Pages:
Author

Topic: The ban was a mistake. I need admin’s attention (Read 3528 times)

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1655
To the Moon
I asked theymos for the reports against you and it seems like it was just that copy and paste that got you banned. I unbanned the account.

hilariousandco, Thank you for your decision.

Thank you for leaving your positive feedback. You have made your contribution into my unban.

It's time to close this thread.
sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 415
I asked theymos for the reports against you and it seems like it was just that copy and paste that got you banned. I unbanned the account.

Good to see mods acting in a positive and ethical ways. Keep it up!

And congratulations to Tvplus006 for the unban, stay safe here after. Wink
global moderator
Activity: 3850
Merit: 2643
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I asked theymos for the reports against you and it seems like it was just that copy and paste that got you banned. I unbanned the account.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1283
Looking at it from a mod's perspective, I don't actually see a reason to unban you.
Interesting.

Then how all other accounts are getting unbanned? Looking at it from my perspective I see: account is banned because they c/p post and that maybe wasn't malicious attempt to blatant copy/paste someone's hm..."work"? for post count, maybe user really wanted to be helpful but instead putting things under quotation marks they just c/p post.

Maybe it is just me and I am defending scam busters (60+ scams exposed), well, I'll be damned if that is not millions dollars saved in investards pocket.

That is net positive. It is damn time consuming, I can tell you that from first hand. It is much easier to go to gambling section and spam 20 messages to say how you agree that LUCK IS NEEDED for fucking win!

Banning users who are exposing scams while keeping users who are discussing "If I gamble and I pick nose at the same time, will I win?" is wrong!

It would be OK to say why this user does not deserve a second chance!

Let's just agree to disagree, sure I can understand that it's hard work to expose 60+ scams, but I agree with hilariousandco when he says that it's just a clear case of plagiarism.
Besides, I'm sure I'll get a lot of flak for saying this, I do not actually hold the opinion that most scam busting is all that useful.

Hear me out, it's basically trying to empty the ocean with a thimble.
I think it's much more valuable to educate people to not fall for these scams in the first place, than it is to try and "bust" every individual scam.
Sure, you might prevent some people from losing their money, but most of those people who were already thinking of spending money on a questionable service, would probably just do it again when there's no-one around to stop them.

Now I do concede that it's a very good thing to point out the more elaborate scam attempts, especially when a fair bit of research is involved.
Just not when it's all painfully obvious. So, is OP a net positive contributor on Bitcointalk? For me, the scam busting doesn't automatically mean he is, but that's just my opinion.

One last thing that really baffles me, it takes more time to copy paste that message than to just quote it and add a couple of words yourself.
I mean someone who's been on this forum for so long as OP should really know better. I don't believe in "forgetting" to quote, copy/pasting is such a deliberate action in most cases that it's not hard to avoid doing.

That's the last I'll say about this case.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
... I PMd theymos to see if he has an archive of the reports against you.

Thank! I hope that this story ends and i get unbanned.


[BAN] Hero Member tvplus006 - 501 merits [all earned]
#freetvplus006
global moderator
Activity: 3850
Merit: 2643
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
There's no evidence to suggest that. Sometimes you can tell when someone's just accidentally fucked up a quote. I PMd theymos to see if he has an archive of the reports against you.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Where exactly is the refutation of this post below because it's pretty cut and dry plagiarism to me:

I have not even considered the post as plagiarism.

Well it clearly is and you saying it cannot be considered plagiarism is just wrong. I don't even know if that was the post you were actually banned for but it's plagiarism regardless of what you and a couple of others may claim or think.

I believe that is the mistake theymos was talking about:

I know of one case where someone was banned for plagiarism in the recent massacre, but a very careful reading of the context showed that the person actually did just forget to quote, and by "quoting" the post they were expressing an actual point even if it constituted their entire post. This person was unbanned without any sigban, since this isn't plagiarism.
global moderator
Activity: 3850
Merit: 2643
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Where exactly is the refutation of this post below because it's pretty cut and dry plagiarism to me:

I have not even considered the post as plagiarism.

Well it clearly is and you saying it cannot be considered plagiarism is just wrong. I don't even know if that was the post you were actually banned for but it's plagiarism regardless of what you and a couple of others may claim or think.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Where exactly is the refutation of this post below because it's pretty cut and dry plagiarism to me:

I have not even considered the post as plagiarism. It may be seen that I have tried to help one of the participants by incorrectly quoting one of bounty manager’s post, which was very big. I was inexperienced, as up to that point I have only been on forum for 2 month, that is why I did not know, that you could simply delete unnecessary information from the quoted text. You can follow the link to see where the fragment came from and indeed it is placed in the same bounty  topic.
It is not about payment since signatures from bounty posts are not included in the campaigns. It is clearly seen, that my aim was to help one to find an answer to the question.

They also write about it here:

This has been discussed many times in this thread. And this can not be considered plagiarism.
I believe that is the mistake theymos was talking about:

I know of one case where someone was banned for plagiarism in the recent massacre, but a very careful reading of the context showed that the person actually did just forget to quote, and by "quoting" the post they were expressing an actual point even if it constituted their entire post. This person was unbanned without any sigban, since this isn't plagiarism.

Meh, tvplus just was answering a noob's question and parroted what the OP had answered to another user. I think the intent was to be helpful rather than upping their post count for financial gain.

It is very clear that OP was just tried to help someone else. That's the reason why I am much curious to know why OP got banned. If only reason that mentioned by suchmoon then OP likely deserve unban without conditions according to admin.


