY2K16 on August 08, 2016, 02:40:53 PM

is anyone else jumping between block 11503 - 11505 then back to 11503 Huh

?

mine was going from 11506-11508 just now
and then resolved to 11507

yeah mines just done the same, at least I know its not just me then :-)

frobley

hero member

Activity: 708

Merit: 500

Quote from: ALATAY2K16 on August 08, 2016, 02:40:53 PM

is anyone else jumping between block 11503 - 11505 then back to 11503 Huh

?

mine was going from 11506-11508 just now
and then resolved to 11507

ALATAY2K16

full member

Activity: 188

Merit: 105

is anyone else jumping between block 11503 - 11505 then back to 11503 Huh

?

HCLivess

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1090

=== NODE IS OK! ==

I am an anarchist. My age is 32. I want a new society. I cannot be stopped. I will not be stopped. I won't stop until I destroy all corporations and set everyone free

casper77

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1035

Quote from: HCLivess on August 08, 2016, 06:00:24 AM

Hello guys, if you want to join, just download the latest client from https://github.com/hclivess/Bismuth/releases
And try mining some. I can also send you some test coins.

send me too please
i registered in googleform under casper77 but still not received testcoins

ALATAY2K16

full member

Activity: 188

Merit: 105

Quote from: HCLivess on August 08, 2016, 06:00:24 AM

Hello guys, if you want to join, just download the latest client from https://github.com/hclivess/Bismuth/releases
And try mining some. I can also send you some test coins.
Make sure to "Run as administrator" in case you run into any problems
Also download framework from page 1 of this thread (red fat letters)

I see someone else is also running the spammer now, so we have a little variation in timestamp progression, which is interesting

hello :-) I've downloaded the client and its syncing the blockchain just now :-) so just waiting to see if it mines ok after that :-) but so far been straight forward to do and no problems. my address for some test coins is 451acb4e88e515c407cb8c3bcea9b95a746389ef64cfacea2b083403 :-)

HCLivess

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1090

=== NODE IS OK! ==

Quote from: kahir on August 08, 2016, 03:51:40 AM

Quote from: HCLivess on August 05, 2016, 08:03:16 AM

Quote from: kahir on August 04, 2016, 09:45:01 PM

HCLivess can the algorithm be more memory hungry to get rid of botnets .... like it uses at least 4 GB or more

Hi, I haven't thought about that yet. How much does the mining algorithm take for you?
It seems to take 1 core of my laptop, once a GPU miner is developed (I have no idea how to do that), GPU should be just as demanding as CPU currently (limited by the actual hashrate).

i did not mange to try the testnet ... what would be the distribution model for first phase i wish it could be the 1 core cpu and limited mining per IP like early day on vanilla coin aka Vcash now the distribution was really fair at first and everyone hold their vanilla really dear .. would we see something similiar on bismuth at first ?

Wow, I had no clue vanillacoin had something like this, thanks. In fact, mining is now single core CPU (unless you run it multiple times and re-assign affinity), although there are no limits on IPs. It would require an entirely new backend. So far, the mining is relatively fair on the testnet. 94.113.207.67:5492

HCLivess

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1090

=== NODE IS OK! ==

Hello guys, if you want to join, just download the latest client from https://github.com/hclivess/Bismuth/releases
And try mining some. I can also send you some test coins.
Make sure to "Run as administrator" in case you run into any problems
Also download framework from page 1 of this thread (red fat letters)

I see someone else is also running the spammer now, so we have a little variation in timestamp progression, which is interesting

rajeshgarnaik

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

how can i join

Topic: [TESTNET]Bismuth - New Language, Interpretation Engines, DAPPs - page 21. (Read 49748 times)