[BAN] Hero Member tvplus006 - 501 merits [all earned]
#freetvplus006
global moderator
Activity: 3850
Merit: 2643
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Where exactly is the refutation of this post below because it's pretty cut and dry plagiarism to me:



Spreadsheet is under updation and will be public once the stake calculation will be completed.
Signature stakes have already been updated so participants may remove their signature.
Please be patient and try not to ask for access in the meantime.

[...]
Spreadsheet is under updation and will be public once the stake calculation will be completed.
Signature stakes have already been updated so participants may remove their signature.
Please be patient and try not to ask for access in the meantime.


It looks like this site is applying a double standard. On the one hand, user was banned for several copied lines.
On the other hand, someone can be easily forgiven for a stolen article https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-stolen-article-5157468

I'm happy to not issue another sig ban at all and just leave accounts banned forever if you think that would be more fair. Several factors are involved with issuing them but there's no set criteria and every mod may have different reasoning.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
It looks like this site is applying a double standard. On the one hand, user was banned for several copied lines.
On the other hand, someone can be easily forgiven for a stolen article https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-stolen-article-5157468
sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 415
Just my 2 cents:

I don't think you're going to get unbanned, since you've been asking for so long and multiple mods would have seen your topic a bunch of times by now.
Looking at it from a mod's perspective, I don't actually see a reason to unban you.

You are totally wrong, there is actually a reason for Tvplus006 to deserve a second chance, as he is more net positive to the forum overall than other banned members.

You are just ignoring the good work old man! Angry

You've clearly just copy/pasted a reply. It probably wasn't done maliciously, but I reckon that if they made an exception for you, it would just give other plagiarists even more excuses

Let them complain and if they are surely net positive to the forum, one deserves a second chance. That's the exact reason theymos give temp ban powers recently to the mods here if you don't know.

legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1827
Yes, I wish a global moderator would comment on why tvplus006 has been overlooked for a temporary ban. I think he was definitely a net positive. Now I see many people that got the temp ban have had their temp ban expire and are posting now. tvplus006 have had several members requesting he get his ban removed. I hope a global moderator or administrator considers out pleas.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270
Looking at it from a mod's perspective, I don't actually see a reason to unban you.
Interesting.

Then how all other accounts are getting unbanned? Looking at it from my perspective I see: account is banned because they c/p post and that maybe wasn't malicious attempt to blatant copy/paste someone's hm..."work"? for post count, maybe user really wanted to be helpful but instead putting things under quotation marks they just c/p post.

Maybe it is just me and I am defending scam busters (60+ scams exposed), well, I'll be damned if that is not millions dollars saved in investards pocket.

That is net positive. It is damn time consuming, I can tell you that from first hand. It is much easier to go to gambling section and spam 20 messages to say how you agree that LUCK IS NEEDED for fucking win!

Banning users who are exposing scams while keeping users who are discussing "If I gamble and I pick nose at the same time, will I win?" is wrong!

It would be OK to say why this user does not deserve a second chance!
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Spam it`s not mistake  Grin

Bravo! Did you create an account to write this? https://i.ibb.co/F0PzGd2/3453234.png


[BAN] Hero Member tvplus006 - 501 merits [all earned]
#freetvplus006
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Spam it`s not mistake  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 3049
Just my 2 cents:

I don't think you're going to get unbanned, since you've been asking for so long and multiple mods would have seen your topic a bunch of times by now.
Looking at it from a mod's perspective, I don't actually see a reason to unban you.

You've clearly just copy/pasted a reply. It probably wasn't done maliciously, but I reckon that if they made an exception for you, it would just give other plagiarists even more excuses.

To punish good users for good behaviour to prevent bad users from saying that they do the same? Well, most times moderator can see, which case is it in exact situation. If it is not clear, I prefer to give another chance to several intruders till they make an obvious mistake than to ban permanently even one good guy. Noone said any bad word about OP in this topic, so #freetvplus006.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1283
Just my 2 cents:

I don't think you're going to get unbanned, since you've been asking for so long and multiple mods would have seen your topic a bunch of times by now.
Looking at it from a mod's perspective, I don't actually see a reason to unban you.

You've clearly just copy/pasted a reply. It probably wasn't done maliciously, but I reckon that if they made an exception for you, it would just give other plagiarists even more excuses.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
This has been discussed many times in this thread. And this can not be considered plagiarism.
Why do you think this can not be considered plagiarism ?
It was an exact copy/paste of the post of another user.
You didn't forget to quote it properly, you didn't express any opinion. You simply just copy/pasted it.
If you just wanted to help someone / answer questions, why not either just quote it or use your own words ?
I don't think this falls under the category of mistakes mentioned by theymos.
IMO this is very clearly plagiarism.. anyway.. i wish you good luck getting your account back.

I believe that is the mistake theymos was talking about:

I know of one case where someone was banned for plagiarism in the recent massacre, but a very careful reading of the context showed that the person actually did just forget to quote, and by "quoting" the post they were expressing an actual point even if it constituted their entire post. This person was unbanned without any sigban, since this isn't plagiarism.

Read more here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51844566

   
[BAN] Hero Member tvplus006 - 501 merits [all earned]
#freetvplus006
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2481
This has been discussed many times in this thread. And this can not be considered plagiarism.

Why do you think this can not be considered plagiarism ?

It was an exact copy/paste of the post of another user.
You didn't forget to quote it properly, you didn't express any opinion. You simply just copy/pasted it.

If you just wanted to help someone / answer questions, why not either just quote it or use your own words ?

I don't think this falls under the category of mistakes mentioned by theymos.


IMO this is very clearly plagiarism.. anyway.. i wish you good luck getting your account back.
Pages:
Jump to: